Technique: Anderson Technique
Allen F. Anderson
Christian N. Anderson
INTRODUCTION
Intrasubstance tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) have been recently reported with increasing frequency in skeletally immature patients. Epidemiologic data from a large integrated health care system demonstrates an incidence of 0.11 per 10,000 at 8 years of age that gradually increases to 2.42 per 10,000 by 14 years of age.1 Although ACL injuries in children and adolescents are relatively rare, an increased rate of ACL reconstructions in this population has been observed over the last 20 years.2 This increase in pediatric ACL surgery is thought to be commensurate with increasing injury incidence2; however, this phenomenon may also represent a change in management preferences from nonoperative to operative because of improved surgical techniques3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 and increased awareness that meniscal and chondral pathology may be associated with nonoperative13,14,15,16,17,18,19 or delayed surgical treatment.20,21,22,23,24,25
Pediatric knee injuries, including ACL tears, present a public health problem because of the detrimental effects they can have on the health and well-being of young athletes.26 ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients has been shown to be effective at restoring normal knee function and stability.4,27 Surgical reconstruction techniques can be categorized into three groups: transphyseal, physeal-sparing, and hybrid techniques. The type of surgical treatment should be determined by the patient’s physiologic and skeletal age at the time of injury. Appropriate treatment is paramount in avoiding iatrogenic growth disturbance and for return to sports participation and overall quality of life.
TREATMENT
Nonoperative Treatment or Delayed Surgical Management
Nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries in pediatric patients typically involves a regimen of functional bracing, physical therapy, and activity modification. Studies evaluating the efficacy of conservative treatment generally demonstrate poor and “unacceptable” outcomes, including high rates of recurrent instability, meniscal damage, early arthritis, and sports-related disability.13,14,15,16,17,18,19 Both noncompliance21 and significantly higher activity levels observed in children28 have been cited as contributing factors for these poor results. Delayed surgical reconstruction until skeletal maturity in an effort to avoid risking iatrogenic growth disturbance has also been associated with recurrent instability and an increased incidence of associated knee pathology.20,21,22,23,24,25
In contrast to the growing body of literature demonstrating poor outcomes with conservative or delayed treatment, relatively few studies support the use of nonoperative treatment algorithms in skeletally immature patients.29,30,31,32 Even so, a recent meta-analysis overwhelmingly favored early surgical stabilization over conservative treatment or delayed reconstruction.24 In this study, the aggregate data of nonoperative or delayed treatment was associated with a 34-fold increase in knee instability.24 Furthermore, patients treated nonoperatively had a 12-fold increase in the rate of medial meniscus tears and none were able to return to their preinjury level of play.24 Given the increasing evidence of poor outcomes with nonoperative and delayed surgical treatment, our current recommendation is early reconstruction to avoid recurrent instability and associated knee pathology.
Surgical Treatment Options
The first step in surgical treatment of ACL injuries in pediatric individuals is determining the skeletal maturity and growth potential of the patient. The most common method for assessing skeletal maturity is comparing hand and wrist radiographs to the Greulich and Pyle atlas.33 In determining the skeletal age, the relative risk and potential consequences of iatrogenic physeal injury can be estimated. Subsequently, the appropriate surgical technique can be selected to minimize the chance of limb length discrepancy (LLD) or angular deformity.
Surgical reconstruction options include transphyseal, physeal-sparing, and hybrid techniques. Transphyseal and hybrid techniques involve drilling through one or both of the growth plates. Favorable results have been achieved using these techniques, with good subjective outcome scores, objective measures, and low complication rates.34,35,36,37,38 However, both basic science39,40,41,42,43,44,45 and clinical research studies34,35,46,47,48,49,50 indicate a risk of iatrogenic LLD or angular deformity with transphyseal drilling. To decrease physeal damage and risk of growth deformity, advocates of transphyseal ACL reconstruction recommend minimizing drill tunnel diameter and drilling femoral tunnels using a transtibial technique or as vertically as possible.34,35,36,37,38 However, vertical femoral tunnel placement results in a nonanatomic ACL graft position51 that does not restore the normal kinematics of the knee.52