Comparative Safety of Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus




Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the prototypic autoimmune disease with diverse clinical manifestations, affecting virtually all organ systems. A wide variety of medications are used for treatment, depending on organ involvement and severity. This article summarizes the adverse effects associated with different drugs currently used to treat SLE.








  • A wide variety of medications are used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus, depending on organ involvement and severity.



  • Some of these drugs, especially immunosuppressive and cytotoxic agents, often lead to significant toxicity.



  • Physicians must familiarize themselves with the adverse effects of each of these drugs and discuss them with patients to facilitate educated decision making.



Key Points
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the prototypic autoimmune disease resulting from a dysregulation of immune function. Diverse clinical manifestations may be seen, affecting virtually all organ systems. For this reason, a wide variety of medications are used for treatment, depending on organ involvement and severity. Although some of these treatments are usually safe and well tolerated, others, especially immunosuppressive and cytotoxic agents, often lead to significant toxicity.


Antimalarials


Several antimalarial medications have been used to treat SLE for more than 100 years. Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil) is currently the most commonly used, although chloroquine (Aralen) and quinacrine (Atabrine, Mepacrine) also remain in use. Several recent studies have highlighted the many benefits of antimalarials in patients with SLE, including




  • An improvement in lipid profiles



  • Reduction of SLE activity



  • Prevention of thrombotic events



  • Improved survival



Although antimalarials are generally well tolerated and possess good safety profiles, they are associated with adverse events (AEs), although these are infrequent and generally mild. The most common AEs are gastrointestinal and cutaneous, whereas the most serious AE, although rare, is retinopathy. In one study comparing the toxicities associated with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, 28% of patients receiving chloroquine experienced AEs compared with 15% of those receiving hydroxychloroquine ( P <.00001).


Retinopathy


The risk of retinopathy ( Fig. 1 ) from hydroxychloroquine is low, especially compared with chloroquine. In a study performed in Thailand, 37 of 139 patients (27%) receiving chloroquine experienced retinopathy. In contrast, in a large series of 1207 patients taking hydroxychloroquine for rheumatic diseases, only 1 case of definite retinal toxicity was identified. In a more recent study, definite or probable retinal toxicity occurred in 0.65% of 3995 patients taking hydroxychloroquine. Although the toxicity rate remained low with longer durations, an increase in toxicity was seen after approximately 6 years of use, or with a cumulative dose of 800 g. For this reason, the American Academy of Ophthalmology recommends that all patients starting on hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine have a baseline examination within the first year of starting the drug. Annual screening should then be performed after 5 years of use in all patients, and from initiation of therapy for patients with maculopathy or unusual risk factors. Recommended screening procedures include careful ocular examination, automated visual field testing, and, when available, testing with one or more objective tests of anatomic or functional damage.




Fig. 1


Left: an early “bull’s-eye” lesion resulted from hydroxychloroquine therapy. Stippled annular hyperpigmentation of the macula is seen. Right: a late lesion shows a central area of hyperpigmentation and an intermediate zone of hypopigmentation encircled by a pigmented rim, creating the characteristic bull’s-eye effect.

(© 2012 American College of Rheumatology. Used with permission.)


Cutaneous


Cutaneous side effects are common in patients taking antimalarials. Cutaneous pigmentary changes have been found in up to 25% of patients taking these medications for more than 3 months. Any of the antimalarials may produce localized blue-black pigmentation, which predominantly affects the pretibial areas, face, gums, hard palate, and subungual regions, although it has most commonly been seen with chloroquine ( Figs. 2 and 3 ). This effect was seen in 25 of 300 patients receiving antimalarials for collagen diseases. Early lesions resembled ecchymoses, but with continued therapy, the areas coalesced and became darker. The duration of therapy varied from 4 to 70 months, and the pigmentation decreased several months after cessation of therapy. African Americans seemed to have a lower incidence of pigmentary changes.


Oct 1, 2017 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Comparative Safety of Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access