Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries









Introduction



E. Lyle Cain, MD

Epidemiology





  • Most common in young amateur or professional athletes, ages 15 to 40 years



  • Most common in males, with 9 : 1 ratio male : female



  • Most common in baseball, with occasional occurrence in other overhead sports (football, javelin throwing, softball, tennis, wrestling, soccer, gymnastics, cheerleading, and pole vaulting)



  • Baseball pitchers make up 89%, followed by catchers



  • Incidence evenly distributed among high school, collegiate, and professional levels



  • Incidence of UCL injury requiring surgery in high school and adolescent athletes has risen dramatically in the past 5 years.



Pathophysiology


Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Traumatic Factors





  • Injury generally occurs during the acceleration phase of the throwing motion ( Figure 11-1 ).




    FIGURE 11-1


    Phases of the overhead throwing motion.



  • Biomechanical factors resulting in poor power transfer from the trunk to the arm may predispose the athlete to UCL injury.



  • Based on cadaveric testing, UCL tensile failure is approached with every throw, especially in high-velocity throwers.



  • Overuse-type throwing habits result in repeated microtrauma to the static restraints of the throwing elbow, without adequate time for healing.



  • Accumulation of elbow microtrauma causes the UCL to become weakened and prone to catastrophic failure.



  • The failure process is exacerbated by high pitch velocity, the throwing of breaking pitches, and inadequate warm-ups.



Classic Pathological Findings





  • Anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is the primary restraint to valgus stress at the elbow during functional range of motion between 20° and 120° of flexion.



  • Dr. Frank Jobe pioneered surgical reconstruction of the UCL in 1974, often referred to as “Tommy John Surgery” in reference to the first recipient of the reconstruction procedure.



Clinical Presentation and Examination





  • All patients report elbow pain while athletically active (throwing, tennis).



  • Baseball players primarily (96%) complained of pain during the late cocking and acceleration phase of throwing.



  • Half report an acute onset of pain at the medial elbow, whereas half cannot identify a single inciting event.



  • For those athletes who can identify the onset of symptoms, three out of four report that the onset occurred during a game, 10% during practice, 10% during the preseason, 4% during the off-season, and 1% while playing recreationally.



  • Decreased velocity and/or loss of control is a common complaint.



Abnormal Findings





  • The primary exam finding is tenderness to palpation of the anterior band of the UCL.



  • Pain with valgus stress (milking maneuver) and active valgus stress are common.



  • Preoperatively one in four athletes has neurological symptoms, most commonly intermittent paresthesias in the ulnar nerve distribution (ring and small fingers) during throwing.



Pertinent Normal Findings





  • Elbow range of motion is generally full, although many overhead athletes have a flexion contracture of about 5°.



  • Only one in four patients demonstrates valgus instability to manual testing at 30° elbow flexion.



Imaging Studies





  • Radiographic examination is normal in half, whereas half have assorted radiographic abnormalities, most commonly olecranon osteophyte formation and ectopic calcification within the UCL substance.



  • Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) with intraarticular contrast is the gold standard diagnostic test.



  • MRA may show complete tearing or a partial undersurface tear of the anterior band of the UCL.



  • CT arthrogram is useful in patients who cannot undergo MRA



  • Ultrasound may be useful in diagnosis and may be helpful to allow some level of reparative process of the ligament with nonsurgical treatment.



Differential Diagnosis





  • Flexor pronator tendinitis: tenderness anterior to the UCL along the medial epicondyle, pain with resisted wrist pronation



  • Ulnar neuritis: sensory disturbance to the ring and small fingers, positive Tinel’s at the cubital tunnel, normal imaging



  • Olecranon osteophyte/valgus extension overload: posterior medial pain along the olecranon tip with extension, pain during ball release or follow-through, osteophyte on radiographs



Treatment


Nonsurgical Options





  • Rest: cessation from throwing or any valgus producing stress to the elbow



  • NSAIDs



  • Physical therapy to maintain elbow motion, decrease pain, strengthen both the shoulder and elbow musculature



  • Injection of corticosteroids or platelet rich plasma: controversial



Guidelines for Choosing among the Nonsurgical Treatment Options





  • Level of play: Higher level of play (major league) is more likely to have successful outcomes than lower level (high school, recreational).



  • Degree of injury (partial vs. complete): Complete tears are more likely to lead to chronic symptoms.



  • Timing of season: Return to play generally takes approximately 1 year.



  • Position (pitcher vs. fielder): Pitcher and catcher require more elbow endurance, and may take longer to return after surgery.



  • Acute versus chronic injury: Chronic ligament insufficiency is less likely to respond favorably to nonsurgical treatment.



  • Symptom magnitude: Some athletes can participate at various levels (i.e., fielding but not pitching) despite ligament damage.



Surgical Indications





  • Absolute: complete tear in pitcher who has failed nonoperative treatment and is unable to participate at the desired level of play



  • Relative: any degree of tear in any sport or position that is unable to return to the desired level of competition after appropriate nonsurgical treatment, and is willing to participate in a minimum 1 year rehabilitation period



  • Most UCL injuries in nonoverhead athletes (e.g., football, gymnastics, soccer) do not require surgery for continued participation.



Aspects of History, Demographics, or Exam Findings That Affect Choice of Treatment





  • Age



  • Level of play



  • Degree of injury (partial vs. complete)



  • Timing of season



  • Position (pitcher vs. fielder)



  • Acute versus chronic injury



  • Symptom magnitude



Aspects of Clinical Decision Making When Surgery Is Indicated





  • Graft choice: palmaris longus versus gracilis tendon (autografts)



  • Additional procedures as indicated: ulnar nerve transposition, olecranon osteophyte excision, loose body removal



  • Muscle-splitting versus modified Jobe (muscle elevation)



  • Graft fixation: suture fixation versus interference screw versus docking



Evidence


  • Azar FM, Andrews JR, Wilk KE, et. al.: Operative treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow in athletes. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28: pp. 16-23.
  • The authors evaluated the first large series of ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions (78) or repairs (13) by one surgeon (JRA). Thirty-seven patients (41%) were professional baseball players, 41 (45%) were collegiate baseball players, and 7 (7.7%) were high school or recreational players. Subcu­taneous ulnar nerve transposition with stabilization of the nerve with fascial slings of the flexor pronator mass was performed in all patients. Reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament was found to be effective in correcting medial instability of the elbow and allowed most athletes (79%) to return to previous levels of play in less than 1 year. (Level IV evidence)
  • Cain EL, Andrews JR, Dugas JR, et. al.: Outcome of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in 1281 athletes: Results in 743 athletes with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: pp. 2426-2434.
  • The authors report follow-up data on a large case series of ulnar collateral reconstruction (1266) or repair (15) performed in 1281 patients over a 19-year period using a modification of the Jobe technique. Seven hundred forty-three patients (79%) were contacted for follow-up evaluation and/or completed a questionnaire at an average of 37 months postoperatively. Six hundred seventeen patients (83%) returned to the previous level of competition or higher. The average time from surgery to the initiation of throwing was 4.4 months and the average time to full competition was 11.6 months after reconstruction. Complications occurred in 148 patients (20%), including 16% considered minor and 4% considered major. (Level IV evidence)
  • Conway JE, Jobe FW, Glousman RE, et. al.: Medial instability of the elbow in throwing athletes. Treatment by repair or reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: pp. 67-83.
  • The authors report longer-term follow-up of the original Jobe cohort of UCL reconstruction. Seventy patients were reported at an average of 6.3 years post surgery. Seven of fourteen repairs (50%) and 38 of 56 (68%) reconstructions returned to the same level of competition or higher. Twelve of sixteen major league players were able to return to the major leagues after reconstruction. Ulnar neuropathy occurred postoperatively in 15 patients, with nine requiring subsequent surgery for the neuropathy. Patients with previous surgery on the elbow had a significantly lower chance of return to the same level of competition. (Level IV evidence)
  • Jobe FW, Stark H, Lombardo SJ: Reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: pp. 1158-1163.
  • The is the landmark article reported by Jobe on reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament using a free tendon graft on 16 athletes in sports that involved throwing (mostly professional baseball). Jobe describes his surgical technique and rehabilitation program. Ten of the sixteen patients returned to their previous level of participation in sports, one returned to a lower level of participation, and five retired from professional athletics. There was a high incidence of complications related to the ulnar nerve. Two patients had postoperative ulnar neuropathy that required a secondary operation, but they eventually recovered completely, and three others reported some transient postoperative hypoesthesia that resolved after a few weeks or months. (Level IV evidence)
  • Petty DH, Andrews JR, Fleisig GS, et. al.: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in high school baseball players: Clinical results and injury risk factors. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: pp. 1158-1164.
  • The authors report the outcome of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction and evaluated potential risk factors for injury at the high school level. Follow-up physical examination and questionnaire data were collected at an average of 35 months after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction from 27 former high school baseball players. Six potential risk factors were evaluated: year-round throwing, seasonal overuse, event overuse, throwing velocity more than 80 mph, throwing breaking pitches before age 14, and inadequate warm-ups. Overall, 74% returned to baseball at the same or higher level. Patients averaged three potential risk factors, and 85% demonstrated at least one overuse category. Of the pitchers, the average self-reported fastball velocity was 83 mph, and 67% threw breaking pitches before age 14. The success rate of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in high school baseball players is nearly equal to that in more mature groups of throwers. Overuse of the throwing arm and throwing breaking pitches at an early age may be related to their injuries. Special attention should be paid to elite-level teenage pitchers who throw with high velocity. (Level IV evidence)
  • Smith GR, Altchek DW, Pagnani MJ, et. al.: A muscle-splitting approach to the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow. Neuroanatomy and operative technique. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: pp. 575-580.
  • The authors describe the relevant anatomy of a novel surgical approach to the UCL by a muscle-splitting approach, rather than the traditional muscle detachment (Jobe) or elevation (Andrews).
  • Thompson WHJF, Yocum LA: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in throwing athletes: Muscle-splitting approach without transposition of the ulnar nerve [abstract]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7: pp. 175.
  • The authors report the outcome of UCL reconstruction with a muscle-splitting approach without transposition of the ulnar nerve in 83 athletes with medial elbow instability. Thirty-three were available for minimum 2-year follow-up. Postoperatively, 5% of this group had transient ulnar nerve symptoms, all of which resolved with nonoperative management. There were no reoperations for nerve dysfunction and no permanent nerve problems. Ninety-three percent of the highly competitive athletes who had not had a prior surgical procedure had an excellent result. All athletes, regardless of whether they had a prior procedure, were able to return to their sport. The authors felt these surgical modifications yielded a decreased postoperative complication rate and improved outcomes compared with the results of prior procedures. (Level IV evidence)

  • Multiple Choice Questions




    • QUESTION 1.

      During which phase of the throwing motion do symptoms most commonly occur with UCL injury?



      • A.

        Wind-up


      • B.

        Acceleration


      • C.

        Ball release


      • D.

        Follow-through



    • QUESTION 2.

      What position in baseball most commonly injures the UCL?



      • A.

        Catcher


      • B.

        Infield


      • C.

        Outfield


      • D.

        Pitcher



    • QUESTION 3.

      What is the most common physical exam finding with UCL injury?



      • A.

        Pain with resisted pronation


      • B.

        Positive Tinel’s at the cubital tunnel


      • C.

        Pain with valgus stress


      • D.

        Loss of motion



    • QUESTION 4.

      What percentage of athletes is expected to return to the same level or higher competition after UCL reconstruction?



      • A.

        Less than 25%


      • B.

        25% to 50%


      • C.

        50% to 75%


      • D.

        Greater than 75%



    • QUESTION 5.

      What is the gold standard diagnostic test for UCL injury?



      • A.

        Plain radiographs


      • B.

        CT scan


      • C.

        Ultrasound


      • D.

        Arthrogram MRI




    Answer Key




    • QUESTION 1.

      Correct answer: B (see Clinical Presentation)


    • QUESTION 2.

      Correct answer: D (see Epidemiology )


    • QUESTION 3.

      Correct answer: C (see Clinical Presentation)


    • QUESTION 4.

      Correct answer: D (see Evidence )


    • QUESTION 5.

      Correct answer: D (see Imaging Studies )





    Nonoperative Rehabilitation of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries



    E. Lyle Cain, MD
    Kevin E. Wilk, PT, DPT
    Todd R. Hooks, PT, OCS, SCS, ATC, MOMT, MTC, CSCS, FAAOMPT



    Guiding Principles of Rehabilitation





    • Restrict elbow range of motion and valgus forces during the early phases of treatment to minimize stresses upon healing structures.



    • Conduct a proper assessment and institute a proper rehabilitation of the entire kinetic chain to reduce the valgus stresses imparted upon the elbow during overhead athletics.



    • Ensure an appropriate functional interval return to play program is implemented to allow for a controlled progression into sporting activities.



    • Proper communication between coach, player, physician, and clinician to determine appropriate return to play guidelines based upon sport of the athlete.




    Phase I (Immediately following injury through week 2)


    Protection





    • A hinged elbow brace is used to restrict motion and prevent valgus strain.



    • The athlete is allowed to perform personal care ADLs while wearing brace.



    Timeline 11-1

    Nonoperative Rehabilitation Following Ulnar Collateral Ligament Sprains of the Elbow in Throwers














    PHASE I (weeks 0 to 2) PHASE II (weeks 3 to 10) PHASE III (weeks 10 to 14) PHASE IV (weeks 14 to 18)



    • Goals:




      • Increase range of motion



      • Promote healing of uInar collateral ligament



      • Retard muscular atrophy



      • Decrease pain and inflammation




    • Absolute control of valgus forces for __ weeks (physician discussion)



    • ROM:




      • Brace (optional) nonpainful ROM [20°-90°]



      • AAROM, PROM elbow, and wrist (nonpainful range)



      • Shoulder ROM, especially internal rotation and horizontal adduction




    • Exercises:




      • Isometrics wrist and elbow musculature



      • Shoulder strengthening (Throwers’ Ten Program)



      • Initiate rhythmic stabilization of elbow




    • Ice and compression




    • Goals:




      • Increase range of motion



      • Improve strength/endurance



      • Decrease pain and inflammation



      • Promote stability




    • ROM: Gradually increase motion 0° to 135° (increase 10° per week)



    • Exercises:




      • Continue Throwers’ Ten Program



      • Initiate manual resistance of elbow/wrist flexor/pronator



      • Emphasize wrist flexor/pronator strengthening



      • Initiate rhythmic stabilization drills for elbow




    • Ice and compression



    • No throwing motion or valgus stress




    • Criteria to progress:




      • Full range of motion



      • No pain or tenderness



      • No increase in laxity



      • Strength 4/5 of elbow flexor/extensor




    • Goals:




      • Increase strength, power, and endurance



      • Improve neuromuscular control



      • Initiate high speed exercise drills




    • Exercises:




      • Initiate isotonic strengthening



      • Thrower’s Ten Program



      • Biceps/triceps program



      • Supination/pronation wrist



      • Extension/flexion



      • Plyometrics throwing drills




    • Two- hand drills at week 10 to 12



    • Single arm plyos at week 12 to 14




    • Criteria to progress to return to throwing:




      • Full nonpainful ROM



      • No Increase in laxity



      • Isokinetic test fulfills criteria



      • Satisfactory clinical exam



      • No pain on valgus stress test




    • Exercises:




      • Initiate interval throwing—monitor signs and symptoms



      • Continue Thrower’s Ten Program



      • Continue plyometrics



      • Continue rhythmic stabilization drills


    Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

    Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

    Apr 5, 2019 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries

    Full access? Get Clinical Tree

    Get Clinical Tree app for offline access