2 Assessment of the Normal and Impaired Lower Extremity



Rachel M. Clancy and Ronald M. Zuker


Summary


Before embarking on any lower extremity treatment intervention, not only must an accurate hands-on physical examination be performed but an in-depth history should first be obtained, as often the patient may be the best source of factual information. A complete knowledge of the normal lower limb anatomy and physiology is imperative before attempting to evaluate the impaired lower extremity. Often bone and soft-tissue compromise occurs simultaneously, and thus an orthoplastic approach is preferable to solve not just limb but also life-threatening issues like crush or degloving injuries, as well as the risk of a compartment syndrome. The omnipresent risk of osteomyelitis and the high frequency of diabetic foot wounds today, as with all impaired lower extremities, require a multidisciplinary treatment plan.




2 Assessment of the Normal and Impaired Lower Extremity




2.1 Introduction


A comprehensive history as well as a hands-on physical examination is always necessary for the proper assessment of what may be the normal, and definitely for an impaired, lower extremity. Each unit needs to develop a systematic process to achieve this that is routinely followed to facilitate efficiency and completeness. The impaired lower extremity will, in addition, need to be observed for any acute and chronic complications that may have arisen, whatever the etiology. The complications may include lower extremity fractures, identification of surgical emergencies such as compartment syndromes, the possibility of a crush syndrome, and degloving injuries. A description of the pathology expected with chronic diseases, and in particular osteomyelitis and the diabetic foot, will complete this introduction.



2.2 Assessment of the Normal Lower Extremity


Physicians should have at the least a personal routine for the assessment of the lower extremity to ensure a thorough and focused examination is performed in a timely manner. This should be guided by the history, if available, and requires a complete understanding of lower extremity anatomy, biomechanics, and neurovascular supply as is apropos. In this context, the examination should include assessment of the skin; soft tissues; and the vascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. Selection of appropriate bedside tests as well as more involved investigations to aid with this assessment and an exact diagnosis will be important. An understanding of when and why different imaging modalities should be used such as plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, and the audible Doppler is imperative. The choices should be made efficiently and timely without redundancy, as extraneous studies in the presence of a critical or life- or limb-threatening injury may lead to a delay in transfer to the operating room which could compromise not only the immediate management of the patient but also ultimate outcome.



2.2.1 Lower Extremity Anatomy


Humans are bipedal; so in the erect position, full weight bearing will be on the lower extremity. 1 The fibula and tibia are the bony support of the leg with the latter sustaining 85% of the weight-bearing forces necessary to maintain ambulation. 1 This is an important consideration when examining the lower extremity and then selecting potential reconstructive options. The tibia articulates with the femur at the knee joint and joins with the fibula to articulate with the talus to form the ankle joint. The fibula, as does the tibia, serves as a bony surface for multiple muscle and fascial attachments important for integrated locomotion. 1


The leg itself is divided into four muscle compartments: anterior, lateral, and posterior—which is again subdivided into a superficial and deep compartment. Knowledge of the location of these compartments and anatomical markers to facilitate their decompression when indicated is essential (Fig. 2‑1). The anterior compartment contains the tibialis anterior, extensor hallucis longus, extensor digitorum longus, and peroneus tertius muscles. All four of these muscles are supplied by branches of the anterior tibial artery and innervated by the deep peroneal nerve. The peroneus longus and brevis are found in the lateral compartment of the leg. The peroneus longus receives blood supply from branches of the anterior tibial and peroneal arteries, whereas the peroneus brevis is supplied by only the peroneal artery. Both the peroneus longus and brevis are innervated by the superficial peroneal nerve. The posterior compartment is divided into superficial and deep compartments. The superficial compartment includes both heads of the gastrocnemius, soleus, plantaris, and popliteus muscles. Circulation to the gastrocnemius is supplied by the sural branches of the popliteal artery. The soleus is supplied by the posterior tibial, peroneal, and branches of the popliteal artery. The plantaris muscle is supplied by the sural branches of the popliteal artery. The popliteus is supplied by the genicular branches of the popliteal artery. All muscles of the superficial compartment of the leg are innervated by the tibial nerve. The flexor hallucis longus, flexor digitorum longus, and tibialis posterior muscles are found in the deep compartment. The flexor hallucis longus is supplied by the peroneal artery. The flexor digitorum longus and tibialis posterior are supplied by branches of the posterior tibial artery. All muscles of the deep posterior compartment are innervated by the tibial nerve.

Fig. 2.1 Left mid-leg cross-section showing the four muscle compartments of the leg and the relative location of their investing fascia. The arrows show the dotted lines following the direction of the anterolateral and posteromedial incisions needed for four-compartment decompression if a compartment syndrome is suspected.


The common vascular anatomy as stated earlier, however, has numerous anomalies thought to be the result of a generalized defect in the mesoderm. 2 The venous anatomy of the lower limb can be highly variable as a result of venous malformations occurring during embryonic development in the final phase of embryogenesis. 2 ,​ 3 Park et al 4 described four distinct anatomical variations of the femoral and popliteal veins: agenesis, multiplications, variation in anatomical course, and a high union of the tibial veins. Variations in arterial anatomy have also been reported, such as an anterior tibial artery with a high origin; a trifurcation of the anterior tibial artery, peroneal artery, or posterior tibial artery; and a hypoplastic or aplastic posterior tibial artery. 5


There are also unique factors of the lower limb that can lead to predictable compromise. For example, there is minimal soft tissue overlying the tibia anteriorly. Therefore, even the most minor trauma can lead to exposure of the tibia, and the lack of adjacent soft tissue limits the use of local flaps for its coverage. Adequacy of distal lower extremity blood supply can be complicated by the ubiquitous presence of atherosclerosis. Dependency of the leg and consequently enhanced hydrostatic pressures can contribute to an increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis and venous disease, making reconstruction with any form of soft-tissue flap more susceptible to venous congestion. In addition, following even the slightest insult, patients can be susceptible to venous stasis ulcers which are most difficult to treat. 1 ,​ 6 Finally, unlike other areas of the body, normal sensation to the foot best allows proper ambulation and rehabilitation.



2.3 Assessment of the Impaired Lower Extremity


Treatment of the impaired lower extremity must begin just as for the normal lower extremity with a comprehensive evaluation of not just the defect of the ipsilateral limb but the whole patient. The etiology of these defects may be multifactorial and secondary to trauma, neoplasia, infection, poorly controlled systemic disease, and/or arterial and venous compromise. Regardless of the origin of the defect, the patient should be treated by a multidisciplinary team, and always with a respect for the patient’s autonomy. The patient’s comorbidities, premorbid state, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, smoking status, rehabilitative potential, as well as expectations and motivation should always be taken into consideration before embarking on any treatment course. Following the preservation of life and then limb, the goal of reconstruction will be to restore function. In this context, an acceptable reconstruction will require a stable skeleton capable of supporting the patient’s weight, a robust tissue envelope with satisfactory proprioception and plantar sensibility, as well as having a reasonable appearance. 6



2.3.1 Lower Extremity Trauma


Lower extremity trauma should be considered as a potential life-threatening injury due to the risk of high-volume blood loss and the sequelae of inadequate resuscitation, such as hypothermia, hypovolemia or shock, coagulopathy, and adult respiratory distress syndrome. 6 Lower extremity injuries should also be considered potentially limb threatening: so obvious after a traumatic amputation, less obvious with a serious vascular injury causing ischemia or a compartment syndrome, but even possible with any open fracture or fracture dislocations resulting in nerve injury. 7 Universally, the most common mechanisms of lower extremity trauma still remain motor vehicle accidents, falls, and interpersonal violence. 8



2.3.2 History


Open lower extremity fractures are usually a result of high-energy trauma. Treatment can be difficult, as these injuries are usually not solitary but involve multiple-organ systems and each must be assessed and treated simultaneously. 9 As well as the mechanism of injury, a thorough history including any past medical or surgical history, allergies, known medications, social history, and premorbid condition must be known. A primary and secondary survey should be performed to look for specific signs indicative of high-energy trauma that would include the presence of other injuries, a large soft-tissue defect, a degloving injury, or a transverse or segmental fracture pattern with comminution. 9 Complex bony and soft-tissue injuries may be a clue also of the presence of associated neurovascular compromise.



2.3.3 Examination


Open tibial fracture is one of the most common lower extremity injuries that requires an orthoplastic approach. The Gustilo–Anderson classification schema (Table 2‑1) remains the most widely used system for the classification of open lower extremity fractures (Fig. 2‑2). 10 The classification is relatively straightforward and offers orthoplastic surgeons a prognostic framework that guides management.

Fig. 2.2 Typical high-energy trauma injury with open left tibia and fibula fracture, with extensive soft-tissue loss. This would be considered a Gustilo grade IIIB fracture and invariably will require a flap for reconstruction.




















Table 2.1 The Gustilo–Anderson classification of open fractures 10

Gustilo grade definition


I: Low-energy trauma wound <1 cm


II: Wound >1 cm without extensive soft-tissue damage or avulsions


III: Extensive soft-tissue damage/loss including any segmental comminuted fractures or fracture open more than 8 h before treatment




  • IIIA: Type III fracture with periosteal coverage of the fracture; extensive soft-tissue laceration or damage




  • IIIB: Type III fracture with periosteal stripping, extensive soft-tissue loss, and bone damage; usually associated with massive contamination




  • IIIC: Type III fracture associated with a vascular injury requiring repair



The BOA/BAPRAS guidelines are a robust set of evidenced-based principles also devised to aid in the assessment and management of open tibial fractures. 9 They have revolutionized the management of many aspects of lower limb trauma in the United Kingdom and are being increasingly implemented in other European countries. The relevant areas following these guidelines will be summarized as follows.


ATLS principles are employed with airway and spinal management as well as with breathing and circulation support even prior to the arrival of the patient in the emergency department. This should include intravenous access and analgesia. External hemorrhage is stopped via direct pressure or as a last resort by application of a tourniquet. The neurovascular status should be ascertained and documented. Neurovascular examination should include assessment of the capillary refill of the skin, palpation of pedal pulses, as well as the presence or absence of sensation of the medial plantar surface (tibial nerve) and first web space of the foot (deep peroneal nerve).


Repeated neurovascular examinations must be performed particularly for evolving injuries and following any intervention. 9 Gross contamination should be removed, and the limb realigned as long as no iatrogenic injury would occur. Photographs ideally need to be taken before the wound is covered with a sterile moist dressing, and this dressing should then not be interfered with until the patient is taken to the operating room. The fracture must be temporarily splinted and radiographs taken (two orthogonal views, as well as the joint above and below). A more thorough examination of the injury should follow in the operating room jointly by a senior plastic and orthopaedic surgeon. This scenario ensures that sterility, illumination, anesthesia, and an expert opinion will be optimal. On-table femoral angiography most simply can also be performed in the operating room if indicated. This initial surgery should be performed at least within 24 hours of the injury. In some cases, however, more immediate surgery without delay should be strongly considered, including the presence of gross contamination, a suspected compartment syndrome, vascular compromise, or other life-threatening injuries.



2.4 Compartment Syndrome


A compartment syndrome is defined as the elevation of the interstitial pressure in a closed osseofascial compartment resulting in microvascular compromise. 8 A missed diagnosis will result in irreversible neuromuscular ischemia (Fig. 2‑3). Any form of tissue injury can disrupt normal tissue hemostasis leading to increased tissue pressure. Capillary blood flow will decrease when the tissue pressure exceeds the capillary pressure. This causes hypoxia which exacerbates the existing tissue injury, ultimately leading to tissue necrosis. 8 Muscle necrosis will occur after 3 to 4 hours of warm ischemia. 9

Fig. 2.3 Inadequate anterior compartment decompression of a compartment syndrome through this short mid-tibial incision eventually required debridement of all necrotic muscle, exposing the tibia and fibula sidewalls virtually in their entirety.


Compartment syndrome can be caused by both closed and open fractures. The incidence of a compartment syndrome with tibial shaft fractures is 9.1%. 11 This is anything but negligible. It should never be assumed that an open fracture has allowed adequate compartment decompression, as it may have actually increased the risk. A compartment syndrome can also be caused by soft-tissue trauma alone, an arterial injury, severe burns, and prolonged compression due to immobility as often occurring in an obtunded patient. 8


The presence of a compartment syndrome can be difficult to diagnose during the initial assessment. Surgeons must have a high index of suspicion, and should always be considered in any patient with a severe lower extremity injury. Remember that the classic signs of onset of an acute compartment syndrome can be easily missed in patients with severe hypovolemia or in the unconscious patient. 7 Otherwise, the signs and symptoms that should raise clinical suspicion are the following:




  1. Pain with passive stretch of the limb out of proportion with the injury. The tibial nerve and the common peroneal nerve should be assessed by plantar flexion and dorsiflexion of the foot, respectively. In practice, however, this evaluation of pain is difficult as patients are often in a splint or traction device, which by itself is painful as well as limits any such testing. The pain often is described as a burning pain. The possibility of a more proximal injury to the sciatic nerve, nerve roots, or the spinal cord itself should also be considered. 9



  2. Pressure and tightness from tense and palpably swollen compartments will be obvious with gentle palpation. While compartment syndrome remains a clinical diagnosis, devices enabling direct measurement of the pressure in certain groups of patients is helpful, that is, those who are unresponsive or uncooperative (children, intoxicated), and those with premorbid lower limb injuries or compromise.



  3. Paresthesias in the involved compartment. Perception of touch will be diminished. This can be elicited for the tibial and deep peroneal nerve by touch of the medial sole of the foot and the first dorsal web space, respectively.



  4. Paralysis of muscle occurs following prolonged ischemia after arterial injury, and can be a sign of a prolonged compartment syndrome. The degree of paralysis is again difficult to assess if patients are in pain, splinted, or have a bony injury.



  5. Pallor of the skin alone is not a reliable sign. A pale limb with slow capillary refill should immediately arouse suspicion of a major arterial injury, which if present will require immediate intervention.



  6. Pulselessness. The posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis pulses, should be palpated. However, distal pulses may or may not be palpable, and absent pulses is considered a late finding. On the other hand, the presence of a pulse does not exclude the risk of a compartment syndrome. Absent pulses are more suggestive of arterial injury, or preexisting conditions such as atherosclerosis.


If a compartment syndrome is suspected, the encompassing fascia of all compartments of the leg can be released by an anterolateral and posteromedial 15- to 20-cm-long longitudinal incisions. The anterolateral incision is made between the tibial crest and the fibular shaft extending from about 3 cm distal to the tibial crest to the lateral malleolus, passing from the anterior compartment through the anterior intermuscular septum to reach the lateral compartment (Fig. 2‑1). The posteromedial incision is made approximately 2 cm posterior to the posteromedial border of the tibia to extend from the tibial tuberosity to the medial malleolus, through which the posterior intermuscular septum that separates the superficial and deep posterior compartments is released.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 23, 2021 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on 2 Assessment of the Normal and Impaired Lower Extremity

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access