INTRODUCTION
Why do volar locking plates and early mobilization not give the expected improved outcome when compared with external fixation?
Volar locking plates have given us improved extra-articular accuracy in managing distal radius fractures in the 21st century. However, intra-articular accuracy needs to be improved. Pinning of intra-articular fragments with fluoroscopic assistance has been shown to give acceptable reduction (stepoff less than 1 mm) in only 33% of cases. In contrast, arthroscopy-assisted management has proved to be better than fluoroscopy in this respect.
Consequently, the role of arthroscopy in distal radius fractures today is twofold. First, arthroscopy gives excellent accuracy in the intra-articular reduction as we know that intra-articular incongruity of more than 1 mm is associated with the development of secondary osteoarthrosis. Second, the role of arthroscopy also is to detect and treat associated ligament and cartilage injuries.
Associated ligament and cartilage injuries further explain why volar locking plates and early mobilization do not improve the outcome more than does external fixation (EF). In fact, immobilization with external fixation may better treat some of the associated injuries. Surgeons need to be aware of these problems, identify associated injuries, and manage them to truly improve the overall outcome after distal radius fractures. An associated intercarpal ligament injury can occasionally be seen on plain x-rays with distal radius fractures ( Fig. 12-1 A and B) as well as with scaphoid and other fractures ( Fig. 12-2 ). They may occasionally be suspected on fluoroscopy, but associated soft tissue injuries and occult carpal fractures may be seen up to 50% of the time with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, arthroscopy has become the gold standard in the detection of these injuries in addition to being an adjunct in the management of distal radius fractures.
ARTHROSCOPY
Indications
The main indication for arthroscopically assisted management of a distal radius fracture is to achieve intra-articular congruency, especially in cases with an intra-articular stepoff of more than 1 mm that persists after attempted closed reduction ( Fig. 12-3 ). Signs of an associated soft tissue injury, such as widening of the intercarpal joint spaces (see Fig. 12-1 ), a break in Gilula’s lines (i.e., three congruent, concave arches that can drawn along the proximal and distal carpal rows [ Fig. 12-4 ]), and widening or subluxation of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) ( Fig. 12-5 ) are other reasons for considering arthroscopy as an adjunct in the management of distal radius fractures.
Contraindications
Open fractures, soft tissue injuries, median nerve symptoms, and signs of compartment syndrome are contraindications for wrist arthroscopy.
Surgical Technique
The arthroscopy mobile cart (with TV monitor, video camera, video recorder, and light source) is positioned at the foot of the bed ( Fig. 12-6 ). The fluoroscopy unit or C arm is placed on the same side as the hand table.
Axillary block or general anesthesia is recommended for arthroscopy, which is performed preferably 2 to 5 days after the trauma. The hand is placed in an upright position, either with an overhead traction boom, as for shoulder arthroscopy, or with a traction tower. The shoulder is in 60 to 90 degrees of abduction with the elbow flexed to 90 degrees. After exsanguination of the arm, the finger traps are placed on the index and long fingers with approximately 4 to 5 kg of traction. This traction often facilitates the reduction of the extra-articular fracture component. An elastic dressing is wrapped around the forearm to minimize the risk of extravasation into muscle compartments.
Swelling distorts the normal landmarks for the portals. The surface landmarks for establishing the 3-4 portal can be approximated by combining a line along the radial side of the middle finger that intersects with a horizontal line drawn along the tip of the radial styloid and the distal, dorsal rim of the radius and the ulnar head. A needle is introduced into the 3-4 portal, and the hemarthrosis is aspirated to confirm proper position. Saline (5 to 10 mL) is injected into the joint.
A small scalpel incision is followed by wound spread technique and insertion of a cannula and blunt trochar, then by a 2.7-mm small joint arthroscope. Dry technique is optional to minimize the risk of extravasation with a secondary compartment syndrome. It is often necessary to lavage the joint through an outflow portal in the 6U portal. Blood clots and debris can also be removed with a motorized, small joint shaver through the 4-5 portal or 6R working portal ( Fig. 12-7 ). Continuous irrigation with saline solution by gravity flow from an elevated bag is most often carried out. With this method, the intra-articular pressure is kept as low as possible to minimize the risk of extravasation of fluid and thus decrease the risk of postoperative carpal tunnel syndrome and compartment syndrome. Once again, an option is to use the dry technique after the initial lavage of the joint. After having cleared the view, the examination starts by evaluating associated injuries to cartilage and ligaments.
Modified Horizontal Wrist Arthroscopy
The standard upright position often makes internal fixation difficult after the joint surface is reduced. Many fractures have comminution of the metaphysis and need additional treatment such as volar or dorsal plates, external fixator, or cancellous bone grafting. Therefore, it is preferable to do the arthroscopy with a modified horizontal technique ( Fig. 12-8 A).
Traction is applied on the index and middle fingers with the traction force applied horizontally over a handle on a regular hand table ( Fig. 12-8 B). The wrist is slightly elevated over the hand table and blocked with bars, which holds the forearm in pronation ( Fig. 12-8 C). Arthroscopy with the horizontal technique is sometimes more technically demanding, but it is otherwise done as described in the previous and following text ( Fig. 12-8 D), with realignment of the joint as well as assessment and treatment of associated injuries. Moreover, the horizontal position allows one to proceed with any additional necessary techniques without changing the traction or position of the wrist. This secures the reduction of the extra-articular component and facilitates further procedures of the fracture or associated injuries.
Arthroscopically Assisted Reduction
Most displaced fragments must be mobilized before they can be reduced, even if some fragments may be reduced by longitudinal traction alone. The reduction is done either with a probe within the joint ( Fig. 12-9 ) or with an elevator through a separate skin incision over the fracture. Kirschner (K) wires are placed centrally in each fragment. Depressed fragments are elevated through combined manipulation with the probe and elevator and with a joystick maneuver of the K wire. Under arthroscopic control, the fracture fragments are sequentially reduced.
The first step is the realignment of the ulnar border of the radius because it represents a double-joint incongruency both in the sigmoid notch of the DRUJ and in the lunate facet of the radiocarpal joint ( Fig. 12-10 A). The next step is to add further fragments to the ulnar platform by positioning K wires from larger to smaller fragments ( Fig. 12-10 B). Afterward, the realignment of the joint surface is determined arthroscopically ( Fig. 12-11 ). Fluoroscopy confirms that the pins are in proper position with appropriate length. It is preferable to leave the pins outside the skin because this minimizes the risk of injuries to tendons and the superficial branch of the radial nerve. Finally, the extra-articular fracture component, the cancellous defect, and associated injuries are evaluated, and additional procedures are considered.
SPECIFIC FRACTURE TYPES
Radial Styloid Fracture (Chauffeur Fracture)
Radial styloid fracture may be part of a trans-styloid perilunate mechanism ( Fig. 12-12 ); therefore, associated injuries to the lesser or greater arch need to be ruled out. In addition, there is often rotation of the displaced fragment, that is underestimated. Arthroscopically, this is seen with inverted incongruencies dorsally and volarly ( Fig. 12-13 ). The fragment is best reduced with the wrist in supination and the elbow flexed to neutralize the brachioradialis force. With a K wire on the tip of the styloid, palmar to the first extensor compartment, the fragment is reduced and the wire is secured into the radius. Next, a second K wire or a cannulated screw is needed for rotational stability.
Lunate Die-Punch Fragment
If the fragment is not impacted, it is often reduced by traction and some palmar flexion. The reduction can be kept in place with one or two transverse subchondral K wires. Care is taken not to penetrate the DRUJ.
If the fragment is impacted, it is disimpacted and mobilized either with a probe within the joint or with an elevator through a 1- to 2-cm separate skin incision over the fracture (see Fig. 12-9 A). When the joint surface is congruent, as determined with arthroscopy (see Fig. 12-11 ), two transverse subchondral K wires can secure the position (see Fig. 12-1 ). In this situation, additional treatment of the metaphyseal void, by means of bone graft or bone substitution, may be considered.
Partial Palmar Fragments
Partial palmar fragments represent a spectrum of complex injuries to the radiocarpal stabilizing ligaments either as isolated ligament tears ( Fig. 12-14 ) or as ligamentous avulsion fractures. The teardrop is the U -shaped outline of the volar rim of the lunate facet. An abnormal teardrop angle (75 degrees) occurs with displacement of this fragment ( Fig. 12-15 ).
As a general guideline, partial palmar fragments cannot be reduced by traction owing to the strong palmar radiocarpal ligaments, in which traction only increases the incongruency. Consequently, they need an open reduction and osteosynthesis with a fragment-specific screw or volar plate (see Fig. 12-15 ). However, in some cases the fragments might be reduced by decreasing the traction and flexing the radiocarpal joint palmarly. In such cases, they can be pinned from the dorsal aspect of the distal radius or from the palmar aspect through a limited palmar approach.
ADDITIONAL FRACTURE TREATMENT
Cortical Fracture Treatment
Dorsal displacement: Many surgeons nowadays fix the extra-articular displacement with a volar locking plate. Other options are open reduction with fragment-specific plates, other mini-plates, and/or screws. External fixation can be considered in extra-articular comminuted fractures to stabilize the fracture alone or for neutralization after additional fixation.
Dorsoulnar fragments: One option is mini-invasive reduction and percutaneous pinning according to the technique recommended by Geissler and associates. Another option is open reduction of ulnar-sided fractures, which can be part of managing a combined intra- and extra-articular fracture. The fragments can be fixed according to the surgeon’s preference with single screws for partial dorsoulnar fragments or various types of dorsal or palmar plates.
Palmar displacement: In these cases, it is preferable to start with an evaluation of any intra-articular incongruency and assess associated injuries. The modified horizontal technique is especially useful, since the traction is maintained after the arthroscopic examination. By rotating the forearm into supination, it is possible to continue with the palmar plating technique without losing the fracture reduction. An option is to start with the palmar incision with dissection down to the extra-articular part of the fracture, after which the arthroscope can be introduced between the palmar radiocarpal ligaments just distal to the watershed line, which refers to the line at the highest (most volar) margin of the radius, where the volar wrist ligaments are attached ( Fig. 12-16 ).