2: Glenoid Fracture

PROCEDURE 2 Glenoid Fracture







Indications












Examination/Imaging




PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY







image It is important to differentiate true fossa fractures from anterior and posterior rim fractures.
Anterior and posterior rim fractures (type I; see Surgical Anatomy) are larger than Bankart “bony avulsions,” which occur when the humeral head loses its congruity as it dislocates anterior to the glenoid. Rim fractures result from a relatively eccentric lateral force that drives the humeral head against the anterior or posterior portion of the glenoid fossa depending on arm position.
Figure 3A–C shows an anterior rim fracture with maintained concentric glenohumeral alignment in a 63-year-old female accountant who was treated nonoperatively (Case 1).

Figure 4A–C shows an anterior rim fracture with loss of glenohumeral alignment in a 36-year-old male who sustained this injury while skimboarding, when he noticed his shoulder dislocate and self-reduce (Case 2).

In contrast to type I, true glenoid fossa fractures (types II–VI; see Surgical Anatomy) follow a more centrally applied lateral force producing, in most cases, a transverse fracture of the glenoid, which then extends in one of several directions depending on the direction of the load.
Figure 5A–C shows a displaced extra-articular fracture of the scapula in a 31-year-old overhead worker (electrician) who sustained this injury while mountain biking (Case 3). He has a significant past history of an acromioclavicular joint injury treated with late distal clavicle resection.

Figure 6A–C shows a displaced comminuted, intra-articular fracture of the scapula (glenoid fossa type VI) in a 39-year-old male who sustained this injury catching his front wheel and falling from his bicycle (Case 4).

Figure 7 shows a displaced intra-articular transverse fracture of the glenoid fossa (type III) with associated clavicle and first rib fractures in a 36-year-old male triathlete who sustained this injury while road cycling (Case 5). He was neurovascularly intact with symmetric blood pressure in both upper extremities.








COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING



image Two-dimensional CT reconstruction may be useful in preoperative assessment if done in orthogonal planes to the glenoid to assess fragments and their relative displacement.
Figure 8A–C shows two-dimensional CT views of the large anterior rim injury sustained by the skimboarder in Case 2.

Figure 9A–D shows two-dimensional CT views of the type III injury sustained by the triathlete in Case 5.

image Axial CT slices with three-dimensional reconstruction are the most useful modality in fracture assessment and preoperative planning. Centers could decide to make these part of chest trauma CT studies (time, resource utilization, radiation minimization).
Figure 10A and 10B shows three-dimensional CT views of the small anterior rim injury sustained by the 63-year-old accountant in Case 1.

Figure 11A and 11B shows three-dimensional CT views of the large anterior rim injury sustained by the skimboarder in Case 2.


Figure 13A and 13B shows three-dimensional CT views of the type VI injury sustained by the bicyclist in Case 4.



Jun 7, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on 2: Glenoid Fracture

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access