Surgical Management of Traumatic Conditions of the Elbow: Interposition Arthroplasty



Surgical Management of Traumatic Conditions of the Elbow: Interposition Arthroplasty


Bernard F. Morrey

Matthew L. Ramsey



DEFINITION AND PATHOGENESIS



  • Posttraumatic conditions of the elbow represent a spectrum of disorders involving the elbow as a result of previous trauma. Treatment for posttraumatic conditions is individu-alized depending on the characteristics of the pathology as well as the functional demands and age of the patient.



    • Posttraumatic arthritis



      • Primary pathology involves posttraumatic degeneration of the articular surface.


      • Secondary pathologies can include contracture, loose bodies, heterotopic bone, and impingement and irritation from retained hardware.


    • Nonunion of the distal humerus



      • May involve all or a part of the articular surface


      • Frequently associated with marked fixed angular and/or rotatory deformity


    • Dysfunctional instability of the elbow



      • Special clinical situation where the fulcrum for stable elbow function is lost


      • Associated with considerable bone loss


      • The forearm may be dissociated from the brachium (FIG 1).


    • Chronic instability (dislocation)



      • Chronic ligamentous instability of the elbow can lead to articular degeneration, particularly in the elderly osteopenic patient.


      • Fixed contracture and displacement are characteristic.






FIG 1 • Radiograph demonstrating dissociation of the forearm from the brachium after four attempts to manage a terrible triad injury. This degree of deformity was not considered amenable to interposition; a total elbow was performed despite the patient’s high level of activity.


PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL FINDINGS


Patient History



  • The patient history is directed at gaining information about the initial injury, treatments undertaken, complications of treatment, presenting complaints, and patient expectations.


  • Detailed investigation of the patient’s symptoms should include questions regarding the degree of pain, presence of instability or stiffness, and mechanical symptoms of catching or locking.


  • Presence of radiating pain especially in the ulnar nerve distribution is solicited.


  • Special attention is paid to night pain and pain at rest, as these suggest a possibility of sepsis. Note: A history of drainage or any evidence of infection is especially critical to elicit.


Physical Examination



  • Physical examination of the elbow should follow a systematic approach.



    • Inspection of the elbow



      • Especially for warmth and redness


      • Presence and location of previous skin incisions or persistent wounds


      • Alignment of the extremity at rest


      • Prominent hardware


    • Range of motion



      • Localization of pain during active and passive motion


      • Active range of motion (AROM) is assessed and compared to the opposite side. The degree of motion, smoothness of motion, and feel of the end point is established.



        • Normal AROM varies but should be symmetric with the opposite unaffected side.


        • Range of motion should be from near full extension (may have hyperextension) to 130 to 140 degrees of flexion.


        • Normal forearm rotation is an arc of 170 degrees, with slightly more supination than pronation.


        • Functional range of motion has been defined as a flexion-extension arc from 30 to 130 degrees and a pronation-supination arc from 50 degrees of pronation to 50 degrees of supination.10


      • Passive range of motion (PROM) is then assessed and compared to the active motion arc.


    • Palpation of the elbow



      • Should systematically review all of the bony and soft tissue structures of the elbow



      • The ulnar nerve needs to be carefully assessed. If previously surgically manipulated, its location should be identified if possible.


      • Examine for the presence of Tinel sign.


    • Motor function of the elbow should be assessed. In particular, the flexor (biceps and brachialis) and extensor (triceps) function should be evaluated.


IMAGING AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES


Plain X-rays



  • Orthogonal views of the elbow are mandatory.


  • A good lateral radiograph can typically be obtained.


  • A useful anteroposterior (AP) radiograph can be difficult to obtain, particularly if the patient has a significant flexion contracture.



    • Note: If difficulty is encountered, use fluoroscopic guidance to obtain proper orientation.


  • Oblique radiographs can be helpful in obtaining more detail.


Advanced Imaging



  • Computed tomography (CT) scan



    • CT scans are particularly helpful in assessing the integrity of the bone and establishing whether the joint space is reasonably preserved.


    • Three-dimensional reconstructions provide a better understanding of complex osseous injuries (FIG 2).


  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)



    • MRI is rarely needed in the assessment of a posttraumatic joint and is therefore used sparingly.


    • May be helpful to assess suspicious and atypical soft tissue deformity or swelling


DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS



  • Nonunion/malunion of the distal humerus


  • Posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow


  • Chronic dislocation of the elbow


NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT



  • The success of nonoperative management depends on specific features of the pathology and the motivation and goals of the patient.


  • Activity modification in order to reduce the forces across the elbow






    FIG 2A. Complex injury with unclear joint pathology or state of healing. B. The 3-D reconstruction clarifies the extent of the problem.


  • Maintain range of motion of the elbow. Aggressive efforts to regain lost motion can inflame and thus aggravate the joint.


  • External bracing is occasionally used to support an unstable extremity. However, in general, bracing is poorly tolerated and functionally limiting.


SURGICAL MANAGEMENT



  • Surgical management is directed at addressing the underlying cause of disability, taking into consideration the patients age, pathology, physical requirements, and expectations.



Contraindications



  • Active or subacute infection (septic arthritis with persistent infection)8


  • Grossly unstable elbow


  • Marked angular deformity (exceeding 15 degrees)


  • Inadequate bone stock


  • Patients unable or unwilling to follow postoperative instructions


  • Inexperience with the technique


  • Pain at rest or pain without associated functional loss (relative contraindication)


Preoperative Planning



  • Graft options



    • Allograft Achilles tendon7: has the advantage of no donor site morbidity



      • The abundance of the tissue allows for variable thickness depending on reconstructive need.


      • Can also be used to reconstruct the collateral ligaments if necessary


    • Autogenous dermis or fascia lata



      • Best used for limited applications (eg capitellum)


    • Allograft dermal tissue


  • An articulated (hinged) external fixator must be available.


Patient Positioning



  • Supine with the arm across the chest and bump under the ipsilateral shoulder (FIG 3)8


  • Alternatively, the lateral decubitus position with the arm over an arm holder







FIG 3A. Patient is placed in the supine position and the arm is brought across the chest and is supported with a bolster. B. Alternative lateral decubitus position with the arm maintained over an arm support.

Jul 22, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Surgical Management of Traumatic Conditions of the Elbow: Interposition Arthroplasty

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access