Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendinopathy









Introduction



William G. Hamilton, MD, BSE, AAOS, AOA, FACS
Marika Molnar, PT, LAc
Nadia Sefcovic, DPT, COMT

Epidemiology


Flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendinopathy (dancer’s tendinitis) is common in female ballet dancers who perform in toe shoes. It is rare in athletes.




  • Age: early teens to early 40s



  • Sex: females (male dancers rarely dance in toe shoes)



  • Sport/Art: usually ballet, but occasionally in other dancers and athletes



  • Position: maximum plantarflexion



Pathophysiology


Intrinsic Factors





  • The FHL tendon is the “Achilles tendon of the foot” for the ballet dancer working on pointe.



  • The tendon has its origin on the posterior fibula, crosses behind the ankle and passes through a fibroosseous tunnel on the medial side os calcis then exits into the arch of the foot.



  • It can become strained and swollen within this tunnel, setting up a repetitive cycle: because it is swollen, it binds as it moves and the binding, in turn, causes swelling and irritation, etc.



  • If the condition is chronic, the tendon can develop a fibrous knot that causes triggering of the great toe (“hallux saltans”) ( Figure 41-1 ).




    FIGURE 41-1


    A nodule on the FHL tendon causing triggering of the hallux.



  • Splits and partial tears can develop in the tendon but these are infrequent ( Figure 41-2 ).




    FIGURE 41-2


    A serious tear of the FHL with shredding of the tendon.



  • FHL tendinitis can be associated with posterior impingement on an os trigonum or trigonal process (“Stieda’s process”) ( Figure 41-3 ).




    FIGURE 41-3


    Posterior impingement on an os trigonum.



  • At times, the differentiation between these two syndromes can be difficult, because they can exist separately or together.



  • Posterior impingement does not cause FHL tendinitis. They are two separate syndromes that may coexist.



Extrinsic Factors





  • Toe shoes and pointe work contribute to the injury, although it can be found in male ballet dancers and even modern dancers who usually dance barefooted.



  • It is a common “overuse” injury in this group of performers.



  • It is rare in athletes but can occasionally be seen in pronated runners along with the “jogger’s foot” (tendonitis at Henry’s knot).



  • It can occur in athletes such as place kickers in American football.



  • The author has removed the os trigonum of a place kicker of an NFL professional football team.



  • Hard floors, fatigue, and poor technique (“rolling in,” or pronating) can contribute to this injury.



  • It is frequently misdiagnosed as posterior tibial tendinitis, which is relatively common in athletes but rare in dancers.



Traumatic Factors





  • This is rarely an acute injury. It is almost always caused by overuse.



  • Forced plantarflexion in the presence of an os trigonum or trigonal process is usually the cause of posterior impingement.



  • Posterior impingement can be associated with fractures of the posterior process (“Shepherd’s fracture”) ( Figure 41-4 ).




    FIGURE 41-4


    Fracture of the posterior process—“Shepherd’s fracture.”



Classic Pathological Findings





  • FHL tendonosis results in chronic swelling and inflammation in the tendon as it enters or passes through the fibroosseous tunnel on the medial side of the os calcis.



  • The swelling can cause ganglion-like cystic formation behind the ankle.



  • Posterior impingement causes inflammation, fractures, cystic changes, and occasionally displacement of the os trigonum ( Figure 41-5 ).




    FIGURE 41-5


    Displacement of the os trigonum when the ankle is plantarflexed.



Clinical Presentation


History





  • The pain is usually activity related and relieved by rest.



  • FHL tendonitis presents as posterior medial ankle pain without a history of trauma.



  • Posterior impingement usually causes posterior lateral pain and may have a definite onset. It is exacerbated by plantarflexion such as pushoff in running and relevé in ballet (going up in a toe raise).



  • The symptoms are frequently mistaken for strains of the Achilles or posterior tibial tendons.



Physical Examination


Abnormal Findings





  • Localized pain and swelling behind the ankle over the FHL tunnel medially or over the os trigonum posterior laterally, or both



  • Increased pain with plantarflexion, especially when forced—the positive “plantarflexion sign.” It is only positive for posterior impingement, not for FHL tendonitis. This sign differentiates posterior impingement from all other causes of posterior ankle pain ( Figure 41-6 ).




    FIGURE 41-6


    The “plantarflexion sign” for posterior impingement.



  • Pain in FHL tunnel with active and passive motion of the first MP joint



  • Triggering of the Hallux may be present.



  • Tenderness over the FHL tunnel behind and below the medial malleolus



  • Range of motion of the ankle may be reduced because of pain.



Pertinent Normal Findings





  • No ecchymosis



  • No effusion within the ankle joint



  • No pain with dorsiflexion



  • No loss of subtalar motion



  • The “drawer sign” for ankle ligament will be negative.



  • There is usually no peroneal tendon weakness.



  • Examination of the posterior tibial tendon and Achilles tendon is normal.



Imaging





  • Lateral radiographs taken in foot flat and in forced plantarflexion on in full toe raise will help diagnose posterior impingement but will not show FHL tendonitis.



  • Sonography will reveal swelling of the FHL tendon.



  • An MRI study will show the swollen FHL tendon and fluid within the sheath and tunnel surrounding it. This fluid may extend upward to the posterior ankle area and can be mistaken for joint fluid ( Figure 41-7 ).




    FIGURE 41-7


    An MRI study of acute FHL tendonitis showing fluid within the sheath extending upward behind the ankle.



  • Imaging studies do not always pick up tears, partial tear, and rents in the tendon.



  • Often a sonogram will show these better than an MRI.



  • A bone scan will be negative for FHL tendonitis but positive for posterior impingement.



Differential Diagnosis





  • An osteochondritis dissecans lesion of the posterior talar dome



  • Early arthritis or degeneration of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint



  • A fibrous middle facet tarsal coalition



  • Posterior tibial or Achilles tendinitis or strain



Treatment


Nonoperative Management





  • Relative rest—“don’t do what hurts” and antiinflammatory medications



  • Physical therapy modalities such as phonophoresis, iontophoresis, and acupuncture



  • Technique correction if this is a contributing factor



  • If the symptoms warrant it, immobilization of the ankle and first metatarsophalangeal joint in a walking boot along with antiinflammatories



  • If these fail, then a sonographic guided corticosteroid injection into the FHL sheath (but NOT into the tendon itself) or the os trigonum, if posterior impingement is present



Guidelines for Choosing Among Nonoperative Treatments





  • It is important to know which of the three syndromes is present: FHL tendinitis, posterior impingement, or both. This can be difficult to determine.



  • The diagnosis may require diagnostic injections of local anesthetics.



  • Immobilization in a walking boot treats both conditions.



Surgical Indications





  • Failure to respond to conservative therapy



  • Symptoms severe enough to warrant surgical intervention



  • Surgery should NOT be performed in the absence of discomfort simply to increase the plantarflexion in the ankle by removal of the os trigonum. The results will be disappointing in these cases.



  • A diagnosed tear in, or rupture of, the FHL should be surgically decompressed and repaired.



Aspects of History, Demographics, or Exam Findings that Affect Choice of Treatment





  • Posterior impingement can be treated by removal of the os trigonum or trigonal process either by a small posterolateral incision or by endoscopic excision.



  • The open technique has a lower complication rate but a longer postop recovery.



  • The author prefers the open technique for tenolysis and debridement or repair of the FHL because the posterior tibial nerve can be identified and protected with the medial approach and the os trigonum can also be removed at the same time.



  • The author’s results have been better in professional ballet dancers than in amateurs.



Aspects of Clinical Decision Making When Surgery Is Indicated





  • Which of the two syndromes is present, or are both present?



  • Are you going to do this endoscopically or open?



  • In the open technique, posterior impingement alone can be corrected through a lateral incision, but FHL tendonitis or a combination of FHL tendonitis and posterior impingement should be approached through a medial incision so that the posterior tibial nerve can be protected.



Evidence


  • Hamilton WG: Stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor hallucis longus tendon and posterior impingement upon the os trigonum in ballet dancers. Foot Ankle 1982; 3: pp. 74-80.
  • The earliest report of these syndromes in dancers.
  • Hamilton WG: Posterior ankle pain in dancers. Clin Sports Med 2008; 27: pp. 263-277.
  • Differential diagnosis and treatment of FHL tendonitis and posterior impingement in professional level dancers. (Level V evidence)
  • Hamilton WG, Geppert MJ, Thompson FM: Pain in the posterior aspect of the ankle in dancers. Differential diagnosis and operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: pp. 1491-1500.
  • A retrospective review was performed of the results of operative treatment of stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor hallucis longus tendon or posterior impingement syndrome, or both, in 37 dancers (41 operations). The average duration of follow-up was 7 years. Twenty-six operations were performed for tendinitis and posterior impingement; nine, for isolated tendinitis; and six, for isolated posterior impingement syndrome. A medial incision was used in 33 procedures; a lateral incision, in six; an anterior and a medial incision, in one; and a lateral and a medial incision, in one. Thirty ankles had a good or excellent result; six, a fair result; and four, a poor result. The result was good or excellent for 28 of the 34 ankles in professional dancers, compared with only two of the six ankles in amateur dancers. This is still the definitive article on the subject. The results were better in the professional dancers than the amateurs. (Level IV evidence)
  • Kolettis GJ, Micheli L: Release of the flexor hallucis longus tendon in ballet dancers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: pp. 1386-1390.
  • Thirteen female ballet dancers had an operative release of the flexor hallucis longus tendon because of isolated stenosing tenosynovitis, and the results were reviewed after a mean duration of follow-up of 6 years. All of the patients danced at the advanced or professional level, and all had failed to respond to nonoperative management. Symptoms, which included pain and tenderness over the medial aspect of the subtalar joint, were exacerbated by jumping and by attempts to perform en pointe work. Crepitus was present in six patients, and triggering was present in three. No patient had evidence of a symptomatic os trigonum. Postoperatively, all patients participated in a formal physical-therapy program for a mean of nine weeks. All patients returned to dancing, within a mean of 5 months. Eight patients were professional ballet dancers, four were students at advanced ballet schools, and one had stopped performing ballet for reasons unrelated to the tenosynovitis of the flexor hallucis longus. No complications were noted in this series. We concluded that an operative release of the flexor hallucis longus is effective for the treatment of isolated stenosing tenosynovitis in female ballet dancers who place high demands on the foot and ankle and for whom non-operative treatment has failed. (Level IV evidence)
  • Niek van Dijk C: Anterior and posterior ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Clin 2006; 11: pp. 663-683.
  • Anterior ankle impingement is characterized by anterior ankle pain on activity. Recurrent (hyper) dorsiflexion is often the cause. Arthroscopic management with removal of the offending tissue provides good to excellent long-term results. In posterior ankle impingement, patients experience hindfoot pain when the ankle is forcedly plantarflexed. Trauma or overuse can be the cause. The trauma mechanism is hyperplantarflexion, Overuse injuries typically occur in ballet dancers and downhill runners, who report pain on palpation at the posterolateral aspect of the talus. On plain radiographs, an os trigonum or hypertrophic posterior or talar process can be detected. Surgical management involves removal of the os trigonum, scar tissue, or hypertrophic posterior talar process. In the case of combined posterior bony impingement and flexor hallucis longus tendinopathy, a release of the flexor hallucis longus is performed simultaneously. Endoscopic management is associated with a low morbidity, a short recovery time, and provides good/excellent results at 2 to 5 years follow-up in 80% of patient. This is a good paper discussing endoscopic treatment. (Level V evidence)
  • Sammarco GJ: Partial rupture of the flexor hallucis longus tendon in classical ballet dancers: two case reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61: pp. 149-150.
  • (Level IV evidence)
  • Sammarco GJ: Flexor hallucis longus injury in dancers and non-dancers. Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19: pp. 356-362.
  • Thirty-one cases of flexor hallucis longus injuries in 26 patients were treated over a 16-year period (1977-1993). Groups were divided into dance-related injuries (group I) and other causes (group II). The two groups were compared with regard to age, activity, duration of symptoms, operative findings, histopathology, and postoperative time to resumption of full activities. Twenty-seven cases required surgery for unsuccessful nonoperative treatment. In group I, 71% of patients had a partial longitudinal tear of the flexor hallucis longus compared with 30% in group II. Another common finding was isolated tenosynovitis (21% in group I and 53% in group II). Eight cases had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations before surgery. Clinical correlation was found to be an important factor in interpreting the MRI. Dancers tended to have symptoms for a longer period of time before seeking treatment than did non-dancers. Surgical correction of tenosynovitis, pseudocysts, and tendon tear yielded good or excellent results in 14 of 15 dancers and 9 of 11 nondancers. Surgical treatment of tendon tears and other pathologic tendon conditions gave consistently good results in patients with refractory flexor hallucis longus disease. This study noted a 71% incidence of longitudinal tears in the dancer group versus 30% in the nondancers. Good results were obtained in both groups. (Level IV evidence)

  • Multiple-Choice Questions




    • QUESTION 1.

      The “plantarflexion sign” will be positive for



      • A.

        FHL tendonitis only.


      • B.

        posterior impingement only.


      • C.

        Both conditions


      • D.

        Neither condition



    • QUESTION 2.

      Posterior impingement



      • A.

        is only seen in dancers.


      • B.

        is mostly seen in dancers.


      • C.

        is never seen in athletes.


      • D.

        usually accompanies FHL tendonitis.



    • QUESTION 3.

      Posterior impingement can lead to FHL tendonitis.



      • A.

        True


      • B.

        False



    • QUESTION 4.

      A documented partial tear in the FHL is best approached



      • A.

        through a lateral incision.


      • B.

        through a medial incision.


      • C.

        endoscopically.


      • D.

        Any of the above




    Answer Key







    Beyond Basic Rehabilitation: Return to Ballet after Treatment for Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendinopathy and Posterior Impingement



    William G. Hamilton, BSE, MD, AAOS, AOA, FACS
    Marika Molnar, PT, LAc
    Nadia Sefcovic, DPT, COMT

    Introduction




    Aspects of Ballet That Require Special Attention in Rehabilitation


    Unlike any other sport, the rules of the game are never the same in dance.




    • Dancers are required to perform their art at the extremes of range, making return to activity challenging. Extreme plantar flexion (PF) of the ankle/foot complex is necessary so that the dancer can balance on the tips of the toes as well as be able to fully dorsiflex the hallux while in plantar flexion at the ankle in order to balance or push off from there. Ankle dorsiflexion (DF) is essential for landing from big jumps, lunging, preparation for all turns, etc.



    • The dancer must also regain strength and proprioception of the ankle/foot complex in these extreme ranges of motion. Acceleration, deceleration, and isometric holds are required.



    • The dancer must be able to maintain strength, stability, and flexibility at the lumbopelvic and hip joints and the entire lower extremity in order to meet the demands of the choreography. For example ballet dancers must have adequate neuromuscular control in hip external rotation (i.e., turnout).



    • Dynamic strength and alignment control will be important as the dancer returns to the studio. The dancer must be able to move with varying speeds, in various body positions, in all planes of movement and in all directions.



    • Special attention must be paid to the type of shoe the dancer must wear in order to return to dance (i,e., pointe shoes, ballet slippers, jazz/character shoes, barefoot, etc.). Dancing barefoot or in ballet slippers usually requires more hallux dorsiflexion than other forms of footwear.





    • Posterior ankle impingement (PAI) is caused by compression of the tissues between the posterior tibia, talus, and calcaneus, which occurs in extreme ranges of ankle plantar flexion that dancers require to achieve en pointe and demi-pointe positions.



    • Osseous or soft-tissue can be impinged in PAI. Causes of osseous impingement include an os trigum, Stieda’s process, or anatomical variations in the posterior aspects of the tibia or calcaneous. Soft tissue impingement causes can include various structures including: the capsule or synovium of the subtalar or talocrural joints; ligaments such as the posterior talofibular ligament, the posterior intermalleolar ligament, or the posterior tibiotalar ligament; or tendons such as the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) as it passes from the fibula, crossing the posterior talus, and running through the fibroosseous tunnel.



    • Repetitive plantar flexion required of dancers can also cause FHL tendinopathy. Dancers can develop irritation and swelling of the tendon or the tendon’s sheath. This irritation to the tendon and sheath causes pain and limited motion as the musculotendinous unit hypertrophies. The dancer will have resultant tendon and muscular weakness secondary to pain and disuse of the muscle. As this becomes a chronic condition the tendon can develop adhesions, calcifications, and nodules at the musculotendinous junction as part of the degenerative process.



    • Flexor hallucis longus injury is very common in dancers, both male and female. Most dance movements require the use of the FHL as the foot and ankle go through plantar and dorsiflexion thousands of times per day. When the foot is in plantarflexion, the FHL functions as a stabilizer and eccentrically it restrains dorsiflexion at the first metatarsophalangeal joint as well as eccentrically controlling calcaneal eversion. As the dancer is landing a jump or in grand plié, the FHL is stretched between the posterior talar tubercles and the sustentaculum tali.



    • Flexor halluces longus tendinopathy and posterior ankle impingement are separate injuries, but often they occur in combination.



    • Posterior impingement pain is usually posterolateral to the ankle joint; pain, tenderness or swelling posterior to the medial malleolus is experienced with FHL tendinopathies. The dancer also can experience triggering of the toe or crepitus of the FHL tendon, which can be palpated at the tendon sheath when the dancer moves their hallux.



    • Although posterior impingement and FHL tendinosis are seen in both genders, these injuries seem to be more problematic for females and pointe dancers. Female dancers who are on the professional track will usually have their os trigonum removed as it interferes with their ability to go up onto pointe. Once the surgical site is healed the rehabilitation follows the same course as outlined if it was a simple bony removal.



    • A common precursor to posterior ankle impingement is ankle instability resulting from an ankle sprain. If a lateral ankle sprain precedes these injuries it usually takes longer to rehabilitate owing to laxity in the ligaments, which then allows for excessive anterior displacement of the talus. This excessive motion will need to be controlled to provide more boney stability. Often when there is boney instability and ligamentous laxity, this will lead to muscle overactivity that can lead to tendinopathies. Stability of the ankle as well as proprioception must be addressed in the dancer’s rehabilitation in addition to addressing the stability role of the FHL in the medial longitudinal arch and great toe.



    • Generally if these injuries are treated appropriately with a conservative physical therapy program including sufficient relative rest and appropriate exercises, all usually return to dance.



    • If conservative therapy does not return the dancer to full function, surgical repair of tendon or removal of extra bone or scar tissue in the posterior ankle may be necessary; the dancer can usually return to full participation once all rehabilitation criteria have been met.



    Phase I (Weeks 1 to 2): Advanced Strength and Conditioning Programs


    Periodization





    • Linear



    Timeline 41-1

    Rehabilitation of Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendinopathy and Posterior Impingement












    PHASE I (Weeks 1 to 2) PHASE II (Weeks 3 to 7) PHASE III (Weeks 7 to 12)



    • PT modalities to decrease inflammation and pain



    • AROM—wk 1: ankle and toe dissociation of DF & PF—on the wall



    • AROM—wk 1: foot intrinsic strengthening of DF & PF—on the wall



    • PROM FHL in various ankle positions



    • Mobilizations as needed



    • Single limb stance (SLS) eyes open and using port de bras



    • SLS eyes closed



    • Eccentric FHL strengthening—wk 1: on the wall



    • Eccentric FHL strengthening—wk 2: sitting



    • Neuromuscular reeducation exercises



    • OKC and CKC gluteus medius exercises



    • Gastroc & soleus flexibility



    • Gait training




    • AROM: ankle and toe dissociation of DF & PF—wk 3—seated



    • AROM: CKC DF (pliés)—wk 3—on the reformer



    • Flexibility—FHL stretching—wk 3–7



    • Eccentric FHL strengthening: Double leg elevé—wk 3– seated



    • Intrinsic foot strengthening: Doming—wk 3—seated



    • Eccentric FHL strengthening: Lowering from full pointe to demi-pointe—wk 3 standing



    • AROM: CKC DF (pliés)—wk 4—standing



    • Intrinsic foot strengthening: Doming—wk 4—standing



    • Eccentric FHL strengthening: Double leg relevé & elevé—wk 4—on reformer



    • Neuromuscular re-education: OCK ankle and toe dissociation of PF (tendus)—wk 4—standing



    • AROM: Single leg CKC DF (fondu)—wk 5—on the reformer



    • Eccentric FHL strengthening: Relevé & elevé, ascend on two legs, descend on affected leg in parallel—wk 5—on reformer



    • AROM: Single leg CKC DF (fondu)—wk 6—standing



    • Eccentric FHL strengthening: Single leg relevé & elevé—wk 6—on reformer



    • Eccentric FHL strengthening—wk 7: double leg relevé & elevé in standing in parallel and turn-out



    • Plyometrics: Simulate push-off and deceleration of landing a jump performed in a lunge position—wk 7—standing lunge



    • Proprioception & balance—progressing to uneven surfaces—wk 3–7



    • Hip ER OCK & CKC PREs—wk 3–7



    • Gait training—wk 3–7



    • Mobilizations as needed—wk 3–7



    • PT modalities as needed—wk 3–7




    • PT modalities as needed



    • Mobilizations as needed



    • AROM—full weight-bearing ankle PF (90° for a ballet dancer) with hallux ext (90° for a ballet dancer)



    • Relevés & elevés—wk 7: double leg parallel & turn-out—standing



    • Relevés & elevés—wk 8: ascend on two legs, descend on affected leg parallel & turn-out—standing



    • Relevés & elevés—wk 9: single leg parallel and turn-out—standing



    • Dance specific—wk 10: turning technique



    • Plyometrics—wk 10: progressing from double leg to single leg—on reformer



    • Plyometrics—wk 11: progressing from double leg to one leg to the other—standing



    • Plyometrics—wk 12: progressing to single leg—standing



    • Proprioception & Balance—in CKC PF



    • Gait training

    Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

    Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

    Apr 5, 2019 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendinopathy

    Full access? Get Clinical Tree

    Get Clinical Tree app for offline access