Abstract
Background
While transfibular total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes, factors influencing postoperative ankle dorsiflexion remain underexplored. This is the first study aimed to identify factors influencing dorsiflexion range of motion after transfibular TAA.
Methods
Forty-nine patients undergoing transfibular TAA were classified into dorsiflexion-improved (DF-improved) group (≥5°,n = 26) and dorsiflexion-non-improved (DF-non-improved) group (<5°, n = 23). Radiographic parameters, residual medial tibial osteophytes, and Achilles tendon lengthening were evaluated.
Results
The DF-improved group had smaller anterior talar implant depth (3.1 ± 2.0 mm vs. 5.5 ± 1.7 mm), greater γ angle (17.4 ± 4.3°vs. 14.4 ± 5.1°), smaller proportion of postoperative residual medial tibial osteophyte (2 vs. 10), and more Achilles tendon lengthening than the DF-non-improved group (9 vs. 2).
Conclusions
Close consideration of the depth and angle of talar implant placement, meticulous osteophyte resection of medial tibia, and Achilles tendon lengthening may improve the postoperative dorsiflexion following transfibular TAA.
Levels of evidence
Level III case-control study (retrospective comparative study).
1
Introduction
Normal gait demonstrates an average of 10–18°of ankle dorsiflexion immediately prior to a heel lift . Pinney et al. suggested that an ankle dorsiflexion of < 10° may compromise normal biomechanics . Decreased ankle dorsiflexion during the stance phase of gait can cause compensation in other joints of the lower limb, leading to excessive stress on the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot during gait ,, .
Therefore, improving dorsiflexion in patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) may contribute to the prevention of mid- to long-term complications such as forefoot painful callosity or adjacent joint OA.
Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) instead of ankle arthrodesis has become popular in recent years for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis, with comparable clinical outcomes . The recent studies report TAA can help maintain or improve ankle range of motion, although this is still debated ,,,, . One of the most recent designs of TAA is the use of a fixed-bearing implant placed via the lateral transfibular approach as an alternative to the traditional anterior approach. This lateral approach requires fibular osteotomy, with the advantages of good access to the tibiotalar joint and direct visualization of the center of rotation of the ankle , . Although some studies have shown improvement in the total ankle range of motion after transfibular TAA, no study has focused on evaluating the factors associated with the improvement of postoperative ankle dorsiflexion in this procedure ,, . This study aimed to determine the factors associated with improvement in ankle dorsiflexion after transfibular TAA.
2
Material and methods
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by our institutional Ethics Committee. Patients who received transfibular TAA using the Trabecular Metal Total Ankle System (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw IN, USA) between April 2021 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed at an academic medical center and a community hospital. Inclusion criteria were as follows: all TAA between April 2021 and March 2023 in patients who were available for 6 months of follow-up; and no secondary procedures during the follow-up period. Exclusion criteria were as follows: lack of follow-up radiograph and computed tomography (CT) suitable for accurate measurement. Surgery was performed as previously described by four senior surgeons . Indications for the operation were as follows: (1) Takakura IIIB and IV ankle OA or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with symptomatic ankle joint destruction with Larsen grades 3–5; and (2) no or only slight collapse of the talus , . Radiographs obtained preoperatively and six months postoperatively and CT images six months postoperatively were used in the analysis. Patient demographics, including age, sex, body mass index, operated side, and primary disease (OA/RA), were collected. Achilles tendon lengthening during the surgery was also recorded.
The patients were divided into two groups: those with a postoperative dorsiflexion range of motion improvement ≥ 5° were included in a dorsiflexion-improved (DF-improved) group, while those with < 5° of improvement were included in a dorsiflexion-non-improved (DF-non-improved) group. We established the cut-off value of 5°, based on previous study showing that mean dorsiflexion improved by 5.4° from preoperative levels following various types of TAA at 12 months postoperatively .
2.1
Surgical procedures
A transfibular approach was used for the arthroplasty system. All the patients were placed in the supine position on a radiolucent table. Osteophytes of the medial tibia were removed first in cases where osteophyte removal was deemed necessary. A 4-cm longitudinal incision was made above the medial gutter of the tibial joint. Osteophytes of the medial tibia were removed using a chisel and rongeur. A 15-cm curved longitudinal incision was made along the lateral malleolus. Subperiosteal dissection of the fibula and anterior side of the tibia was then performed to obtain a full view of the joint line and anterior osteophytes. The posterior capsule, anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), and posterior talofibular ligament were released. Oblique fibular osteotomy was then performed. The distal fibular segment was reflected distally to visualize the ankle joint. The legs were then placed on an alignment stand. After achieving the desired alignment, the ankle was fixed to the stand with calcaneal, talar, and tibial pins. Bone resection was performed by cutting guides using the peck-drilling technique. After drilling the rail holes and trial reduction, the final components were inserted.
The fibula was reduced and repaired with a posterolateral fibular plate using either of the A.L.P.S. Distal Fibula (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA), Salus Loc posterolateral fibula (MEIRA, Aichi, Japan), or LCP Distal Fibula Plate (DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA). Syndesmosis fixation was performed with trans-syndesmostic suture tape using a zip-tight suture tape (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw IN, USA) in cases in which syndesmostic stabilization was deemed necessary. Finally, the ATFL was repaired using soft anchors as necessary. Percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening using Hoke triple hemisection was performed if passive ankle dorsiflexion with the knee extended was < 5°. Ankle dorsiflexion of < 10°occurs from posterior leg compartment contracture is a common indication for surgical intervention in general . The previous studies showed average preoperative ankle dorsiflexion with knee straight was 5.1 degrees in clinically diagnosed equinus contracture . Based on the above rationale, we perform percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening if passive ankle dorsiflexion with the knee extended is < 5°. The triple hemisection consists of 3 stab incisions centered midline over the Achilles tendon. The first hemisection is performed 2–2.5 cm proximal to the superior calcaneus whereas the second and third hemisections are sequentially performed 2.5–3 cm proximal to each preceding hemisection. The length and degree of correction can be controlled in graduated manner through a stepwise manual manipulation of the dorsiflexed foot .
Postoperatively, the patients were immobilized with a short-leg splint until sutures removal on the 14th post operative day. Squatting exercise with the splint was initiated at one week. The splint is somewhat flexible enough to allow mild dorsiflexion. This squatting motion is expected to apply vertical pressure to the ankle joint prosthesis and encourage bone ingrowth of the trabecular metal of the prosthesis. Active ankle dorsiflexion movement and stomping without a splint were started at two weeks for 30 min twice a day with a physiotherapist. Full weight-bearing gait training for 20–30 min twice a day and passive ankle dorsiflexion movement 10 min twice a day were initiated at three weeks .
2.2
Radiographic parameters
All the patients were evaluated using standard weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the ankle, and a lateral radiograph was obtained with the ankle in maximum plantarflexion and dorsiflexion with a established method reported by Coetzee . A radiograph was obtained in the position of maximum dorsiflexion in a weight-bearing position with the foot on the same outline. The patient flexed the knee until the foot reached maximum dorsiflexion. The radiographic view in maximum plantarflexion was taken with the patient without any weight and with the ankle in maximum active plantarflexion. Fixed anatomical landmarks were selected to create six radiographic lines to measure the sagittal motion arc ( Fig. 1 ). Ankle dorsiflexion angle, ankle plantarflexion angle, tibiotalar joint angle, subtalar joint angle, talonavicular joint angle were measured. Tibiotalar range of motion was defined as the difference between the tibiotalar joint angle with maximum dorsiflexion and the maximum plantarflexion. Subtalar range of motion was defined as the subtraction angle of the subtalar joint angle with maximum plantarflexion from the subtalar joint angle with maximum dorsiflexion. Talonavicular range of motion was defined as the difference between the talonavicular joint angle with the maximum dorsiflexion and the maximum plantarflexion ( Fig. 1 A, B).
Radiographic measurement of ankle motion(A) Radiographic assessment of maximum dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. (B) Radiographic lines for the calculation of sagittal arc of movement. Line AB was the tibial axis, and line CD was drawn from the inferior aspect of the sesamoid bone to the inferior aspect of the calcaneal tuberosity. Ankle dorsiflexion angle was defined as 90° minus the angle created by lines AB and CD at maximum dorsiflexion. Ankle plantarflexion angle was defined as 90° minus the angle created by lines AB and CD with maximum plantarflexion. Line EF was drawn from the anterior to the posterior aspect of tibia plafond. Line GH was drawn from the lateral to the posterior process of the talus. Tibiotalar joint angle was defined as the angle created by the EF and GH lines. Tibiotalar range of motion was defined as the difference between the tibiotalar joint angle with maximum dorsiflexion and the tibiotalar joint angle with maximum plantarflexion. Line ID was drawn from the inferior anterior process of the calcaneus to the inferior aspect of the calcaneal tuberosity. Subtalar joint angle was defined as the angle created by the GH and ID lines. Subtalar range of motion was defined as the subtraction angle of the subtalar joint angle with maximum plantarflexion from the subtalar joint angle with maximum dorsiflexion. Line JK was drawn from the superior and inferior proximal corners of the navicular region. Talonavicular joint angle was defined as the angle created by lines GH and JK. Talonavicular range of motion was defined as the difference between the talonavicular joint angle with maximum dorsiflexion and maximum plantarflexion. (C) Radiographs showing measurement techniques for preoperative tibiotalar surface angle. (D) Radiographs showing measurement techniques for postoperative α angle, β angle, γ angle, and tibio-talar ratio (BC/AC). The α angle is the angle between the anatomic axis of the tibia and articular surface of the tibial component on the anteroposterior view. The β angle is the angle between the anatomic axis of the tibia and articular surface of the tibial component on the lateral view. The γ angle is the angle between a line connecting the ends of the talar component and a line along the center of the talar neck on the lateral view. The tibiotalar ratio is the ratio of the length of the posterior part of the talus (BC) to its full length (AC) and is expressed as a percentage. (E) Radiographic image of the anterior talar implant depth. The depth measured from the anterior inferior aspect of the talar implant to the dorsal talar cortex. (F) Computed tomography image showing postoperative residual medial tibial osteophytes (black arrows).
Tibiotalar surface angle, tibiotalar ratio, α angle, β angle, γ angle, and anterior talar implant depth were also recorded ( Fig. 1 C-D). Anterior talar implant depth was defined as the depth measured from the anterior inferior aspect of the talar implant to the dorsal talar cortex ( Fig. 1 E).
The presence of the remaining postoperative osteophytes of the medial tibia were determined using postoperative CT images ( Fig. 1 F).
To remove the influence of interobserver variability, all the measurements were performed by an independent board-certified orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon.
2.3
Statistical analysis
Descriptive analysis was used to summarize baseline characteristics. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to verify the normality of distribution for all variables. For subgroup comparisons, the Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney U test was performed for continuous variables, depending on the normality of data distribution. The Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze categorical variables. Statistically significant was considered at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR (ver.4.0.2) (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) .
3
Results
Sixty-eight ankle replacements were performed during the study period, of which 49 met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up month (and interquartile range) was 26.0 (15.0, 37.0) months. Nineteen ankle replacements were excluded due to lack of follow-up radiograph and CT suitable for accurate measurement. Demographic patient data are shown in Table 1 . No intergroup differences were observed between the two groups. The DF-improved and DF-non-improved groups consisted of 26 and 23 patients, respectively. The preoperative radiographic parameters of both groups are shown in Table 2 . The maximum preoperative ankle dorsiflexion angle was significantly smaller in the DF-improved group ( P = 0.0019). Postoperative implant position, remaining osteophytes in the medial tibia, and Achilles tendon lengthening are shown in Table 3 . Significant differences in the anterior talar implant depth ( P = 0.000074), γ angle ( P = 0.032), postoperative residual medial tibial osteophytes ( P = 0.0037), and Achilles tendon lengthening ( P = 0.03) were observed between the groups. The DF-improved group showed smaller anterior talar implant depth, greater γ angle, lower proportion of postoperative residual medial tibial osteophyte, and more concurrent Achilles tendon lengthening procedures than the DF-non-improved group.
Table 1
Patient demographic data analyzed in DF-improved and DF-non-improved groups.
|
DF- improved group
(26) |
DF- non-improved group
(23) |
P -value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 71.3 ± 8.7 | 71.1 ± 8.7 | 0.92 |
| Sex Male (Female) | 4 (22) | 4 (19) | 0.85 |
| BMI | 23.5 ± 3.9 | 23.3 ± 2.6 | 0.67 |
| Side Left (Right) | 14 (12) | 9 (14) | 0.30 |
| Primary disease (OA/RA) | 14/12 | 15/8 | 0.51 |
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree





