Compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, or cubital tunnel syndrome, is the second most common peripheral nerve compression syndrome in the upper extremity. Diagnosis is made through a good history and physical examination. Electrodiagnostic testing can confirm the diagnosis and severity of injury to the nerve. Surgical intervention is indicated when nonoperative treatment does not relieve the symptoms. There is currently no consensus on the best surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. However, the only randomized prospective studies to compare treatment options to date indicate that simple decompression and anterior transposition yield comparable results.
- •
Compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, or cubital tunnel syndrome, is the second most common peripheral nerve compression syndrome in the upper extremity.
- •
Surgical intervention is indicated when nonoperative treatment, including activity modification, does not relieve the symptoms.
- •
There is currently no consensus on the best surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.
Introduction
In 1878, Panas provided the first description of ulnar neuropathy across the elbow in a patient who had sustained an elbow fracture as a child and developed a tardy ulnar nerve palsy. With subsequent descriptions throughout the early 1900s, investigators focused on specific origins of these symptoms related to trauma and osteoarthritis, often referring to the constellation of symptoms as a “friction neuritis” or “traumatic neuritis.”
It was not until 1949 that Magee and Phalen described the first case of a spontaneous presentation of ulnar nerve symptoms across the elbow. They suggested the cubital tunnel as the origin of the symptoms. Osborne (1957) described a fibrous band bridging the 2 heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) as a site of compression and was the first to recommend a release of the cubital tunnel and anterior transposition of the nerve. One year later, Feindel and Stratford compared this compressive neuropathy with carpal tunnel syndrome as “an area of focal constriction” and recommended simple decompression to relieve the symptoms.
Since the 1950s, the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome has increased in prevalence to become the second most common compressive neuropathy in the upper extremity after carpal tunnel syndrome. The purpose of this article is to review the relevant anatomy of ulnar neuropathy across the elbow, the proposed causes, and to review the relevant diagnostic maneuvers and treatment options to provide the reader with a logical approach to treating this common entity.
Anatomy
An understanding of the anatomic course of the ulnar nerve is critical to understanding cubital tunnel syndrome and its differential diagnoses.
The Course of the Ulnar Nerve
The ulnar nerve proper travels the following course:
- •
Originates in the axilla from the medial cord of the brachial plexus, with contributions from the C8-T1 nerve roots
- •
Travels posterior to the medial intermuscular septum, anterior to the medial head of the triceps
- •
Through the cubital tunnel (defined later)
- •
Dives into the forearm between the 2 heads of the FCU
- •
Travels between the FCU and flexor digitorum profundus into the forearm
- •
Travels through Guyon canal at the wrist
- ○
Terminates in the hand as motor and sensory branches
- ▪
Sensory: ulnar digital nerve to the ring finger, radial and ulnar digital nerves to the small finger
- ▪
Motor: deep motor branch to the intrinsic muscles of the hand
- ▪
- ○
Significant branches of the ulnar nerve during the dissection around the cubital tunnel include the following:
- •
The first branch off the ulnar nerve in most patients is a sensory branch to the elbow joint. It can be sacrificed without significant consequence.
- •
The next branch is a motor branch to the FCU.
- ○
Often times this branch is a tether to anterior transposition of the nerve and must be freed via neurolysis to a more proximal level to complete the transposition.
- ○
Sites of Compression of the Ulnar Nerve (Proximal to Distal)
Nerve fibers contributing to the ulnar nerve begin in the neck and travel all the way down to the fingertips of the ring and small fingers, sending branches out along the way ( Fig. 1 ). Entrapment of these nerve fibers at any point along this path can cause symptoms. For the purpose of this article, only compression along the ulnar nerve from the brachium through the area of the cubital tunnel is discussed. The common sites of compression include the following:
- •
Arcade of Struthers (a fibrous band running from the medial head of the triceps to the medial intermuscular septum) located approximately 8 cm proximal to medial epicondyle
- ○
Arcade of Struthers present in 70% of patients
- ○
Implicated primarily as a site of compression in the transposed nerve
- ○
- •
Medial intermuscular septum: also implicated primarily as a site of compression in the transposed nerve
- •
Medial epicondyle of the humerus
- •
Arcuate ligament of Osborne/cubital tunnel proper
- ○
Osborne ligament: the thickened fascia between ulnar and humeral heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris that creates the roof of the cubital tunnel
- ○
The floor of the cubital tunnel is formed by the medial collateral ligament of the elbow
- ○
- •
Anconeus epitrochlearis: anomalous muscle present in 1% to 30% of people that overlies the nerve and runs from its origin on the medial epicondyle to the olecranon ( Fig. 2 )
Fig. 2
Anconeus epitrochlearis: The ulnar nerve can be seen traversing through the anomalous muscle belly at the cubital tunnel.
- •
Fibrous bands within the FCU
- •
Aponeurosis at the proximal edge of the flexor digitorum sublimis
Extrinsic Blood Supply of the Ulnar Nerve
The extrinsic blood supply has been discussed as a potential concern in ulnar neuropathy ( Fig. 3 ). Smith (1966) reported that if the nerve was dissected over a distance of 6 to 8 cm, a portion of the nerve would be devascularized. The ulnar nerve receives its blood supply from 3 main branches:
- •
Superior ulnar collateral artery
- •
Posterior ulnar recurrent artery
- •
Inferior ulnar collateral artery (variably present)
Because the nerve has already been compromised in cases of ulnar neuropathy, efforts should be made to maintain as much of the extrinsic blood supply as possible when performing ulnar nerve surgery.
Surrounding Anatomic Dangers
In addition to the nerve itself, 2 main structures are at risk when performing ulnar nerve surgery:
- •
Posterior branches of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve are particularly at risk in anterior transposition surgeries with longer incisions.
- ○
Sixty-one percent of patients have branches crossing approximately 1.8 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle.
- ○
One hundred percent of patients have branches crossing approximately 3.1 cm distal to the medial epicondyle.
- ○
- •
The medial collateral ligament of the elbow forms the floor of the cubital tunnel and is at risk when performing a medial epicondylectomy.
Cause
Most surgeons agree that there are 2 main factors that play a role in idiopathic ulnar neuropathy of the elbow: compression and traction.
- •
Feindel and Stratford reported that the normally oval configuration of the cubital tunnel changes to a more slitlike shape with elbow flexion.
- •
Iba and colleagues reported on intraoperative pressures in the cubital tunnel and found them to be elevated to an average of 105 mm Hg, compared with normal pressures reported in cadavers that were previously reported to be between 17 to 65 mm Hg.
- •
Other investigators have suggested that the course around the medial epicondyle creates increased tensile strain along the nerve as the elbow moves into flexion.
- ○
Gelberman and colleagues examined interstitial nerve pressures in the cubital tunnel and found that pressures were increased in elbow flexion even after release of the Osborne ligament.
- ○
Hicks and Toby found that performing a medial epicondylectomy and allowing anterior translation of the nerve was effective in decreasing strain in the nerve.
- ○
Clinical presentation
History
A detailed history and physical examination will usually reveal the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome. Common presenting symptoms include the following:
- •
Vague discomfort localizing to the medial elbow
- •
Paresthesias or numbness in the ring and small fingers of the hand
- •
Weakness with grip and/or pinch strength
- •
Difficulty with opening jars or bottles
- •
Fatigue with repetitive tasks involving the hands
- •
Worsening of symptoms at night or with flexion of the elbow, such as when talking on the telephone
The categorization of symptoms has been described by McGowan and modified by Dellon ( Box 1 ).
Grade I: Sensory neuropathy only
Grade II: Sensory and motor neuropathy, without muscle atrophy
Grade III: Sensory and motor neuropathy, muscle atrophy present
Physical Examination
- •
Observation alone can yield many findings in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome.
- ○
The carrying angle will give a clue as to whether there has been prior trauma that could increase the carrying angle and cause excess traction on the ulnar nerve.
- ○
Atrophy of the intrinsic muscles of the hand and, in particular, the first dorsal interosseous muscle is more common in severe ulnar neuropathy.
- ○
Clawing of the small and ring fingers is found in severe disease (Duchenne sign).
- ○
- •
The elbow range of motion should be assessed and will also suggest whether or not patients have underlying joint abnormalities, such as degenerative arthritis, which could be contributing to the symptoms.
- •
Sensory function should be assessed on both the radial and ulnar side of each digit to determine if there is altered sensibility in an anatomic pattern that corresponds to the ulnar nerve (ulnar side of ring finger and both radial and ulnar sides of small finger).
- ○
Light touch is useful as a quick screening test to determine if patients have gross subjective alteration in sensibility.
- ○
Monofilament testing/2-point discrimination (static) is useful for the evaluation of slow-adapting fibers.
- ○
Vibrometry/2-point discrimination (moving) is useful for the evaluation of quick-adapting fibers.
- ○
- •
Motor strength testing: Motor strength should be assessed in all of the major upper extremity muscle groups, with particular attention paid to the intrinsic muscles of the hand and the deep flexors to the ring and small fingers ( Fig. 4 ). In addition, the following tests should be included in the examination:
- ○
Wartenberg sign ( Fig. 5 ): Patients are unable to fully adduct the small finger and hold the finger slightly abducted and extended as the abductor digiti minimi is unopposed by the denervated palmar interosseous muscle.
Fig. 5
Wartenberg sign.
- ○
Froment sign ( Fig. 6 ): Patients are asked to perform a key (appositional) pinch. A positive test is indicated by the flexion of the interphalangeal joint of the thumb because patients attempt to compensate for weakness of the ulnar nerve innervated adductor pollicis by using the flexor pollicis longus (median nerve innervated).
Fig. 6
Froment sign: The patient is asked to hold the paper between the thumb and index finger. ( A ) With the intact ulnar nerve, the patient is able to make use of the adductor pollicis. ( B ) When the ulnar nerve is deficient, the patient compensates for the denervated adductor by using the flexor pollicis longus (median nerve innervated).Related posts:
Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Evaluation and Treatment of Failed Ulnar Nerve Release at the Elbow
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome After Distal Radius Fracture
Physical Examination of Upper Extremity Compressive Neuropathies
Ulnar Tunnel Syndrome
Evaluation and Treatment of Failed Ulnar Nerve Release at the Elbow
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
- ○
