The Infected Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty






Chapter Preview


CHAPTER SYNOPSIS


Infection following primary total knee arthroplasty can be a potentially devastating complication. This chapter will provide information to the reader concerning ways to help prevent the total knee infection from the host to surgical procedures and techniques. The diagnosis and types of infection will be detailed along with the current surgical treatment options and clinical outcomes reported in the literature.




IMPORTANT POINTS:




  • 1

    Host factors including, albumin, total lymphocyte count, absolute white blood cell count, and tranferrin levels are all implicated in measuring preoperative risk of surgical site infection.


  • 2

    The operating room environment is very important to lowering bacterial counts and includes air turnover rate, laminar flow, use of personal ventilation suits, and traffic in the operating room.


  • 3

    Postoperatively, the risk of hematoma formation should be minimized since this can significantly increase the risk of acquiring a postoperative primary total knee arthroplasty infection.


  • 4

    Diagnosis of infection often involves multiple tests including blood work, imaging, joint aspiration, and frozen sections to accurately detect an indolent infection.


  • 5

    Chronic infections are treated by two-stage surgery with removal of implants and placement of an antibiotic spacer and 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics with second-stage revision total knee arthroplasty surgery performed from 6 to 12 weeks once documentation of infection eradication has taken place.





CLINICAL/SURGICAL PEARLS:




  • 1

    Pain is the first sign of infection and all painful primary total knee arthroplasties need to have an infection workup completed.


  • 2

    Proper utilization of a cookbook approach to ruling out an infection in a painful total knee arthroplasty can be a helpful approach to determine the diagnosis.


  • 3

    Surgically, when taking frozen sections, these should be taken from five different areas intracapsularly including the intramedullary canals of the tibia and femur.


  • 4

    Nonarticulating spacers should completely cover all exposed bone to minimize bone loss for the stage II reimplantation procedure.


  • 5

    Proper balancing of the articulating spacer needs to be performed to prevent instability and early failure of the spacer.





CLINICAL/SURGICAL PITFALLS:




  • 1

    Incomplete workup of a loose total knee arthroplasty leads to repeat failure of revision from presence of an indolent infection.


  • 2

    Relying on any one diagnostic study to rule out the presence of infection is not advisable.


  • 3

    Incomplete coverage of bone with a static spacer leads to excessive bone loss for the stage II procedure.


  • 4

    Improper sizing of static spacer leads to subluxation or dissociation of the spacer.


  • 5

    Not ruling out host response to stage I surgery prior to reimplantation of implants leading to repeat infection of stage II revision.





VIDEO AVAILABLE:




  • 1

    Articulating spacer mold application Length 1:30


  • 2

    Static spacer technique Length 1:25





HISTORY/ INTRODUCTION/ SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM


Infection following total knee arthroplasty can be a challenging problem for the surgeon as well as a devastating complication to the patient. The overall risk of infection after a primary total knee arthroplasty in the literature has been reported from 1% to 2%, and the estimated cost for treatment of an infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) taking into account inflation and increases in health care is well over $60,000.


Any classification method that describes the mechanisms of bacteria entry into the joint or that is based on the timing of the diagnosis of infection after surgery has very limited usefulness in either identifying the specific cause of infection or formulating preventive measures for periprosthetic infections. Classification systems may, however, be helpful in guiding the surgeon to a proper treatment plan.


The high success rate with antibiotic therapy alone as seen for other bacterial infections has not been achieved in total joint infections. This is due to the fact that the variable and often unknown mechanism and timing of the seeding of the infection, along with the fewer number of phagocytic cells, the presence of biofill on the implant surface, and limited delivery of antibiotics to the bone and joint, are among some of the unpredictable and limiting factors that have time and again forced us to realize that “Prevention is the best treatment.”


Any discussion on preventive measures has to recognize the critical relationship between the bacteria, the host, and the environment in which they interact ( Fig. 25-1 ). The events that are necessary for an infection to take place depends on a number of factors including the number, virulence, and pathogenicity of the bacteria. In any given surgical site, the host’s ability to mount an inflammatory response to fight the bacteria load as well as the local wound conditions that exist and the environment surrounding these conditions play a major role in whether an infection takes place. This triad can be affected by a number of factors, and any imbalance or breach may provide the opportunity for bacteria to initiate the vicious cycle necessary for the infectious process to take hold within the surgical site of the host.




FIGURE 25-1


The epidemiologic triad showing the relationship with the causes of infection in the center of the diagram.


The old adage that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure is especially appropriate in the realm of primary TKA. Any preventive measures must focus on optimization of the epidemiologic triad described earlier. The wound environment and the nutritional status of the host, as well as its ability to fight infection and minimize bacterial contamination into the wound, are all foci that the surgeon needs to take into consideration. It requires a coordinated effort during the preoperative, operative, and postoperative time periods that involves input from the primary care physician, anesthesiologist, and operating room ancillary staff to optimize the process.


The goal of treatment for a periprosthetic TKA infection is, first, eradication of the infection with restoration of a well functioning painless joint. The outcome in these cases, however, is not always favorable. There always exists the real chance that the end result could be an arthrodesis or an amputation. On some rare occasions, the only realistic option may be to suppress the infection with continued oral antibiotics while retaining the prosthesis, but this option is for those patients whose surgical risks outweigh the benefits of the surgery along with an identified bacterium of low virulence.




HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION


Diagnosis of the painful TKA should start with careful history taking and should identify host factors that may predispose the patient to infection. A history of postoperative drainage or a hematoma may also be helpful in identifying a patient at risk. The physical examination should look for knee effusion, warmth, erythema, tenderness, nighttime pain, painful range of motion, and history of drainage or hematoma after the index procedure. There is usually complete absence of any constitutional symptoms or systemic signs and symptoms of infection.


Pain is a strong associated factor, and infection should be considered in any persistently painful TKA or an acute onset of pain in a previously well functioning TKA. The timing of infection can have a significant impact on the outcome and is used for guiding treatment decisions.


In a TKA that had been well functioning and pain free that presents with an acute onset of symptoms, there should be a detailed history concerning any previous ailments or suspicion of hematogenous sources of infection (upper respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, dental procedures, or abscesses). Diabetics should have a complete physical examination of their feet to rule out presence of any foot ulcers or secondary skin sources of infection as well. The history and physical examination remain the initial cornerstone of the workup in a painful TKA and thus start the process of determining the diagnosis of an infection.




INDICATIONS/CONTRAINDICATIONS


The indicated treatment of the infected total knee replacement depends on multiple factors. These factors include existing patient comorbidities, time of diagnosis from the index surgery, and in some cases the virulence of the organism. The indicated treatment strategy includes retention of the implants with irrigation debridement and polyethylene insert exchange, removal of implants and placement of a static or articulating polymethylmethacrylate antibiotic spacer, direct exchange, and/or infusion of appropriate antibiotic therapy. In the recurrent or chronic infection case, knee fusion or possibly amputation may also be indicated. This chapter will outline the approach to preventing, diagnosing, and treating the infected total knee replacement. Since the indications first depend on diagnosis and where in the classification system the type of infection is located, then all of these issues will be covered in detail.


Patient-Dependent Factors


Nutritional Status


Malnutrition adversely affects the following humoral and cell-mediated immune functions: neutrophil chemotaxis, bacterial phagocytosis, neutophil bactericidal function, delivery of inflammatory cells to infectious foci, and serum complement components. Nutritional status of a patient can be determined by anthropometric measures (such as muscle mass, triceps skin fold thickness, weight-height ratio, arm muscle circumference), measurement of cell types (lymphocyte count <1500/mm is associated with increased risk for infection ), serum albumin levels (levels <3.5 g/dL have been shown to increase wound complications), and serum transferrin levels (have been shown to be a very sensitive indicator of wound complications ). The additive history of recent weight loss of greater than 10% has also been associated with increased wound complication rate and should be asked by the physician on interviewing the patient.


The nutritional index of Rainey-MacDonald is a useful screening tool for determining the nutritional index of a patient. The formula is (1.2 × serum albumin) + (0.013 × serum transferrin) − 6.43. If the sum is 0 or a negative number, the patient is nutritionally depleted and is thus at a higher risk for sepsis. Jensen et al. determined that 42% of the patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery were malnourished and that the number of comorbidities that patients possess were positively correlated to the rate of infection and incidence of complications. Length of stay has also been positively correlated to these same higher incidences of infection and complications.


Immunologic Status


Our ability to fight infection is directly correlated to our ability to initiate an inflammatory (cell mediated) and immune (antibody-mediated) response to the invading organism. The mechanisms involved are (1) neutrophil response, (2) humoral immunity, (3) cell-mediated immunity, and (4) the reticuloendothelial system. Any malfunction of the above, from either congenital or acquired causes, would predispose the patient to an infection by specific groups of opportunistic organisms. Abnormal humoral and cell-mediated immune deficiencies can lead to infections by encapsulated bacteria in infants and elderly subjects, pseudomonas infections in heroin addicts, and Salmonella and pneumococcal infections in patients with sickle cell anemia. Neutrophil counts of less than 55/mm are associated with increased risk for infections with Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacilli, Aspergillus, and Candida . Diabetes, alcoholism, malignancy, and chemotherapy are all causes for neutrophil abnormalities that need to be taken into consideration for risks of infection.


Immunoglobulin and complement factors play crucial roles in humoral immunity. Splenectomy or hypogammaglobulinemia predispose to infections by encapsulated bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae , and Neisseria. Defects in the complement cascade predispose patients to S. aureus and gram-negative bacillus, while hypogammaglobulinemia also predisposes to infections by rare organisms like Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Ureaplasma urealyticum.


Cell-mediated immune response is a result of interaction between T-lymphocytes and macrophages. Although primary cell–mediated immune deficiencies are rare, secondary cell–mediated immune deficiencies are common. Steroid therapy, malnutrition, lymphoma, systemic lupus erythematosus, immune deficiencies in elderly, and autoimmune deficiency syndromes can all predispose to fungal, mycobacterial, herpes, and Pnemocystis carinii infections.


Anesthetic agents also have an immunosuppressive effect on the patient, and the use of regional anesthesia may have a slightly lower incidence of infection. Transfusion of homologous blood products has been associated with a slightly lower incidence of postoperative infection compared to autologous blood transfusion (less immunologic modulation of the recipient).


Ectopic Sources of Infection


Many of these sources of infection are targeted for discovery during the preoperative workup of the patient. Dental caries, infections of the genitourinary tract infections, pulmonary infections, and skin ulcers are common potential source for seeding of the primary total knee replacement in the postoperative period. Psoriatic plaques adjacent to the operative site, thin atrophic skin, abrasions/folliculitis, venous stasis ulcers, toe web space ulcers, and infected toenails can be associated with a higher rate of infection, and these must be identified and treated appropriately before surgery. Recognition of many of these sources involves a thorough history and physical examination prior to the operative procedure. The surgeon must remember that other primary care physicians may not realize the importance of these listed sources of bacterial seeding, nor may the patient. Therefore, it is the surgeon’s obligation to make sure all of these issues are addressed in the preoperative time period.


Surgeon-Dependent Factors


Surgeon-dependent factors are by definition ones that are under the easiest control by the surgeon. Specific routines that are developed by the surgeon can help the staff to adhere to many guidelines that can make a difference in the incidence of postoperative infection rates.


Skin Preparation


Although it may not be possible to completely disinfect the skin, significant reduction in the number of pathogens can be achieved before surgery. The skin and hair can be sterilized by application of the most common substances, including alcohol, iodine, hexachlorophene, or chlorhexidine. One must remember that it is not possible to sterilize the hair follicles and sebaceous glands, which normally harbor bacteria. Hair removal or shaving should be done only in the operating room immediately before surgery to minimize bacterial contamination and reproduction, and electronic shaving devices are better than mechanical blades so that the hair follicles and glands are not invaded prior to surgery.


Along the same lines of consideration, skin barriers also help reduce the contamination during surgery. Plastic surgical adhesive drapes reduce wound contamination by preventing lateral migration of the skin bacteria. One should remember that normal recolonization of the skin occurs within 30 minutes. However, a plastic drape impregnated with slow-release iodophor effectively eliminates any skin colonization for up to 3 hours. Application of povidone-iodine solution to the skin margins to reduce the bacterial colony count is a useful method to reduce contamination. Vigorous scrubbing of the operating site should be avoided during preparing the site, as it may be counterproductive by increasing the bacterial counts by releasing harbored bacteria from follicles and sebaceous glands.


Some of the same issues listed above concerning skin preparation of the surgical site are applicable to hand scrubbing by operating room staff and the surgeon. The optimum antiseptic agent and the proper duration for surgical hand scrub are not clear, but applications of Betadine-Povidone, Avagard, alcohol povidone-iodine, alcohol chlorhexidine, foam alcohol, and hexachlorophene foam compound have all provided excellent bactericidal action.


Prophylactic Antibiotics


A number of studies have shown the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing infection rates after orthopedic procedures. During the first 24 hours after surgery, the incidence of an infection depends on the number of bacteria present that the host can successfully mount a response that eradicates the bacterial load. In the first 2 hours, the host defense mechanisms decrease the overall number of bacteria. However, during the next 4 hours, the number of bacteria remains fairly constant, with the bacteria that are multiplying and those that are being killed by the host defenses being roughly equal.


It is the first 6 hours after surgery that is called the golden period, after which the bacteria multiply exponentially. Antibiotics decrease bacteria multiplication and thus expand the golden period. A good prophylactic antibiotic is one that is safe, bactericidal, and effective against the most common organisms responsible for infection— S. aureus, S. epidermidis, Escherichia coli, and Proteus. The first-generation cephalosporins are nontoxic, inexpensive, and effective against the most potential pathogens in orthopedic surgery. In patients who are allergic to penicillin, vancomycin may be the alternative antibiotic of choice. A maximal dose of antibiotic should be administered 30 to 60 minutes before the skin incision and at least 10 minutes before inflation of the tourniquet. During the procedure, antibiotics should be re-dosed every 4 hours or whenever the blood loss exceeds 1000 mL. Many studies have shown that 24 hours of antibiotic therapy is just as effective as 48 or 72 hours, and most authorities recommend a single preoperative dose of antibiotics followed by two or three postoperative doses to reduce the possibility of antimicrobial toxicity and to prevent development of resistant organisms and reduce unnecessary costs.


The role of antibiotic irrigation is still not well established in orthopedics. However, several studies have shown a decrease in colony counts in wounds and a decrease in infection rates with the use of antibiotic irrigation in general surgical procedures. Triple antibiotic irrigation (neomycin, polymyxin, and bacitracin) is currently one of the most favored solutions in use.


Local Wound Environment


Careful preoperative assessment and planning are required to minimize the risk of infection in patients with advanced vascular disease, multiple scars from previous surgeries, history of infection, and psoriatic lesions over operative sites. The relatively subcutaneous position of the knee joint makes infection more common compared to the more deep-seated joints. Meticulous closure and good wound care in the postoperative period help in reducing the overall incidence of infection. Prolonged operative time also has an impact on the rate of deep prosthetic infection.


The well-thought-out use of preexisting scars around the knee is essential to reduce the skin complications, and such preexisting scars should be excised, unless it compromises the wound closure. All attempts should be made to use the lateralmost previous incision for surgery in order to optimize the blood supply to the subcutaneous flap. Gentle handling of the tissues, avoiding prolonged use of self-retaining retractors and racks, as well as avoiding the dissection of subcutaneous tissue from underlying fascia all help to prevent devitalization of the subcutaneous tissues. Faulty placement of sutures strangles the tissue and facilitates infection. Meticulous closure of the joint capsule and subcutaneous tissues to avoid dead space and careful homeostasis both help to reduce the incidence of postoperative hematoma formation.


The routine use of drains for total knee replacements is controversial, and many recent studies suggest equivocal results. Good-layered closure with epidermal apposition provides early sealing of the wound and minimizes wound drainage. Watertight closure of the joint capsule prevents deep seeding from a superficial infection or stitch abscess. Chemical composition of the suture is an important determinant of infection in the presence of wound infection and contamination. Monofilament absorbable synthetic suture is associated with a lower rate of infection than braided absorbable synthetic suture. Although the exact effects of specific physical or chemical properties of implants for total joint arthroplasty are not known, studies suggest that specific biomaterials do influence bacterial adhesion to the implant surface. Coagulase-negative staphylococci exhibit preferential adhesion to polymers, while coagulase-positive staphylococci adhere more readily to metals. Bacteria alter their metabolic characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility after adhering to biomaterials, and bacteria adherent to methylmethaacrylate show very high resistance to antibiotics compared with those that are adherent to metals.


Experimental studies and many clinical trials have found no difference in the infection rates between uncemented and cemented implants. Antibiotic-impregnated cement is becoming popular as it has been shown to lower the incidence of infection but has some inherent problems such as weakening of bone cement, promoting emergence of resistant organisms, and possible allergic reaction. The availability of premixed antibiotics such as tobramycin (Simplex Tobramycin; Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) or gentimicin (Smartset GHV; Depuy, Inc. Warsaw, IN) has led many surgeons to include their use in primary TKA or in patients who have known comorbidities that may increase their chances of infection. Only long-term studies will reveal if this practice will decrease infection rates without increasing the rate of aseptic loosening, however. The Swedish joint registry has now confirmed a decreased incidence of primary TKA infection but has shown a trend to more resistant organisms, which may not be beneficial in the long run.


Operating Room Environment


Clean Air


Airborne bacteria are another source of wound contamination. They are usually gram positive and originate exclusively from the staff in the operating room. Studies have shown that each individual in the operating room sheds 5000 to 55,000 particles per minute. Interestingly, premenopausal females shed significantly fewer bacteria than postmenopausal females and males. A conventional operating room may contain as many as 10 to 15 bacteria per cubic feet and as many as 250,000 particles per cubic feet. A laminar airflow system can reduce this by 80% and the use of a personnel isolator system further reduces the airborne bacterial contamination. Clean air is optimally provided by a combination of laminar flow, vertical airflow systems, use of personal isolator suits, and a room air exchange turnover rate of more than 300 times an hour. Body exhaust suits reduce the bacterial counts in the room air, and vertical laminar airflow system is more effective than horizontal airway systems.


Ultraviolet light has also shown to decrease the incidence of wound contamination by reducing the number of airborne bacteria. This concept although first introduced in 1936 and has not been very popular as there is lack of conclusive evidence about its efficacy and there are concerns regarding personnel exposure in the operating rooms. However, ultraviolet light is very cost effective and a good alternative to laminar airflow systems.


Methods of Reducing Bacterial Contamination and Optimization of Wound Environment


There are several important practices that help in optimizing the wound and the operating room environment, and their application may help in lowering the incidence of infection. Some of these may be obvious, and others have already been alluded to previously in this chapter. Sometimes the initiation of some of these practices is not realized by surgeons as they may be involved with other duties such as dictating while some of these occur. It has been shown that avoiding the use of ward beds in the operating room can affect infection incidence. Along the same lines, restricting traffic in and out of the operating room can decrease bacterial counts as well. This can be accomplished by providing signs and temporary barriers to staff from a main corridor so that personnel can only enter the operating room through a substerile corridor or use a telephone to call into the room ( Fig. 25-2 ). Identification of personnel who are part of the surgical scrub team as bacterial shedders can also aid in decreasing the risk of primary infection as well. Other points that may reduce the incidence of bacterial contamination include clamping off of suction tips to avoid continuous air flow through the sucker tip and increased deposition of airborne pathogens on the tip of the sucker. The use of impervious gowns and drapes over cloth has also been shown to be helpful. It may be beneficial to change sucker tips every 30 to 45 minutes to help prevent this from occurring. Letting the scrub technician know that use of a water basin to keep instruments in that return to and from the operative field is a technique that should be avoided can be helpful as well. Pulsatile lavage can remove as much as 99% of wound contaminants and can be added to the operative regimen to aid in decreasing contamination of the operative site as well.




FIGURE 25-2


Temporary barriers and signs can be used in the operating room to keep traffic to a minimum.


There are multiple issues that the anesthesiologist can address during the operation that can decrease the risk of operative site infection as well. One of these is to ensure the proper timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration. This is usually the responsibility of the anesthesia team, and they should be educated on its significant importance.


The monitoring of the patient’s temperature is a concern most orthopedic surgeons are aware of during trauma procedures but not as focused on during elective procedures. Patient temperature and risk of surgical site infection in an elective setting have been determined, however. Hypothermia has been shown to cause vasoconstriction, and this further reduces the blood supply to the operative site and makes it more susceptible to infection.


Diabetes is a relatively common comorbidity in many patients. Well-controlled diabetes with blood glucose level less than 200 mg/dL during the operative procedure to decrease risk of surgical site infection has been reported.


Anesthesia traffic should to be kept to a minimum as well. Explaining the importance of this to the anesthesia team as well as posted reminders and barriers as stated in the previous paragraph can be helpful as well. Ultimately, it takes a multidisciplinary approach to keep all related services involved in patient care on the same page concerning all of these risk factors to minimize the incidence of surgical site infection in primary total knee replacement.




POSTOPERATIVE RESTRICTIONS/REHABILITATION


It is important to watch for all risk factors and address the postoperative factors that may contribute to infection. A rapidly expanding hematoma may need timely evacuation and debridement as the pressure on the surrounding tissues may devitalize the adjacent tissues and reduce the influx of antibiotic in the operative site. Hematoma also provides a prime milieu for bacterial proliferation. Superficial skin necrosis should be treated aggressively, and serous wound drainage should be treated initially with compressive dressing and prophylactic antibiotic coverage; however, any persistent drainage should be treated in the operating room with open irrigation and debridement.


Prevention in Early Postoperative Period: Hematogenous Infection


In the early postoperative period, the hematoma around the operative wound is susceptible to hematogenous seeding with any episode of bacteremia. All intravenous lines and indwelling catheters should be removed as soon as possible. It is advisable to maintain oral antibiotic coverage for any indwelling catheter in the urinary tract. Although it is very difficult to document bacteremia-preceding infection, it is very important to treat remote infections of the urinary tract, respiratory tract, skin, and overt dental infection in order to prevent any hematogenous seeding.


The common risk factors, which may also predispose to such infections, are rheumatoid arthritis and use of structural bone grafts. The total joint implants are surrounded by an immunocompromised fibroinflammatory zone, wherein the particle debris stimulates the macrophages leading to superoxide radicals, and a self-perpetuating cytokine-mediated tissue damage cascade is created. This causes a progressive enlargement of the immunocompromised fibro inflammatory zone. This typically leads to osteolysis, but hematogenous seeding of this immunocompromised zone can occur. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is generally recommended for high-risk patients with a prosthetic joint any time they have a dental procedure or an invasive procedure like endoscopy, colonoscopy, cystoscopy, and so on, although there is conflicting evidence in the literature and no definitive guidelines are universally agreed on.


Radiologic Studies


Radiographs must be studied carefully for signs of loosening of the implant, bone resorption at bone–cement interface, scalloping at the cement–bone interface, cyst formation, periosteal new bone formation, periprosthetic bone resorption, and ectopic bone formation ( Fig. 25-3 ). Progressive prosthetic loosening is the most consistent radiographic finding (bone destruction is not obvious on plain films until an infection has been present for 10 to 21 days and a lytic lesion is seen only when 30% to 50% of bony matrix has been destroyed/lost). Conventional tomograms and arthrograms have very limited role in the diagnosis of TKA infections and are largely of historical interest.


Mar 22, 2019 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on The Infected Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access