Hip Disarticulation and Transpelvic Amputation: Surgical Management
Sheila A. Conway MD, FAAOS, FAOA
Motasem A. Al Maaieh MD
Dr. Conway or an immediate family member serves as an unpaid consultant to DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson Company. Dr. Al Maaieh or an immediate family member is a member of a speakers’ bureau or has made paid presentations on behalf of Silony Medical; serves as a paid consultant to or is an employee of Daichii Sankyo and Medtronic; and has stock or stock options held in Medtronic.
ABSTRACT
Hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy are viable—sometimes necessary—alternatives to limb salvage procedures in patients with extensive pathology or trauma of the upper thigh, buttock, and pelvis. Both procedures are technically demanding, require detailed preoperative planning, and occasionally necessitate involvement from a multispecialty surgical team. Systemic and local complications are frequent and occasionally life-threatening and their management and rehabilitation are complex.
Keywords:
hemipelvectomy; hip disarticulation; transpelvic amputation
Introduction
Amputations through the hip joint and the pelvis are useful surgical options for managing various, generally severe, pathologies of the upper thigh, buttock, and pelvis.1,2,3 Neoplasm, including primary bone and soft-tissue sarcomas and metastatic disease, is a common indication for these high-level amputations. The oncologic goal of surgery is local disease control; however, palliative amputations may be indicated in fungating tumors or locally invasive disease when negative margins cannot be achieved. Nonneoplastic indications include severe trauma and crushing injuries, end-stage vascular disease with a functionless or gangrenous limb, and extensive bone and soft-tissue infection such as necrotizing fasciitis.4,5 The optimal level of amputation must be determined based on the proximal extent of disease or injury and the viability of the surrounding soft tissues to ensure adequate soft-tissue coverage.5,6
This chapter reviews the surgical management of hip disarticulation and transpelvic amputation, with an emphasis on preoperative planning, surgical technique, postoperative care, and complications. Because these surgical procedures are highly challenging, surgical proficiency is critical to optimize outcomes and minimize complications.
Indications
A variety of pathologies may require hip disarticulation or hemipelvectomy. One of the most common indications is neoplasm, including soft-tissue sarcomas, primary bone sarcomas, and metastatic disease. Primary malignancies of the proximal thigh and recurrent tumors after a transfemoral amputation are common neoplastic indications for hip disarticulation, whereas primary and metastatic disease in the pelvis may necessitate hemipelvectomy. Extensive tumor fungation in the thigh and associated pathologic femoral fractures may result in extensive soft-tissue contamination, which may preclude limb salvage or distal-level amputations. Pediatric neoplasms of the proximal femur may necessitate high-level amputations when physeal tumor involvement or skip lesions preclude viable limb reconstruction for definitive local control.
Other indications for hip disarticulation or hemipelvectomy are severe soft-tissue infections with or without systemic sepsis, such as in a patient with diabetes and necrotizing fasciitis, which requires immediate surgical intervention, systemic antibiotics, and aggressive critical care management. Mortality rates in such patients may be as high as 50%.7,8,9,10 Periprosthetic joint infections represent an increasing indication for hip disarticulation.11 Severe trauma associated with extensive crush or high-energy injuries may require hip disarticulation or hemipelvectomy, either in an urgent setting or as a salvage procedure for failed lowerlevel amputations or limb salvage.5,10 Ischemia, including peripheral vascular disease and prior revascularizations, is another indication for surgery and associated with high mortality rates for hip disarticulation.10,11
Determining the salvageability of a limb may be challenging and requires consideration of the following: tumor behavior and sensitivity to adjuvant therapies, acceptable surgical margins, neurovascular involvement, the location and degree of bone resection, the anticipated function of the residual limb, and patient factors. When definitive local control of malignant disease
is the primary goal, careful preoperative assessment with three-dimensional imaging is essential to determine if adequate margins can be achieved with limb salvage techniques. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy may help achieve limb salvage in patients with highly sensitive tumors. A similar approach to extensive infections is important to ensure adequate resection of contaminated or nonviable soft tissue and areas of chronic osteomyelitis. Estimating the functionality of the residual limb is equally critical in the decision-making process; if both the sciatic and femoral nerves are involved, a functional limb is highly unlikely. Extensive muscular disease in the thigh or large osseous resections can make a functional limb unsalvageable, even when preservation of either the sciatic or femoral nerves is possible.10,11
is the primary goal, careful preoperative assessment with three-dimensional imaging is essential to determine if adequate margins can be achieved with limb salvage techniques. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy may help achieve limb salvage in patients with highly sensitive tumors. A similar approach to extensive infections is important to ensure adequate resection of contaminated or nonviable soft tissue and areas of chronic osteomyelitis. Estimating the functionality of the residual limb is equally critical in the decision-making process; if both the sciatic and femoral nerves are involved, a functional limb is highly unlikely. Extensive muscular disease in the thigh or large osseous resections can make a functional limb unsalvageable, even when preservation of either the sciatic or femoral nerves is possible.10,11
Contributing patient factors include overall health, nutritional status, comorbid disease, and patient acceptance. Nutritional status and comorbidities such as diabetes and peripheral vascular disease can affect wound healing and influence the optimal amputation level. A patient’s emotional acceptance of amputation must be carefully assessed and proactively managed. When time permits, preoperative consultation with a psychiatrist, physiatrician, prosthetist, and support groups should be considered to optimize patient education and acceptance and establish realistic expectations. Given the high morbidity and mortality of both hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy, surgical candidates with poor anticipated survivability may be better treated with a palliative, nonsurgical approach.
Preoperative Planning
Extensive preoperative assessment and surgical planning should be completed. Three-dimensional imaging, with either CT or MRI, is essential to determine the extent of both soft-tissue and bone resections. Medical optimization should be completed, and adequate blood products should be available. Consultation with a general surgeon and a plastic surgeon should be considered in cases where intrapelvic disease extension exists or traditional flaps may not be adequate. If excessive bleeding is anticipated, angiography and preoperative embolization are useful modalities in both oncologic and nonneoplastic patients. The ideal level of amputation is generally guided by the extent of disease, the viability of the soft-tissue envelope, and functional expectations and goals. The amputation level has a major effect on level of disability, prosthetic use, and walking aids—with more proximal amputation levels associated with poorer functional scores.12
Hip Disarticulation
Surgical Technique
Hip disarticulation accounts for only 0.5% of lower limb amputations in the United States.13 The patient is positioned in a lateral decubitus position on a well-padded beanbag or in a semisupine position with a support under the pelvis. Split drapes or U-shaped drapes allow for wide exposure to the anterior and posterior hip and buttocks. Prepping should include the abdomen, the groin, the buttock, and the entire lower limb. Current practice is based on the technique described by Boyd14 and uses a racquet-shaped incision that begins just medial and inferior to the anterior superior iliac spine and descends parallel to the inguinal ligament down to approximately 5 cm distal to the ischial tuberosity and the gluteal crease. The other limb of the incision runs obliquely on the anterior thigh, curving posteriorly approximately 8 cm from the greater trochanter to meet the medial incision (Figure 1). Deep dissection typically begins anteriorly with exposure of the femoral triangle, identification and isolation of the femoral vessels, and meticulous suture ligation and division. The femoral nerve is gently transected under tension and allowed to retract into the pelvis. Following neurovascular control, the muscles are transected in a sequential manner. The sartorius and rectus femoris are detached from their proximal origins, and the pectineus is divided close to the pubis. The external rotators of the hip and the iliopsoas are transected. The obturator vessels should be identified and suture ligated, followed by division of the adductor and the gracilis muscles and a gentle
traction neurectomy of the obturator nerve. Posteriorly, the gluteal muscles are sequentially transected as distally as the disease process will allow to ensure a substantial myocutaneous flap. The sciatic nerve should be transected with a sharp scalpel under tension to minimize symptomatic neuroma formation; when possible, the nerve is either allowed to retract or manually placed inside the pelvis through the sciatic notch. The external rotators of the hip are released from their femoral insertions and the hamstrings from their proximal origins. The hip capsule is released around the acetabulum, the ligamentum teres is transected, and the limb is removed. The muscles of the buttock together with iliopsoas and the obturator externus thus remain attached to the pelvis.
traction neurectomy of the obturator nerve. Posteriorly, the gluteal muscles are sequentially transected as distally as the disease process will allow to ensure a substantial myocutaneous flap. The sciatic nerve should be transected with a sharp scalpel under tension to minimize symptomatic neuroma formation; when possible, the nerve is either allowed to retract or manually placed inside the pelvis through the sciatic notch. The external rotators of the hip are released from their femoral insertions and the hamstrings from their proximal origins. The hip capsule is released around the acetabulum, the ligamentum teres is transected, and the limb is removed. The muscles of the buttock together with iliopsoas and the obturator externus thus remain attached to the pelvis.
After the limb is removed, the acetabulum is covered by approximating the preserved muscle groups, most frequently the quadratus femoris to the iliopsoas and the obturator externus to the gluteus medius. Deep drains are recommended, followed by closure of the posterior gluteus maximus fascia to the inguinal ligament. This surgical technique allows methodical dissection, avoids weight bearing over the suture lines, divides muscles at their origins or insertions, and provides a viable muscle flap as a weight-bearing surface for sitting and/or prosthetic use. Postoperative care should include strict decubitus ulcer precautions, perioperative antibiotics, and thromboprophylaxis.
Although the previously described approach is most commonly used, alternative surgical approaches may be recommended according to surgeon preference or disease location. One such modification uses a lateral approach15 and may be more familiar to orthopaedic surgeons. A total adductor myocutaneous flap also has been described when disease precludes using more traditional anterior or posterior flaps.16 Frey et al17 described an alternative quadriceps muscle flap, consisting of skin, subcutaneous fat, and the quadriceps muscle. This flap receives its blood supply from the muscular branches of the superficial femoral artery and can cover defects up to the level of the posterior superior iliac spine. Infrequently, when local flaps are not available, free flap or pedicle-based augmentation flaps may be considered.
Complications
Hip disarticulation has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, which are more common in patients with severe infections, crushing injuries, and peripheral vascular disease. Postoperative complications occur in up to 75% of patients, with the most common being wound infections. Other local morbidities include wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, seromas, painful neuromas, and phantom pain. Mortality rates after hip disarticulation vary considerably in the literature, ranging from zero to 47% depending on patient factors, comorbid disease, and the indication for amputation.10,17,18,19,20,21,22
Hemipelvectomy
Transpelvic amputation involves resection of all (complete or classic hemipelvectomy) or part (modified hemipelvectomy) of the hemipelvis, with either retention of the ipsilateral lower limb (internal hemipelvectomy) or removal of the lower limb (external hemipelvectomy). The ability to preserve the lower limb depends on multiple factors, most paramount being the salvageability of an adequate neurovascular supply to the retained limb and resultant anticipated function. This factor is influenced by both the extent of the resection and whether a functional pelvic reconstruction is achievable or advisable.
Surgical Technique
The approach to surgery begins by positioning the patient in a lateral position, with the ability to modify (as needed) the patient’s position intraoperatively to a more supine or prone inclination, which is commonly described as a “sloppy lateral” position. Such positioning is best achieved with a well-padded beanbag because it allows intraoperative position modifications while simultaneously ensuring adequate patient stability. An axillary roll should be placed beneath the chest wall to avoid pressure or traction on the brachial plexus. All bony prominences must be well padded because the length of the surgical procedure can predispose patients to compressive neuropathy. Prepping the leg into the surgical field allows for easy intraoperative alterations in positioning and is strongly advocated. Hip and knee flexion with hip adduction allows for enhanced exposure posteriorly (Figure 2, A), whereas hip and knee extension with hip external rotation and abduction allow for full anterior exposure (Figure 2, B). A Foley catheter is necessary to monitor fluid balance and facilitate urethra identification and bladder decompression. Preoperative ureteric catheterization and bowel preparations are often advisable to ease the intraoperative identification (or repair in the event of accidental transection) of the ureters and decompress the bowels, which is an important consideration because genitourinary injury and enterotomy are inherent risks of these procedures. When bowel or bladder involvement require visceral resection, a procedure described as a compound hemipelvectomy, including a diverting colostomy and/or ileostomy, is recommended.23,24
When applying surgical drapes, it is critical to ensure adequate access to the anterior viscera and the posterior structures, including the sacrum. Split drapes are recommended with the limbs of the drapes extending beyond the midline both anteriorly and posteriorly.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

