Upper Extremity



Upper Extremity





General Upper Extremity Guidelines

In evaluating upper extremity (UE) impairment, there are four prime elements to consider:



  • Diagnosis-based estimates (DBEs)


  • Amputation


  • Nerve injury: (a) loss of sensation, (b) loss of motor function


  • Loss of motion (not on a neurologic basis)

    Sometimes a fifth element is also involved:


  • Other (miscellaneous) conditions: arthroplasty, instability, deformity, weakness, vascular compromise, pain

The five elements are evaluated as explained in the following subsections.


Diagnosis-based Estimates

DBEs are estimated impairment ratings for common medical procedures or problems. Table 6-1 (shown later in this chapter) is a quick reference for common upper extremity impairments using DBEs. All values in this table are stand-alone; that is, they are not to be combined with any other values for the same joint, injury, or problem, with the exception that if the individual exhibits more than the usual loss of motion for the condition, the value may be combined with an impairment from the loss of motion table for that joint.

If Table 6-1 is not used, all impairments for a given joint or body area can be combined, other than as noted in the exceptions discussed later in this chapter.


Amputation

Use the amputation table (Table 6-2) or Figure 6-1. (All figures and tables mentioned in these subsections can be found in the section “Rating Specific Upper Extremity Impairments,” later in this chapter.)


Neurologic Injury

For a digital nerve injury, determine digital sensory loss from Figure 6-2. If the nerve injury is proximal to the digits, use Table 6-3.









TABLE 6-1 Diagnosis-Based Estimates for Common Upper Extremity Procedures




































































































  % Digit % Hand % UE % WP
Total shoulder arthroplasty 24 14
Acromioplasty, Neer 5 2
Distal clavicle resection (Mumford) 10 5
Open rotator cuff repairaa (average result) 20 12
Shoulder instability, mild/subluxating/dislocating 6/12/24 5/10/14
Total elbow arthroplasty 28 17
Radial head resection with or without implant 8 5
Ulnar nerve decompression/anterior transposition (usual result)b 7 4
Carpal tunnel release (usual result) 5 5 3
Total wrist arthroplasty 16 10
Proximal row carpectomy 12 7
Ulnar head resection (Darrach, Bower) 10 6
Thumb CMC arthroplasty 25 10 9 5
Index or middle finger implant arthroplasty (MP/PIP) 20/10 4/2 4/2 2/1
Ring or little finger implant arthroplasty (MP/PIP) 10 2/1 2/1 1/1
UE, upper extremity; WP, whole person; CMC, carpometacarpal; MP, metacarpophalangeal; PIP, proximal interphalangeal.
aThis value is offered as a matter of convenience because open rotator cuff surgery is still frequently done. In the author’s experience, when patients reach maximum medical improvement, most still have loss of some abduction, forward flexion, and strength. Typically, the shoulder is not a scheduled item, and 12% ppi whole person is the most commonly assigned rating. Obviously, some individuals do not do as well, and some do better.
bA common rating based on the experience of the author and consultants.








TABLE 6-2 Amputation, Upper Extremity






























































































  % Digit % Hand % UE % WP
Humerus, proximal one third 100 60
Humerus, middle and distal one third 95 57
Forearm/wrist/hand 92 55
Thumb metacarpal ray 40 36 22
Single metacarpal ray, each ray (except thumb) 10 9 5
Thumb, MP level 100 40 36 22
Thumb, IP level 50 20 18 11
Index or middle finger, MP or proximal phalanx 100 20 18 11
Index or middle finger, PIP or proximal phalanx 80 16 14 8
Index or middle finger, DIP or distal phalanx 45 9 8 5
Ring or little finger, MP or proximal phalanx 100 10 9 5
Ring or little finger, PIP or middle phalanx 80 8 7 4
Ring or little finger, DIP or distal phalanx 45 5 5 5
Fingertip, significant soft tissue, no bone (thumb or index, middle or ring, little) 13 (5, 3, 1) (5, 3, 1) (3, 2, 1)
UE, upper extremity; WP, whole person; MP, metacarpophalangeal; IP, interphalangeal; PIP, proximal interphalangeal; DIP, distal interphalangeal.
Adapted from Cocchiarella L, Anderson GBJ, eds. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2001:440–442.







Figure 6-1. Chart for amputation of a digit, showing percentage of impairment.






Figure 6-2. Digital sensory loss chart showing percentage of digital impairment for total digital nerve loss.









TABLE 6-3 Nerve Injury, Upper Extremity



















































  Maximum % UE (% WP) Impairment
Sensory or Pain Motor Sensory and Motor Combined
Axillary 5 (3) 35 (21) 38 (23)
Long thoracic 0 15 (9) 15 (9)
Median, above midforearm 39 (23) 44 (26) 66 (40)
Median, below midforearm 39 (23) 10 (6) 45 (27)
Ulnar, above midforearm 7 (4) 46 (28) 50 (30)
Ulnar, below midforearm 7 (4) 35 (21) 40 (24)
Radial, high with loss of triceps 5 (3) 42 (25) 45 (27)
Radial, below triceps 5 (3) 35 (21) 38 (23)
UE, upper extremity; WP, whole person.
Adapted from Cocchiarella L, Anderson GBJ, eds. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2001:492.


Loss of Motion

Motion loss measurements should be active measurements (i.e., active on the part of the patient). Amazingly, active versus passive range of motion measurements are not addressed in the AMA Guides. However, consultants on this issue unanimously agreed that active motion is the parameter of most importance. After all, what benefit does a patient with a 45-degree arc of wrist dorsiflexion gain if the motion is purely passive and the individual must use a brace to position the hand in space?

For loss of motion due to stiffness, musculotendinous malfunction, or skeletal problems, use Table 6-4 for the thumb, Table 6-5 for the index or middle finger, Table 6-6 for the ring or little finger, Table 6-7 for digital deformity, Table 6-8 for digital values,
Table 6-9 for the wrist, Table 6-10 for the elbow, or Table 6-11 for the shoulder. If neurologic impairment is the cause of loss of motion, do not use a loss of motion table.








TABLE 6-4 Loss of Motion: Thumb













































Severity Description % Thumb % Hand % UE % WP
Mild TAM 125° (can flex tip to touch palm and extend tip to within 1 cm of full extension) 15 6 5 3
Moderate TAM 65° (can flex tip to within 1 cm of palm and extend tip to within 2.5 cm of full extension) 50 20 18 11
Severe TAM 30° (can flex tip to within 2.5 cm of palm and extend tip to 3.5 cm of full extension) 75 30 27 16
Ankylosis/surgical fusion MP joint in functional position (20–30°) 50 20 18 11
IP joint in functional position (20–30°) 40 16 14 8
UE, upper extremity; WP, whole person; TAM, total active motion; MP, metacarpophalangeal; IP, interphalangeal.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 16, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Upper Extremity

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access