Posterosuperior Tears (Irreparable): Open Lower Trapezius Transfer
Abdulaziz F. Ahmed
Ryan Lohre
Bassem T. Elhassan
INDICATIONS
The lower trapezius muscle tendon transfer is indicated in younger, active patients with irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (ie, infraspinatus and/or teres minor with or without supraspinatus) who present after failed nonoperative treatment or failed prior rotator cuff repair with persistent pain and/or shoulder dysfunction consisting of external rotation weakness and lag signs. The open lower trapezius tendon transfer is also indicated in patients with brachial plexopathy for which external rotation is the desired goal.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Contraindications to performing muscle tendon transfers are advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis, the presence of cuff tear arthropathy adaptations (≥ Hamada grade 3), and significant medical comorbidities precluding surgical intervention. Moreover, if the lower trapezius muscle is dysfunctional due to direct muscle damage or nerve injury, then one should consider the latissimus dorsi muscle tendon transfer as an alternative.
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION
History
Comprehensive history taking is essential to gather important information about the patient’s condition and determine whether a lower trapezius muscle tendon transfer is appropriate. Most patients present with shoulder pain combined with external rotation weakness. One must also understand the timeline of symptoms such as whether the symptoms’ onset is related to trauma, as well as the chronicity and progression of symptoms. It is crucial to inquire about the type and number of prior surgical interventions especially on the affected shoulder, which plays an important role in decision making. Past medical history and active medications should be asked to determine any relevant conditions that can affect the tendon transfer healing process. Other important parameters are the patient’s hand dominance, occupation, activity level, and how the patient’s quality of life has been impacted. One must also evaluate the patient’s social history such as social support system, their ability to comply with postoperative immobilization, and smoking habits.
Physical Examination
A full comprehensive shoulder examination should entail inspection, palpation to areas of pain, range of motion, and strength testing. With inspection, the affected shoulder should be inspected for
any deformities, swelling, or muscle wasting and must be compared with the contralateral shoulder. Patients with irreparable posterosuperior tears present with marked atrophy of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus when inspecting the shoulder from the back. Range of motion examination typically reveals limited active external rotation of the affected shoulder while passive external rotation is preserved. Patients might also present with shoulder pseudoparalysis or pseudoparesis as the force couples about the glenohumeral joint are disrupted.
any deformities, swelling, or muscle wasting and must be compared with the contralateral shoulder. Patients with irreparable posterosuperior tears present with marked atrophy of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus when inspecting the shoulder from the back. Range of motion examination typically reveals limited active external rotation of the affected shoulder while passive external rotation is preserved. Patients might also present with shoulder pseudoparalysis or pseudoparesis as the force couples about the glenohumeral joint are disrupted.
Since posterosuperior rotator cuff tears can involve the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor, special tests for such rotator cuff muscles can be expected to be positive.
For the supraspinatus, strength can be tested by the resisted Jobe (ie, empty can) or resisted full can test.1 In addition, the drop arm test initially described by Codman indicates severe deficiency of the posterosuperior cuff.2 The Jobe test is performed with the arm elevated to 90° in the scapular plane and fully internally rotated. Patients are then asked to resist downward pressure applied by the examiner. A full can test is similar to the Jobe test except the arm is in external rotation to 45°. The latter test might be more tolerable to patients as it is less prone to positional pain. In the drop arm test, patients are asked to abduct their arm to 90° and then to lower it slowly. A drop arm test is considered positive if the arm drops instead of being able to lower it gradually.
For the infraspinatus and teres minor strength testing, one can examine external rotation strength and perform the external rotation lag signs. External rotation strength can be examined by asking the patient to externally rotate their arm at the side of their body against examiner resistance with slight arm abduction. Another method is by testing external rotation in abduction, also known as Patte sign, which consists of passively placing the arm at 90° in the scapular plane with the elbow flexed.3 The arm is then passively placed in maximal external rotation, and the patient is asked to maintain external rotation against resistance. Both strength tests are graded from 0 to 5 according to the Medical Research Council Scale. Three lag signs can be examined: the external rotation lag sign at the side, the drop sign, and the Hornblower test. The external rotation lag sign consists of holding the patients’ arm in maximal external rotation at the side with slight arm abduction and then asking the patient to maintain the external rotation.4 Failure to maintain the arm in external rotation constitutes a positive external rotation lag sign, indicating tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. Of note, the arm must be relaxed by about 5° from the maximal external rotation position to avoid arm recoil, which results in a false-positive test. The drop sign for the infraspinatus/teres minor is different from the drop arm sign of the supraspinatus. It was first described by Hertel et al and consisted of passively forward elevating the arm to 90° in the scapular plane and then fully externally rotating the arm passively.4 Failure to maintain the arm in the maximum external rotation indicated a positive drop sign, which has been correlated with grade 3 and 4 fatty atrophy of the infraspinatus.5 The Hornblower test was described by Walch et al, which entails asking the patient to reach their mouth with the hand of the affected shoulder without elevating the elbow.5 Patients with massive posterosuperior cuff will be unable to externally rotate the arm in that position to reach their mouth. Thus, patients would have to elevate the shoulder and let the arm fall in internal rotation, hence resembling a Hornblower. Walch et al have demonstrated that a positive Hornblower test is highly correlated with irreparable teres minor and infraspinatus cuff tears.
Diagnostics
Plain shoulder radiographs are useful to exclude glenohumeral osteoarthritis and advanced rotator cuff arthropathy adaptations (Hamada grade ≥ 3), both of which are contraindications for performing a muscle tendon transfer. Radiographs are often normal with posterosuperior cuff tears without cuff tear arthropathy adaptations. Radiographs are also helpful in the evaluation of bony deformity and preexisting hardware.
Computed tomography (CT) scans are primarily used to evaluate bony deformity and the degree of arthritic changes. Soft tissue quality such as rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration can also be ascertained with CT scans. CT arthrography is another valuable modality that is comparable with MRI in determining the presence of cuff deficiency especially in the presence of prior hardware. Fatty atrophy and muscle quality can be evaluated on the sagittal CT images with the use of the Goutallier grading system.6 Irreparability is often associated with Goutallier grade 3 or 4.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard imaging modality for assessing rotator cuff tears and muscle quality (Figure 18-1). T2-weighted images best appreciate the size of the rotator cuff tears, whereas T1-weighted images best evaluate the muscle quality and fatty infiltration. On the T2-weighted coronal sections, the degree of retraction can be measured for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor tears. The T1-weighted sagittal sections are best to evaluate the degree of fatty infiltration in the rotator cuff muscles. Muscle quality and fatty atrophy can be ascertained on MRI sagittal images by using the Fuchs grading system, which is adapted from the Goutallier on CT scans.7 The tangent sign of Zanetti can be measured on sagittal images, which consists of drawing a line from the coracoid to the scapular spine.8 Significant fatty atrophy of the supraspinatus is indicated by failure of the line to transect the supraspinatus. MRI with arthrogram is another imaging modality that can be helpful in evaluating the rotator cuff with a history of prior repair.
TECHNIQUE
Positioning and Preparation
The procedure can be performed in either a beach chair position or a lateral decubitus position. The affected arm and back are then prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion, and the patient receives appropriate antibiotics intravenously preoperatively as prophylaxis against infection. It is crucial to ensure adequate exposure to the back, with draping a few centimeters medial to the scapular medial border (Figure 18-2). The shoulder is positioned in slight flexion to make the scapula more prominent for accurate skin marking and subsequent lower trapezius tendon harvesting.
Lower Trapezius Muscle Tendon Harvest
A horizontal incision of approximately 6 cm is made parallel and a few centimeters distal to the scapular spine. The incision should be 2 cm medial and 4 cm lateral to the medial scapular border.
Dissection is carried until the subcutaneous fat is encountered and skin flaps are elevated (Figure 18-3). Prior to cutting through the subcutaneous fat, one can visualize the anatomical region as a triangle to make the lower trapezius tendon harvest a facile procedure. The medial limb of the triangle is the lower trapezius tendon, and the lateral limb is the posterior deltoid. The floor of the triangle is the infraspinatus fascia. One should start by cutting through the fat overlying the floor of the imaginary triangle until the glistening fascia of the infraspinatus is encountered (Figure 18-4). Identifying the infraspinatus fascia ensures that one has not inadvertently cut through the lower trapezius tendon or the posterior deltoid. The surgeon can then undermine the lower trapezius tendon just medial and superficial to the exposed infraspinatus fascia, thus elevating the “medial limb of the triangle” (Figure 18-5). Subsequently, attention should be shifted toward releasing the insertion of the lower trapezius tendon from the medial scapular spine (Figure 18-6). The surgeon can start from the apex of the imaginary triangle, which is the most lateral and proximal part of the undermined lower trapezius tendon in the previous step. Afterward, one can reliably use electrocautery to elevate the lower trapezius from the medial scapular spine in a lateral-to-medial direction by staying on the bone on the scapular spine. It is important to remain on the center of the scapular spine while elevating to avoid cutting through the lower trapezius tendon inferiorly or cutting through the middle trapezius superiorly. Clearing superficial fascia and fat allows the surgeon to see a raphe between the lower and middle trapezius musculature, which can be opened to preserve the middle trapezius and its insertion. Once the whole lower trapezius insertion is elevated, the tendon and muscle are usually tethered to subcutaneous tissue peripheral and to the deep infraspinatus fascia (Figure 18-7). Releasing the tethering points must be performed gently, and one should minimize finger dissection to avoid bleeding. One should avoid dissecting medial to the scapular border on the deep aspect of the lower trapezius tendon as the spinal accessory nerve is one to two fingerbreadths away, whereas dissection superior to the lower trapezius tendon is always safe. One can finally confirm a successful harvest by looking at the deep surface of the harvested muscle tendon, and one should identify a clear tendinous structure. If one cannot see a clear tendinous structure, then the surgeons have either cut through the tendon itself or harvested part of the muscular middle trapezius combined with the lower trapezius. The latter scenario is less worrisome. Finally, the lower trapezius tendon end is whipstitched, which facilitates in tendon retraction at the end of the procedure when performing the Achilles tendon weave with the lower trapezius tendon (Figure 18-8).
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree







