Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine uptake among individuals with rheumatic conditions remains low despite heightened risk for related adverse outcomes. This is especially pronounced among historically marginalized populations who suffered disproportionately from the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the myriad of reasons for low vaccine uptake, mistrust in the healthcare system, misinformation related to the vaccine development process, fear of rheumatic disease flares, and inconsistent physician recommendations, are highlighted. Two randomized controlled trials are underway leveraging multimodal strategies and community partnerships to disseminate COVID-19 vaccine information, reduce hesitancy and hopefully improve vaccine uptake, particularly in marginalized communities.
Key points
- •
Reasons for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy among individuals with rheumatic conditions are multifaceted and stem from misinformation, lack of physician or other provider recommendations, fear of disease flares, mistrust in the healthcare system, and prior experiences of racism.
- •
Lessons can be learned to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake from interventions to increase uptake of other vaccinations among individuals with rheumatic conditions.
- •
To improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake and reduce existing inequities, multimodal hospital and community-based strategies are needed to provide education and build trust.
Background
The burden of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been staggering globally with over 775 million reported cases and over 7 million deaths. Individuals with rheumatic diseases, who may be immunocompromised, have an increased risk of developing life-threatening complications. While most studies indicated no significant differences in the prevalence of COVID-19 infection compared to the general population, a study based in England found that individuals who had rheumatic conditions had an increased risk of COVID-19 related mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–1.3]). Individuals with additional comorbidities like hypertension, cardiovascular disease or diabetes had even higher odds of developing a poor outcome, including the need for hospitalization or ventilatory support.
Inequities in adverse COVID-19 outcomes by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and neighborhood exposures have been observed both in the overall population and in those with a rheumatic condition. Black and Hispanic populations had disproportionately higher rates of COVID-19 infection, intensive care unit admission, and related mortality. , In the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry, Black (odds ratio [OR] 2.7 [95% CI 1.9–4.0]), Latinx (OR 1.1 [95% CI 1.9–2.5]), and Asian (OR 2.7 [95% CI 1.2–6.2]) patients had significantly higher odds of hospitalization compared to White patients. Additionally, Latinx patients had 3-fold higher odds of requiring ventilatory support (OR 3.3 [95% CI 1.8–6.1]). Similar findings were observed among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); Black (OR 2.7 [95% CI 1.4–5.5]) and Hispanic (OR 2.76 [95% CI 1.34–5.69]) patients had higher odds of severe outcomes like hospitalization, oxygen/ventilatory requirement, and death, compared to White patients, adjusted for age, sex, region, time period, number of comorbidities, presence of renal or cardiovascular comorbidities, disease activity, exposure to glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressive medication category.
Vaccination remains a critical prevention tool against morbidity and mortality related to infectious diseases. For patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, a 2023 meta-analysis of 8 studies comprising 1348 patients found a pooled COVID-19 vaccine uptake rate estimated at 67% (I 2 = 98%), indicating a persistent need for education and interventions to improve vaccination uptake. There is a paucity of studies investigating sociodemographic disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake in patients with rheumatic diseases. In a 1:1 age-, sex-, race-, and county-matched study of 342 patients with SLE and 350 patients without SLE, about 17% of patients with SLE remained unvaccinated 7 months after vaccines became available in 2021. This study found no differences in uptake between patients with and without SLE after adjusting for race, ethnicity, or area deprivation index. This rate was consistent with the overall United States (US) vaccination rate. However, the cohort was nearly 87% White and based in the upper Midwest and may not be sufficiently powered to draw conclusions regarding potential sociodemographic inequities.
Vaccine-preventable diseases have often shared an inverse relationship with vaccine uptake in historically marginalized communities. Racial and ethnic disparities in vaccination rates can stem from inequitable care access and delivery, driven by structural racism. Structural racism reflects the ways in which “societies foster racial discrimination through mutually reinforcing macro-level systems” (eg, housing, education, healthcare, and criminal justice). Thus, utilizing an equity lens allows for the consideration that different groups of individuals experience different sets of risk, needs, and opportunities due to legacies of inequity, injustice, and discrimination. , Therefore, interventions to improve overall vaccination uptake should specifically focus on the needs of populations that have been historically marginalized or made vulnerable to prevent the widening of already existing inequities. In this review, through an equity lens, we explore reasons for vaccine hesitancy and describe interventions to reduce hesitancy and improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals with rheumatic conditions. We describe 2 scalable interventions that are underway that utilize community-engaged strategies to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake among historically marginalized individuals with rheumatic conditions in Alabama, Illinois, and Massachusetts.
Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine hesistancy among individuals with rheumatic conditions
During the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccination became highly politicized, controversial, and a source of doubt. Despite its benefits and protection against viral infection, levels of skepticism and misinformation were high, leading to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. In 2019, vaccine hesitancy was identified by the World Health Organization as a top 10 threat to public health. Vaccine hesitancy is of particular concern among people with rheumatic conditions given their increased risk for adverse outcomes from serious infections like COVID-19. ,
While acknowledging their increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, patients in an Italy-based study with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (54.9%, n = 344/626) were less likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine compared to healthy controls (82.3%, n = 284/345). Further, differences exist in vaccine hesitancy when stratifying this population by race. A New York City-based study found that Black rheumatology outpatients were 4 times more likely than White rheumatology outpatients to express hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccination (OR 4.29, [95% CI, 1.96–9.36]). Several studies have investigated reasons for this hesitancy to inform the design of interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in patients with rheumatic conditions. Recurrent themes in the peer-reviewed literature highlight fear of disease flares, adverse events, vaccine efficacy, and lack of physician recommendation as important sources of hesitancy among individuals with rheumatic conditions.
One source of hesitancy has been concern for rheumatic disease flares following COVID-19 vaccination, with discrepancies between degree of hesitancy and actual burden of documented flares. One study (N = 5619) demonstrated that risk of disease flares following COVID-19 vaccination was less than 5%. , However, 25% (n = 763/2921) of individuals with autoimmune or inflammatory rheumatic diseases in a China-based study believed that the vaccine would aggravate their disease. An earlier study based in the Netherlands found that 32% (n = 164/515) of patients with systemic autoimmune disease feared the vaccine would aggravate their disease. These results are further corroborated by a 2022 study from Greece, which found that 2% (n = 9/441) of vaccinated patients experienced disease flares, yet 24.2% (n = 29/120) of unvaccinated patients refused vaccination out of fear of disease flares. Additionally, nearly 30% (n = 53/184) of individuals with RA believed that they would need to discontinue their medications to get vaccinated, further contributing to this fear. The consistency among these international studies reflects perceived risk of disease flare as a key barrier to COVID-19 vaccination for people with rheumatic conditions, and also as a potential target for an educational intervention.
Studies among individuals with rheumatic conditions have also reported varying levels of concern about side effects and adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccines. , , , A study based in India showed that 35% (n = 29/82) of vaccinated individuals with autoimmune rheumatic diseases self-reported symptoms of redness or swelling at the inoculation site, weakness, and muscle soreness. , In a study based in China among 3104 individuals with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases, 20.2% (n = 591) believed that their disease would increase the incidence of adverse events following vaccination. Due to this risk, 19.9% (n = 347) were unwilling to be vaccinated. A study from the Netherlands reported that 52% (n = 154/296) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refused the vaccine due to concerns about adverse events, and in a small subset of patients with SLE, this figure rose to 83% (n = 15/18).
COVID-19 vaccine development occurred quickly in response to its dire need during the beginning of the pandemic. This pace created concerns regarding vaccine efficacy with 61% (n = 384/633) of patients in doubt or unwilling to be vaccinated in the Netherlands believing that no long-term research was performed in its development and rollout. In fact, nearly 35% (n = 108/324) of patients in a study based in China reported that the vaccine could cause COVID-19 infection, with other studies affirming strong associations between fear of infection and willingness to receive the vaccine. , Social media, community perceptions, and fears about vaccine development have resulted in misinformation regarding vaccination among individuals with rheumatic conditions. When asked where they obtained information about vaccines, nearly 70% (n = 716/1026) of patients with rheumatic conditions said the internet was their primary source; less than 30% (n = 304/1026) cited guidance from their doctors.
Misinformation and a general lack of information, as highlighted in the literature, have contributed to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among individuals with rheumatic conditions. Structural racism and experiences of everyday discrimination may relate to heightened vaccine hesitancy among minoritized groups; a scoping review found that two-thirds (n = 41/60) of articles cited structural or systemic racism as a source of medical mistrust regarding vaccinations. A 2023 qualitative study aimed to understand barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake in Black communities in greater Chicago and Boston and included physicians, community leaders and individuals living with rheumatic conditions (n = 20). The investigators found that mistrust was a significant barrier to vaccination; conspiracy theories, racism, and historic injustices, and factors related to vaccine development and to the healthcare system were specific subthemes mentioned. Conspiracy theories, referred to as the “belief that the vaccine and pandemic is a result of a secret plot,” was the most common subtheme mentioned by 60% (n = 12/20) of participants. Participants in this study recognized the role that general mistrust in the medical system plays in vaccine hesitancy, noting the impact that prior incidents have on current attitudes toward vaccination. Mistrust in the healthcare system can be tied to racism and historic injustices; 7 participants mentioned the role of medical racism on hesitancy. Half of the participants acknowledged concerns about vaccine development, specifically the speed of development and the vaccine’s function, as a reason for hesitancy, with 1 participant describing the vaccine as “experimental.”
Among respondents with autoimmune rheumatic conditions who expressed hesitancy toward receiving the vaccine in a 2021 international study, a small percent (5%, n = 158/3109) reported that their physicians advised against vaccination. Fragoulis and colleagues reported similar results in their 2021 phone interview survey study, where 5.8% (n = 7/120) of respondents declined vaccination because it was not recommended by their rheumatologist. These results raise concern, as those who did not receive recommendations to be vaccinated had “the highest comorbidity burden,” according to a study conducted by Sen and colleagues. , A significant proportion of individuals with autoimmune and rheumatic conditions were at risk for severe COVID-19, yet did not perceive themselves as such, or did and were still hesitant to be vaccinated. , Further, 23% (n = 4926/21,164) of patients reported lack of physician recommendation as the “primary factor for booster hesitancy.” Physicians could increase vaccination rates in this population by over 20%, highlighting the “importance of patient education in this context.” ,
Hesitancy to receive other vaccines among individuals with rheumatic conditions
Similar to COVID-19 infection, compared to the general population, individuals with systemic rheumatic conditions have an increased risk of infectious diseases such as influenza, pneumonia, and shingles with poorer outcomes. Despite this, vaccine uptake is suboptimal with estimates as low as 33% for influenza, 13% for pneumococcus, and 24.3% for diphtheria–tetanus–poliomyelitis vaccines. , Similar factors including lack of information and awareness, lack of physician recommendations, perception of good health, lack of time, concerns about efficacy, and fear of adverse effects have been associated with low uptake of these vaccines. Younger age, lower educational attainment, and belonging to a minoritized group were negatively associated with influenza vaccine uptake. , While some studies found that type of immunosuppression influenced vaccine uptake, others did not. ,
While there are nuanced differences between reasons for uptake of different vaccinations, according to a 2021 multinational study, willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine was higher among individuals who had been vaccinated against influenza in the last 3 years, or pneumococcal vaccination in the last 5 years. Further, studies have shown that, similar to COVID-19, the most common reasons for non-COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were fear of side effects, lack of awareness of infection risk, concerns about effectiveness, and lack of recommendation by a physician. A 2019 study of vaccine coverage in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome found that 40.3% (n = 23/57) of unvaccinated respondents attributed influenza vaccine hesitancy to fear of side effects; 79.1% (n = 77/111) of respondents attributed pneumococcal vaccine hesitancy to lack of vaccine recommendation by a physician. There are also differences in patient awareness of adverse effects based on disease treatment class. As shown by Jaques and colleagues, patients who were treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs alone were “were less aware of increased risk of infectious complications compared to patients treated with biologics.” Despite consensus surrounding the benefit of vaccinations, vaccine uptake for patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease remains lower than desired, with one study reporting only 33.4% (n = 180/540) of patients vaccinated against influenza and 49.1% (n = 265/540) vaccinated against pneumococcal infection.
Interventions to improve uptake of vaccination among individuals with rheumatic conditions
While fears surrounding vaccination do exist, targeted interventions have the potential to increase vaccine uptake. 54.7% (n = 954/1745) of patients in China with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease who were uncertain or unwilling to get vaccinated said that they would if advised to by a physician. Moreover, 66% of patients in one study reported that they were vaccinated because their physician recommended it. By increasing educational tools and materials available to providers to share with their patients, vaccine hesitancy may be addressed among those unsure about vaccination. When one considers inequities by race and ethnicity, both in infection burden and vaccine uptake, special consideration and focused efforts are needed to address reasons for vaccine hesitancy, including those that stem from experiences of racism.
Several strategies to increase overall vaccination rates in people at risk for vaccine-preventable infections have been recommended. These include increasing patients’ awareness about the need for vaccination using reminders and letters, improving access to vaccines in patient homes, and reminding clinicians to recommend the appropriate vaccines. , While there are no randomized clinical trials comparing the effect of interventions to improve uptake of appropriate vaccinations among people with rheumatic conditions, results of several studies using quasi-experimental or non-randomized trial designs have been reported.
Clinician-Directed Interventions
Several studies have evaluated electronic health record (EHR) best practice alerts to improve vaccination uptake. An EHR alert significantly increased influenza vaccination rates (from 47% to 65%; P <.001), as well as pneumococcal vaccination rates (19% to 41%; P <.001) in rheumatology patients taking immunosuppressive medications at 1 US-based academic and 1 community site (n = 758 patients eligible for influenza vaccine and n = 426 patients eligible for pneumococcal vaccine). Similarly, an EHR alert implemented at a US academic medical center significantly improved shingles vaccination among people with RA on immunosuppressants from 10.1% (n = 184/1823) before the intervention implementation to 51.7% (n = 804/1554) during the intervention phase ( P <.0001). In another study (n = 228), coupling EHR alerts at the time of the rheumatology visit with education sessions and weekly rheumatologist-specific e-mail reminders resulted in a significant decrease in the proportion of people with RA to whom influenza vaccination was not recommended or administered (47% to 23% P <.001).
A quality improvement study among 2898 rheumatology patients based at an academic hospital, which employed paper reminders for rheumatologists at the time of the clinic visit, showed approximately 23% increase in the proportion of patients with up-to-date pneumococcal vaccination over a 4-year period. In another quality improvement study (n = 3717), using a similar point-of-care paper reminder approach for rheumatologists during the visit, found that the pneumococcal vaccination rate in patients treated by rheumatologists who were exposed to the intervention significantly increased from 67.6% to 80.0% ( P = .006), compared to patients who were seen by rheumatologists in the control group. A study from a large academic medical center in Belgium compared vaccination coverage before and after implementing a vaccination module in the EHR to support vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, 604 (42%, n = 604/1430) of which who had a rheumatologic conditions. The proportion of fully vaccinated patients (influenza vaccine in patients older than 50 years old or taking immunosuppressive therapy, pneumococcal vaccine in patients who were older than 65 y old or taking immunosuppressive therapy) significantly increased from 32.9% (n = 199/604) in 2018 to 48.5% (n = 293/604) in 2021( P <.001).
Multi-modal Clinician and Patient-Directed Interventions
A quality improvement study (n = 1255) based in a US academic rheumatology clinic evaluated a system-level intervention to increase recommended vaccination rates. This multipronged intervention included electronic reminders with linked order sets, rheumatologist auditing and feedback, patient outreach through letters with reminders of the importance of influenza, and pneumococcal vaccinations. While the intervention did not result in improved self-reported influenza vaccination rates, likely due to the baseline rate being already high (79%), pneumococcal vaccination rates significantly increased from 28.7% to 45.8%. In another study, a multimodal implementation strategy that included patient and physician reminders and availability of influenza vaccines during the rheumatology clinic visit was evaluated in a pre/post single arm study design involving patients with RA seen at a single outpatient academic rheumatology clinic in Canada (n = 116). After the intervention, the influenza vaccination rate was 63%, substantially lower than the recommended 75% to 80% coverage in at-risk groups, but this multimodal intervention was associated with a 14.1% (95% CI 1.5, 26.1) increase in influenza vaccine uptake among people with RA.
Patient-Directed Interventions
A cluster non-randomized multi-site study in Australia involving 12,786 patients aged 18 to 64 years with at least 1 medical risk factor evaluated the role of vaccination reminders, including text messages at different times before an appointment with a general practitioner and printed-out reminders at the time of the appointment. An automated text message sent 1 hour before the appointment time, alone or in combination with reminders when booking the appointment or with a printed-out reminder at the time of appointment, was associated with 79% increased odds of influenza vaccination in people with rheumatic conditions (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.09–2.92).
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Randomized Controlled Trial Interventions
To date, there are no published results of randomized controlled trials specifically targeting COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals with rheumatic conditions; however, several studies are underway. A multi-site randomized controlled trial (NCT06469788) is currently testing a multimodal intervention to improve uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among Black and Latinx individuals with autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. This theoretically-informed intervention includes a brochure depicting current recommendations regarding COVID-19 vaccination, first-person narratives from people living with autoimmune rheumatic diseases who received the most recent COVID-19 vaccine addressing the benefits of subsequent COVID-19 vaccine doses, and post-clinic visit calls from trained research staff who will determine modifiable barriers to COVID-19 vaccination and potential solutions and will “navigate”/assist participants to schedule and obtain COVID-19 vaccine on their own. Patient stories can help disseminate knowledge, increase viewer’s engagement with the story and personal insight, and create a sense of community. , The complementary patient navigation component aims to further support patients by discussing challenges they may encounter in obtaining the updated COVID-19 vaccine dose, answering questions, and providing logistics assistance for vaccination. This Alabama and Massachusetts-based study will specifically enroll adults (≥18) who identify as Black or African American and/or Latinx. The control population will receive information and a video about oral hygiene and autoimmune conditions. The primary outcome will be receipt of the most recent COVID-19 vaccine dose, compared between the intervention and control arms.
A second randomized controlled trial (NCT05822219) is also underway that leverages community-academic partnerships in 2 cities, Boston and Chicago. This study uses the Center for Disease Control and Prevention validated community-based Popular Opinion Leader (POL) model to test the efficacy of using a racial justice versus a biomedical framework to train POLs to share information with their social networks to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake and reduce hesitancy. , Due to the inequities in COVID-19 infection and vaccine uptake, this intervention focuses on individuals who identify as Black and/or of African descent with rheumatic conditions. The POL model, a community-based intervention that trains trusted community leaders to disseminate health information to their social network members (eg, friends, family, and neighbors), has been shown to reduce stigma and improve care-seeking behaviors. ,
This study has leveraged a community-engaged iterative approach to develop the trial protocol and the intervention curricula. The intervention arm (Arm 1, racial justice framework) curriculum uses the Public Health Critical Race Praxis, which recognizes race as a social construct, emphasizes the ways social systems and institutions reinforce racism, and calls on researchers to critically examine a priori assumptions related to issues of race at every stage of a biomedical study. , , With this framework, intervention arm (Arm 1) modules will acknowledge and address the role of structural racism in vaccine deliberation and rheumatic condition health outcome inequities, with an emphasis on community-level COVID-19 vaccine uptake as a strategy to advance racial justice. , Arm 2 uses a biomedical framework, emphasizing the physical and biologic underpinnings of health outcomes, COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms, and preventive care. Arm 2’s strategies are more focused on improving and protecting the health of the individual and their close contacts, compared to Arm 1’s strategies that emphasize the health of the community. The trial’s primary outcome is social network member COVID-19 vaccine uptake, which will be compared between intervention arms.
Discussion
Despite the known risks of serious infections to individuals with systemic rheumatic conditions, and the reassuring data regarding vaccine safety, uptake is suboptimal for all vaccinations, and specifically for COVID-19 vaccination. The reasons are multifaceted and are more pronounced among minoritized populations. Interventions to increase uptake of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations based in clinical settings have yielded mixed results suggesting the need for heightened patient involvement and community engagement, as well as attention to the nuanced reasons driving hesitancy particularly around COVID-19 vaccination. Two interventions are currently underway that focus on Black and Latinx individuals who were disproportionately affected by COVID-19 and who have persistently lower rates of COVID-19 vaccination compared to White individuals. One intervention showcases diverse patient voices describing their motivations for COVID-19 vaccination and the other leverages community leaders to disseminate vaccination information through their social networks. If successful, these low-cost readily implementable interventions may be scalable to other medical centers and regions. Further interventions are also needed for physicians and other providers to promote vaccination uptake for patients with systemic rheumatic conditions while also paying attention to the unique reasons driving hesitancy among individual patients. Leveraging both patient-physician partnerships and community-academic partnerships may increase both vaccine uptake and overall trust in healthcare that could spill over to other domains where significant inequities exist.
Summary
COVID-19 vaccine uptake remains low among individuals with rheumatic conditions with significant inequities by race and ethnicity. While there are hospital-based interventions to improve uptake of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine, there are no published results of interventions to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals with rheumatic conditions. Interventions that are both hospital-based and community-based, and that address mistrust and experiences of racism are underway leveraging educational and trust-building strategies to improve uptake.
Disclosure
Dr N. Ezeh and Ms T. Boadi have no disclosures. Dr M.I. Danila: Research grants: NIH ( P30 AR072583 , P50 AR060772 , R01 AI153365 , R01 AR065493 , R01 AR080784 ) Pfizer , Radius–sums paid to the Institution. Associate Editor for Arthritis Care and Research. Speaker fees <10k. Hospital for special surgery, UT Southwestern, Cedars Sinai, RheumNow. Dr R. Ramsey-Goldman: Research Grants: NIH ( R01AR071091 , R01 AR080089 , R01 AI170938 , P30AR072579 , R21AI171491 ); DOD, United States ( W81XWWH2010692 ); MUSC18-053-8D365; LuCIN subcontract; MP-CPI-21 to 005 OMH (subcontracts with ACR, LFA, University of Alabama); NU58DP0069080100 (subcontract with ACR); PCORI no number (subcontract with University of Alabama, Birmingham), Consulting, Honoraria, Speaking fees (all <10K): State University of New York, Syracuse; Merck; Biogen; Cabaletta; Exagen Diagnostics; Duke University, Ampel Solutions, Clarivate, Upstart Research Consulting, AstraZeneca, Georgetown University. Chair, Collaborative Initiatives Special Committee (COIN) American College of Rheumatology. Dr C.H. Feldman: Research Grants: NIH, United States ( 1OT2HL161841 , 1P30AG064199-03 , R01AR080089 , 30AR072577 , R03AR083661 , R01MD019235 , R01AR074290 ), the Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation, United States , the Arthritis Foundation, United States , Brigham and Women’s Hospital Health Equity Innovation Pilot . Consulting: Harvard Pilgrim, OM1, Inc., Bain Capital, LP, the American College of Rheumatology, the Lupus Foundation of America, and the University of Alabama. Speaker honorarium (<10K) from University of Texas Southwestern, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Hospital for Special Surgery, University of Washington. Conference travel reimbursement from RLITE Foundation, the Rheumatology Research Foundation, and EULAR. Associate Editor for Lupus Science and Medicine, Editorial Board for Arthritis Care and Research and Medical-Scientific Advisory Board Member for the Lupus Foundation of America. Member of the American College of Rheumatology Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee and the Climate Change Task Force.
References

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree


