The economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus




Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterised by variable and unpredictable manifestations that can severely affect a person’s physical and mental well-being, social life and ability to acquire and maintain gainful employment. Damage to vital organs may ensue as a result of the disease itself or as a consequence of treatment, and patients often consume substantial health-care resources and incur considerable health-care costs. Furthermore, SLE tends to affect women in young and middle adulthood, at a time in their lives when they are usually most actively engaged in the workforce, and can have important consequences with respect to acquiring and maintaining employment and advancing in one’s career. A number of studies have attempted to assess the health-care costs (direct costs) associated with SLE, the effects of SLE on employment and the associated costs due to decreases in work productivity (indirect costs). In this article, we review a number of recent studies that have added to our current understanding of the economic burden of SLE.


Introduction


Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that can severely affect a person’s physical and mental well-being, social life and ability to acquire and maintain gainful employment. It is a condition that is characterised by frequent exacerbations that can affect virtually any organ system. Over time, damage to vital organs may ensue as a result of the disease itself or as a consequence of treatment. Patients experiencing the unpredictable and often severe manifestations of SLE often require substantial health-care resources and incur considerable health-care costs. Furthermore, the propensity of SLE to predominantly affect women in young and middle adulthood, at a time in their lives when they are establishing careers and starting a family, can have important consequences with respect to acquiring and maintaining employment, remaining productive in the workforce and advancing in one’s career.


The scope of this current review is to provide a picture of our current understanding of the economic burden that SLE has on patients and on society as a whole. The first part of the review focusses on health-care costs, also referred to as direct costs. Over the past few years, several studies have demonstrated that patients with SLE, when compared to persons without SLE, are heavier consumers of health-care resources and incur substantial health-care costs. Although these studies do have their limitations, they help shed light on how health-care resources are used in SLE and what predicts increased costs. This information helps policy makers in their efforts to allocate health-care resources in a manner that could control costs while ensuring the best outcomes. The second part of this review focusses on the impact of SLE on rates of employment and disability, work productivity and the costs of work productivity loss. A number of recent studies are reviewed that demonstrate employment rates among persons with SLE, predictors of work disability and how persons with SLE enter and exit the workforce. The monetary costs associated with work loss and diminished productivity, also referred to as indirect costs, are reviewed.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 11, 2017 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on The economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access