Surgical Considerations During Patellar Stabilization
Najeeb Khan
Robert Stewart
Donald Fithian
INTRODUCTION
This chapter includes surgical considerations for patellar stabilization procedures, including medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO), lateral retinacular release/lengthening, and trochleoplasty. It also summarizes the pertinent findings on physical examination and imaging studies to help formulate a surgical plan.
INDICATIONS FOR MEDIAL PATELLOFEMORAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
MPFL reconstruction is best used to treat episodic lateral patellar instability owing to excessive laxity of medial retinacular patellar stabilizers.
The ideal candidate has minimal pain between episodes of patellar instability and seeks medical care primarily to address the occasional dislocation or subluxation.
It is imperative that the surgeon documents MPFL laxity by physical examination1 before committing to an MPFL reconstruction. An examination under anesthesia is necessary to confirm laxity of the medial retinacular structures owing to patient apprehension and discomfort in the clinic. Examination under anesthesia is typically done just prior to surgical reconstruction, but can be done in isolation in rare cases where the diagnosis is uncertain.
CONTRAINDICATIONS FOR MEDIAL PATELLOFEMORAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
MPFL reconstruction is not recommended to address patellofemoral pain. Stabilization of the patella will not reliably treat pain that is not directly caused by their instability episodes.
First-time dislocators are better served with a nonoperative approach. In a natural history study performed at author’s institution, only 17% of first-time dislocators suffered a second dislocation within the subsequent 2 to 5 years.2 Others have reported recurrence of up to 71%; in these reports, MPFL repair or “reefing” did not reliably reduce the recurrence rate.3,4,5,6 Several levels 1 and 2 prospective studies have shown no benefit of MPFL repair compared to nonoperative treatment after initial patellar dislocation.3,5,7,8,9 There is at least one prospective randomized trial that reported improved clinical scores, lower redislocation rates, and better outcomes after MPFL reconstruction compared to nonoperative treatment for acute patellar dislocation.10
Controversy persists regarding operative treatment of the first-time patellar dislocator vis-à-vis the MPFL. The standard of care at this time remains a trial of nonoperative treatment. Subsequent dislocation or subjective instability despite an adequate course of physical therapy would be an indication for MPFL reconstruction.
ROLE OF ADJUNCTIVE PROCEDURES
The most important pathoanatomic features of the recurrent patellar dislocator are MPFL disruption, patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, and rotational or other alignment abnormalities (femoral anteversion and tibial tubercle lateralization relative to the trochlea or posterior cruciate ligament [PCL]). When indicated, these pathoanatomic features may need to be corrected. The isolated and combined predictive values of these risk factors are included in Chapter 3. Surgical techniques for correction of each of these factors are described in detail in the corresponding chapter of this book.
Arthroscopy
Diagnostic arthroscopy is performed in cases where chondral injury is to be surgically addressed or
documented. Though articular surface injuries are common, majority do not involve significantly displaced fragments.
Large displaced osteochondral fragments that are of sufficient size and involve enough bone to be amenable to fixation are reduced and stabilized, either arthroscopically or through an arthrotomy.
Smaller fragments not amenable to fixation require treatment only if they are symptomatic loose bodies.
Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy
TTO (distal realignment) can be utilized in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction when patients have an increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG or TT-PCL distance) or patella alta.11
Anteromedialization of the tubercle is reserved primarily for offloading of distal and lateral articular damage and secondarily for stabilization in conjunction with ligament reconstruction.
TTO for distalization is most commonly performed in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction when there is patella alta that results in delayed entrance of the patella into the trochlea. Patella alta can be corrected when the Caton-Deschamps index is greater than or equal to 1.2. After distalization, the patella will engage in the trochlea earlier in the flexion, resulting in improved osseous constraints to lateral translation.
Care must be taken to avoid overmedializing when performing a distalizing osteotomy because distalization usually results in a certain degree of medialization and decrease in TT-TG distance.12
Corrective trochlear dysplasia surgery (trochleoplasty) may obviate the need for medialization, although this requires further study.
Lateral Release or Lengthening
Lateral release or lengthening is no longer indicated as an isolated procedure to treat patellar instability.
A lateral release, in contrast to a lateral lengthening, is a full-thickness transection of the lateral retinaculum and should no longer be performed, neither as an isolated procedure nor as an adjunct procedure because of its ineffectiveness and risk of iatrogenic medial patellar instability. Isolated lateral release also reduces resistance to lateral displacement and increases the risk of recurrent lateral instability.13
Of the myriad operations described for the treatment of patellar instability, isolated lateral retinacular release is the only one shown to be ineffective for the treatment of patellar instability.5 In one series of patients who underwent lateral release for instability, 100% of the patients continued to experience dislocations.14 Poor results of isolated lateral release for the treatment of patellar instability may be attributed to its inability to align the patella more medially and the risk of iatrogenic medial patellar instability.5,15,16Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree