12 Nonflap Wound Closure Alternatives: Skin Graft, Skin Substitute, Skin Stretch, and Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy



Hyunsuk Peter Suh


Summary


The evolution of wound closure techniques has introduced different alternative methods of closing the skin. Although skin graft and flaps are the main techniques of wound reconstruction, these alternative methods support the concept of reconstructive ladder or elevator. Negative-pressure wound therapy has changed the way we approach reconstruction in terms of preparation and closure for some defects. Skin substitutes allow faster granulation and skin stretch devices allow us to close small wounds that are ambiguous for reconstruction. This chapter covers these alternative supporting approaches.




12 Nonflap Wound Closure Alternatives: Skin Graft, Skin Substitute, Skin Stretch, and Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy



12.1 Introduction


The skin is the largest organ of the human body with a surface area of 1.2 to 2.2 m2 and 8% of total body weight. 1 The skin protects the body from pathogens and excessive water loss. It also controls body temperature, senses external stimuli, blocks ultraviolet rays, and serves an aesthetic function. It is a complex organ consisting of epidermis and dermis including hair follicle, sensory nerve, and sweat gland. When injury to the skin is deep to the dermis and the apocrine glands and the pilosebaceous unit is destroyed, the skin loses its generative capacity. 2


The use of modalities of secondary healing with negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), primary closure, and skin graft is located at the lower part of the traditional reconstructive ladder. 3 Although it is at the lower portion of the ladder, it can cause more complications than the modalities at the upper portion of the ladder when the method is applied to the improper condition of the wound.


A small wound can be healed by secondary intention by wound contraction and epithelization from the wound margin. However, if the defect is full thickness and wide, it takes a long time to heal and eventually makes a wide scar with deformity and sometimes it becomes a nonhealing wound. Even when we close the wound with a primary suture, it does not heal well due to its tension and also produces unsightly scars. Therefore, if the wound is wide, skin graft or flap must be used to cover the wound.


Skin graft is the most common and simplest way to cover a superficial defect. The origin of the skin graft is an ancient technique. It was performed as early as 2500 BC to cover nasal skin defect. 4 Then, over the next few thousand years, only a few anecdotal descriptions report the use of grafts to cover the traumatic defects. In Bologna, in his famous treatise on medicine of 1597, Gaspare Tagliacozzi (1545–1599) mentions a cutaneous transplantation. 5 Although skin grafting has been known for centuries, it was not until the 19th century that grafting was rediscovered, improved, and then generalized. 6 ,​ 7 ,​ 8


Skin grafts are indicated for covering of skin defect caused by trauma, burn, after excision of tumor, in case the primary closure of the defect is not possible, and wound bed is well granulated and vascularized.



12.2 Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy


NPWT is used for almost all wounds including pressure sores, soft-tissue injuries caused by trauma, burns, diabetic foot, and postoperative wounds. Despite its massive usage, there are still no randomized clinical trials (RCT) with high-certainty evidence that demonstrates its superior efficacy over conventional dressing, 9 ,​ 10 ,​ 11 ,​ 12 ,​ 13 but only few people suspect its efficacy. NPWT is being used for an increasingly wide range of applications with the primary purpose of promoting granulation tissue formation.



12.2.1 Indications of NPWT in Open Wounds


NPWT can be used for the following indications:




  • Deep open wound.



  • Wound bed preparation (Fig. 12‑1, Fig. 12‑2):




    • Before split-thickness skin graft (STSG) or flap surgery.



  • During the infected wound management:




    • Instillation system can be used.



    • Surgical wound dehiscence.



  • If neither primary closure nor flap surgery is possible.

    Fig. 12.1 (a) Necrotic tissue and biofilm remaining after first debridement of dog bite wound. (b) After applying negative-pressure wound therapy for the wound for a week, and (c) wound coverage with free perforator flap.
    Fig. 12.2 (a) Necrotic tissue was seen on the surface after initial debridement. (b) Healthy granulation tissue was covering the surface following serial debridement and negative-pressure wound therapy after 11 days after initial debridement. (c) The wound was covered with free perforator flap.



12.2.2 Protocols of NPWT for the Infected Wound with Necrotic Tissue


NPWT is a very effective method to remove a large amount of discharge and minimize the bacterial burden of the wound. During the early period of wound management for the infected wound with massive necrotic tissue, serial surgical debridement is needed along with proper antibiotics use and dressing. In between the serial debridement, NPWT can be applied as a wound dressing method. For infected wound, NPWT with instillation is better than standard NPWT, 14 ,​ 15 and as an instillation solution, normal saline solution is as effective as other antiseptics. 16 ,​ 17



12.2.3 Limitations


NPWT is only a dressing method bridging in between the surgical debridement. NPWT cannot replace scheduled wound evaluation or any surgical procedure including necrotic tissue removal and pus drainage. For example, in the early phase of infected diabetic wound care, daily surgical debridement is needed in the severely infected limb. The duration in between the debridement can be modified based on the condition of the wound.



12.2.4 Pitfalls of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy


NPWT undoubtedly has the advantage of growing granulation tissue. Sometimes wounds that previously only could be covered with flaps can also be covered with secondary healing or skin grafts after using NPWT. As some of the reports could be easily found, 18 ,​ 19 ,​ 20 ,​ 21 ,​ 22 more and more people are using NPWT for deeper wounds. In some wounds with exposed bone or ligament, NPWT may make it covered by the granulation tissue and, finally, STSG could be applied with cosmetically or functionally undesirable result. If there was no sufficient granulation even after weeks of NPWT, eventually flap coverage is needed, which is already delayed and the cost of the wound care is inevitably increasing.



12.3 Split-Thickness Skin Graft


The recipient bed should have good vascular supply, with no devitalized tissue. Skin graft take is possible over the healthy granulation tissue, fat, muscle, and fascia, but skin graft will be necrotized over the cartilage or bone without periosteum or perichondrium and tendon without paratenon due to lack of nutrition. However, even if there is no vascular distribution, skin grafts can survive if the defective skin area is narrow. Up to a distance of 0.5 cm from the edge of the skin defect, the skin graft can be nourished by the bridge. 23 In practice, 0.5-cm-width cartilage or tendon without paratenon and perichondrium can be covered by skin graft alone. If there is a necrotic tissue in the recipient site, surgical debridement is needed. After the removal of the necrotic tissue, thorough hemostasis is essential. After debridement, skin graft can be delayed until the granulation has covered the defect and to confirm whether debridement is sufficient while NPWT is used.



12.3.1 Flap versus Skin Graft


The choice between skin graft and flap depends mainly on recipient status, defect size, location, and postsurgery aesthetics. The success of skin graft depends on the vascular status of the recipient site. A well-vascularized bed is the best indication for skin graft. In the cases where the bone or the implants are exposed or dead space in the defect is large, free tissue transfer or local flap, including propeller flap, is essential to fill and cover the defect (Fig. 12‑3).

Fig. 11.3 Large wound with bone defect and muscle necrosis. (a) A free flap was used to cover the exposed bone and fill the dead space. (b) Split-thickness skin graft was used to cover the exposed muscle and granulation tissue. (c, d) Eighteen months after coverage, grafted skin and flap are stable, and hypertrophic scar on the skin graft donor site is observed.


Color and texture match of the skin graft and flap is also essential when we are considering wound coverage on the exposed body surface.



12.3.2 Advantages of Split-Thickness Skin Graft


The advantages of STSG are as follows (Table 12‑1):




  • Possible to cover a large surface.



  • Reharvest is possible on the same donor site after healing.



  • The meshing of skin is possible to enlarge the graft and cover the larger defect.



  • Short operation time.



  • No microanastomosis or microdissection is needed.























































    Table 12.1 Characteristics of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) and full-thickness skin graft (FTSG)



    Thickness


    Recipient site


    Contracture


    Donor site


    Revascularization


    Take


    STSG


    Thin STSG


    8–12/1,000 inch


    thigh, buttock, scalp, back, chest wall


    More


    Fast epithelialization


    Fast


    Easy


    Intermediate STSG


    12–18/1,000 inch






    Thick STSG


    18–25/1,000 inch



    Slow epithelialization




    FTSG



    Different based on the donor site


    Postauricular, groin, wrist, elbow


    Less


    Primary closure recommended


    Slow


    Difficult




12.3.3 Detriments of Split-Thickness Skin Graft


The detriments of STSG are as follows (Table 12‑1):




  • Irregular texture.



  • Lack of hair.



  • Lack of dermal element.



  • Less pliability and elasticity.



  • More contracture.



  • Wide donor site scar.



  • The technical difficulty of harvesting skin in old patients and long-term steroid use.



12.3.4 Recipient Bed Preparation


One of the most important aspects of skin graft success is wound bed preparation. The wound must be free of devitalized tissue and inflammation or biofilm. Wound surface should be debrided if the wound was kept open for dressing especially in the case of a chronic wound. Pin-point bleeding from the entire bed is the most essential factor to ensure the well-vascularized bed and sufficient debridement. At the same time, meticulous hemostasis is essential to prevent hematoma under the graft (Fig. 12‑4).

Fig. 12.4 The wound bed was covered with biofilm and nonviable tissue. (a) It was debrided before the coverage. (b) Two weeks after skin graft. (c) 4 months later coverage.



12.3.5 Split-Thickness Skin Harvest


The most import thing in skin harvest is to get even thickness skin as we planned to harvest. The use of hand-held dermatome operated by air pressure with depth gauge is recommended. Choose the area that is easy to harvest. To minimize the visible scar, the buttock or the posterior thigh can be selected. The width of the harvested skin can be selected by changing the width plate. As the width plate has a few millimeters of thickness, the width of the harvested skin is narrower than the actual width marked on the width plate. The harvesting area is prepared with lubricating oil or jelly. The entire surface of the donor site should be on tension to make an even friction during the harvest. It is useful if the assistant can pull the lateral margin with gauze and use the nondominant hand of the operator to pull the skin to make a countertraction. After starting the dermatome, it is engaged to the donor site at a 45-degree angle and a firm and gentle amount of pressure is applied during the movement. The harvested skin can be seen over the blade during the harvest. If the donor skin is thin in an old patient or in patients with long-term steroid use, thickness gauge should be adjusted and extra caution should be made not to apply an excessive pressure during the harvest. At the completion, the dermatome is lifted while it is on, to detach graft from the donor site. If you are planning to mesh the skin, it is easier to stop the machine while it is kept attached to the donor site and locate the plastic skin graft carriers under the machine before spreading the skin over the carrier.



12.3.6 Meshing Split-Thickness Graft


By meshing the graft, you can enlarge the graft, minimize hematoma under the graft, and promote easier graft take. On the contrary, mesh graft heals with more scarring because of the secondary healing by epithelialization of the openings on the graft. Mesh graft is usually applied to large defect or defect of the unexposed body surface (Fig. 12‑5).

Fig. 12.5 Mesh graft can be effective in large wounds. (a) A 67-year-old patient had a degloving injury on her right thigh. (b) After the debridement, (c) 1:3 mesh graft was done over the wound mostly. (d, e) As most of the meshed graft was transferred over the fat tissue, there were minimal hypertrophy and tethering.



12.3.7 Graft Fixation and Immobilization


Harvested skin is transferred to the defect. The dermal side should face the defect. There should be no raw surface at the margin of the defect to minimize the hypertrophic scar. The graft can overlap on the skin margin. The graft can be fixed with suture or staples.


NPWT is an effective method to immobilize the graft. 24 ,​ 25 ,​ 26 Continuous mode with –125 mm Hg pressure is suitable for most of the wound. NPWT can be applied for 5 to 10 days after the graft. It is crucial to seal correctly. Leakage of air makes the graft wet or dry and makes it difficult to get the proper graft take. If it is not possible to use NPWT, especially wound is near the external fixator, tie-over dressing or bolster dressing with stapler and gauze is also possible and effective. The dressing should be maintained until the graft is revascularized and has a robust fixation on the wound bed. Usually, the first dressing change is done on day 5 and excessive care and sufficient time should be assigned not to detach the skin from the bed. If there is hematoma under the skin, compression and irrigation should be done to remove all the hematoma.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 23, 2021 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on 12 Nonflap Wound Closure Alternatives: Skin Graft, Skin Substitute, Skin Stretch, and Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access