RATIONALE AND BASIC SCIENCE PERTINENT TO THE PROCEDURE
Injury to the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is a common cause of ulnar-sided pain and disability in the wrist.
In 1989, Palmer proposed a classification system for disorders of the TFCC that considers two basic categories: traumatic (class 1) and degenerative (class 2) ( Table 54-1 ). These classes are further subdivided into types, depending on the location of the tear and the presence or absence of associated chondromalacic changes. Class 1 traumatic lesions are subdivided into four types according to the tear’s location. Type 1B injuries are peripheral tears located on the ulnar side of the TFCC. Recent advances in histology and functional anatomy show that the ulnar side of the TFCC is arranged in a complex tri-dimensional structure.
Class 1: Traumatic Injuries | |
A | Central perforation of the disk proper |
B |
|
C | Distal avulsion from the carpus |
D |
|
Class 2: Degenerative Injuries | |
A | TFCC wear |
B | TFCC wear + lunate and/or head chondromalacia |
C | TFCC perforation + lunate and/or head chondromalacia |
D | TFCC perforation + lunate and/or head chondromalacia + lunotriquetral ligament perforation |
E | TFCC perforation + ulnocarpal arthritis |
According to structure and function, the TFCC is separated into three components: the proximal triangular ligament, the distal hammock structure, and the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL). Some authors debate the existence of the UCL or consider it to be a part of the floor of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) sheath, eventually including some surrounding loose ligamentous tissue. However, the functional UCL can be assimilated to the distal hammock structure, since they both share the same function of supporting and suspending the ulnar carpus. The distal hammock structure and the UCL should be considered as the distal component of the TFCC (dc-TFCC), which is the opposite of the proximal component (pc-TFCC), represented by the proximal triangular ligament ( Fig. 54-1 ). The proximal triangular ligament is a strong ligamentous structure that originates from the fovea ulnaris and spans to the ulnar corners of the distal radius with two limbs—volar and dorsal. It should be considered the true radioulnar ligament that stabilizes the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ).
Because of the intensity and direction of the traumatic force, either the dc-TFCC or the pc-TFCC or both may be torn. Therefore, ulnar-sided pain, reduced grip strength, decreased forearm rotation, and clinical signs of DRUJ instability may be present accordingly.
Appropriate management of peripheral tears should aim at restoring the original anatomy by direct suture or osseous reattachment of the TFCC by open or arthroscopic repair.
Many arthroscopic techniques have been proposed that suture the torn TFCC to the dorsal ulnocarpal joint capsule and the ECU tendon subsheath. These techniques restore TFCC tautness and thus improve the patient’s symptoms. However, arthroscopic suture is of limited benefit when TFCC tears involve the pc-TFCC and when the DRUJ is clinically unstable. In these instances, an arthroscopic repair is unable to reconstitute the preinjury anatomy and provide adequate joint stability. Therefore, open repair is generally recommended, since it is the only technique that allows for a direct reattachment of the proximal component of the TFCC to its foveal insertion. However, a careful and rather extensive exposure of the distal radioulnocarpal joint is required to perform a TFCC reattachment via either transosseous sutures passed through drill holes or bone anchors.
Continuous advances in the understanding of the intra-articular anatomy and the kinematics of the wrist, as well as the introduction of new volar portals, have contributed to the emergence of an “all-arthroscopic” attitude toward ulnar-sided disorders of the wrist for many surgeons.
This chapter describes a method of an arthroscopic-assisted foveal reattachment using a only devised DRUJ working portal—the direct foveal (DF) portal—which is indicated for repairable proximal or complete peripheral TFCC tears associated with DRUJ instability, but without secondary degenerative changes.
CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS
The typical candidate for an arthroscopic TFCC foveal reattachment is a patient complaining of ulnar-sided wrist pain, usually after a fall on an outstretched hand or a violent traction and twisting injury of the wrist or forearm.
Patients may complain that their wrist spontaneously “gives way” when they are trying to open a bottle, rotate a steering wheel, turn a door handle, or hold an object in their hand during forearm rotation. The suspected diagnosis is achieved by means of special provocative maneuvers and diagnostic tests. Pain is exacerbated by passive forearm rotation and may be associated with the presence of a click or crepitus or an intra-articular grinding sensation. Resistance rotational movements are often weak and reproduce the patient’s complaints. The ulnar foveal sign is positive; that is, the patient has point tenderness over the ulnar capsule just volar to the ECU tendon. Provided that the forearm muscles are relaxed, provocative maneuvers for DRUJ instability show greater laxity in the painful wrist compared with the opposite side. Hypertonicity of the muscular stabilizers of the DRUJ may lead to false-negative findings; hence it is recommended that DRUJ stability should be evaluated under regional anesthesia before the operation.
Although all patients presenting with acute or chronic wrist pain should have radiographs taken of the wrist, these are usually of limited help in diagnosing isolated TFCC tears, but they may reveal an associated ulnar styloid fracture or nonunion. Still, the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), even with intra-articular gadolinium, is a controversial issue. Whereas an MRI arthrogram may be both sensitive and specific in diagnosing a tear, it has not shown similar accuracy in assessing tear size and location. Studies comparing specificity and sensitivity of arthrography, MRI, and arthroscopy confirm arthroscopic visualization of a TFCC tear to be the gold standard for definitive diagnosis.
Arthroscopy of the radiocarpal joint (RC-Arth) and the DRUJ (DRU-Arth) allows for a thorough evaluation of the tear’s characteristics. RC-Arth is used to evaluate the dc-TFCC. The tear is visualized in the dorsoulnar corner of the TFCC. The TFCC tension is evaluated by the trampoline test and the hook test. The trampoline test evaluates the TFCC resilience (trampoline effect) by applying a compressive load across it with the probe. The test is positive when there is a peripheral TFCC tear, since the TFCC becomes soft and compliant. The hook test consists of applying traction to the ulnarmost border of the TFCC with the probe inserted through the 4-5 or 6R portal. The test is positive when the TFCC can be pulled upward and radially toward the center of the radiocarpal joint ( Fig. 54-2 ). It is a useful maneuver for detecting a foveal disruption of the pc-TFCC.
DRU-Arth is the only method for detecting any ligamentous laceration of the pc-TFCC or avulsion of the foveal attachments. It is mandatory when a hook test yields positive results or when the TFCC tear is associated with clinical signs of DRUJ instability.
Because the DRUJ is a very narrow and tight joint, it may be difficult to perform DRU-Arth when the pc-TFCC is still intact. However, when the pc-TFCC is torn, the articular disk is loose, and more space is available for DRUJ exploration. An 18-gauge hypodermic needle may be placed percutaneously 1 cm proximal to the 6U portal. It will enter the joint close to the fovea and may be used to lift the articular disk—thus enlarging the visual field—and to palpate the pc-TFCC. Furthermore, DRU-Arth allows DRUJ cartilage to be examined for chondromalacic changes.
RC-Arth and DRU-Arth provide a combination of findings that should be considered when deciding on the appropriate treatment of a TFCC tear. They are summarized in the following four parameters.22
Lacerated Components of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex
Establishing the extent of TFCC disruption is of utmost importance. Each component of the TFCC, that is, distal (dc-TFCC) and proximal (pc-TFCC), may be involved either separately or in association.
Three types of ligamentous damage are possible:
- 1.
Distal tear (isolated tear of the distal component of the TFCC) : When only the dc-TFCC is lacerated, the trampoline test result is positive for loss of TFCC resilience, but the hook test result is negative. Integrity of the foveal attachments of the pc-TFCC is confirmed by DRU-Arth.
- 2.
Complete tear (tear of both distal and proximal components of the TFCC) : Complete peripheral TFCC tear involves both components of the TFCC. A tear of the dc-TFCC is visible during RC-Arth, and a pc-TFCC avulsion is demonstrated by DRU-Arth. Both trampoline and hook test results are positive.
- 3.
Proximal tear (isolated tear of the proximal component of the TFCC) : An isolated avulsion of the pc-TFCC from the fovea ulnaris can be demonstrated by DRU-Arth, which is mandatory to achieve the correct diagnosis. Standard RC-Arth fails to show any abnormalities of the contour and capsular reflection of the TFCC, even though both trampoline and hook tests show positive results.
Surgical treatment varies according to which TFCC component is lacerated.22 In case of a proximal or complete tear, a TFCC reinsertion onto the fovea ulnaris is recommended. However, in case of a distal tear, arthroscopic suturing of the TFCC to the dorsal ulnocarpal joint capsule and the ECU tendon subsheath is appropriate.
Reducibility of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear
With a small TFCC tear, as well as an avulsion type of rupture, the tear’s edges can be reapproximated or reduced easily, and a TFCC repair can be successfully performed. By contrast, in the presence of a massive rupture of the TFCC and/or retraction of the ligamentous remnants, reapproximation of the avulsed ligament or repair of the TFCC tear to its anatomic position is not feasible. Therefore, reconstruction with tendon graft should be taken into consideration.
Healing Potential of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear
Chronic midsubstance ligamentous tears showing degenerated or necrotic edges cannot be debrided back to a well-vascularized area; therefore, direct repair is unlikely to provide adequate healing. The same applies to the elongated and frayed ligament after a failed suture; direct repair is unlikely to be successful, and a TFCC reconstruction with tendon graft is recommended. In our experience, pc-TFCC tears have a good healing potential for up to 3 months after injury (acute tears), whereas tears treated from 3 to 6 months after injury (subacute tears) have unpredictable characteristics. More chronic tears usually have a poor healing potential. Moreover, congenital dysmorphisms of the styloid and foveal area of the ulna (e.g., styloid hypoplasia and flattened ulnar head) represent other conditions that are associated with poor healing potential after a repair, and hence require reconstruction.
Cartilage Status of the Distal Radioulnar Joint
Healthy cartilage status is of the utmost importance when planning any reconstructive surgery for TFCC disruption. After high-energy trauma, a cartilage defect over the ulnar head and sigmoid notch may have been produced at the time of the initial injury. Alternatively, degenerative chondromalacia may be the consequence of the altered joint kinematics resulting in chronic DRUJ instability. Well-preserved cartilage is a sine qua non for every type of ligament repair or reconstruction of the DRUJ. When DRU-Arth shows a chondral lesion, some type of salvage arthroplasty is recommended as an alternative.
Based on the above-mentioned criteria, a novel classification22 is defined that considers the variety of TFCC peripheral tears and provides guidelines for specific treatment modalities: repair (suture or foveal insertion), reconstruction with tendon graft, or salvage procedures (arthroplasty or joint replacement) ( Table 54-2 ).