Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Fractures of the Proximal Ulna



Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Fractures of the Proximal Ulna


David Ring





ANATOMY



  • The greater sigmoid notch of the ulna is formed by the coronoid and olecranon processes and forms a nearly 180-degree arc capturing the trochlea.


  • The region between the coronoid and olecranon articular facets is the nonarticular transverse groove of the olecranon, a common location of fracture and a place where precise articular reduction is not critical.


  • The triceps has a broad and thick insertion from just superior to the point of the olecranon and the tip of the olecranon process that can be used to enhance fixation of small, osteoporotic, or fragmented fractures and can be split longitudinally, if needed, when applying a plate.


  • The radioulnar articulation is stabilized by the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) at the distal radioulnar joint, the interosseous ligament in the midforearm, and the annular ligament at the proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ). Fracture of the ulna with dislocation of the PRUJ disrupts the annular ligament, but typically, the other structures are spared.


  • In a true Monteggia lesion (fracture-dislocation) of the forearm, the radial head dislocates anterolaterally from the PRUJ.


PATHOGENESIS



  • Fractures of the olecranon and proximal ulna can result from a direct blow to the point of the elbow or indirect forces during a fall on the outstretched hand.


NATURAL HISTORY



  • Stable nondisplaced or minimally displaced olecranon fractures are uncommon. The majority of olecranon fractures are displaced and benefit from operative treatment.


  • The occasional untreated displaced simple olecranon fracture demonstrates a slight flexion contracture, some weakness of extension, no arthrosis, and little, if any, pain.






    FIG 1 • The Mayo classification of olecranon fractures accounts for the factors that will influence treatment decisions: displacement, comminution, and dislocation or subluxation of the articulations.









    Table 1 Bado Classification of Monteggia Lesions with Jupiter Subclassification of Type II Fractures









































    Type


    Description


    Illustration


    I


    Anterior dislocation of the radial head with fracture of the diaphysis of the ulna with anterior angulation of the ulnar fracture (most common type of lesion)


    image


    II


    Posterior or posterolateral dislocation of the radial head with fracture of the ulnar diaphysis with posterior angulation of the ulnar fracture


    image


    IIA


    Fracture at the level of the trochlear notch (ulnar fracture involves the distal part of the olecranon and coronoid)


    image


    IIB


    Ulnar fracture is at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction, distal to the coronoid.


    image


    IIC


    Ulnar fracture is diaphyseal.


    image


    IID


    Comminuted fractures involving more than one region


    image


    III


    Lateral or anterolateral dislocation of the radial head with fracture of the ulnar metaphysis


    image


    IV


    Anterior dislocation of the radial head with a fracture of the proximal third of the radius and ulna at the same level


    image


    Adapted from Bado J. The Monteggia lesion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1967;50:717; Jupiter JB, Leibovic SJ, Ribbans W, et al. The posterior Monteggia lesion. J Orthop Trauma 1991;5:395-402.




  • In contrast, undertreated or poorly treated fracture-dislocations of the olecranon often lead to severe arthrosis and angulation of the arm under the influence of gravity.


  • Even well-treated complex injuries are at risk for stiffness, heterotopic ossification, arthrosis, and occasionally nonunion.


PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL FINDINGS



  • Knowledge of the characteristics of the patient (age, sex, medical health) and the injury (mechanism, energy) will help the surgeon understand the injury and determine optimal treatment.


  • First, the patient is assessed for life-threatening injuries (Advanced Trauma Life Support [ATLS] protocol) and any medical problems that may have contributed to the injury.


  • A secondary survey is performed to identify any other fractures, ipsilateral arm injuries in particular.


  • The skin is inspected for any wounds associated with the fracture.


  • The pulses are palpated, capillary refill inspected, and an Allen test performed if necessary.


  • Peripheral nerve function is assessed.


  • Patients with high-energy injuries, particularly those with ipsilateral wrist or forearm injuries, are at risk for compartment syndrome. If the clinical examination is suggestive or unreliable (owing to problems with mental status), compartment pressure monitoring should be performed.


IMAGING AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES



  • Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs are used for initial characterization of the injury.


  • Radiographs after reduction or splinting or oblique views can be useful.


  • Computed tomography (CT) is useful for characterization of fracture-dislocations. In particular, three-dimensional (3-D) CT reconstructions can be useful for assessment of the coronoid and radial head.


DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS



  • Elbow dislocation


  • Essex-Lopresti fracture-dislocation of the forearm (disruption of the interosseous ligament and or TFCC usually with fracture of the radial head)


  • Fracture-dislocations of the elbow (“terrible triad” injury)


  • Distal humerus fracture


NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT



  • Nonoperative management is appropriate for the rare fracture of the olecranon that is less than 2 mm displaced with the elbow flexed 90 degrees.


  • Four weeks of splint immobilization followed by active-assisted mobilization of the elbow will usually result in a healed fracture and good elbow function.


SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

Jul 22, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Fractures of the Proximal Ulna

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access