Evidence and methods in back pain research




Back Pain focussed editions of Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology published in 2010 and 2013 have highlighted the burden of back pain on individuals and to societies across the globe. The scale of the impact of the condition is enormous and presents challenges to the organisation of healthcare systems everywhere. These challenges extend to individual clinicians who are faced with increasing numbers of patients disabled by pain and often constrained by availability of time and resources. In the course of their practice, they must handle considerable uncertainty regarding diagnosis, prognosis and treatment effectiveness.


In this context, the current edition aims to provide a contemporary reference for evidence-based practitioners and researchers working in the field of back pain. The chapters are organised into three themes:



  • 1.

    current understanding of back pain management


  • 2.

    research in underserved areas


  • 3.

    new directions



The authors of each chapter were asked to address two broad aims within their topic: (1) to present an overview of current evidence and (2) to comment on the critical methodological considerations that are necessary for interpretation of the evidence.


Current understanding of back pain management


Using the framework of clinical practice guidelines, O’Connell et al. provide a synthesis of current evidence for the treatment of back pain. Recent updates of major international guidelines published in the UK and Canada provide the opportunity to overview the state of research regarding treatment effectiveness. Along with this synopsis, the methods of guideline development are appraised and critical commentary provided on the various processes. This offers clinicians an insight into how recommendations are made and facilitates their own appraisal of clinical practice guidelines. Alongside clinical effectiveness, issues of cost-effectiveness are important drivers of healthcare practice. Van Dongen et al. collect the current evidence for the cost-effectiveness of treatments for back pain to provide a systems perspective to the edition and give readers an overview of this key input into policy. Their methodological overview identifies gaps in our knowledge and describes priorities and guidance for future research efforts. As the past few decades have seen a move towards understanding back pain from a behavioural perspective, so have self-management and behaviour change interventions become increasingly recommended. Mansell et al. review the evidence regarding the effectiveness of these types of interventions and describe the theoretical and operational processes that underpin their development. Reliable and valid measurement of outcome is fundamental to the operation of evidence-based healthcare. Ensuring optimal and standardised choice of outcome measures enables reliable evaluation of care and provides a common language across clinical and research settings. Chiarotto et al. report on international consensus regarding choice of outcome measures for research and practice and outline the basis for these recommendations. The findings are directly and immediately applicable to clinicians and researchers in the field.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 10, 2017 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Evidence and methods in back pain research

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access