Introduction
Achilles tendon injuries, including ruptures and chronic degenerative changes, are common, especially among athletes. While conservative management is often effective, surgical intervention becomes necessary when there is significant tendon gapping or retraction. Open repairs have been linked to postoperative issues such as wound dehiscence, infection, and sural nerve disturbances. , These complications are partly due to the tendon’s anatomical location, which is covered by a relatively avascular, thin skin layer, making surgical closure prone to tension and delayed healing.
Traditional repair strategies for the Achilles tendon include direct end-to-end suturing, V–Y lengthening, tendon transfers, and tendon grafting. These approaches are selected based on defect size and tissue viability. However, challenges persist in achieving tension-free closures, especially in cases involving tendon retraction or chronic pathology. This article introduces a novel method where the posterior deep crural fascia is surgically released and anchored to the Achilles tendon. This approach repositions the tendon anteriorly, reduces skin tension, and improves wound healing.
Background
Historically, surgical approaches to Achilles tendon reconstruction have focused on primary end-to-end repairs, V–Y advancements, or tendon transfers, depending on the size of the defect and the quality of the tissue. According to Azam et al., end-to-end repair is suitable for defects <2 cm, while defects between 2 and 5 cm often require tendon augmentation or transfer, and larger defects (>5 cm) may necessitate allografts or autografts such as the semitendinosus. Despite procedural success, open repair techniques have been consistently linked with higher rates of soft-tissue complications. Studies report wound complication rates ranging from 8 % to 20 %, particularly with direct posterior approaches that violate avascular skin zones. ,
Increased tension at the surgical wound activates mechanotransduction pathways in fibroblasts via upregulation of integrins, resulting in increased production of type I and type III collagens, abnormal collagen cross-linking, resulting in the accumulation of dense, disorganized bundles of collagen, resulting in stiff scar tissue with a poor hysteresis curve. ,, Excessive skin closure tension, resulting in abnormal collagen and fibronectin deposition, leads to weaker tissue planes and a more hostile environment for neovascularization and angiogenesis at the surgical incision. These adverse phenomena may lead to dehiscence and frank tissue necrosis in the peri‑incisional area. Moreover, if sutures are placed in excess or incorrectly to overcome tissue tension upon incision closure, there is an increased risk of tissue necrosis.
Recent advances in surgical techniques have explored ways to minimize soft-tissue damage through mini-open and tendon-sparing approaches. Rai et al. demonstrated significantly fewer wound-healing complications with a posterolateral incision compared with a direct posterior approach, underscoring the importance of incision placement. The deep crural fascia, located in the posterior compartment of the ankle joint, has largely been overlooked in reconstructive techniques. However, its robust structure and anatomical proximity suggest it could be useful as a local reinforcement layer.
Notably, the concept of posterior crural fasciotomy is not new. In 1999, Myerson described the use of fascial turndown flaps and posterior compartment releases in cases of chronic Achilles ruptures with tendon retraction, particularly when gap closure is difficult. These techniques aim to restore length and decrease tissue tension.
Furthermore, in a recent cadaveric study by Ozer et al., the use of a posterior crural fasciotomy was studied to augment open Achilles repairs. Using 10 matched-pair cadaveric limbs, crural fasciotomy was associated with substantially less skin tension during repair when complete release of the posterior compartment fascia at the level of the Achilles tendon was achieved to decrease fascial constraint and allow for greater anterior tendon mobility. Their findings demonstrated that crural fasciotomy can significantly improve tendon excursion and reduce closure tension. However, their technique stopped short of using the fascia as a structural reinforcement.
The senior author (MA) proposed a modification of this experimental technique by not only releasing the fascia but also suturing it to the Achilles tendon itself. This maneuver not only reduces the tendency of the tendon to retract posteriorly but also integrates the fascia into the repair construct. This adaptation aims to correct tendon positioning, reduce soft-tissue stress during closure, and potentially minimize postoperative complications by modifying the mechanical interface between the tendon and skin. This may be especially beneficial in complex cases with extensive retraction, compromised tissue quality, and even those that require bulky graft augmentation, which may develop an irritable posterior prominence.
Surgical technique case studies
Case #1: primary repair
The patient is a 28-year-old male with no pertinent past medical history who presented late with a six-week-old partial rupture of the Achilles tendon in the watershed region after a basketball hyperpronation injury. MRI demonstrated a deficit of approximately 3 cm. An end-to-end Achilles repair, with debridement of the chronic tendon defect and anchorage into the calcaneus, followed by the senior author’s modified closure technique, was undertaken.
The patient was placed in the prone position under general anesthesia. A longitudinal incision was made directly posterior to the Achilles tendon. The paratenon was dissected from the injured tendon and preserved, which was then reflected off the underlying tendon.
The diseased tendon was identified and determined to be approximately 3 cm in length; it was subsequently excised. The remaining ends of the Achilles tendon were debrided using a sharp senn retractor. The final deficit after debridement measured about 4 cm ( Image 1 & 2 ).
Visualization of the Krakow suture technique of the proximal tendon.
The deep posterior crural fascia was identified deep to the Achilles tendon, overlying the FHL. A 4 cm linear incision was made from proximal to distal and elevated from the posterior compartment, preserving its integrity for suturing.
Next, the proximal tendon stump was sutured using the Krackow method with 1.3 mm Fiberwire. Two holes were then drilled into the medial and lateral posterior aspect of the calcaneus. A suture passer was then utilized to pass both ends of the suture tape through the calcaneus. The tendon was placed under tension with the foot in a plantar flexed position, and the suture tape was secured with 4.75 mm suture anchors. The distal and proximal ends of the debrided Achilles tendon were then approximated and sutured using 3–0 Vicryl ( Images 3 & 4 ).
Visualization of the completed end-to-end repair.
Visualization of the incised deep crural fascia with the underlying FHL exposed.
Demonstration of suturing the deep fascia to the adjacent ends of the repaired Achilles tendon.
The medial and lateral flaps from the freed crural fascial segment were mobilized anteriorly and sutured into the Achilles tendon on their respective sides using 0–0 Vicryl in a running simple suture pattern. Completing the “fasciodesis” and drawing the Achilles tendon anteriorly, reducing posterior retraction/’bow-stringing” and avoiding undue skin closure tension ( Images 5 & 6 ).

