Prevalence, Prevention, and Economic Implications of Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty



Prevalence, Prevention, and Economic Implications of Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty


Stephen J. Nelson, MD

Patrick K. Strotman, MD

James A. Browne, MD



INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most dreaded complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The combination of increasingly drug-resistant pathogens with a large foreign body in a capacious potential space makes these infections particularly difficult to fully eradicate, requiring intense intervention—both surgical and antibiotic. Even when treated appropriately, PJI carries a significant risk factor for mortality.1 Such outcomes are distressing to both the patient and surgeon. With such weighty consequences, the old adage rings true, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” This chapter will comment on the prevalence of infection following TKA and then discuss risk factors, steps for prevention, and the economic implications associated with PJI.


PREVALENCE

While PJI is a relatively uncommon complication, it has supplanted polyethylene wear and aseptic loosening as the most common reason for revision TKA.2,3,4 Bozik et al evaluated the national inpatient sample and found that 25.2% of revision procedures were performed for infection. Its incidence has been reported to be in a range from 0.7% to 2.2%.5,6,7 Kurtz evaluated the Medicare 5% national sample administrative data and noted that the incidence of infection within 2 years of surgery was 1.55%.7 Crowe examined 3419 primary TKA procedures performed at NYU Lagone Medical Center between 2009 and 2011 and noted an infection rate of 0.76%.5 Pulido evaluated their rates of PJI at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in a series of 4185 patients prospectively gathered between 2001 and 2006. They also reported an infection rate of 1.1%.6 Despite increasing attempts at prevention, there is some evidence that the incidence of PJI may be slowly increasing given the increase in life expectancies and higher volumes of joint arthroplasty procedures.8,9

Though acute postoperative infection is of primary concern for the orthopedic surgeon, Kurtz and colleagues found that the risk of infection extends beyond the 2-year mark postoperatively, as 0.46% of patients developed an infection between 2 and 10 years.7 In an evaluation of the Finnish health registry, Huotari noted that the incidence rate of late PJI (after 2 years) after hip or knee arthroplasty was approximately 0.07% per prosthesis year.10

Infection rates are exponentially higher following total knee revision procedures, with Frank et al reporting a rate of 7%.11 If the reason for revision TKA is infection, Cochran et al report risk of reinfection being 24.6% for 1-stage and 19% for 2-stage revision patients, respectively, at 1 year postoperatively. In their study, the cumulative risk of revision at 6 years was 38.3% and 29.1% for 1- and 2-stage revision patients, respectively.12 It is unclear whether the higher risk of infection after revision procedures is due to the increased length and complexity of surgery, the incomplete eradication of the infection which indicated the revision procedure in the first place, or the failure to diagnose implant failure as an infectious process. It is likely all of these factors drive the higher infection rate in patients who have undergone multiple revisions.


May 16, 2021 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Prevalence, Prevention, and Economic Implications of Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access