Posterior ankle arthroscopic reduction and fixation for treatment of posterior malleolus fractures with absorbable screws

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the clinical efficacy of posterior ankle arthroscopy with absorbable screws in treating posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs).

Methods

The data of 33 patients who underwent posterior ankle arthroscopy with absorbable screws for the treatment of PMFs between January 2022 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical time, postoperative secondary injuries and soft tissue complications were recorded. The articular surface reduction quality and syndesmotic congruence were observed under X-ray and 3D CT. At the last follow-up, the ankle joint flexion mobility and occurrence of toe flexion contracture were recorded. Pains were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Functional efficacy was evaluated using American Orthopeadic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).

Results

No secondary injuries or complications occurred postoperatively. The reduction of articular surface and the syndesmotic congruence were good. The fractures had no reduction loss and were all healed on time. At the last follow-up, the ankle joint flexion mobility was excellent, and there was no complication of toe flexion contracture. The VAS scores were 0.67 ± 0.92, the AOFAS scores were 92.73 ± 6.77, and the OMAS scores were 94.84 ± 7.01.

Conclusions

Posterior ankle arthroscopic reduction and fixation for treatment of PMFs with absorbable screws enables direct visualization of articular surface reduction and fixation, avoiding secondary removal of internal fixation and reinjury of soft tissues. Good ankle joint functions can be obtained through soft tissue protection and precise reduction, indicating this scheme is an optional surgical method.

Introduction

Ankle fractures are among the common fractures in orthopedics, accounting for 4 %-9 % of general fractures, and up to about 50 % of the ankle fractures involve the posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) . Although the shapes and sizes of PMFs vary, and their surgical indications and surgical methods are controversial , larger posterior malleolar fragments are often associated with higher incidence of traumatic arthritis . Thus, anatomical reduction and soft tissue management are crucial for surgical outcomes . The most common surgical approaches for traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) are the posterolateral and posteromedial approaches. During the surgery, steel plates or screws for internal fixation can be selected according to the shape and size of the posterior malleolar fragment . This process requires extensive soft tissue dissection, which pose a risk of neurovascular injury and may cause late-stage complications due to soft tissue adhesion (e.g., toe flexion contracture, restricted ankle dorsiflexion) . After the posterior malleolar fragment is reduced and fixed, if there is a step greater than 1 mm on the articular surface, the incidence of late-stage traumatic arthritis will be significantly increased . The traditional ORIF cannot directly evaluate the articular surface reduction intraoperatively, and will easily omit the loose bodies in the joint cavity. Hence, there is a risk of traumatic arthritis caused by poor articular surface reduction and long-term articular surface wear .

Recently, ankle arthroscopy has been gradually applied to auxiliary treatment of PMFs. During open surgery, arthroscopy is used to assist in reduction the articular surface and evaluate the reduction quality, and to timely detect hidden injuries that may be missed . Moreover, to decrease soft tissue damages during internal fixation, some researchers have tried the completely closed reduction of internal fixation under anterior or posterior ankle arthroscopy, and achieved good therapeutic effects , . However, this scheme has not been widely used. In addition, posterior malleolus fracture fragments are often fixed with metal screws or steel plates, which still have a risk of soft tissue injuries during removal. Compared with metal internal fixators, the use of absorbable screws in ankle fractures can achieve similar clinical efficacy, and does not require removal after surgery, avoiding injuries caused by secondary surgery ,, .

Thus, we propose to treat PMFs using posterior ankle arthroscopic reduction combined with absorbable screw fixation, ensuring anatomical reduction of the articular surface. The clinical data of patients with PMFs after the above treatment in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, and the surgical skills and efficacy were further explored.

Materials and methods

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria were: (1) acute closed fracture; (2) patients with ankle fractures involving the PMFs diagnosed with medical history, symptoms, signs and imaging examinations; (3) agreement to sign right of informed consents, and consent for arthroscopic surgery on the PMFs; (4) PMFs fixed with absorbable screws; (5) complete medical records, and follow-up time ≥ 12 months.

Exclusion criteria were: (1) severe osteoporosis or secondary pathological fractures; (2) combination with severe neurovascular injuries; (3) open or non-acute fractures; (4) combination with other serious injuries or bad compliance that affected postoperative rehabilitation training; (5) incomplete information or missed follow-up.

Basic information

Based on the above inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data of 33 patients who underwent treatment for PMFs using posterior ankle arthroscopy with absorbable screws in our hospital between January 2022 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 20 males (60.61 %) and 13 females (39.39 %) (43.85 ± 8.90 (25−63) years old). The causes of injuries included traffic injuries (10, 30.30 %), fall injuries (16, 48.48 %), fall-down injuries (4, 12.12 %), and squeeze injuries (3, 9.10 %). According to Haraguchi classification , there were 18 cases (54.55 %) of type I and 15 cases (45.45 %) of type II. According to Bartoníček and Rammelt (B&R) classification , there were 18 cases (54.55 %) of type 2, 11 cases (33.33 %) of type 3, and 4 cases (12.12 %) of type 4 ( Table 1 ).

Table1

Patient demographics and fracture characteristics.

n (%)
Gender
Male 20 60.61
Female 13 39.39
Mode of injury
Traffic 10 30.30
Fall 16 48.48
Fall-down 4 12.12
Squeeze 3 9.10
Posterior malleolus fracture type (Haraguchi)
Type I 18 54.55
Type II 15 45.45
Type III 0 0
Posterior malleolus fracture type (Bartoníček and Rammelt)
Type 1 0 0
Type 2 18 54.55
Type 3 11 33.33
Type 4 4 12.12

Surgical strategy

Preoperative preparation

Following admission, manipulative reduction with plaster fixation or bone traction therapy was administered based on the specific type of ankle fracture. The three-dimensional (3D) CT of the ankle joint was conducted to characterize PMFs. Low-molecular-weight heparin was given preoperatively, if necessary, to prevent thrombosis, and the vascular ultrasound of lower limbs was performed to determine whether thrombosis occurred. Moreover, surgical contraindications were excluded. When the swelling of the affected limb subsided and the skin tension was moderate, surgical treatment was performed after about 5–7 days after the injury occurrence.

Surgical process

(1) Following successful anesthesia (general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation or continuous epidural anesthesia), the patient took a prone position, and a pneumatic tourniquet was applied to the proximal thigh of the affected limb.

(2) Fixation of the lateral malleolar : A 6–8 cm longitudinal incision was made over the fibular or lateral malleolar fracture site. The fracture was exposed through the anterior interval between the peroneus longus and brevis muscles. After elevating the periosteum and evacuating the hematoma, the fracture was anatomically reduced and stabilized using an anatomic locking plate with multiple screws (Tianjin Zhengtian Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China). The deep interval between the peroneus longus and brevis tendons was not incised.

(3) The posteromedial (PM) and posterolateral (PL) portal sites were identified as follows: First, a horizontal line was drawn at the level of the tip of the lateral malleolus. Then the PM and PL portals were located at the points where this line intersects the medial and lateral aspects of the Achilles tendon. When the ankle joint was in the dorsal extension position, 11# scalpel was used to incise the skin by about 0.5 cm. The PM and PL portals were established using incision and expansion techniques. A 4.0-mm 30 º arthroscope was introduced through the PL portal, while a 4.0-mm shaver was inserted via the PM portal. After meeting, soft tissues were debrided and the posterior ankle working space was established. The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) was identified, thus establishing the medial safe zone. ( Fig. 1 A–C). The posterior joint capsules were debrided, hematomas and any small loose bodies were removed. The distal articular surface of the tibia, the posterior tibiofibular ligament, and the syndesmotic congruence were assessed. The posterior talofibular and the posterior tibiofibular ligaments were protected.

Fig. 1

A: Surface positioning of posterior ankle arthroscopy; B-C: in vitro and in vivo operational perspectives of posterior ankle arthroscopy respectively; D: intercalary fragment in PMFs (die punch fragment) embedded on sagittal plane under ankle joint 3D CT; E: die punch fragments observed under posterior ankle arthroscopy; F: reduced die punch fragments under posterior ankle arthroscopy with talus as a template; G: broken end of posterior malleolus fracture exposed; (H): articular surface of posterior malleolus fracture after anatomical reduction; (I): placement of guide wires under posterior ankle arthroscopy; (J): placement of absorbable screws under posterior ankle arthroscopy.

(4) A proximal posterolateral (PPL) portal was established approximately 2–4 cm proximal to the posterolateral (PL) portal and served as an auxiliary portal. A 0.5-cm skin incision was made with 11# scalpel, after which the tract was dilated with a vascular clamp until the bone surface was reached. The resulting portal served three purposes: (A) to push the posterior malleolar fragment to the distal end of the joint for anatomical reduction; (B) to enable temporary fixation or placement of a more proximal anti-sliding screw for large fragments; and (C) to retract the flexor hallucis longus tendon, thereby protecting the medial neurovascular structures and expanding the surgical field of view.

(5) Reduction techniques: The articular reduction was monitored arthroscopically through the PM portal. The talar articular surface served as a template for reduction, assisted by dorsiflexion traction, distal pushing of the fragment via the PPL portal, and joystick manipulation using a Kirschner wire inserted into the fragment. If a small impacted osteochondral fragment (“die punch fragment”) was present ( Fig. 1 D, E), it was first reduced using the talus as a template ( Fig. 1 F). If necessary, temporary fixation with a Kirschner wire could be performed, followed by reduction of the posterior malleolar fragment using the previously described techniques.

(6) Fixation: A 1.0 mm guide wire was inserted into the posterior malleolar fragment via the PL portal, aiming at the center of the ankle joint and positioning the posterior tibia tubercle. Through the PPL portal, vascular forceps retracted the FHL tendon medially to enhance access to the posterior tibial margin. A second 1.0 mm guide wire was inserted higher than the first guide wire via the PM portal. If the fracture fragment was large, a third 1.0 mm guide wire can be inserted via the PPL portal. The fracture reduction status and the position of the Kirschner wire were assessed with fluoroscopy. The anatomical reduction of the articular surface was confirmed again under arthroscopy. After drilling, depth measurement, and tapping, a 3.5 mm cannulated absorbable screws (INION, Finland) in an appropriate length were inserted ( Fig. 1 G–H).

(7) Final steps: After arthroscopic and fluoroscopic confirmation, guide wires were removed, and portal incisions were closed with 3–0 sutures. If a medial malleolus fracture was present, the operative table was tilted slightly toward the affected side with the knee flexed, and an anteromedial arc incision was made for reduction and internal fixation. For certain fracture types (e.g., B&R type 3: posteromedial two-part fragment involving the medial malleolus, cases with a large medial malleolar fragment), temporary fixation of the medial malleolus with two or three Kirschner wires was performed after lateral malleolus fixation. Following reduction and fixation of the posterior malleolus, the Kirschner wires were replaced with two 3.5-mm cannulated screws. The distal tibiofibular syndesmotic congruence was probed via posterior ankle arthroscopy, and the syndesmotic stability was assessed by performing the Cotton test. If necessary, syndesmotic screw or elastic fixation could be applied. All incisions were closed layer-by-layer, and after dressing, a neutral-position plaster splint was applied to immobilize the ankle.

Postoperative processing

Antibiotics were routinely used to prevent infection until 24 h after surgery, and the affected limb and the ankle joint were raised and fixed with neutral plaster. Anterior and lateral X-rays and 3D CT of the ankle joint were re-examined. When there was no contraindication for anticoagulants, subcutaneous injection of enoxaparin sodium (4000 U/d) was started at 12 h postoperatively until discharge. After discharge, oral rivaroxaban (10 mg/d) was continued until 30 days after the operation. The plaster was removed 4 weeks postoperatively, and non-weight-bearing extension and flexion exercises were performed. Partial weight-bearing exercises were started 6–8 weeks postoperatively, and gradually transited to complete weight bearing.

Evaluation of therapeutic effect

Evaluation of surgical time

The surgical time and the posterior ankle arthroscopic surgery time were recorded.

Fracture reduction quality evaluation

The articular surface reduction (sagittal displacement > 2 mm is bad reduction) and the syndesmotic congruence were postoperatively re-examined via 3D CT .

Evaluation of functions

The ankle joint flexion mobility at the last follow-up (before take-out of internal fixation) was recorded. Pains were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0–2: excellent, 3–5: good, 6–8: acceptable, >8: bad). Functional efficacy was evaluated using American Orthopeadic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score (90–100: excellent, 75–89: good, 50–74: acceptable, <50: bad) , and Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) (91–100: excellent, 61–90: good, 31–60: acceptable, 0–30: bad) .

Complications

After the surgery, secondary injuries (e.g., neurovascular injuries), and soft tissue complications (e.g., wound infection and skin necrosis) were recorded. The ankle joints were reexamined with regular X-rays (monthly) until complete healing to evaluate fracture healing, and any reduction loss was recorded. At the last follow-up (before internal fixation removal), whether big toe flexion contracture occurred was recorded.

Results

All 33 patients were followed up postoperatively for 14.03 ± 1.40 (12−18) months. In an elderly patient, a calf intramuscular venous thrombosis was initially detected during lower limb ultrasound screening. However, subsequent venography confirmed the absence of deep vein thrombosis. The patient continued the prescribed postoperative anticoagulation regimen, and follow-up evaluation at 2 weeks demonstrated complete resolution. No secondary injuries (e.g., neurovascular injury), or soft tissue complications (e.g., wound infection, skin necrosis) occurred postoperatively. The operation time was 95.45 ± 11.55 (80−120) min, and the posterior ankle arthroscopy time was 35.30 ± 5.58 (30−45) min. Follow-up X-ray examinations demonstrated timely fracture healing, with no evidence of reduction loss. The 3D CT confirmed satisfactory articular surface reduction, and showed maintained syndesmotic congruence. At the last follow-up (before internal fixation removal), no patient suffered toe flexion contracture, the ankle joint plantar flexion mobility was 47.15 ± 4.37 (33−50) °, and the ankle joint dorsiflexion mobility was 21.12 ± 3.10 (14−26) °. The VAS scores were 0.67 ± 0.92 (0−3), including 31 excellent cases (93.94 %) and 2 good cases (6.06 %). The AOFAS scores of the patients were 92.73 ± 6.77 (74−100), including 25 excellent cases, 6 good cases, and 2 acceptable cases, with an excellence and good rate of 93.94 %. The OMAS scores were 94.84 ± 7.01 (75−100), including 25 excellent cases, and 8 good cases, with an excellence and good rate of 100 % ( Table 2 ).

Table 2

Pain, functional outcomes and complications.

AOFAS scores n (%)
Excellent 25(75.76 %)
Good 6(18.18 %)
Acceptable 2(6.06 %)
Bad 0
OMAS scores n (%)
Excellent 25(75.76 %)
Good 8(24.24 %)
Acceptable 0
Bad 0
VAS scores n (%)
Excellent 31(93.94 %)
Good 2(6.06 %)
Acceptable 0
Bad 0
Mobility of ankle joint plantar flexion (°)
Flexion 47.15 ± 4.37(33–50)
Dorsiflexion 21.12 ± 3.10(14–26)
Complications
(neurovascular injury, wound infection, skin necrosis, reduction loss, fracture nonuion, toe flexion contracture)
None
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 5, 2026 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Posterior ankle arthroscopic reduction and fixation for treatment of posterior malleolus fractures with absorbable screws

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access