The infected total knee replacement: the worst and unfortunately most frequent complication





Abstract


Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common reason for early revision following total knee replacement surgery. It is associated with poor patient outcomes, prolonged inpatient stay, costly surgical interventions and extended treatment in the community. Despite advances in surgical technique, implants and operating room technology, PJI is an unresolved problem in arthroplasty. As the volume of knee replacement procedures continues to increase, PJI continues to be a significant burden for the health service. Treatment of PJI has historically been with two-stage exchange, but with single-stage revision surgery increasing in popularity for selected cases. In this review we aim to follow the patient journey from presentation to diagnosis and treatment, and discuss contemporary management strategies when treating this devastating complication.


Introduction


Infected total knee replacement (TKR), or periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), is one of the most severe complications following joint arthroplasty. Occurring in approximately 1–2% of primary TKRs, and higher in revision cases, PJI can lead to severe pain, functional impairment and reduced quality of life for affected patients. The consequences of an infected TKR extend beyond patient well-being, as each case adds significant financial burden due to prolonged hospital stays, complex surgeries and extensive rehabilitation. Understanding the aetiology, diagnostic methods and treatment options for PJI is critical to improving outcomes and minimizing healthcare costs.


Incidence


PJI is a devasting complication of unicompartmental (UKR) or total knee replacements (TKR), for both the patient and surgeon. The incidence of PJI in primary TKRs is reported to be 0.5–3.9%, and <1% in primary UKRs, although reported rates vary significantly and are often underreported in national joint registries. The current incidence of revision total knee replacement (TKR) for PJI is estimated at 7.5 cases per 1000 primary joint replacement procedures at 10 years. Though the risk of PJI is relatively low, there is evidence that the incidence is increasing in modern series; this is attributed to patients being treated younger, with more complex indications and more early aggressive treatment of wound problems. The growing number of primary joint replacements performed means that PJI is a significant burden to health services, and it is the first or second commonest indication for revision knee replacement in most joint registries, frequently overtaking aseptic loosening as an indication for revision TKR.


Risk factors


Risk factors for developing a PJI following knee arthroplasty can be divided into patient factors, surgical factors and post-operative factors. Lenguerrand et al. undertook an analysis of risk factors associated with revision for PJI in the UK National Joint Registry (NJR) in a population of 679,000 TKRs. Some of these will be discussed below.


Patient factors





  • Age: patients under the age of 60 years have 2 × the risk of infection compared to patients over 80 years old.



  • Male sex: males have a 1.8 × greater risk of infection compared to females.



  • Diabetes: patients with diabetes have a 1.4 × greater risk of infection compared to non-diabetics.



  • Hypoalbuminaemia: Bohl et al. showed that patients with a preoperative albumin level of less than 3.5 g/dl had a significantly higher risk of PJI in primary TKR, and hypoalbuminaemia has also been shown to decrease the success in single and two-stage revision for PJI.



  • Body mass index (BMI): patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m 2 have a 1.5 × greater risk of infection compared to patients with a BMI <25 kg/m 2 .



  • Inflammatory arthropathy: patients with inflammatory arthritis have a 1.4 × greater risk of infection.



  • Post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA): patients with previous surgery for trauma have a 1.9 × greater risk of infection.



  • Intra-articular injections before TKA: Bedard et al. observed that intra-articular knee injections with corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid or other drugs prior to TKA were related to an increased risk of PJI, and this association appeared to be time-dependent: the shorter the delay between injection and TKA, the greater the likelihood of PJI.



  • Previous septic arthritis: patients with previous septic arthritis have a 4.9 × greater risk of infection.



  • Other medical co-morbidities: patients with a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Grade 3 to 5 have a 1.8 × higher risk of PJI compared to those with an ASA Grade of 1. Studies have also shown that congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary illness, preoperative anaemia, depression, renal illness, pulmonary circulation disorders, psychosis, metastatic tumour, peripheral vascular illness and valvular illness all are independent risk factors in PJI.



  • Current tobacco use: Singh et al. found that smoking was related to an elevated risk of PJI after primary TKA.



Surgical factors





  • Requirement for tibial bone graft: patients with significant tibial bone loss have a 2 × greater risk of infection.



  • Use of constrained TKR: patients requiring a posteriorly-stabilized fixed-bearing prostheses versus an unconstrained fixed bearing prosthesis have a 1.4 × increased risk of infection, and those needing a constrained condylar prostheses have 3.5 × higher risk of revision for prosthetic joint infection.



  • Prolonged operative time: patients with a postoperative infection have a mean operative time of 127 minutes, compared to 94 min in a control group.



  • Unilateral versus bilateral TKR: bilateral TKA has a significantly higher complication profile compared to unilateral TKRs.



Postoperative factors





  • Early return to theatre: patients requiring early return to theatre, including evacuation of haematoma within 30 days of index TKA, have a 12% risk of subsequent PJI.



  • Postoperative blood transfusions: patients requiring a post-operative transfusion have a 1.2 × higher risk of PJI.



  • Length of stay in hospital (LOS) over 15 days: patients with an increased LOS have an increased risk of PJI. The risk increases for increasing length, from 15 days to 24 days (HR 1.2), 25–34 days (HR 1.4) and over 35 days (HR 1.5).



  • Higher postoperative glucose variability: diabetic patients who have higher glucose level variability have an increased risk of PJI.



  • Discharge to convalescent care: patients discharged from hospital to convalescence care have a 1.3 × higher risk of PJI.



Presentation


Infection following TKR is a complication that presents with distinct clinical features, depending on the infection timeline and pathogenic route. Infections are typically categorized into acute, delayed, chronic and haematogenous subtypes, with each one exhibiting specific symptoms.


Acute infections manifest within 3 months of the operation, commonly due to intraoperative contamination or early post-operative bacterial colonization. Clinically, acute infections are marked by the classical signs of acute inflammation, including intense localized pain, erythema, oedema and a hot joint. Patients may exhibit functional impairment of the joint, often accompanied by systemic signs of infection, such as pyrexia. Purulent discharge from the incision site or wound dehiscence is common, especially in cases involving pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus or Gram-negative organisms.


Delayed infections, occurring between 3 months and 12 months post-operatively, are frequently caused by lower-virulence organisms, such as coagulase-negative staphylococci, which are often introduced perioperatively. The clinical manifestations are typically subacute, with persistent knee pain being the main symptom. The joint is often stiff, and there may be mild oedema; however, overt signs of inflammation, such as erythema or fever, are often absent or minimal. These patients may experience a subtle decline in knee function, leading to a delayed presentation. Inflammatory markers are often raised at lower levels than in acute infections.


Chronic infections, defined as occurring more than 1 year after surgery, are typically due to low-grade pathogens that persist from the initial surgery, or from haematogenous seeding from a distant infection site. Chronic infections are often characterized by persistent joint pain, chronic synovitis and functional limitations, such as restricted range of motion and intermittent swelling. In some cases, sinus tract formation is observed, which is pathognomonic for deep-seated prosthetic joint infection. Radiographic findings may reveal osteolysis and peri-prosthetic lucency, indicating chronic infection and implant loosening. Due to the low virulence of causative organisms, systemic signs like fever are typically absent, complicating the clinical diagnosis without confirmatory synovial fluid cultures and advanced imaging.


Haematogenous infections can occur at any time after TKR, and are caused by hematogenous spread of organisms from a separate infective focus, commonly a urinary, oral or respiratory tract infection. These infections typically present acutely, with sudden onset of symptoms in previously asymptomatic patients. Clinically, haematogenous infections resemble acute infections, with acute knee pain, oedema, erythema, and pyrexia. High-virulence organisms, such as Staph. aureus or Streptococcus species are commonly implicated.


Microbiology of PJI


Weinstein et al. undertook a retrospective cohort study in America in 2023 that aimed to compare the incidence, the microbiology and the factors that influence PJI in total knee replacement surgery, using the National Veterans Affairs Healthcare system to collect data. From 79,367 patients that were identified, 1599 were diagnosed with PJI. This data also showed that, among the patients with culture results (1,473), 459 had culture-negative results. Among the positive culture results, 710 (48.2%) had Gram-positive infections, with Staphylococcus species being the most common (536 (36.4%)). Staph. aureus was the most common organism (489 (33.2%)), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (286 (19.4%)), Enterococcus species (65 (4.4%)), and Streptococcus species (122 (8.3%)). Gram-negative infection was identified in 164 (11.1%) cases, predominantly Pseudomonas aeruginosa (40 (2.7%)), Escherichia coli (34 (2.3%)), Klebsiella species (32 (2.2%)), and Enterobacter species (40 (2.7%)). Additionally, 102 (6.9%) patients had polymicrobial infections. A significant limitation of this study was that males were over-represented (94.8%).


Another study, by Perni et al. used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to identify the PJI incidence in hip or knee replacements, identifying 695 PJIs that occurred following knee replacements, and 707 that occurred after hip replacements. Gram-positive species represented 71% of PJIs diagnosed in the first 3 months post-surgery, and 85% diagnosed within the first 12 months after surgery. The most common organism of the gram positive organisms identified in the first 3 months was Staph. aureus (34.3%), and other Staphylococcus species made up a further 23.3%. The most frequent Gram-negatives were E. coli and P. aeruginosa (12.2% and 6.1%). After 12 months, the most common organisms identified were other Staphylococcus species (37.1%), Staph. aureus (29.1%), Gram-negative E. coli (6.1%) and P. aeruginosa (2.6%). Additionally, 36.0% of PJIs diagnosed after 3 months and 25.3% after 12 months had multiple organisms. (Of note, this dataset included both hip and knee replacement patients.)


Iqbal et al. identified 48 patients that were diagnosed with PJI out of 4269 patients that underwent primary knee replacement between 2008 and 2018, in Pakistan. Of these, 52.1% had Staphylococcus species identified, predominantly MRSA (39.6%), followed by Streptococcus in 12.5%. In four (8.3%) cases the organism was Gram-negative, and in two (4.1%) the organism was fungal. In contrast to the other studies, MSSA was only identified in three (6.25%) of cases. The study was limited by a smaller sample size.


Diagnosis


The diagnosis of PJI can be surprisingly challenging. Infection should remain in the differential diagnosis for all patients with pain, stiffness or loosening of implants following TKR. The diagnosis of an acute infection is usually straightforward, with the typical stigmata of infection often present; however, delayed PJI cases often present with indolent symptoms and signs requiring further investigation. In a recent study, out of 297 patients undergoing ‘aseptic’ revision hip or knee replacement, 37 (13%) had at least three unexpected positive culture (UPC) results at the time of revision surgery, whilst in other studies, UPC rates have varied from 4% to 38%. These results suggest that a high index of suspicion is required for possible underlying infection in all revision TKRs. However, the quandary remains as no test is 100% sensitive or specific for PJI, and hence multiple investigations are often needed to diagnose or exclude infection.


Serological markers


C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are widely available cheap blood tests that should be performed on all cases undergoing revision surgery. In acute infection with an inflammatory presentation, CRP and ESR are commonly raised, with the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) on PJI stating an acute PJI should have a CRP >100 mg/litre. It has been shown that the CRP level normalizes at approximately 3 weeks post-surgery, while the ESR level may be elevated for up to 1 year after an uncomplicated total hip or knee arthroplasty. In acute infections, the sensitivity of ESR is 42–94%, and its reported specificity ranges from 33 to 87% in the literature. The sensitivity of CRP is 74–94%, and its specificity varies between 20% and 100%.


In chronic infection, CRP elevation may be minimal, and it may vary with the virulence of the causative organism, with the ICM setting a criteria of 10 mg/litre for chronic PJI. Fernández-Sampedro et al. analysed a total of 498 patients, including 77 late PJIs. In these late PJIs, the sensitivity of CRP was only 62.3%, potentially leading to many false negative results. Greidanus et al. showed that using a combination threshold of CRP >13.5 mg/litre and ESR >22.5 mm/hour, if both tests were negative then the negative predictive value was 96%, but if both tests were positive, the positive predictive value was 84%. The problem remains that neither ESR or CRP are specific to infection, and they can be raised in many conditions.


Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine that is released in the presence of bacterial infection or tissue damage. A 2010 meta-analysis showed superiority of IL-6 over CRP and ESR in diagnosing PJI, with a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 91%. With the combined use of IL-6 and serum CRP, Elgeidi et al. reported a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99% and accuracy of 98%. However, the main problem remains the expense and lack of availability of the test.


D-dimer is a product of fibrin-clot dissolution by plasmin, and this is a commonly performed test. The increased fibrinolytic activity associated with infections results in increased D-dimer levels. Mixed results have been reported in the literature in comparison to ESR and CRP, with added problems that D-dimer is raised in the normal postoperative course, and with other conditions such as thromboembolism.


Pro-calcitonin (PCT) has recently attracted research interest in PJI, primarily due to its utility in identifying bacterial infections. PCT is normally produced by the thyroid gland, whereas in infectious conditions it is produced by macrophages and liver-derived monocytic cells. Again, there has been variability in the success of its use in diagnosing PJI, limiting its routine uptake by clinicians.


Radiology


X-ray are obtained in almost all cases of revision surgery, and may exhibit signs compatible with infection, including radiolucency and osteolysis, or rapid migration of a prosthesis that exceeds 2 mm within a 6–12-month period. However, these radiographic signs are more often seen in chronic infection, and Zajonz et al. found that radiographic evidence of infection was demonstrated in 61% of PJI in hip cases, but in only 29% for knees.


MRI is probably an underused investigation for PJI. MRI generates detailed images of soft tissues, and it is effective in detecting alterations in bone marrow, analysing fluid collections and in visualizing synovitis. The development of Metal Artefact Reduction Sequences (MARS) has helped to reduce metal artefact from the TKR, but does not illuminate it. Some studies have reported good results in distinguishing septic from aseptic failure, but it has only been adopted sparingly. In cases with evidence of osteomyelitis on X-ray, MRI can be useful in determining the extent of the infection and of soft tissue collections.


Nuclear medicine: a host of nuclear medicine investigations, including triple-phase bone scintigraphy, positive emission tomography (PET) and labelled white cell scans, have all been advocated in the investigation of PJI. White blood cells (WBCs) labelled with 99mTc-hexamethylene-propyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) or indium oxine, represent the gold-standard imaging technique for diagnosing PJI, with high sensitivity and specificity, and is the only imaging modality to be considered in the European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria for diagnosing PJI. While this technique offers diagnostic utility, it is associated with complexity and high costs, and it is significantly time-consuming, meaning that it is often best reserved for challenging cases where PJI is suspected but remains unproven.


Synovial fluid analysis


Synovial cell counts: this method estimates the total number of leukocytes, along with an assessment of the polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) percentage. Various cut-off settings have been used with various sensitivity and specificity values in a variety of different scenarios. The original synovial leukocyte count cut-off value of >10,000 cells/μl, proposed by the International Consensus Meeting, has been shown to have low sensitivity by multiple authors, in both acute and chronic PJIs. Cytological assessments can be affected by many host-related factors and by whether the patient has received antibiotics.


α-defensin (AD) is an antimicrobial peptide secreted by synovium neutrophils in reaction to infection, and targets the cell membrane of the infecting agent. It has been reported to exhibit a sensitivity range of 96–100% and a specificity exceeding 90%. Significantly, this biomarker’s diagnostic accuracy is not compromised by the administration of antibiotics, and it possesses the capability to identify a broad spectrum of microbial agents exhibiting a diverse range of virulence. A recent large-scale meta-analysis reported that laboratory-based synovial AD and synovial calprotectin were the two best independent preoperative diagnostic tests for diagnosing PJI. The assay is available in two configurations: a qualitative lateral flow test (LFT), which presents lower diagnostic accuracy, and a quantitative method, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).


Leucocyte esterase (LE) assay presents a swift diagnostic method for identifying potential PJI. This enzyme is characteristically released by neutrophils as a response mechanism to infectious stimuli. A positive (‘+’) reading on the LE test may suggest the existence of an acute infection, while a double-positive (‘++’) serves as a threshold indicative of a chronic infection. Despite the notable advantages of this test, including cost-effectiveness, wide availability and rapidity, the interpretation of outcomes remains susceptible to observer bias.


Calprotectin is a protein secreted by neutrophils, and stimulates leucocyte migration as part of the inflammatory response. Hantouly et al. conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis comprising 618 subjects across eight studies looking at the diagnostic accuracy of calprotectin. They found a cumulative sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 93% respectively.


Synovial CRP , and the combination of synovial CRP and serum CRP, has demonstrated superior diagnostic precision relative to the exclusive use of serum CRP alone. In a study conducted by Baker et al., an analysis was undertaken of 621 patients being evaluated for a revision arthroplasty due to potential PJI. Both serum and synovial CRP levels were examined, and the combination of the two resulted in an enhancement in diagnostic accuracy. They reported sensitivity as 74.6% and specificity of 98%, which were superior to serum CRP alone.


D-lactate is a metabolic by-product derived from bacterial activity, typically present within infected tissues. It has been recommended as a screening test by Karbysheva et al., who tested 224 patients with suspected PJI synovial fluid and found that it had a 92.4% sensitivity and 88.6% specificity. However, as d -lactate mirrors bacterial activity, lower levels are seen in low-virulence infections.


Microbiology culture


Aspiration and culture of the synovial fluid remains the most important investigation in infected TKR, with identification of the causative organism playing a crucial role in subsequent management. However, there are significant false negative rates due to the lower virulence of organisms in chronic infection, where there are slow replication rates. Schäfer et al. reported on 284 patients with suspected PJI who underwent cultures with a 14-day incubation period, concurrently compared with histological analysis. Findings from the study indicated an overall detection rate of 73% via culture method alone. It was observed that less virulent organisms, including Propionibacterium acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci, were identifiable within the 14-day timeframe, but more virulent organisms such as Staph. aureus were identified typically within 7 days of culture, highlighting the need for extended cultures. The sensitivity of culture is also significantly reduced by the administration of pre-operative antibiotics. Malekzadeh et al. found that the odds of having a culture-negative specimen increase 4.7-fold if the patient had received antibiotics within the 3 months prior to aspiration or surgery. The routine practice is therefore to withhold antibiotics for at least 2 weeks prior to sampling if clinically safe to do so.


The synovial fluid and tissue also contain planktonic (free floating) bacteria, whereas the implants are covered with a biofilm containing sessile bacteria, which can be more difficult to culture. Various techniques including sonification of the implants to disrupt the biofilm can improve culture rates, but may increase contamination rates, and require careful handling.


Histology


Histological examination is very important in confirming PJI, either from tissue biopsy or from tissue taken at the time of revision surgery. Inagaki et al. conducted a comprehensive histological and microbiological analysis of 60 PJI specimens and 78 specimens from aseptic implant failures, utilizing a well-established guideline for PJI detection. Their findings indicated that a combined approach of histological and microbiological analyses yielded an accuracy rate of 98.6%. Furthermore, this approach was effective in accurately identifying aseptic failures.


In culture-negative results, there is increasing interest in molecular techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS). Goswami et al. conducted a multi-centre analysis on 85 patients with culture-negative PJIs, implementing to ascertain the presence of organism genetic material. Results revealed that bacteria were identifiable in 65.9% of patients with culture-negative PJIs using NGS; however, the significance of organisms identified is unsure, and the test remains expensive to perform.


Scoring systems


Due to the plethora of investigations possible and the variable sensitivity of each one, recently a multitude of scoring systems have been developed to help the guide clinician on the likelihood of infection in each situation. These systems include those developed by institutions such as the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the International Consensus Meeting (ICM), and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS).


Treatment strategies for PJI in TKR


Once the diagnosis of PJI is confirmed, there are a multitude of treatment options, which have been veraciously debated over the years. In the past, surgeons have tended to favour a specific approach for most patients; however, recently, most major PJI units have tended to individualize the treatment strategies based on the timing of infection, co-morbidities of the host, soft tissues and causative organism. The use of a multidisciplinary team discussion (MDT) of cases and management within a specialist PJI centre with standardized treatment algorithms has been shown to improve outcomes. The MDT approach has been adopted in the UK for the management of PJI of TKRs, and all infected cases should be discussed in local and regional MDTs. Figure 1 shows a treatment algorithm used by the author for the management of TKR PJI.


Jun 2, 2025 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on The infected total knee replacement: the worst and unfortunately most frequent complication

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access