Open Surgical Reconstruction of Acute and Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instability



Open Surgical Reconstruction of Acute and Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instability


Augustus D. Mazzocca

Cory M. Edgar

Knut Beitzel

Andreas B. Imhoff

Thomas M. DeBerardino

Robert A. Arciero



HISTORICAL CONTEXT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations have been a topic of interest and treatment controversy since the writings of Hippocrates and Galen (1). A variety of closed reduction maneuvers and splinting techniques have been described with mixed results. Bracing may be painful and poorly tolerated, leading to residual instability and possibly chronic pain or dysfunction. Since the first reported surgical treatment of a displaced AC joint in 1861 by Samuel Cooper, more than 60 techniques have been described to stabilize the joint, including numerous direct repair or reconstructive procedures for both the AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).

Injuries to the AC joint are one of the more common shoulder injures sustained during athletic participation. It is typically a result of a direct trauma to the superior aspect of the shoulder driving the scapula downward and
medial (3, 4, 5). Using the Rockwood classification, type I and II injuries are universally treated nonoperatively, while type IV, V, and VI injuries have been consistently managed with surgical repair or reconstruction (1). The area of persistent controversy concerns management of type III injuries especially acutely in the active patient. Indications for surgical treatment are typically related to joint instability, persistent pain, or changes in shoulder biomechanics that can affect sport or daily activity. A thorough understanding of the relevant anatomy and structures responsible for AC joint stability as well as an understanding of the historical progression of surgical solutions to treat these injuries is important in providing the optimum treatment.

The AC joint is a true diarthrodial joint with a thin cartilage surface with an interposed fibrocartilaginous meniscoid disk. Static stability comes from capsular thickenings or ligaments and two extracapsular CC ligaments: the conoid and trapezoid. Cadaveric sectioning studies estimate the AC ligaments to contribute 20% to 50% of resistance to superior migration but 90% to clavicular translation in the sagittal plain (anterior/posterior) (6, 7, 8). The CC ligaments are the primary restraint to inferior and medial translation of the scapulohumeral complex in relation to the clavicle and axial skeleton. Specifically, the conoid ligament tensions under loads that displace the clavicle superiorly, and the trapezoid tensions during compression of the AC joint or medialization of scapulohumeral complex (6, 7). Failure of one ligament complex increases strain on the remaining static restraints. Not to be underestimated is the dynamic stability to the AC joint provided by the deltotrapezial fascia, specifically the anterior deltoid insertion on the anterolateral boarder of the clavicle and AC joint.

With the progression of technology and its application to surgical improvements of AC joint injuries, the treatment of complete AC joint separations has transitioned from conservative to operative management over the years (1). The surgical treatment of AC joint dislocations has a clear historical progression. Intra-articular fixation of the AC joint with pins/wires was among the first techniques to be described. Fixation was meant to provide an enhanced temporary reduction allowing the native soft tissue an opportunity to heal anatomically. However, reports of fixation failure, loss of reduction, and disastrous migration of hardware led to abandonment of this technique. Extra-articular fixation followed and is best illustrated by the Bosworth “screw suspension” technique. As described in 1941, it was meant to provide stability to facilitate CC ligament healing, but again hardware failure, migration, and coracoid fractures associated with the use of this device led to the development of alternative “CC suspension” constructs, including Dacron grafts, wires, and various types of sutures. Distal clavicle excisions were reported by Mumford and Gurd independently in 1942 as a means to address painful type II AC joint (Mumford) or type III (Gurd) injuries. However, the instability of the AC joint is not addressed by these procedures. In 1972, Weaver and Dunn published their technique of distal clavicle resection and transfer of the coracoacromial ligament to restore and reconstruct the CC ligaments and treat acute and chronic AC joint instability. Over the years, numerous modifications to this technique have been described (1, 2).

The first attempt at the reconstruction of the CC ligaments was reported in 1942 by Vargus, describing transfer of part of the conjoined tendon anterior to the clavicle. Anatomic reconstruction of the native CC ligaments and AC ligaments represents an improved understanding of the biomechanics in this area with the possibility of improved surgical outcomes. The Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction (ACCR) Technique described here attempts to restore the biomechanics of the AC joint complex for the treatment of painful or unstable dislocations. This technique has been previously reported during various stages of its development, and this technique represents the final progression of its development (9, 10, 11, 12).




SURGERY: ANATOMIC CORACOCLAVICULAR LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION (DR. MAZZOCCA AND ARCIERO TECHNIQUE)


Patient Positioning

The procedure is performed in the beach-chair position with the hip flexed to 60 to 70 degrees and the patient positioned far lateral on the bed to allow the arm to fall into extension. This facilitates exposure and mobilization of the shoulder for scapula reduction to the clavicle. A small towel bump is placed along the medial boarder of the scapula to prevent protraction of the scapula. In addition, this elevates the torso away from the table thereby improving access to the clavicle for drilling the bone tunnels. Gently rotating the patient’s head away from the operative field with some extension aids in exposure (Fig. 18-3). Care should be taken to not be overly aggressive with this maneuver and to provide enough support to ensure there is not excessive tension to the brachial plexus during the procedure.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Tags:
Sep 16, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Open Surgical Reconstruction of Acute and Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instability

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access