The Stiff Total Knee



The Stiff Total Knee


Ivan De Martino, MD

Vanni Strigelli, MD

Peter K. Sculco, MD

Thomas P. Sculco, MD



INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been demonstrated to be an efficacious and cost-effective solution for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. One of the most common complications within the early postoperative period is reduced knee range of motion (ROM). Stiffness following TKA is a challenge for patients and surgeons alike and occurs in approximately 5% of patients post surgery.1,2 The definition of what constitutes a stiff knee and the overall severity varies across studies.2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 A recent classification system provided by the International consensus of the definition and classification of fibrosis categorizes knee stiffness according to loss of movement based on the deviation from full flexion or extension as mild, moderate, and severe extension restriction (5° to 10°, 11° to 20°, >20°) or flexion range (90° to 100°, 70° to 89°, <70°).10 However, what is considered as total stiffness is probably best related to the preoperative knee ROM. Flexion of 90° is considered unsatisfactory when presented with an initial preoperative flexion of 120°. Yet, in a patient presenting with a preoperative flexion of 60°, reaching 90° can be considered a promising outcome. The evaluation of the stiff knee after TKA must be approached in a systematic fashion as the underlying etiology may be biologic, psychosocial, or mechanical, and the treatment plan must be modified based on these data. Further, several potential reasons for knee stiffness include primary arthrofibrosis, component malrotation, component overstuffing, instability, coronal malalignment, pain catastrophizing, and kinesophobia.10 In addition, severe preoperative knee stiffness and prior open surgical procedures increase the risk of reduced ROM post TKA.

Developing stiffness can be frustrating for the patient: walking requires 65° of flexion, rising from a chair requires 70°, and descending stairs around 100° depending on the stair height. When a patient has severe stiffness, almost every activity of daily living is negatively impacted, with the most basic tasks requiring a minimum of 60° of flexion.8,11 For this reason, stiffness after TKA leads to inferior patient-reported outcomes scores and inferior general health scores. Proper patient education and evaluation are integral in optimizing patient satisfaction following TKA.12 To date, the best predictors of ROM post TKA are preoperative motion and the passive motion achieved at time of surgery.2,9 The aim of this chapter is to outline the specific causes of stiffness in the setting of TKA and provide surgical management tailored to the underlying etiology.


EPIDEMIOLOGY

The prevalence of stiffness post TKA ranges from 1.3% to 14%.6,7,9,13 However, the definition of stiffness is variable among these studies. Gandhi et al reported an incidence of 3.7%, using a definition of stiffness as flexion less than 90°,6 while Yercan reported an incidence of 5.3% with a definition of 10° or more of extension and/or less than 95° of flexion.7 Le et al showed stiffness as the third most common reason for TKA failure, behind infection and instability.13 Zmistowski et al further demonstrated that postoperative stiffness following TKA is one of the most common causes of readmission within the first 90 days after surgery and for revision TKA.14 Regardless of the selected study, stiffness post TKA is one of the more commonly encountered early complications requiring conservative and possibly operative management.


ETIOLOGIES

Knee stiffness can be categorized as intrinsic (anatomically localized in the knee) or extrinsic (outside of the knee joint). Intrinsic etiologies include severe reduction in preoperative ROM, low-grade infection, aseptic loosening, or poor surgical technique.9 Extrinsic etiologies include hip or spine disease, neurologic injury, abnormal inflammatory response, complex regional pain syndrome (CPRS), patient motivation, and improper indication for the TKA.9 Among these, perhaps the most significant risk factor is a preoperative reduction in ROM, as a stiff knee is more likely to yield postoperative stiffness after a knee replacement. Vince further categorized etiologies of stiffness into five groups: pathology, patient, rehab, surgical technique, and implant design.17 Among those five, some etiologies are more commonly associated with early stiffness after TKA, while others have a strong affinity with late-onset stiffness. Etiologies more commonly associated with early stiffness after TKA include component malposition, arthrofibrosis, and CPRS. Etiologies seen in late stiffness include synovitis, tendinitis, aseptic loosening, or prosthetic breakage. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) have been known to cause both early and late reductions in ROM.


Intrinsic Causes

Poor surgical technique is one of the leading causes of stiffness in the postoperative period. Femoral or tibial malalignment or malrotation can lead to pain and
stiffness post TKA. Malalignment results in asymmetry of the extension gap, while malrotation can result in asymmetry of the flexion gap and additional patellar tracking issues. Tibial malrotation can also cause increased medial collateral ligament (MCL) ligament tension during flexion which could also impede early motion. Other intrinsic causes of stiffness post TKA include overstuffing of the patellofemoral joint, mismatch of the flexion and extension gaps, inaccurate ligament balancing, oversized components, joint line elevation, and excessive tightening of the extensor mechanism. In these circumstances, the most appropriate course of treatment is a revision surgery. While not generally attributable to poor surgical technique, aseptic loosening (can yield recurrent effusions and pain) is a prominent cause of stiffness following TKA.18,19

A postoperative hemarthrosis or large effusion can decrease early ROM. Increased intra-articular tension secondary to hemarthrosis causes a mechanical restriction of flexion, in addition to pain. If motion remains limited for 4 to 6 weeks, fibrosis may develop, resulting in permanent ROM reduction and a stiff knee. In a similar fashion, recurrent hemarthrosis secondary to hypervascular and hypertrophied synovium, impingement of the hypertrophied synovium, repetitive trauma, pigmented villonodular synovitis, anticoagulation, vascular disorders, and hemophilia can all cause delayed postoperative stiffness.20 However, the incidence remains low, with a previously reported rate of 0.3% to 0.7%.20

Uncontrolled pain in the postoperative period can negatively impact early ROM. The inability to perform basic range-of-motion exercises can limit the patient from achieving full extension and an optimal level of flexion. Other intrinsic causes of increased knee pain in the postoperative period include synovitis, popliteal tendon impingement, and femoropatellar maltracking with irritation of the lateral facet of the patella.19,21


Infection

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following TKA is one of the most devastating complications seen, often resulting in revision surgery. PJI can manifest as a painful or stiff knee, as the inflammatory reaction to the infecting agent can lead to development of intra-articular fibrosis. Due to its devastating nature, a surgeon should always exclude PJI as a potential diagnosis in a patient presenting with a stiff knee, particularly in a TKA that has delayed loss of motion in the setting of increasing pain.


Overstuffing

Overstuffing of a joint can result from insufficient bone resection or oversized implants and can involve the patellafemoral or tibiafemoral joint. Overstuffing the patellafemoral joint can commonly be seen in two conditions: an anteriorly displaced femoral component or an underresected patellar (combination of patella bone and button is greater than the original thickness).9,15,22

The anterior displacement of the femur can be a consequence of insufficient anterior femoral bone resection or from oversizing of the femoral component. The first scenario results in an anterior translation of a femoral component of appropriate size. In the second condition, a larger than required femoral component size is chosen, and the anterior flange is anterior to the anterior cut surface of the femur.15 Anterior displacement of the femur is most often a potential problem regarding posterior referencing instruments and must always be considered during the anterior resection.22 The junction of the anterior cut and anterior cortex should lay on the same coronal plane and be inspected and palpated. The thickness of the anterior femur bone resection should not be less than the thickness of the anterior flange of the femoral implant, when possible. The risk of overstuffing anteriorly has decreased as anterior-posterior size differential has decreased from 4 mm to around 2 mm for most contemporary knee systems concomitant with an increase in the number of femoral sizes available.

Similarly, the cumulative patella bone-patella button thickness can be excessively thick if the patella resection is insufficient. The thickness of the patellar resection should be at least equal to the thickness of the patellar component. Failure to do so would inadvertently increase the total thickness of the patella following implant insertion. Prior to resection, the patella can be measured in order to ensure the appropriate bone and cartilage removal. If patella overstuffing occurs, knee flexion can be limited due to a tight patellafemoral joint.22

Lastly, Vince found internal rotation of the tibial component to be one of the most common causes of stiff TKA revisions.17 An internal rotation of the tibia may cause maltracking and lateralization of the patella, with a risk of dislocation moving from an extended position to a flexed position. This subsequently may result in a painful stiff TKA. In addition, internal rotation of the tibial component increases MCL tension which will also negatively influence knee motion. On the femoral side, an excess of internal rotation of the femur can also be a cause of patella maltracking, pain, and reduced knee ROM.

Overstuffing the tibiafemoral joint is most commonly seen when insufficient bone is removed from the tibia or distal femur, when the femoral component is larger than the femoral anteroposterior dimension and it is translated posteriorly or in the presence of an upslope in tibial resection.

Failure to recreate native tibial slope in a cruciate retaining (CR) knee can lead to an overly tight posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and reduced ROM. For cruciate-sacrificing, posterior-substituting (PS) implant designs, decreasing the posterior slope of the tibia during preparation of the proximal tibia may also lead to an overly tight flexion gap and reduced knee flexion. Some surgeons prefer to set the posterior slope of the tibial cut at 0° or 3°, which is a relatively low angle compared with the natural posterior slope of the tibia. Some PS-TKA manufacturers
also recommend this in their surgical procedure manuals. However, the extent to which the decreased posterior slope affects the flexion gap with PS-TKA remains unclear.24 In case of reverse tibial slope, an overly tight flexion gap can be created in PS-TKA.

Posterior osteophytes, both on the tibia or femur, can also result in reduced knee extension and flexion if not adequately addressed at time of TKA. Large posterior femoral osteophytes can increase tension on the posterior capsule, and this can prevent full extension. Retained osteophytes behind the femoral component can also impinge against the posterior tibia or tibial component during flexion, preventing full flexion. Osteophytes on the tibia are usually removed with tibial resection, while posterior femoral osteophytes must be extracted. In order to do so, the knee is positioned in 90° of flexion with a laminar spreader and then removed with a curved osteotome and/or curette. In patients with a preoperative flexion contracture, additional stripping/release of the posterior capsule may be necessary.

Additional sources of impingement include native bone overhang from either behind the posterior condyles of the femoral component or posterior portion of the proximal tibia. The residual bone in these areas may cause impingement and limit flexion.22 Utilization of a small tibial component or poor positioning in the anterior aspect can afford a similar effect, resulting in uncovered bone in the posterior knee. The uncovered posterior cortex of the tibia can lead to a contact between the posterior femur and tibia as the knee is flexed, potentially increasing the risk of impingement and stiffness.


Implant Design

When a posterior cruciate ligament-preserving knee (CR) implant is used, careful evaluation of the balance must be done in order to avoid limited flexion. Tightness of the PCL may lead to limited knee flexion, while overrelease of the PCL may limit flexion due to paradoxical anterior translation prior to rollback.12,15

When trial components have been inserted and passive knee flexion performed, if the polyethylene liner trial lifts off anteriorly with deeper flexion, then a tight PCL should be suspected.25 The PCL may also be pathologic and may contribute to the overall mechanical deformity. For example, Laskin et al showed that in patients with a preoperative varus contracture of at least 15°, the PCL is most likely involved.23 In these patients, a PCL release is often necessary to achieve adequate balance. It is important to distinguish between a tight flexion gap and excessive roll back due to an overly tensioned PCL.23


EXTRINSIC CAUSES

Knee stiffness can arise due to extrinsic causes outside of the knee joint as well. Patient factors (including preoperative ROM), body habitus, and patient personality have all previously been implicated with stiffness.15 Patients that are obese may have limited ROM secondary to posterior soft-tissue impingement as the knee flexes,15 and some studies have shown a direct relationship between BMI and reduced ROM.26 Interestingly, patients with low BMI may be at increased risk for reduced ROM as well.17

Demographic risk factors that have been reported in the literature include age and ethnicity. Younger age at time of TKA has been associated with increased risk of stiffness post TKA.17 Springer et al reported that patients younger than 45 years and of African-American ethnicity were twice as likely to undergo a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA).27 Patient comorbidities may also contribute to the risk of developing stiffness. For example, the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus has been associated with reduced ROM and risk for arthrofibrosis. Other patient factors that may limit ROM include poor patient motivation which may compromise postoperative rehabilitation protocols and overall compliance with postoperative exercises.6 In addition, previous open surgical procedures on the affected knee have been suggested as a risk factor for arthrofibrosis after TKA.5,28

Other extrinsic causes that can lead to knee stiffness include any muscular or nervous system disorder that prevents normal knee motion. Central or peripheral nervous system disorders that may lead to spasticity might negatively influence final ROM. Parkinson disease, not well pharmacologically controlled, results in increased spasticity, cogwheel rigidity, and knee stiffness. Additionally, tight quadriceps or hamstring muscles secondary to muscle injury, heterotopic ossification (HO), or long-standing juvenile inflammatory conditions limiting knee ROM prior to the completion of skeletal growth may be an extrinsic source of knee stiffness.9 Problems affecting other joints can influence TKA outcome. Pain originated at the hip radiating to the knee should be evaluated such as radiculopathy. Moreover, flexion deformity of the ipsilateral hip can develop into a compensatory flexion deformity of the knee. A patient with severe valgus or varus OA of both knees who undergo a TKA in one of the affected joints, after the surgery, would have a leg length discrepancy resulting in longer operated limb versus the nonoperated one. The patient may balance the leg length discrepancy by bending the operated knee resulting in a potential flexion contracture. The two possible solutions are the use of a shoe lift on the nonoperated limb or to perform a simultaneous bilateral TKA. In addition, spine deformity, such as dorsal or lumbar kyphosis, can lead to knee flexion.12 Finally, improper surgical indications for TKA might lead to a painful and/or stiff TKA. Evaluation of preoperative radiographs may confirm this suspicion, and caution must be taken when considering surgery for patients with severe pain but minimal preoperative radiographic degenerative changes.29



Arthrofibrosis

Arthrofibrosis is an abnormal inflammatory response. In the literature, fibrosis after TKA ranges from 1% to 15%.10 However, this high variability can be contributed in part by the lack of a preexisting precise definition.10 Arthrofibrosis is characterized by excessive intra-articular deposit of thick fibrous tissue, made of extracellular matrix components, between the extensor mechanism and anterior femoral cortex, involving medial and lateral gutters and posterior capsule. Recent efforts have been made to achieve a clear definition: postsurgical fibrosis of the knee was defined as limited ROM of the knee, in flexion and/or extension, that is not attributable to a bony or prosthetic block to movement from malaligned or mispositioned components, hardware, ligament reconstruction, infection (septic arthritis), pain, complex regional pain, or other specific causes, and is due to fibrosis of the soft tissues which was not present preoperatively. Pain is a possible cause of stiffness; this can be demonstrated by examination under anesthesia.10 Therefore, when fibrosis occurs in association with another pathology causing stiffness, this was not considered true postsurgical fibrosis. Knee arthrofibrosis is diagnosed primarily on clinical assessment after exclusion of all the other causes of stiffness and ultimately confirmed with histopathologic analysis.

Arthrofibrosis is usually accompanied by a combined loss of extension and flexion and associated pain. Isolated loss of extension is relatively rare and is typically found in patients with a significant preoperative flexion contracture. Isolated loss of flexion occurs more frequently due to suprapatellar pouch pathology.30 Patellar clunk syndrome has been defined as parapatellar fibrous nodules on the undersurface of the quadriceps; patient’s experience a painful clunk when extending the knee from a flexed position but is usually not a cause of reduced ROM. Patellofemoral synovial hyperplasia is characterized by a more diffuse proliferation of tissue proximal to the patella. It includes pain and crepitus, not clunk, and occurs usually during active knee extension from a flexed position; again ROM is often not affected.31

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 16, 2021 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on The Stiff Total Knee

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access