Abstract
Introduction
Sociocultural factors may influence the impact of chronic low back pain (cLBP) on patients. The goal of this study was to compare pain and disability levels, and psychobehavioural parameters in four French-speaking countries in patients with cLBP.
Methods
Two hundred and seventy-eight patients were included: 83 in France, 36 in Morocco, 75 in the Ivory Coast and 84 in Tunisia. Demographic data were collected; pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), disability with the Quebec scale, psychobehavioural factors by the hospital anxiety depression scale (HAD), the fear and avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the coping strategy questionnaire (CSQ). A Student t -test was used to compare means. Anova (covariance) was used to test for a “Country Effect”, i.e. the incidence of country on outcomes.
Outcomes
There was no difference in disability levels between countries. A “country effect” was found ( p < 0.001) for pain (F = 2.707), anxiety (F = 3.467), depression (F = 5.137), fear and avoidance beliefs regarding professional activity (F = 1.974) and physical activity (F = 5.076), strategy of distraction, dramatization, efforts to ignore pain, prayer, seeking social support and reinterpretation ( p < 0.01). Pain level was higher in Morocco ( p < 0.05); anxiety, depression, fear and avoidance beliefs about physical activities were higher in Tunisia ( p < 0.05) and fear and avoidance beliefs about professional activities were higher in the Ivory Coast ( p < 0.01). Among the coping strategies used, distraction, dramatization, prayer and search for social support were used more in the Ivory Coast; reinterpretation in Tunisia; seeking social support was less common in France.
Conclusion
In this population of patients with cLBP, despite similar disability levels across the four French-speaking countries, there were considerable variations in pain level and psychobehavioural repercussions.
Résumé
Introduction
Les facteurs socioculturels influencent probablement le retentissement de la lombalgie chronique. L’objectif de cette étude est de comparer des évaluations de douleur, d’incapacité fonctionnelle et psychocomportementales chez des lombalgiques chroniques dans quatre pays francophones.
Matériel et méthodes
Deux cent soixante-dix-huit patients ont été inclus : 83 en France, 36 au Maroc, 75 en Côte d’Ivoire et 84 en Tunisie. Les données démographiques ont été recueillies. La douleur a été mesurée par une échelle visuelle analogique (Eva), l’incapacité par l’échelle de Québec, l’anxiété et la dépression par le hospital anxiety depression scale (HAD), les peurs et croyances par le fear and avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) et les stratégies d’adaptation par le coping strategy questionnaire (CSQ). La comparaison des moyennes a utilisé le test t de Student. Une analyse de la covariance (Anova) a permis de mesurer l’« effet pays » (incidence du pays sur le résultat).
Résultats
Il n’existe pas de différence entre les pays pour le retentissement fonctionnel. Un « effet-pays » est mis en évidence ( p < 0,001) pour la douleur (F = 2,707), l’anxiété (F = 3,467), la dépression (F = 5,137), la peur de la reprise de l’activité professionnelle (F = 1,974), la peur de la reprise de l’activité physique (F = 5,076) et les stratégies de distraction, dramatisation, efforts pour ignorer la douleur, prière, soutien social et de réinterprétation ( p < 0,01). L’Eva douleur la plus élevée est retrouvée au Maroc ( p < 0,05) ; le score d’anxiété, de dépression et d’appréhension vis-à-vis des activités physiques les plus élevés sont observés en Tunisie ( p < 0,05) ; l’appréhension vis-à-vis des activités professionnelles est plus importante en Côte d’Ivoire ( p < 0,01). Parmi les stratégies d’adaptation, la distraction, la dramatisation, la prière et la recherche de soutien social sont plus utilisées en Côte d’Ivoire ; la réinterprétation est plus utilisée en Tunisie ; la recherche de soutien social est moins utilisée en France.
Conclusion
Dans la lombalgie chronique, pour des niveaux d’incapacité identiques, des variations importantes de douleur et de retentissement psychocomportemental sont observées entre quatre pays francophones.
1
English version
1.1
Introduction
Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a public health issue in most industrialised countries. The incidence has been continually increasing over the past 20 years in industrialized countries . In France, cLBP constitutes about 7–10% of all forms of low back pain but costs 70–80% of total spending for this condition . This includes direct costs which are stable but also indirect costs (sick leave, compensation, loss of earnings, loss of spending power), thus having important economical repercussions (tax returns, company productivity level) . Since the study by Mayer et al. , many studies have suggested that functional programs are effective in the management of cLBP , as well as for sub-acute pain . However, the long-term maintenance of these benefits is linked to the regular practice of a physical activity .
The patient’s perception of his condition and the potential effect of treatment has a large impact on treatment effectiveness . Fear of pain and related avoidance behaviour are precursors for pain-related disability to set in . The results of many studies have confirmed the benefits of psychobehavioural management of pain associated with fitness training . This type of management is even more effective if it begins early following the onset of pain or even as prevention . Scales designed to measure the effects of different psychobehavioural approaches as well as the functional impact of chronic pain have been validated in French . A review of the literature only found transcultural studies of scale validation or measures in industrialized countries (non emerging) . However, no study has attempted to compare these outcome measures and their results as a function of culture, economic level and customs within different French-speaking countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate pain and its repercussions on cLBP patients in four French-speaking countries by studying transverse and longitudinal correlations between parameters such as pain, function, anxiety, depression, fears and beliefs regarding return to work and physical activity and coping strategy (psychological defence strategies which patients may use when facing a painful stress).
1.2
Materials and methods
This study is a prospective open study comparing a population of cLBP patients in four French-speaking countries with different economical levels and cultures.
1.2.1
Patients
Patients included had non-radiating low back pain for at least 3 months, were aged between 18–60 years, had the nationality of the country evaluated and spoke fluent French. Exclusion criteria included the association of pathologies which cause chronic pain, secondary low back pain, cognitive problems judged to be severe by the investigator, difficulties in expressing or understanding French and psychiatric disorders requiring a change in treatment during the past three months.
1.2.2
Study design
Prospective observational open study with inclusions over a 1-year period.
1.2.3
Patient recruitment
Recruitment of patients was carried out during consultations by the doctor responsible for the study in each of the participating French-speaking countries. Hospitals involved in each country were: France (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department [PMR] for Spinal Pathologies run by Professeur Revel, Cochin University Hospital, Paris, highly specialised department), Tunisia (PMR run by Professeur Rejeb at Sahloul Hospital, Sousse, PMR run by Professeur Dziri at the Mohamed Kassab Institut of Tunis and PMR run by Professeur Helleuch at the Bourguiba University Hospital of Sfax, tertiary care practice), Morocco (Department run by Docteur Oudghiri at Casablanca CRFM (private center), secondary care practice) and the Ivory Coast (Orthopedic PMR run by Professeur Nandjui, Yopougon University Hospital at Abidjan, tertiary care practice).
1.2.4
Inclusion visit
Patients were included following consultation with the doctor involved in each of the participating departments. During this visit, the inclusion criteria were verified; the modalities of the study explained and the patients were given the information letter to read and the informed consent form to sign. The patients were given the study documents to fill in on site. Patient management was not altered by inclusion in the study.
1.2.5
Number of patients
The inclusion period lasted 1 year. Each participating department included the number of patients consulting for cLBP during this period.
1.2.6
Legalities and administration
This study is considered as out-with the Huriet law. It is an observational study with no physical or psychological implications for the subjects who agreed to participate. An information letter as well as an informed consent form was given to each patient.
1.2.7
Data collection during the inclusion visit
The demographic characteristics of the patients (country, age, sex, weight, height, body mass index [BMI], profession, work related accident, duration of pain, amount of sick leave, use of a lumbar brace, rehabilitation) were noted.
Medical data:
- •
clinical impairment-related data: pain over the last 48 hours evaluated with a visual analogue scale (pVAS) 100 mm in length ;
- •
functional evaluation using the Quebec scale (/100) . This self-administered questionnaire, validated in French, evaluates functional capacity in 20 activities of daily living;
- •
psychological evaluation using the hospital anxiety and depression scale HAD-A (/21) and HAD-D (/21) . This self-administered questionnaire, validated in French, evaluates the state of anxiety (HAD-A) and depression (HAD-D) of the patient;
- •
evaluation of fears and beliefs with the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire FABQ Work (/42) and FABQ Phys (/24) . This self-administered questionnaire, validated in French, evaluates the level of apprehension and avoidance of returning to work (FABQ Work) and physical activities (FABQ Phys);
- •
evaluation of coping ability with the coping strategy questionnaire (CSQ). This self-administered questionnaire, validated in French, evaluates psychological defence strategies used by patients when faced with a painful stress. It measures six strategies of adaptation: distraction (/20), dramatisation (/20), reinterpretation of pain (/16), efforts to ignore pain (16), tendency to pray (/12) and seeking social support (/32) .
1.2.8
Data analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the program Systat ® 9 for Windows ® . A Student t test was used to compare means. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. An analysis of covariance (Anova) was used to assess the “country effect”: a statistical test used to determine if the means of each country are statistically different, i.e. if the country has an impact on the result. The higher the F-value, the higher the difference.
1.3
Results
During the year of inclusions, 278 patients were included: 83 in France, 75 in the Ivory Coast, 84 in Tunisia and 36 in Morocco. Demographic and clinical data of the population are presented in Tables 1 and 2 .
Sex ratio M/F | France | Morocco | Tunisia | Ivory Coast | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
48/35 (57.8%) | 20/16 (55.6%) | 33/51 (39.3%) | 37/38 (49%) | |||||||||||||
Mean | Minimum | Maximum | S.D. | Mean | Minimum | Maximum | S.D. | Mean | Minimum | Maximum | S.D. | Mean | Minimum | Maximum | S.D. | |
Age (years) | 43.0 | 19 | 71 | 11.6 | 45.2 | 20 | 65 | 11.2 | 40.8 | 15 | 65 | 11.2 | 39.0 | 18 | 59 | 9.8 |
Weight (kg) | 74.2 | 50 | 120 | 15.5 | 73 | 55 | 98 | 10.5 | 73.1 | 45 | 132 | 14.3 | 72.3 | 49 | 108 | 12.4 |
Height (cm) | 172 | 150 | 194 | 9.2 | 167 | 155 | 186 | 7.5 | 167 | 90 | 190 | 12.4 | 168 | 140 | 189 | 9.7 |
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) | 24.5 | 18 | 37 | 4.2 | 26.0 | 21 | 31 | 2.8 | 26.5 | 19 | 92 | 8.6 | 25.1 | 18 | 39 | 4.3 |
Duration of pain (months) | 47 | 3 | 250 | 56.7 | 31 | 3 | 120 | 31.9 | 50.9 | 3 | 240 | 54.3 | 57.7 | 3 | 288 | 63.1 |
Work accident (%) | 15.7 | NA | NA | NA | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 0.13 | NA | NA | NA | 5.3 | NA | NA | NA |
Duration of sick leave (months) | 2 | 0 | 210 | 4.38 | 0.1 | 0 | 3 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 15 | 3.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 3 | 0.5 |
Physio (%) | 66.3 | NA | NA | NA | 61.1 | NA | NA | NA | 57.1 | NA | NA | NA | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.5 |
Number of physio sessions | 24 | 0 | 300 | 39.6 | 12 | 0 | 60 | 13.4 | 9.5 | 0 | 80 | 13.0 | 6.4 | 0 | 30 | 7.9 |
Brace (%) | 23 | NA | NA | NA | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 21.4 | NA | NA | NA | 9.3 | NA | NA | NA |
Duration of brace (months) | 1.3 | 0 | 56 | 6.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 144 | 15.9 | 0.8 | 0 | 48 | 5.6 |
France n = 83 | Morocco n = 36 | Tunisia n = 84 | Ivory Coast n = 75 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | Minimum | Maximum | S.D. | Mean | Minimum | Maximum | S.D. | Mean | Minimum | Maximum | S.D. | Mean | Minimum | Maximum | S.D. | |
Visual analogue scale pain (mm) | 43.7 | 0 | 90 | 43.7 | 51.4 | 19 | 88 | 15.4 | 25.3 | 2 | 100 | 25.3 | 43.4 | 17 | 78 | 13.4 |
Quebec (100) | 31.9 | 2 | 76 | 15.6 | 36.6 | 9 | 84 | 16.4 | 38.3 | 4 | 81 | 17.2 | 34.1 | 2 | 72 | 14.9 |
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD-A) (21) | 9.5 | 0 | 21 | 3.9 | 8.1 | 3 | 16 | 3.6 | 10.3 | 1 | 17 | 3.9 | 10.8 | 1 | 17 | 3.5 |
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD-D) (21) | 5.4 | 0 | 21 | 3.2 | 7.3 | 1 | 13 | 3.1 | 8.1 | 0 | 18 | 3.9 | 6.4 | 0 | 13 | 3.3 |
Fear and avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) Work (42) | 19 | 0 | 42 | 12 | 15.7 | 0 | 38 | 11.4 | 19.2 | 0 | 44 | 13.0 | 36.3 | 1 | 66 | 16.1 |
Fear and avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) Phys (24) | 14 | 0 | 24 | 5.7 | 15.6 | 0 | 24 | 6.5 | 22.8 | 0 | 322 | 41.4 | 22.1 | 0 | 30 | 8.4 |
Distraction | 11.3 | 5 | 20 | 4.5 | 13.3 | 5 | 20 | 4.0 | 13.5 | 4 | 20 | 4.3 | 14.9 | 7 | 20 | 2.8 |
Dramatisation | 12.8 | 5 | 20 | 4.4 | 11.3 | 5 | 20 | 3.8 | 12.6 | 5 | 20 | 4.2 | 14.9 | 5 | 20 | 3.4 |
Reinterpretation | 6.8 | 4 | 16 | 3.1 | 8.6 | 4 | 16 | 4.0 | 8.5 | 4 | 16 | 3.8 | 7.8 | 3 | 16 | 3.2 |
Ignoring the pain | 9.3 | 4 | 16 | 3.2 | 9.7 | 3 | 15 | 2.8 | 10.1 | 4 | 16 | 2.9 | 9.6 | 4 | 16 | 2.8 |
Prayer | 5.6 | 3 | 12 | 3.2 | 9.5 | 3 | 12 | 3.2 | 9.8 | 3 | 12 | 2.8 | 11.1 | 3 | 16 | 1.8 |
Support seeking | 23.3 | 10 | 32 | 4.7 | 25.2 | 11 | 32 | 5.2 | 24.8 | 13 | 32 | 4.6 | 27.2 | 11 | 32 | 3.4 |
The Anova was used to evaluate the “country effect”, i.e. if the country has an impact on the results. No “country effect” was found for the duration of the low back pain (F = 1.145; p = 0.24) or for the Quebec function index (F = 0.577; p = 0.53). A “country effect” was found for pain (F = 2.707; p < 0.001), anxiety (F = 3.467; p < 0.001), depression (F = 5.137; p < 0.001), fear of return to work FABQ Work (F = 1.974; p < 0.001) and fear of physical activity FABQ Phys (F = 5.076; p < 0.001). Regarding coping strategies, a “country effect” was found for distraction (F = 5.256; p < 0.001), dramatisation (F = 4.830; p < 0.001), reinterpretation (F = 5.716; p < 0.01), efforts to ignore the pain (F = 5.017; p < 0.001), praying (F = 18.725; p < 0.001) and seeking social support (F = 7.120; p < 0.001).
Paired comparisons for the significant values of the “country effect” gave the following results:
- •
for pain level, mean VAS score in Morocco was significantly higher than that of the Ivory Coast (+7.1; p = 0.02), France (+8.9; p = 0.03) and Tunisia (+13.4; p = 0.04). Mean pVAS was significantly higher than that of Tunisia (+18.6; p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the Ivory Coast and France (0.52; p = 0.9). The pVAS for the Ivory Coast was significantly higher than that of Tunisia (+16.84; p < 0.01);
- •
for the anxiety scale, the HAD-A for Tunisia was respectively greater than that for the Ivory Coast (+0.02; p = 0.98), France (0.91; p = 0.24) and Morocco (+2.42; p ≤ 0.01). The HAD-A score for the Ivory Coast was significantly higher than that for France (+1.41; p = 0.02) and Morocco (+1.78; p = 0.08). The score for France was significantly higher than for Morocco (+1.64; p = 0.04);
- •
for the depression scale, the HAD-D score for Tunisia was respectively greater than that of Morocco (+1.42; p = 0.12), the Ivory Coast (+2.12; p = 0.01) and France (+2.95; p < 0.01). The score for Morocco was higher than that of the Ivory Coast (+1.97; p = 0.02) and France (+1.92; p = 0.02). The score for the Ivory Coast was higher than that of France (+1.12; p = 0.04);
- •
for the apprehension regarding return to work scale, the FABQ Work score was respectively significantly higher in the Ivory Coast than in France (+3.51; p = 0.03), Tunisia (+18.94; p < 0.01) and Morocco (+23.78; p < 0.01). It was greater in France than Tunisia (+1.15; p = 0.64) and Morocco (+5.81; p = 0.01). This score was greater in Tunisia than in Morocco (+5.4; p = 0.03);
- •
for the scale of apprehension of a return to physical activities, the FABQ Phys score was respectively higher in Tunisia than the Ivory Coast (+0.67; p = 0.92), France (+7.8; p = 0.18) and Morocco (+2.23; p = 0.16). The FABQ Phys score for the Ivory Coast was higher than that for France (+8.25; p < 0.01) and Morocco (+6.42; p < 0.01). The score for France was higher than for Morocco (+0.14; p = 0.92).
For coping strategies:
- •
the distraction strategy was respectively more used in the Ivory Coast than in Morocco (+1.47; p = 0.09), Tunisia (+1.68; p = 0.03) and France (+3.53; p < 0.01). Its use was greater in Morocco than Tunisia (+0.38; p = 0.73) and France (+0.56; p = 0.55). It was more used in Tunisia than France (1.82; p = 0.03);
- •
the strategy of dramatisation was respectively more used in the Ivory Coast than in France (+2.11; p < 0.01), Tunisia (+2.30; p ≤ 0.01) and Morocco (+3.81; p < 0.01). This strategy was used more in France than Tunisia (+0.26; p = 0.76) and Morocco (+1.86; p = 0.05). It was used more in Tunisia than Morocco (+2.06; p = 0.05);
- •
the strategy of reinterpretation was respectively more used in Tunisia than Morocco (+0.29; p = 0.78), the Ivory Coast (0.56; p = 0.47) and France (+1.64; p = 0.02). This strategy was more used in Morocco than the Ivory Coast (+0.42; p = 0.61) and France (+1.44; p = 0.14). It was more used in the Ivory Coast than France (+1.08; p = 0.02);
- •
no significant differences for the strategy of ignoring the pain were found. The strategy tended to be respectively more used in Morocco than Tunisia (+0.09; p = 0.9), the Ivory Coast (+0.08; p = 0.9) and France (+0.58; p = 0.41). It was more used in Tunisia than the Ivory Coast (+0.26; p = 0.63) and France (+0.76; p = 0.53). It was more used in the Ivory Coast than France (+0.31; p = 0.53);
- •
the strategy of prayer was respectively more used in the Ivory Coast than Tunisia (+1.60; p < 0.01), Morocco (+1.58; p < 0.01) and France (+5.73; p < 0.01). This strategy was more used in Tunisia than Morocco (+0.38; p = 0.61) and France (+4.15; p < 0.01). It was more used in Morocco than France (+3.92; p < 0.01);
- •
the strategy of finding social support was respectively more used in the Ivory Coast than Tunisia (+1.62; p = 0.06), Morocco (+1.53; p = 0.14) and France (+8.39; p < 0.01). This strategy was more used in Tunisia than Morocco (+0.50; p = 0.68) and France (+6.02; p < 0.01). It was more used in Morocco than France (+5.81; p < 0.01).
1.4
Discussion
This study revealed a “country effect” (effect which could result from the country of birth and the country in which the person is living with the symptoms) on the parameters of pain, anxiety, depression, avoidance behaviour and psychobehavioural adaptations but not for function. It is known that the patient’s perception of his illness and of the potential benefit of treatment is decisive for improvement and compliance with treatment for both sub-acute and cLBP . Based on this knowledge, an approach was developed in order to predetermine the profile of patients who suffer from this pathology. Five predictive factors of chronicity in industrialised countries were found: personal, medicolegal, socioeconomical, professional and psychological .
Among the personal factors, only age above 45 years is significant . This factor was not found in our study, the mean age for all the countries being below 45 years except for Morocco (45.2 years). Moreover, analysis of demographic criteria showed that there were few differences between the countries studied with regard to age, weight, height and BMI.
Regarding the medicolegal factors, the notion of compensation is a high risk factor for pain to become chronic (RR > 5) .
With regard to socioeconomic factors, low socioeconomic status and poor level of education (independent factors) are the most common . In our study, it is probable that variations in social criteria, even if they are complex are important. They are only indirectly measured by the number of work-related accidents and the duration of sick leave. France has the highest number of pathologies linked to work-related accidents. This is probably because these accidents are covered by the social security system rather than because working conditions are more dangerous. The duration of sick leave in France is also longer. Similarly, financial compensation during the sick leave may not incite patients to return to work. In the Ivory Coast, little physiotherapy is offered. In the other participating countries, this type of treatment appears to be as well developed as in France but the number of sessions of therapy per patient is higher in France. This can be explained by differences in social security cover.
With regard to professional factors, the boring nature of the job is not a predictive factor of cronicity (in contrast with acute LBP ), however, low job status and poor physical condition relative to work constraints are predictive factors. Our findings showed that apprehension regarding return to work (FABQ Work) was greater in the Ivory Coast than France, Tunisia or Morocco. The difference between the Ivory Coast and the other countries was very large. This result is different to that for recommencing physical activity (FABQ Phys): for this parameter, Tunisia has the highest apprehension score compared with the Ivory Coast, France and Morocco.
Lastly, with regard to psychological factors, an anxious-depressive or hysterical nature is recognised as being a predictive factor for chronicity . It is difficult to know if these are primary or secondary factors relating to the lumbar pathology. Similarly, patients with cLBP tend to have a more hypochondriac personality than the general population (higher hospital admittance for other pathologies such as gastric ulcers, pain syndromes…) . Anxiety was found to be higher in Tunisia than in other countries. Morocco had the lowest anxiety level. With regard to depression, the mean HAD-D score was highest in Tunisia, compared with the Ivory Coast, Morocco then France.
The CSQ was used to evaluate patients’ defence strategies against pain. Tunisia had high repercussions of low back pain (HAD-A, HAD-D, FABQ Phys), however, it had the lowest level of pain. The most used compensatory strategies were reinterpretation (positive) and prayer (negative). The Ivory Coast also had high repercussions from the pathology (FABQ Work). The most used compensatory strategies in this country were distraction and dramatisation (negative) and seeking social support (positive). The highest level of pain was in Morocco (pVAS). The most used compensatory strategy was ignoring the pain (positive).
Many studies have evaluated the psychological approach to chronic pain. Indeed, Feurstein and Beattie in 1995 defined four types of phychological high-risk behaviours : the patient presents all pathology as serious; he finds all pathology which is unexplained or resistant to treatments very serious; the patient is incapable of managing his pain and he underestimates his true physical capacity. Based on the conclusions of Fordyce et al. , Lethem et al. developed the concept of “fear-avoidance-exaggerated response to pain”. Linton then went on to conclude that there are two possible responses to a painful stimulus . The first is conditioned, automatic and always the same (sympathetic response with fear, anxiety and muscle tension). The second is acquired and defined as a learning of avoidance behaviour in order to decrease fears, anxiety and muscle tension. These responses have limited effectiveness and reinforce these attitudes, leading to a vicious circle responsible for a progressive deconditioning. This is characterized by a decrease in physical activity with loss of muscle endurance (especially spinal and abdominal) with repercussions on morale (increased sensation of being seriously ill) and modifications in pain tolerance. Vlaeyen and Linton established the current model of “fear-avoidance” based on his work and the notion of “kinesiphobia” defined by Kori et al. . In this concept, the patient chooses between confrontation (adapted) and avoidance (pathological). Subjects who adopt the second strategy have a poorer prognosis, regardless of the type of therapeutic programme . Early, effective therapeutic management can change behaviour, thus rapidly improving function . In a prospective study, Klenerman et al. showed that the psychological concept occurs very early and that rapid evaluation and management are the best predictive factors for return to work. This model of “fear-avoidance behaviour” has been validated for all painful pathologies (cLBP, post-herpes nerve pain, algodystrophy…) .
Our results help to orientate specific management strategies for cLBP depending on the cultural and socioeconomic particularities of the population. There is, however, a selection bias in our study regarding the recruitment of patients who understand and can read French. The reason for this was so that we could use scales validated in this language, however, African patients who fit this criterion may not be representative of the general population of their respective countries.
A longitudinal cross-cultural study of cLBP using scales which have been translated and validated for each individual country seems justified in order to ensure a representative sample. This could lead to different treatment approaches being used within a country which has a population of people of varied backgrounds.
1.5
Conclusion
The results of this study show that there is not a “country effect” for functional ability but that there are many variations regarding pain, anxiety, depression, avoidance behaviour and psychobehavioural adaptations. An analysis of explanatory factors deduced from a prospective longitudinal study is warranted.
2
Version française
2.1
Introduction
La lombalgie chronique pose un problème de santé publique dans la majorité des pays industrialisés. Son incidence est en constante augmentation ces 20 dernières années dans les pays industrialisés . En France, les formes chroniques, qui ne représentent que 7 à 10 % des lombalgies, occasionnent 70 à 80 % des dépenses globales pour les lombalgiques . Ces dernières sont constituées de coûts directs, stables , mais aussi indirects plus ou moins mesurables (arrêts de travails, indemnisations, perte de salaire, de pouvoir d’achat) entraînant des répercussions économiques importantes (rentrées fiscales, taux de productivité des entreprises) . De nombreuses études depuis celle de Mayer et al. en 1985 suggèrent que les programmes de restauration fonctionnelle sont efficaces dans la prise en charge des lombalgies chroniques mais aussi subaiguës . Cependant, la persistance des bénéfices à long terme semble être étroitement liée à la pratique d’une activité physique .
La perception du malade sur son état et sur le potentiel du traitement sont décisifs pour l’amélioration de l’observance du traitement . Les peurs de la douleur et les conduites d’évitement induites se révèlent prépondérantes dans l’initiation puis le maintien de l’incapacité liée à cette douleur . De nombreux travaux ont confirmé l’intérêt de la prise en charge psychocomportementale de la douleur associée aux programmes de reconditionnement à l’effort . Cette prise en charge serait d’autant plus efficace qu’elle est pratiquée tôt dans l’anamnèse de la lombalgie, voire en préventif . Les échelles permettant de mesurer ces différentes approches psychocomportementales ainsi que le retentissement fonctionnel de la douleur chronique ont été validées en français . L’analyse de la littérature ne retrouve que des études transculturelles de validation d’échelles ou de mesure dans des pays industrialisés (non émergeants) . Mais aucune étude n’a tenté de comparer ces outils de mesure et leurs résultats en fonction des cultures, du niveau économique, des us et des coutumes de différents pays francophones. L’objectif de cette étude est l’évaluation de la douleur et de son retentissement chez les patients atteints de lombalgie chronique dans quatre pays francophones en étudiant les corrélations transversales et longitudinales entre les paramètres évaluant la douleur, la fonction, l’anxiété, la dépression, les peurs et des croyances face à la reprise d’une activité professionnelle et physique et la stratégie de coping (stratégies de défenses psychologiques qu’utilise un patient face à un stress douloureux).
2.2
Matériels et méthodes
Ce travail est une étude prospective ouverte comparant une population de lombalgiques chroniques commune dans quatre pays francophones de niveaux économiques et culturels différents.
2.2.1
Patients
Les patients inclus souffraient de lombalgie commune, sans radiculalgie, depuis au moins trois mois, étaient âgés de 18 à 60 ans, avaient la nationalité du pays d’évaluation et parlaient la langue française couramment. Les critères d’exclusion ont été l’association de pathologies associées entraînant des douleurs chroniques, les lombalgies secondaires, des troubles cognitifs jugés sévères par l’investigateur, des troubles de compréhension ou d’expression de la langue française, des troubles psychiatriques ayant nécessité une modification du traitement dans les trois derniers mois.
2.2.2
Déroulement de l’étude et calendrier des évaluations
Étude prospective observationnelle ouverte avec un délai d’inclusion d’un an.
2.2.3
Recrutement des patients
Le recrutement des patients s’est fait en consultation par le médecin référent de chaque pays francophone ayant accepté de participer à l’étude. Le recrutement des patients a eu lieu en France (service de médecine physique et de réadaptation [MPR] des pathologies du rachis du Professeur Revel, CHU de Cochin de Paris, service très spécialisé), en Tunisie (service de MPR du Professeur Rejeb à l’hôpital Sahloul de Sousse, service de MPR du Professeur Dziri à l’Institut Mohamed Kassab de Tunis et service MPR du Professeur Helleuch CHU Bourguiba à Sfax, tous de recours secondaire), au Maroc (service du Docteur Oudghiri du CRFM de Casablanca (établissement privé), de recours secondaire) et en Côte d’Ivoire (service de MPR à orientation orthopédique du Professeur Nandjui, CHU Yopougon à Abidjan, recours secondaire).
2.2.4
Visite d’inclusion
Les patients ont été inclus lors d’une consultation par les correspondants des services concernés, qui ont vérifié les critères d’éligibilité, expliqué les modalités et le déroulement de l’étude, ont fait lire la note d’information et signer le consentement éclairé. Les médecins ont fourni au patient le cahier de protocole à remplir sur place. La prise en charge des patients, pendant et après cette consultation, n’a pas différé de la prise en charge habituelle des patients.
2.2.5
Nombre de patients
La période raisonnable d’inclusion a été d’un an. Chaque service des pays concernés a inclus le nombre de patients concernés par cette pathologie au cours de leur consultation sur cette période.
2.2.6
Aspect légal et administratif
Cette étude est considérée comme indépendante de la loi Huriet. En effet, il s’agit d’une étude observationnelle n’induisant pas d’atteinte à l’intégrité physique et psychique des sujets ayant accepté de participer. Une lettre d’information ainsi qu’un consentement éclairé ont été soumis au patient.
2.2.7
Recueil des données lors de la consultation d’inclusion
Les caractéristiques démographiques du patient (pays, âge, sexe, poids, taille, Indice de masse corporelle [IMC], profession, accident de travail, durée des lombalgies, arrêt de travail et durée, port de corset, rééducation ont été reportées.
Les données médicales :
- •
données cliniques portant sur la déficience : douleur au cours des 48 heures précédentes, évaluée sur une échelle visuelle analogique (Eva) (100 mm) ;
- •
évaluation de l’incapacité fonctionnelle par l’échelle de Québec (/100) . Cet autoquestionnaire, validé en Français, permet d’évaluer les possibilités fonctionnelles des patients au cours de 20 activités de la vie quotidienne ;
- •
évaluation psychologique par la hospital anxiety and depression scale HAD-A (/21) et HAD-D (/21) . Cet autoquestionnaire, validé en Français, permet d’apprécier l’état anxieux (HAD-A) et dépressif (HAD-D) du patient ;
- •
évaluation des peurs et des croyances par le fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire FABQ Travail (/42) et FABQ Phys (/24) . Cet autoquestionnaire, validé en Français, permet d’apprécier les notions d’appréhension et d’évitement à la reprise d’une activité professionnelle (FABQ Travail) et physique (FABQ Phys) ;
- •
évaluation du coping par le coping strategy questionnaire (CSQ). Cet autoquestionnaire, validé en français, permet d’apprécier les stratégies de défenses psychologiques qu’utilise un patient face à un stress douloureux. Il y est mesuré six stratégies d’adaptation : la distraction (/20), la dramatisation (/20), la réinterprétation des douleurs (/16), les efforts pour ignorer la douleur (16), la tendance à la prière (/12), la recherche de soutien social (/32) .
2.2.8
Analyse des résultats
L’analyse statistique a utilisé le logiciel Systat ® 9 pour Windows ® . La comparaison des moyennes a utilisé le test t de Student. Le seuil de significativité retenu est p < 0,05. Une analyse de la covariance (Anova) a permis de mesurer l’« effet pays » : test statistique qui sert à déterminer si les moyennes des différents pays sont statistiquement différentes, c’est-à-dire si le pays a une incidence sur le résultat. Plus F est grand, plus la différence est grande.
2.3
Résultats
Sur ce délai d’un an, 278 patients ont été inclus : 83 en France, 75 en Côte d’Ivoire, 84 en Tunisie et 36 au Maroc. Les données démographiques et cliniques de la population sont représentées par pays dans les Tableaux 3 et 4 .