Vasculitis and inflammatory arthritis




Abstract


Vasculitis has been described in most types of inflammatory arthritis. The best described and most widely recognised form is rheumatoid vasculitis. The incidence of systemic rheumatoid vasculitis has declined significantly following the general early use of methotrexate in the 1990s, and it is now a rare form of vasculitis. Treatment of rheumatoid vasculitis is conventionally with glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide, but there is an increasing role for rituximab similar to that in other types of vasculitis. Despite these developments the mortality of rheumatoid vasculitis remains high. Vasculitis in other types of inflammatory arthritis is less well described and the treatment remains empirical.


Introduction


Vasculitis is an inflammation of the blood vessel wall resulting in distal organ ischaemia or infarction. Vessels of all sizes may be involved in vasculitis. It has been recognised as a feature of inflammatory arthritis for over 100 years. Initially vasculitis was recognised with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but as our concepts of the classification of inflammatory arthritis have evolved, it has been recognised that vasculitis may occur in association with other types of inflammatory arthritis, including spondyloarthropathies and psoriatic arthritis. The occurrence of vasculitis in spondyloarthropathies and psoriatic arthritis is much less well documented than in RA. The Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC) on the definition on nomenclature of vasculitis recognised the occurrence of vasculitis in association with RA as a distinct form of vasculitis .


In this chapter, we will review the occurrence of vasculitis in association with the inflammatory arthropathies, focussing on the occurrence of vasculitis in RA.




Rheumatoid vasculitis


Systemic vasculitis occurring in the context of rheumatoid arthritis (SRV) was first described in 1898 by Bannatyne, in a patient with histological evidence of vascular inflammation of the vasa nervorum . The early clinical descriptions in the 1940s and 1950s by Eric Bywaters and colleagues were of the classical features of peripheral gangrene and mononeuritis multiplex . Since then, a wider spectrum of diseases have been recognised, including carditis, scleritis, nodules and systemic diseases . All sizes of vessel may be involved, from the aorta to capillaries. Small vessel vasculitis can occur in isolation as small nail edge or nailfold lesions, which are considered to be benign but may herald or co-exist with a major arterial disease . Rheumatoid vasculitis usually occurs in patients with long-standing rheumatoid factor-positive erosive rheumatoid arthritis. Males with RA are at greater risk than females.


Classification and diagnostic criteria


The CHCC defined SRV as vasculitis occurring in association with and might be caused by RA . There are no validated classification or diagnostic criteria. The Scott and Bacon criteria from 1984 remain in widespread use ( Table 1 ) . These have been criticised as not requiring a biopsy, and many recent studies have included only biopsy-proven cases.



Table 1

Classification criteria for rheumatoid vasculitis.













The presence in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis of one or more of the following:


  • 1

    Mononeuritis multiplex or acute peripheral neuropathy



  • 2

    Peripheral gangrene



  • 3

    Biopsy evidence of acute necrotising arteritis plus systemic illness (e.g. fever or weight loss)



  • 4

    Deep cutaneous ulcers or active extra-articular disease (e.g. pleurisy, pericarditis, scleritis) if associated with typical digital infarcts or biopsy evidence of vasculitis


Other causes of such lesions, such as diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis, should be excluded. Patients with nailfold lesions or digital infarcts alone are excluded.

Adapted from Scott and Bacon, 1984.


Epidemiology


Rheumatoid vasculitis first became widely recognised and reported during the 1960s. In the UK, the first estimate of the incidence was from Bath/Bristol in the 1970s and suggested an incidence of 6/million . In Spain, the annual incidence of biopsy-proven rheumatoid vasculitis during 1988–1997 was 6.4/million . A detailed study conducted in Norfolk, UK, between 1988 and 2010, compared the incidence of SRV between 1988 and 2000 with the period 2001 to 2010 . The annual incidence deceased from 9.1/million to 3.9/million. The decline was predominantly during the late 1990s ( Fig. 1 ). Rheumatoid vasculitis is now less common than many other types of systemic vasculitis, such as the ANCA-associated vasculitides the overall incidence of which in Northern European populations is around 15–20/million . The incidence in the Norfolk study was equal in both males and females, but other studies have suggested a male preponderance.




Fig. 1


Rolling three-year incidence of systemic rheumatoid vasculitis. From Ntatsaki E, Mooney J, Scott DGI, Watts RA. Systemic rheumatoid vasculitis in the era of modern immunosuppressive therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) [Internet]. 2014 Oct 8 [cited 2013 Oct 14]; 53(1):145–52.


Several studies from the USA have supported this decline in SRV; a population-based study of the incidence of extra-articular RA reported a reduction in the 10-year cumulative incidence of SRV from 3.6% in 1985–1994 to 0.6% in 1995–2007 . The reduction in the prevalence of SRV has also been reported in a serial cross-sectional study analysing both hospitalised and ambulatory patients from the US veteran population during 1985–2006, comprising a similar duration of cohort observation with our study of 22 years . There has also been a decline in hospitalisation in California of SRV patients between 1980 and 2001 .


The reasons for this gradual decline in SRV are unclear. Rheumatoid arthritis in general has become less severe, with the extra-articular disease becoming much less common; the need for surgery, such as hand surgery, foot surgery, cervical spine stabilisation and splenectomy for Felty’s syndrome, both of which may be considered to be surrogate markers of disease severity, has declined . Over the past two decades, there have been major changes in the treatment of RA with increased focus on tight control of the inflammation through the introduction of treat-to-target initiatives. To achieve this, there has been much wider and earlier use of methotrexate and this seems in the UK to be associated temporally with the decrease in SRV .


Mortality in SRV remains a serious concern. In the Norwich cohort, the mortality at 5 years was 57% with a 20% 1-year mortality, an overall mortality which is worse than that for the ANCA-associated vasculitides ( Fig. 2 ) A study from the Mayo clinic during 2001–2010 reported a 26% mortality at 5 years; however, the median follow up in this study was only 16 months . In this study, the relapse was 36% at 5 years. Patients with only nailfold lesions have a better prognosis with 87.8% 5-year survival in comparison with SRV ( Fig. 3 ) .




Fig. 2


Comparison of the mortality of systemic rheumatoid vasculitis with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis.



Fig. 3


Comparison of the mortality of systemic rheumatoid vasculitis with isolated nailfold vasculitis. From Ntatsaki E, Mooney J, Scott DGI, Watts RA. Systemic rheumatoid vasculitis in the era of modern immunosuppressive therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) [Internet]. 2014 Oct 8 [cited 2013 Oct 14]; 53(1):145–52.


Risk factors for the development of SRV


Patients with SRV are generally aged over 60 years. The patients in the 2001–2010 cohort in the Norfolk study were older than the first cohort (median age 71.5 years vs. 64.4 years), whereas in the Mayo study, the median age was 63 years . Rheumatoid vasculitis is very uncommon in newly diagnosed RA patients; the median duration of RA was 15–16 years in Norfolk and 10.8 years in the Mayo clinic.


Following the adjustment for age and disease duration, the Mayo case control study showed that smoking at RA diagnosis, co-existent peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, severe RA (defined as nodulosis, need for joint replacement surgery) and biologic therapy were risk factors for the development of SRV. Interestingly, the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and low-dose aspirin reduced the risk of SRV.


The observation that HCQ and low-dose aspirin are protective is significant. There has been increasing focus on cardiovascular risk in RA over the past decade. HCQ has been shown to improve the lipid profiles in RA , but the use of HCQ as a monotherapy is not widespread although it is a component of many combination therapy regimens. These data support the notion that HCQ should perhaps be more widely used in RA to reduce the risk of vascular disease associated with RA.


Drugs have been associated with the development of vasculitis in RA patients. Methotrexate has long been associated with nodulosis; recently two cases were reported of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-related vasculitis in the skin, which regressed after the withdrawal of methotrexate . Vasculitis has been reported as occurring during the treatment with most biological response modifiers, including TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and abatacept .


Guignard et al. compared the features of vasculitis in patients treated with TNFi with those not so treated. They noted that SRV was more common during the TNFi therapy, but that TNFi-treated patients had more severe RA, making it difficult to draw firm conclusion on whether the development of vasculitis was due to the inefficacy of TNFi therapy or induction by TNFi. Patients developing vasculitis while taking a biologic drug had a similar pattern of organ involvement compared to these not taking a biologic drug. The treatment was done with conventional immunosuppression . TNFi have also rarely been associated with the development of a large vessel vasculitis .


Genetics


Rheumatoid vasculitis occurs in patients who are seropositive for rheumatoid factor (RF); this group of RA patients is associated with the shared epitope of the third hypervariable region of HLA-DRB1 . A meta-analysis of 14 studies with 1500 RA cases showed an association between SRV and three specific epitopes of the HLA-DRB1 -shared epitope: *0401/*0401, *0401/*0404, *0101/*0401 . A small Brazilian study reported that HLA-DRB5*01 may confer protection against SRV . Rheumatoid vasculitis has also been associated with HLA-C3 that is not in linkage disequilibrium with HLA-DRB1 . A recent small study (23 patients) has reported an association between the presence of the HLA-DRB1*1402 and HLA-DRB1*0101 alleles and cutaneous lesions in SRV patients and a correlation between the inhibitor KIR2DL3 and the HLA-C*0802 ligand .


Pathogenesis


The underlying mechanisms by which some patients with RA develop a severe vasculopathy are poorly understood, but it remains generally accepted that immune complexes play an important role, based on the fact that most patients with SRV have high levels of circulating rheumatoid factors. In addition, the presence of other autoantibodies has been demonstrated in SRV, including antiendothelial antibodies and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. The immune complex deposition can induce an inflammation in the vessel walls and activate the complement cascade. Complement levels are low in SRV but not in uncomplicated RA. Fc receptors may have a role with leucocyte degranulation, cytokine release and expression of adhesion molecules. Recently, it has been demonstrated that vascular inflammation is important in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and it is now well established that cardiovascular disease is an important determinant of mortality in RA. Increasing attention is being given to the management of cardiovascular risk factors alongside the suppression of the inflammatory process in RA.


Pathology


All sizes of blood vessels may be involved in SRV; there is no specific pathological appearance of vasculitis in SRV. The most common appearance is leucocytoclastic vasculitis, but this is not specific to SRV, occurring in drug eruptions, infection and other autoimmune diseases. The most suggestive appearances are medial necrosis with proliferating intimal and adventitial cells organised in a radial manner; necrosis may involve the whole circumference of the vessel wall. Perivascular infiltrates are not a specific finding in SRV, as they may be seen in uncomplicated RA .


Classification and diagnostic criteria


There are no validated classification or diagnostic criteria. The Scott and Bacon criteria from 1984 remain in widespread use ( Table 1 ) . Many recent studies have included only biopsy-proven cases.


Clinical features


The commonest clinical features are skin and neurological involvement ( Table 2 ).



Table 2

Clinical features of SRV.



























































































































































































RV Clinical Features A B C D
Norwich Norwich Bath Mayo
(2001–2010) (1988–2000) (1975–1981) 2001–10
Number of patients 18 47 50 86
Rheumatoid factor 18 (100%) 42 (89%) 47 (94%) 72 (84%)
Erosions 13(83%) 32 (68%) NA 46 (54%)
Nodules 3/8 (38%) 16/28 (57%) 43/50 (86%) 38 (44%)
Systemic 5 (31%) 23 (49%) 42(82%) NA
Weight loss 2 16 41
Malaise 5 13 NA
Cutaneous 14 (78%) 42(89%) 44(88%) 56(65%)
Infarct 3 33 26
Ulcer 8 21 12
Purpura/LCC Vasculitis 4 7 28
Gangrene 2 16 7
Neurological 9 (50%) 18 (38%) 21 (42%) 30 (35%)
Peripheral neuropathy 5 16 14
Mononeuritis multiplex 5 6 7
Stroke 1 2 2
Pulmonary 9 (50%) 13 (28%) 17(34%) 1(1)
Fibrosis 3 8 9
Pleurisy/Effusion 4 6 8
Infiltrates/Nodules 2 0 NA
Renal 5 (28%) 12(25%) 12(24%) 1 (1%)
Protein/Haematuria 1 8 6
Raised creatinine 5 1 2
Ophthalmic 2 (11%) 12(25%) 2 (2%)
Scleritis 2 11 7
Corneal melt 1 NA NA
Cardiovascular 4 (22%) 9(19%) 17(34%)
Pericarditis 4 5 7
Aortic incompetence 0 2 2
Myocardial Infarction 0 2 3
Gastrointestinal 0 2(4%) 5(10%)


Systemic manifestations


Patients with SRV often describe significant weight loss and fatigue, but fever is uncommon.


Musculoskeletal


The patient with SRV typically has changes consistent with long-standing RA, such as joint subluxation and deformity. However, there is often little evidence of an active joint inflammation on clinical examination, but there may be evidence of an inflammation on joint ultrasound.


Cutaneous


Cutaneous involvement has a wide spectrum of features from the minor nailfold lesions to major ulceration with substantial loss of tissue. The development of leg ulcers in a patient with long-standing RA should prompt consideration of vasculitis as the underlying cause; however, other common cause such as venous stasis should also be considered. Features of an ulcer that are suggestive of a vasculitic ulcer include acute onset, pain and location in a position unusual for venous ulceration. The presence of other extra-articular features is suggestive of a vasculitic cause. The differentiation between a vasculitic and non-vasculitic ulcer may, however, be difficult. There is often a reluctance to perform a biopsy because of concerns about poor wound healing.


Digital ischaemia while now very uncommon is indicative of severe ischaemia and needs to be investigated and treated urgently ( Fig. 4 ). Other causes should be sought, such as thromboembolism.




Fig. 4


Digital gangrene occurring in a patient with systemic rheumatoid vasculitis.


Nailfold lesions are generally benign ( Fig. 5 ), but should prompt a search for other extra-articular manifestations of RA, in particular interstitial lung disease, scleritis and neuropathy.




Fig. 5


Isolated nailfold vasculitis occurring in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis.


Nodules are common and may have overlying vasculitic lesions. They are typically located over points of pressure such as the elbows.


Neurological


Neurological involvement may be sensory or motor or a combination of both. The development of a motor neuropathy should be assessed urgently, as the rapid treatment may prevent progression. The typical pattern is a mononeuritis multiplex with the involvement of arms and legs with a wrist or foot drop ( Fig. 6 ). Sensory neuropathy may be in a glove and stocking distribution suggestive of a length-dependent peripheral neuropathy; this typically affects the legs. It is characterised by burning, parasthesiae and numbness and is not always associated with a motor deficit. The main differential for this pattern of neuropathy is diabetes and alcohol neuropathy.




Fig. 6


Mononeuritis multiplex causing wrist drop in a patient with systemic rheumatoid vasculitis.


The central nervous system involvement is uncommon. But patients may present with seizures, neuropsychiatric symptoms, confusional states and haemiparesis. Diagnosis may only be made following meningeal or parenchymal biopsy.


Renal


A clinically significant renal involvement is uncommon in SRV, unlike in other types of vasculitis, such as the ANCA-vasculitides. Presentation is with an active urinary sediment, but progression to renal failure is uncommon.


Ophthalmic


Scleritis and corneal melt are associated with SRV, but may occur independently. The most severe type is corneal melt due to severe peripheral ulcerative keratitis, leading to the thinning of the peripheral cornea and possibly eventually to optic perforation and blindness. It is strongly associated with severe SRV.


Cardiac


The cardiac involvement manifests as pericarditis, aortic incompetence and myocardial infarction. This may be difficult to differentiate from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Symptomatic coronary arteritis is uncommon.


Pulmonary


Pulmonary capillaritis is uncommon in SRV, and other causes of pulmonary haemorrhage should be sought.


Gastrointestinal


Large and small bowel perforation has been described in SRV, but is uncommon.


Investigation of a patient with suspected rheumatoid vasculitis


Investigations are directed towards confirming the diagnosis and establishing the extent of organ involvement. A systematic approach should be adopted for any patient with a suspect multisystem disease.


The full blood count may show changes consistent with a chronic disease with anaemia and thrombocytosis. The acute-phase response should be assessed; however, often patients developing SRV do not have a significant elevation of CRP or ESR. Routine biochemistry, including renal and liver function, is necessary although renal impairment is not a typical feature of rheumatoid vasculitis, but a urinalysis should be performed.


Radiology


A chest X-ray is needed to find evidence of pulmonary involvement from an interstitial lung disease; if this is abnormal or the patient is dyspnoeic, then pulmonary function tests (looking for a restrictive defect) and a high-resolution computerised tomography (CT) scan may be needed.


Autoantibodies


Patients with SRV are typically positive for rheumatoid factor and ACPA (>90%). Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) may be present, typically of a perinuclear pattern or an atypical pattern on immunofluorescence. The specific ELISA assays for anti-proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase are typically negative. Their presence in a patient with RA does not indicate the development of a separate ANCA-vasculitis, such as granulomatosis with polyangitis (GPA). Antinuclear antibodies are negative.


Complement levels (C3 and C4) are low in SRV, but may also be low in active SLE, hypocomplementaemic urticarial vasculitis (HUVS), mixed essential cryoglobulinaemia, and chronic infections associated with the immune complex formation. It should also be remembered that C3 and C4 are acute-phase proteins and may therefore be elevated in an inflammatory response.


Neurological investigation


Patients presenting with cerebral dysfunction, in association with RA or with evidence of central or peripheral symptoms should be investigated initially with CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spinal cord, as infection, inflammation, malignancy, haemorrhage and ischaemia may all present with neurological symptoms, cerebral vasculitis is uncommon in RA. Many modern RA patients are immunocompromised from the use of methotrexate possibly combined with TNF inhibition or B cell depletion. A lumbar puncture with gram stain, cell count and culture/PCR for bacteria, fungi or viruses is required. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or magnetic resonance venography (MRV) may be necessary if there is a suspicion of a cerebral vasculitis or sinus thrombosis. Peripheral nervous symptoms such as motor or sensory neuropathy may require four-limb nerve conduction studies and possibly a nerve biopsy. The pattern of sensory or motor symptoms can be suggestive of the glove and stocking pattern or mononeuritis multiplex. Electromyography may be required if there is a suspicion of a myopathy.


Tissue biopsy


A tissue biopsy is obviously the gold standard means of confirming the diagnosis of SRV; however, this may not always be possible. In patients with ulcers, there may be concerns about poor wound healing. Ideally, a tissue biopsy should be obtained prior to treatment; however, if there is a critical organ involvement, the treatment should never be delayed for diagnostic purposes. The choice of organ to biopsy is determined by the suspicion of involvement and the ease of biopsy.


A skin biopsy is easy to obtain and has low morbidity, and the samples should be sent for both conventional histochemistry and immunohistochemistry.


Differential diagnosis


The differential diagnosis occurs from the other types of vasculitis. The presence of changes of long-standing RA should suggest the diagnosis. Other causes of digital ischaemia or ulceration such as atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus should be sought.


Treatment


The treatment for SRV remains a conundrum and is essentially empirical, as there are no randomised controlled trials to guide therapy. Isolated nailfold vasculitis does not require specific therapy, as the risk of progression to systemic disease is low and mortality is also low; however, the patient should be kept under close observation .


Non-biologic immunosuppression


Corticosteroids alone are usually ineffective and rapid changes in dose have been implicated in the pathogenesis and induction of SRV and may predispose patients to vascular occlusion. Azathioprine in combination with prednisolone may be effective in the treatment of SRV, but no controlled data exist . A comparison of azathioprine and prednisolone in the treatment of isolated nailfold vasculitis showed no significant advantage over conventional therapy .


Methotrexate has been used to treat SRV, but there is no evidence from randomised controlled trials to support its use. Other immunosuppressive agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil, have also been used.


The present conventional approach is intravenous or oral cyclophosphamide combined with glucocorticoids, as pioneered by Scott and Bacon in the 1980s, building on the experience with cyclophosphamide in granulomatosis with polyangitis (Wegener’s granulomatosis) The cyclophosphamide dose regimen is similar to that used in the ANCA-vasculitides, that is 10–15 mg/kg IV repeated every 2 weeks for three doses and infusions every three weeks for 6 months . The dose should be reduced to compensate for the effects of age and renal function. The oral dose is 2 mg/kg/day. Glucocorticoids are given IV (methylprednisolone 1 g) with the first dose, and then, a rapid tapering course starting at 1 mg/kg (maximum dose prednisolone 60 mg/day). Patients receiving cyclophosphamide should receive prophylaxis against uroepithelial malignancy with mesna and pneumocystis jirovecii with co-trimoxazole.


Biologic response modifiers


However, this approach is associated with a mortality of 20% at one year, and there is an urgent need for new approaches. The introduction of biologic response modifiers in the treatment of RA TNFi, abatacept, anakinra and B cell depletion has led to considerable interest in their use in SRV. In the Mayo study, cyclophosphamide was used in 29% of the patients and a biologic response modifier in 28%; agents used included TNFi, rituximab, abatacept and anakinra. This heterogeneity in the use of biological response modifiers reflects the lack of clear evidence to support one approach over another . The situation has been further confused by a number of reports of the development of vasculitis in patients receiving TNFi . Indeed, recently Mayo clinic noted that biologic therapy was a risk factor for developing SRV, but this might be a reflection of disease severity rather than being causative.


TNF inhibitors


TNF inhibitors have been used to treat SRV, but were associated with only 56% response rate at 6 months and 9% mortality at 3 years with a high rates of severe infection and relapse .


Rituximab


B cell depletion with Rituximab is now widely used to treat other types of vasculitis, in particular ANCA-vasculitis following the publication of the RITUXVAS and RAVE trials . This use and the experience of using it to treat uncomplicated RA has led to its use to treat SRV. In the French Autoimmunity and Rituximab (AIR) registry, there were 17 cases of SRV treated with rituximab . Thirteen patients were treated with the conventional RA dose of 1 g given twice at a two-week interval, and the remaining 4 received either 0.5 g or 0.75 g at 2 weeks apart or four infusions of 0.75 g and 1 g on four occasions at 1-week intervals. Sixteen patients received concomitant glucocorticoids. Remission was achieved in 6 months in 12 patients and 4 had a partial response and 1 had died. At 1 year, 14/17 patients (82%) were in complete remission as defined by a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) of 0 combined with an absence of clinical symptoms and signs of disease. The mean prednisolone dosage was reduced from 19.2 mg/day to 9.7 mg/day, and at 12 months, 14 patients (82%) were in sustained remission. Three patients had severe infections.


The optimum regimen for Rituximab in SRV is unknown, but a logical approach would be to reflect the pattern of use in AAV, with induction using 1 g given twice at an interval of fortnight. The maintenance regimen has not been established in AAV, but current practice suggests that maintenance should be with regular repeat doses of 500 mg–1000 mg every 4–6 months for a total of 2 years .

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 10, 2017 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Vasculitis and inflammatory arthritis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access