Proximal Femur Fractures: Neck, Intertrochanteric, and Subtrochanteric



Proximal Femur Fractures: Neck, Intertrochanteric, and Subtrochanteric


Mark K. Solarz, MD

John J. Walker, PT, DPT, MBA

Saqib Rehman, MD


Dr. Rehman or an immediate family member is a member of a speakers’ bureau or has made paid presentations on behalf of Synthes; has received nonincome support (such as equipment or services), commercially derived honoraria, or other non-research–related funding (such as paid travel) from Jaypee Medical Publishing; and serves as a board member, owner, officer, or committee member of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Orthopedic Clinics of North America. Neither of the following authors nor any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. Solarz and Dr. Walker.



Introduction

Hip fractures, to which the various fractures of the proximal femur are commonly referred, occur most commonly from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly population due to decreased bone mineral density. They also occur in younger populations from high-energy mechanisms such as motor vehicle accidents and falls from height. Management of such injuries depends on the fracture pattern as well as the baseline function of the individual. Equally if not more important as fracture management is the rehabilitation process, followed by aims to regain function in the injured limb and restore baseline ambulatory ability. It is commonly said that the elderly patient with a fractured hip will lose one level of mobility even after recovery. While there may be some truth in this, the goals of rehabilitation after a hip fracture, regardless of patient age, are early mobilization to prevent complications of recumbency, such as pressure ulcers, pneumonia, and deconditioning.

Hip fractures and their related comorbidities continue to be a significant burden on health care expenditures, and are predicted to continue increasing as our population ages. These fractures accounted for 20% of Medicare claims from 1986 to 2005, with 77% of those patients being female. Women, especially those of Caucasian race, account for a higher percentage of proximal femur fractures as a result of their increased risk of low bone mineral density.

Rehabilitation of patients with proximal femur fractures is frequently complicated by multiple medical comorbidities and/or malnutrition in the elderly, or associated traumatic injuries in the young patient. These clearly impact the course of rehabilitation, both early after management and later after discharge from the hospital. Mobilization of patients out of bed as soon as possible is paramount in both the elderly and the young patient, as decubiti, pneumonia, and related sequelae from recumbency can have both immediate and long-lasting effects. For instance, a patient with a successfully repaired hip may not be able to comfortably ambulate for months due to a heel decubitus.

The team caring for the elderly with proximal femur fracture should also evaluate reasons for the patient falling. Risk factors such as vestibular issues, blood pressure, cardiac issues, or osteoporosis prior to initiating the rehabilitation phase after surgery should be identified. Previous falls are accurate indicators of future falls. In the first year after initial fracture, there is a 6 to 20 times higher incidence of a new fracture; therefore, institution of fall prevention strategies is important in the overall management of these patients.

Challenges with the rehabilitation of patients with hip fractures are severalfold. In addition to the issues with treating elderly and polytrauma patients, hip fracture patients are at high risk for falls due to potential problems with balance, fatigue from anemia, abductor weakness, and syncope. Falls can lead to additional injuries, including intracranial bleeding in an anticoagulated patient. While most postoperative patients are allowed to weight bear as tolerated, in certain cases, there are restrictions to motion aimed at preventing postoperative dislocation or weight-bearing limitations to optimize fracture healing. Many patients either live alone or with elderly companions, and must learn how to perform basic activities of daily living (ADLs). The physical therapist and rehabilitation specialist are therefore in a position to make a difference not only with helping the patient regain hip strength, coordination, gait, and balance, but also to gain independence, safety, and overall well-being.


Anatomy of the Proximal Femur

The proximal femur can be divided into three anatomically distinct regions: the femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and
subtrochanteric regions. The femoral neck is located just distal to the femoral head and proximal to a line between the greater and lesser trochanters. Fractures of this region can be further divided into subcapital, transcervical, and basicervical, depending on the location of the fracture within the femoral neck. These fractures are intracapsular, making them particularly prone to nonunion in comparison to other proximal femur fractures. The major blood supply to the femoral head is the medial femoral circumflex artery and its tributary, the lateral epiphyseal artery, which travel retrograde along the femoral neck, making the femoral head prone to osteonecrosis with displaced fractures in this area.

The intertrochanteric region of the femoral metaphysis lies between the greater and lesser trochanters. There is a rich blood supply, unlike the femoral neck, leading to a lower rate of nonunion. There are typically four main parts, consisting of the greater and lesser trochanters, the femoral neck, and the femoral shaft. Intertrochanteric fractures range from a simple nondisplaced fracture through the intertrochanteric region to separation of all four parts. These fractures are either stable or unstable depending on the condition of the femoral calcar (posteromedial cortex) and the orientation of the fracture line. Those that exhibit reverse obliquity and subtrochanteric extension below the lesser trochanter are particularly unstable and require specific types of fixation during definitive treatment.

Subtrochanteric fractures occur in the region of the femur from the lesser trochanter to within 5 cm distal to this landmark. These display a typical displacement pattern with the proximal fragment in flexion, external rotation, and abduction due to the influence of the iliopsoas, short external rotators, and gluteus medius and minimus, respectively.

Treatment of proximal femur fractures is surgical in almost all cases, other than in patients who are too medically unstable to undergo an operation or nonambulators in minimal discomfort. There are several surgical options for the treatment of proximal femur fractures, though the type and pattern of the specific fracture typically orients the surgeon toward a particular type of fixation.






Figure 71.1 Preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) radiographs of a femoral neck fracture treated with closed reduction and cannulated screw fixation.


Surgical Procedures


Femoral Neck Fractures


Closed or Open Reduction with Cannulated Screw or Sliding Hip Screw Fixation


Indications

Indications for using cannulated screw fixation with open or closed reduction are impacted or minimally displaced femoral neck fractures in any patient or displaced femoral neck fractures in the younger patient (<60–65 years old; Figure 71.1). The sliding hip screw is another construct providing stable fixation useful in fixation of the femoral neck fracture in a younger patient. It may be necessary to perform an open reduction if a satisfactory reduction of the fracture cannot be achieved by closed means. Surgical treatment of the displaced femoral neck fracture in the younger patient is considered a
surgical emergency due to the increased risk of osteonecrosis and nonunion with these injuries that are believed to be increased with surgical delay.


Contraindications

Contraindications for cannulated screw fixation of a femoral neck fracture include any active infection in the affected hip or in those patients who are not stable enough to tolerate a surgical procedure for medical reasons.


Procedure

Cannulated screw fixation is accomplished using three large (7.3-mm or 6.5-mm) cannulated screws that are placed over guidewires once adequate reduction is accomplished. If three independent cannulated screws are used, they are typically placed in an inverted triangle position across the fracture site to engage the femoral head. The most inferior screw is placed along the inferior cortex of the femoral neck to support the calcar; the other two screws are placed in the anterosuperior and posterosuperior positions. The starting point for the inferior screw is at or above the level of the lesser trochanter to prevent a stress riser in the subtrochanteric region, which can increase the risk of subtrochanteric fractures. Maximal spread of the screws within the femoral neck provides the most stable construct. If placed percutaneously, there is minimal soft-tissue disruption. However, open reduction is commonly performed in the younger patient with displaced femoral neck fractures in order to anatomically reduce the fragments and lessen the insult on the vascular supply to the femoral head. Weight-bearing restrictions after this treatment varies considerably, with bone quality, surgeon preference, and patient age each playing a role. Toe-touch or touch-down weight bearing on the surgical extremity is usually preferred to protect the reduction until fracture healing is confirmed clinically and radiographically. However, many elderly patients are unable to tolerate this due to loss of strength and balance. Therefore, they may weight bear as tolerated with an assistive device in order to preserve and promote as much mobility as possible.

Sliding hip screw fixation is preferred by some surgeons for fixation of midcervical and basicervical femoral neck fractures. It may offer biomechanical advantages while requiring more exposure. This technique is described in the intertrochanteric section to follow. When used in the femoral neck, a separate cannulated screw may be placed more proximally for rotational control.


Complications

Complications include osteonecrosis of the femoral head, nonunion or malunion, and screw penetration into the hip joint. These would present with acutely increased and persistent pain in the hip or groin region, which can limit rehabilitation. The abductors are rarely violated during this procedure; thus, postoperative Trendelenberg gait is not frequently seen. The occurrence of dislocation is generally very low; therefore, postoperative hip precautions are typically not necessary. As with all proximal femur fractures, there is a high risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolus (PE); thus, mechanical and chemical (when appropriate) prophylactic measures are essential to avoid this complication.


Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty


Indications

Indications for hemiarthroplasty include displaced femoral neck fractures in low-functioning, elderly patients (Figure 71.2). Those elderly patients who are higher functioning or those with preexisting hip osteoarthritis are candidates for the more costly total hip arthroplasty. The osteoporotic bone precludes reliable fixation, while the expected increased activity level may induce wear on the acetabular cartilage and pain.


Contraindications

Contraindications include any active infection within the hip or those who are not medically stable to undergo the operation.


Procedure

Hemiarthroplasty involves removal of the femoral neck and head, and replacement with a prosthetic device. A bipolar hemiarthroplasty also contains an outer bearing over the prosthetic head that serves to theoretically decrease wear on the native articular surface of the acetabulum, while a unipolar hemiarthroplasty does not contain this outer bearing. A total hip arthroplasty replaces the femoral neck and head with a prosthetic component while replacing the acetabular surface with a prosthetic cup as well.

Anterolateral, direct anterior, and posterior surgical approaches are commonly used for hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Anterolateral approaches either utilize the intermuscular plane between the tensor fasciae latae and the gluteus medius, thereby sparing the abductors (Watson-Jones approach), or can split the gluteus medius anteriorly and detach a portion of the abductors from the greater trochanter. The direct anterior approach (Smith-Peterson, and its variants) utilizes an internervous plane between the sartorius (femoral nerve) and the tensor fascia lata (superior gluteal nerve), often detaching a portion of the reflected head of the rectus femoris. In both the anterolateral and direct anterior approaches, an anterior capsulotomy is performed to gain access to the hip joint. The posterior approach splits the gluteus maximus muscle and detaches the short external rotators prior to a posterior capsulotomy, leaving the abductors unviolated aside from intraoperative retraction. In each case, the proximal fracture fragment, including the femoral head, is removed and the neck is prepared with a cut perpendicular to the longitudinal orientation of the neck. The femoral canal is prepared with a series of broaches in order to accept the final implant. Femoral stems can either be cemented or uncemented depending on surgeon preference and the quality of the bone. In a total hip arthroplasty, the acetabular cup is then prepared with a series of reamers to medialize and position the replacement cup with appropriate anteversion and inclination. Once the components are implanted and reduced, care is taken to repair the capsulotomy. The abductors are then repaired in the case
of the anterolateral approach and the short external rotators are repaired in the case of the posterior approach. The subcutaneous tissues and skin are closed according to surgeon preference. Patients can weight bear as tolerated following hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty, though they often must maintain hip precautions during the initial postoperative period to decrease the risk of dislocation. For a posterior surgical approach to the hip and posterior capsulotomy, the hip is most unstable in flexion, adduction, and internal rotation. Thus, typical posterior hip precautions include no hip flexion past 70°, no adduction past the midline of the body, and no internal rotation of the hip past neutral. Typically, the patient is placed in a wedge-shaped abduction pillow postoperatively to prevent adduction while in bed. Also, low chairs and toilets are avoided to prevent excessive hip flexion. For anterior approaches to the hip with anterior capsulotomies, most instability occurs with abduction and external rotation. Patients are cautioned against such positioning, though specific devices are not as commonly needed to prevent these unwanted positions.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 14, 2018 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Proximal Femur Fractures: Neck, Intertrochanteric, and Subtrochanteric

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access