Total knee arthroplasty occasionally does not meet expectations. This randomized clinical trial assessed the effect of restoration of the native patellofemoral height on clinical outcomes. Group I underwent standard patellar bone resection; group II underwent modified patellar bone resection that adjusted the amount of anterior condylar bone removed and the anterior flange thickness. There were no differences in anterior knee pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores, or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores. Patellofemoral compartment height restoration versus patellar height alone does not appear to significantly reduce pain or improve function.
Overall, patellofemoral compartment height restoration versus patellar height alone does not seem to significantly reduce pain or improve function following TKA.
Overall, patellofemoral compartment height restoration versus patellar height alone does not seem to significantly reduce pain or improve function following TKA.
Does restoration of native overall patellofemoral height improve function following primary TKA?
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were all performed using SAS software, version 9.2 (Cary, NC, USA). Univariate, descriptive statistics were calculated and included frequency, proportions, means, and standard deviations. Bivariate analyses were performed using a student t-test and chi-square test. A student t-test was used to determine differences in mean values between groups for the following variables: subject age, patellar height, patellofemoral height, anterior knee pain VAS, KOOS subscores, and WOMAC subscores. A chi-square test was used to determine the difference in the proportions between men and women. An a priori 0.05 level of significance was used for all statistical tests.
References
- 1. Beverland D.: Patient satisfaction following TKA: bless them all! Orthopedics 2010; 33: pp. 657
- 2. Meftah M., Ranawat A.S., and Ranawat C.S.: The natural history of anterior knee pain in 2 posterior-stabilized, modular total knee arthroplasty designs. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26: pp. 1145-1148
- 3. Barrack R.L., Schrader T., Bertot A.J., et al: Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: pp. 46-55
- 4. Berger R.A., Crossett L.S., Jacobs J.J., et al: Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356: pp. 144-153
- 5. Frye B.M., Floyd M.W., Pham D.C., et al: Effect of femoral component design on patellofemoral crepitance and patella clunk syndrome after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: pp. 1166-1170
- 6. Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., Booth R.E., et al: The patellar clunk syndrome. A complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 241: pp. 203-208
- 7. Pagnano M.W., Hanssen A.D., Lewallen D.G., et al: Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356: pp. 39-46
- 8. Rand J.A.: The patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: pp. 612-620
- 9. Rand J.A.: Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: pp. 2062-2072
- 10. Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N., and Scott N.W.: Patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1994; 2: pp. 239-246
- 11. Kohl S., Evangelopoulos D.S., Hartel M., et al: Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: does it correlate with patellar blood flow? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: pp. 1453-1459
- 12. Baliga S., McNair C.J., Barnett K.J., et al: Does circumpatellar electrocautery improve the outcome after total knee replacement?: a prospective, randomised, blinded controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: pp. 1228-1233
- 13. van Jonbergen H.P., Scholtes V.A., van Kampen A., et al: A randomised, controlled trial of circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: pp. 1054-1059
- 14. Indelli P.F., Marcucci M., Cariello D., et al: Contemporary femoral designs in total knee arthroplasty: effects on the patello-femoral congruence. Int Orthop 2012; 36: pp. 1167-1173
- 15. Mahoney O.M., McClung C.D., dela Rosa M.A., et al: The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: pp. 416-421
- 16. Fehring T.K., Odum S.M., Hughes J., et al: Differences between the sexes in the anatomy of the anterior condyle of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: pp. 2335-2341
- 17. Browne C., Hermida J.C., Bergula A., et al: Patellofemoral forces after total knee arthroplasty: effect of extensor moment arm. Knee 2005; 12: pp. 81-88
- 18. D’Lima D.D., Poole C., Chadha H., et al: Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: pp. 213-220
- 19. Bengs B.C., and Scott R.D.: The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: pp. 650-655
- 20. Fitzpatrick C.K., Kim R.H., Ali A.A., et al: Effects of resection thickness on mechanics of resurfaced patellae. J Biomech 2013; 46: pp. 1568-1575
- 21. Hsu H.C., Luo Z.P., Rand J.A., et al: Influence of patellar thickness on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: pp. 69-80
- 22. Koh J.S., Yeo S.J., Lee B.P., et al: Influence of patellar thickness on results of total knee arthroplasty: does a residual bony patellar thickness of
- 23. Steinbruck A., Schroder C., Woiczinski M., et al: Patellofemoral contact patterns before and after total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro measurement. Biomed Eng Online 2013; 12: pp. 58
- 24. Ghosh K.M., Merican A.M., Iranpour F., et al: The effect of overstuffing the patellofemoral joint on the extensor retinaculum of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17: pp. 1211-1216
- 25. Mofidi A., Bajada S., Holt M.D., et al: Functional relevance of patellofemoral thickness before and after unicompartmental patellofemoral replacement. Knee 2012; 19: pp. 180-184
- 26. Pierson J.L., Ritter M.A., Keating E.M., et al: The effect of stuffing the patellofemoral compartment on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: pp. 2195-2203
- 27. Stiehl J.B., Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., et al: Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: pp. 706-714
- 28. Ahmed A.M., Burke D.L., and Yu A.: In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints–Part II: Retropatellar surface. J Biomech Eng 1983; 105: pp. 226-236
- 29. Ahmed A.M., Burke D.L., and Hyder A.: Force analysis of the patellar mechanism. J Orthop Res 1987; 5: pp. 69-85
- 30. Baldini A., Anderson J.A., Cerulli-Mariani P., et al: Patellofemoral evaluation after total knee arthroplasty. Validation of a new weight-bearing axial radiographic view. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: pp. 1810-1817
- 31. Draper C.E., Besier T.F., Fredericson M., et al: Differences in patellofemoral kinematics between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions in patients with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Res 2011; 29: pp. 312-317
- 32. Junior L.H., Soares L.F., Goncalves M.B., et al: Relationship between patellar height and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Rev Bras Ortop 2011; 46: pp. 408-411
- 33. Mihalko W., Fishkin Z., and Krackow K.: Patellofemoral overstuff and its relationship to flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 449: pp. 283-287