11 Extracapsular Hip Fractures

Carlos J. Meheux, Luis F. Pulido-Sierra

11 Extracapsular Hip Fractures


Incidence and Etiology

  • I. Intertrochanteric femur fractures:

    1. Increasing incidence and will likely approach 500,000 per year by 2040. 1

    2. More common in women older than 65 years of age.

    3. About one-third of women reaching the age of 90 years will sustain a hip fracture. 2

    4. Patients with osteoporosis are at increased risk for intertrochanteric femur fractures.

    5. Increased incidence of falls in the elderly population.

      1. Multifactorial:

        1. Postural and gait disturbances.

        2. Decreased visual and hearing acuity.

        3. Usage of one (or multiple) disorienting medications.

    6. Associated fractures include the following:

      1. Distal radius.

      2. Proximal humerus.

      3. Spine.

      4. Ribs.

      5. Pubic rami.

    7. Young patients:

      1. High-energy mechanisms:

        1. Usually have grossly displaced fractures.

        2. Reverse obliquity.

        3. Subtrochanteric extension.

    8. Pathologic fractures from metastasis.

  • II. Subtrochanteric femur fractures:

    1. Asymmetric age- and gender-related bimodal distribution:

      1. High-energy mechanism:

        1. Young patients.

        2. Mostly males.

        3. Usually motor vehicle accidents.

        4. Fall from heights.

        5. Penetrating trauma.

      2. Low-energy mechanism:

        1. Elderly patients.

        2. Mostly females. 3

        3. Falls.

        4. Pathologic fractures:

          • (i) Atypical fractures.

          • (ii) Bisphosphonate use greater than 3 to 5 years.

    2. Associated injuries involving other extremities:

      1. Commonly seen in high-energy mechanisms. 3

    3. Subtrochanteric femur fracture can result from prior surgery:

      1. Screw fixation of ipsilateral femoral neck fracture:

        1. Screw starting point distal to the lesser trochanter.

      2. Core decompression and vascularized free fibula autografting for avascular necrosis of the femoral head:

        1. Lateral cortical defect is below the lesser trochanter.

    4. Pathologic fractures from bisphosphonate use or metastasis.


Intraosseous Scaffold of Trabecular Bone Supports Femoral Head and Neck (Fig. 11.1)

  • I. Primary compressive group:

    1. Dense cancellous bone.

  • II. Secondary compressive, tensile, and greater trochanter groups:

    1. Oriented along stress lines in the lateral femoral neck.

    2. Relative paucity of trabecular scaffolding in the central area also called Ward’s triangle. 4

  • III. Changes in the trabecular pattern affects bone density.

Numerous Muscle Attachments to the Intertrochanteric Area

  • I. Brings rich and abundant blood supply.

  • II. Very conducive to fracture healing.

    Fig. 11.1 Trabecular groups and Ward’s triangle of the proximal femur.

Muscular Forces Dictate Direction of Displacement

  • I. Iliopsoas:

    1. Pulls on its insertion at the lesser trochanter.

  • II. Abductors and external rotators:

    1. Act through their attachments at the greater trochanter.

    2. Leads to shortened and externally rotated extremity in displaced fractures, especially intertrochanteric femur fractures with subtrochanteric extensions or subtrochanteric femur fractures.

Classification Systems

Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures 5

  • I. Stable fracture:

    1. Posteromedial cortex:

      1. Fractured in only one place.

    2. Lateral cortex: intact.

    3. Obliquity: standard.

    4. Withstands axial loads:

      1. Without displacement after anatomic reduction.

  • II. Unstable fracture:

    1. Posteromedial cortex:

      1. Large fragment or comminuted.

    2. Lateral cortex:

      1. Fracture below the vastus ridge.

    3. Obliquity:

      1. May be standard or reverse.

    4. Fracture collapses with axial loading after reduction.

Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

  • I. Russel–Taylor classification 6 ( Fig. 11.2 ):

    1. Type IA:

      1. Does not involve piriformis fossa.

      2. Does not involve lesser trochanter.

    2. Type IB:

      1. Does not involve piriformis fossa.

      2. Involves less trochanter,

    3. Type IIA:

      1. Involves piriformis fossa.

      2. Does not involve lesser trochanter.

        Fig. 11.2 Russell–Taylor classification of subtrochanteric femur fractures. In type I fractures, the piriformis fossa remains intact and in type II fractures, the piriformis fossa is involved. In subtype A fractures, the lesser trochanter is not involved and in subtype B fractures, the lesser trochanter is involved.

    4. Type IIB:

      1. Involves the piriformis fossa.

      2. Involves the lesser trochanter.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 29, 2020 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on 11 Extracapsular Hip Fractures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access