Abstract
Background
This study aimed to report our experience with the combined use of hemiwedge supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) procedure and open ankle arthrodesis (AA) for correcting end-stage ankle arthritis with large varus deformity in the same operative session.
Methods
This retrospective study prospectively followed 14 consecutive patients (15 ankles), consisting of 5 men and 9 women, with a mean age of 68.3 years, and underwent SMO/AA for treating end-stage ankle arthritis and varus deformity of the hindfoot of ≥ 15° from April 2019 to June 2023. The participants were followed up for a mean duration of 3.4 years.
Results
All patients experienced pain relief and walking ability improvement after SMO/AA. The mean osteotomy wedge height was 7.0 mm. The mean time to full-weight bearing and bone union time was 8.4 weeks and 11.7 weeks, respectively. The mean visual analog scale and the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scale score significantly improved from 7.3 and 51.9 preoperatively to 1.4 and 82.2 postoperatively, respectively (p < 0.001). Further, the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire was significantly improved on all subscales (p < 0.001). The mean hindfoot alignment angle significantly decreased from 22.5° preoperatively to 1.8° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Complications included secondary subtalar joint arthritis in two, asymptomatic stress fracture of the calcaneus in one, and delayed union of the osteotomy site in one patient.
Conclusions
Combined SMO/AA is a potential option for preserving the subtalar joint in treating end-stage ankle arthritis with large varus deformity. This technique successfully corrects ankle/hindfoot varus deformity and preserves leg length and subtalar joint motion. Further, a single lateral incision minimizes the risk of impaired blood supply. One-stage surgical treatment reduces recovery time, hospitalization duration, and surgical cost. Rigid locking fixation with careful postoperative weightbearing is required to attain uneventful bone healing.
Level of evidence
IV.
1
Introduction
Ankle arthrodesis (AA) remains the gold standard and the most applied surgical treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis . AA aims to obtain a bony union between the tibia and talus with optimal ankle positioning to provide a pain-free plantigrade foot and maintain a normal physiological gait. The ideal hindfoot position after AA is slightly valgus (0–5°), neutrally dorsiflexed, and slightly externally rotated (5–10°). Posterior talar displacement from the long axis of the tibia need to be < 1 cm , . Limb length discrepancies should be limited (< 2 cm) to prevent symptomatic malalignment and altered gait patterns , . The equinus position of the ankle joint can accompany genu recurvatum, and the varus position of the hindfoot can result in pressure wounds, stress fractures, peroneal spasms, or premature subtalar joint arthritis ,, . Moreover, ankle joint varus malalignment is a twofold increased risk of nonunion after AA .
End-stage ankle arthritis, which is associated with large varus deformity, especially in deformed ankles due to previous traumatic injuries and/or surgical treatments, is an extremely challenging but rewarding deformity to treat . Several options are available for treating distal tibial deformities in patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. Addressing both deformity and ankle arthritis is crucial for successful functional outcomes. Treatment options include (1) combined or staged supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) and total ankle arthroplasty ,, , (2) external fixation to correct the tibial deformity with AA , , (3) application of interposition wedge autograft or allograft in AA , , and (4) combined SMO and AA (SMO/AA) or tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTC) ,, . To the best of our knowledge, only two previous single case reports describe simultaneous SMO/AA for tibial malalignment and ipsilateral ankle arthritis , .
Tonogai and Sairyo , in 2021, performed a one-stage lateral opening-wedge SMO/AA (i.e., varus osteotomy) in a 70-year-old female patient with varus ankle arthritis and valgus tibial malalignment 17–18 years following a failed lateral closed-wedge SMO. An anterolateral locking plate was applied to secure the osteotomy site, and the ankle was fused with two cannulated screws employing a transfibular approach.
More recently, in 2023, Kobayashi and Shido introduced an innovative hemiwedge osteotomy procedure in the distal tibia. This technique combined medial opening-wedge SMO and lateral closed-wedge SMO to overcome the limitations of conventional closed-wedge SMO. A 77-year-old female patient with posttraumatic ankle arthritis concomitant with an extraarticular varus deformity was successfully treated with hemiwedge SMO/AA (i.e., valgus osteotomy) using a single lateral locking plate.
Available literature regarding the clinical and radiological outcomes of SMO/AA is limited; thus, the effectiveness of an additional SMO to realign deformities at the distal tibia level during AA remains unclear. Increased perioperative risks due to the higher complexity of the operation, increased soft tissue damage, longer operation time, and the risk of delayed or nonunion of the osteotomy site as well as the arthrodesis site are possible reasons for the restrained enthusiasm toward performing SMO/AA as a one-stage procedure , .
In the present study, we report our experience with the combined use of the recently introduced hemiwedge SMO procedure and open AA for correcting end-stage ankle arthritis with large varus deformity in the same operative session. We hypothesized that SMO/AA is a feasible and safe procedure and could correct ankle/hindfoot deformity successfully, leading to pain relief and function improvement.
2
Materials and methods
2.1
Patients
The institutional review board of our hospital approved this study, and all patients signed written informed consent for inclusion in the review. This retrospective study prospectively followed 14 consecutive patients (15 affected ankles) who underwent SMO/AA for treating end-stage ankle arthritis with large varus deformity from April 2019 to June 2023. The first author (H.K.) with more than 25 years of experience in foot and ankle reconstruction performed these procedures.
2.2
Assessments
The combined procedure was considered suitable for patients with (1) intractable ankle pain and/or instability refractory to conservative treatment, (2) end-stage varus ankle osteoarthritis, (3) varus deformity of the hindfoot of ≥ 15° on the weightbearing hindfoot alignment (HA) radiographs, (4) relatively undamaged subtalar joint, and (5) preserved leg-foot range of motion. Conservative treatment, including medication, lateral wedge plantar orthosis, and an ankle brace, failed to relieve the symptoms for ≥ 6 months. The analysis excluded patients who underwent other concurrent hindfoot surgeries or followed for < 2 years. Importantly, patients who smoke were excluded to prevent the increased risk of postoperative infection and delayed bone healing.
This study followed up five male and nine female patients with a mean age of 68.3 (52–79) years for a mean duration of 3.4 (2–6.2) years. The mean body mass index was 24.8 (18–36.4). Of the 14 patients, 12 had ≥ 1 comorbidities, including hypertension in 9, type 2 diabetes in 3, obesity in 3, Parkinson disease in 1, and putaminal hemorrhage in 1 patient. The etiologies of ankle arthritis consisted of chronic ankle sprain and instability in seven, plafond fracture in two, primary osteoarthritis without a history of trauma in two, malleolar fracture in one, paralytic foot in one, and foot dystonia in one patient. No patient had undergone previous operative treatment in the affected lower limb; however, one patient underwent contralateral total knee arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis three years before SMO/AA. One patient underwent bilateral surgeries at a 4-month interval.
Clinical outcome measures included a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle–hindfoot scale , , and the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) . The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the JSSF scale and SAFE-Q have been verified ,, . The main body of the SAFE-Q consists of 34 questionnaire items, providing five subscale scores of pain and pain-related, physical functioning and daily living, social functioning, shoe-related, and general health and wellbeing. Each subscale score ranges from 0 to 100 points. Other clinical results included leg-foot range of motion, osteotomy wedge height, time to full weightbearing, and possible postoperative complications. Leg-foot range of motion was measured with a goniometer applied along the lateral border of the leg and foot. These clinical assessments were conducted preoperatively, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. In the present study, the preoperative and most recent follow-up clinical outcome variables were compared.
Weightbearing anteroposterior, lateral, and HA radiographs were obtained in each case, and all ankles exhibited joint space obliteration with partial or complete tibiotalar contact. The severity of ankle osteoarthritis was assessed with the Takakura–Tanaka classification system , . Arthritic changes in the subtalar joint were assessed with the Morrey–Wiedeman classification, graded as zero (normal ankle), one (small osteophytes and minimal joint narrowing), two (moderate osteophytes and moderate joint narrowing), and three (significant joint narrowing with joint deformation or fusion) . Further, multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance images were used to aid preoperative assessment of the subtalar joint ( Fig. 1 ). We believe that patients with preoperative Grade 3 arthritis may be beyond the limits of this subtalar joint–sparing procedure. The radiographic outcome variables included tibial anterior surface (TAS) angle, talar tilt (TT) angle, and medial talar center migration (MTCM) in weightbearing anteroposterior radiograph; tibial lateral surface (TLS) angle, talo-first metatarsal (TMT) angle, calcaneal pitch (CP) angle, and anterior talar center migration (ATCM) in weightbearing lateral radiograph. HA angle and hindfoot moment arm (HMA) were measured on the HA radiograph and were represented as positive numbers in varus-oriented hindfoot , . HA angle of ≥ 15° is considered a large varus deformity of the ankle/hindfoot. These radiographic assessments were conducted preoperatively, monthly postoperatively before bone union confirmation, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. The most recent follow-up radiographs were analyzed for preoperative ankle/hindfoot deformity correction. As a special exception, preoperative Morrey–Wiedeman grade assessment and postoperative MTCM and ATCM measurements were conducted 1–2 months after SMO/AA for more accuracy and certitude ( Fig. 2 ). Rapideye Core software (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) was employed as the image measurement device. The absence of local pain during ambulation indicates a clinically successful bone union and the presence of bridging bone across the operative site and intact osteosynthesis material denotes radiographical success. Delayed union is a bone union time of > 6 months, whereas nonunion is a bone union time of > 9 months . To avoid potential bias, an independent observer (Y.S.), who was blinded to the study objects, performed all clinical and radiographical assessments.
Coronal (A) T1-weighted and (B) T2-weighted magnetic resonance images, and (C) computed tomography scan showing end-stage ankle arthritis with a large varus deformity. Note the relatively undamaged subtalar joint.
(A) Anteroposterior, (B) lateral, and (C) hindfoot alignment radiographs demonstrating radiographic variables. Hindfoot alignment angle and hindfoot moment arm are presented as positive numbers when the hindfoot is varus-oriented. Abbreviations: MTCM: medial talar center migration; TMT: talo-first metatarsal (angle); CP: calcaneal pitch (angle); ATCM: anterior talar center migration; HA: hindfoot alignment (angle); HMA: hindfoot moment arm.
2.3
Operative technique
The previously described operative technique was modified . Surgery was performed with the patient under general anesthesia, and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia was administered for postoperative pain control. The patient was placed in the lateral decubitus position, with a pneumatic tourniquet applied to the thigh. The surgeon stood on the dorsal side and the fluoroscopy unit was positioned on the ventral side of the patient. A 10-cm longitudinal incision was created along the fibula from the tip of the lateral malleolus. An oscillating saw was used to remove an 8-cm section of the distal fibula for a bone graft. The anterior and posterior capsules were arthrotomized, and the joint was exposed with a small pin-based distractor. The articular cartilage was removed utilizing a metal cutting burr and curettage, and multiple holes were drilled using a diamond burr while irrigating frequently to prevent thermal necrosis. During AA, we tried to improve bone fusion by increasing the contact area between the tibia and talus, rather than correcting varus deformity. Coronal plane deformity was mainly corrected at the osteotomy site, whereas sagittal and transverse plane deformities were mainly corrected at the arthrodesis site. An autogenous cancellous bone graft from the resected fibula was packed into the arthrodesis site. A 3.0-mm Kirschner wire (K-wire) was inserted via the plantar aspect of the calcaneus, passing through the talus, and into the tibia, for temporal fixation.
The hemiwedge SMO aimed to correct the varus angulation in the coronal plane and, thus, obtain a parallel ankle joint line (i.e., TAS angle of 90°). Under fluoroscopy, the first proximal 2.0-mm K-wire was inserted obliquely, 2.5 cm above the ankle joint, while leaving space to accommodate the arthrodesis and osteotomy sites for plate fixation. The hinge point was identified by dividing the proximal osteotomy line by approximately 2–1 from lateral to medial. Our goal is a TAS angle of 90°. The distal osteotomy line was determined with a goniometer according to the preoperative planning, and the second distal 2.0-mm K-wire was inserted ( Fig. 3 A). A lateral-based bone wedge was removed with an oscillating saw and thin chisels, and the proximal osteotomy was completed ( Fig. 3 B). The osteotomy gap was then closed, and a 3.0-mm K-wire was advanced proximally to the osteotomy site. A single lateral locking plate was applied to secure both osteotomy and arthrodesis sites ( Fig. 3 C). TomoFix anatomical plate (for the ipsilateral side; DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA) was employed to treat 12 ankles, and Lateral Tibiotalar Fusion Plate (Arthrex, Naples, Florida) was applied to 3 ankles in this study. Proper ankle alignment and plate position were confirmed with intraoperative radiographs ( Fig. 3 D). Four locking screws were inserted proximal to the osteotomy, and three screws were inserted into the talus to stabilize the plate ( Fig. 4 ). A closed suction drain was placed on the plate and removed the following day. The lateral malleolus periosteum was sutured to cover the plate, and the soft tissues were restored.
(A) Intraoperative radiographs demonstrating the first proximal 2.0-mm Kirschner wire (K-wire) inserted obliquely 2.5 cm above the ankle joint while leaving a space to accommodate the arthrodesis and osteotomy sites for plate fixation. The hinge point was identified by dividing the proximal osteotomy line by approximately 2–1 from lateral to medial. The distal osteotomy line was determined with a goniometer according to the preoperative planning, and the second distal K-wire was inserted. (B) A lateral-based bone wedge was removed with an oscillating saw and thin chisels, and the proximal osteotomy was completed. (C) The osteotomy gap was closed, and a 3.0-mm K-wire was advanced proximally to the osteotomy site. Both the osteotomy and arthrodesis sites were secured with a single lateral locking plate. (D) Proper alignment of the ankle and plate position was confirmed with intraoperative radiographs.
Intraoperative photograph demonstrating four locking screws inserted proximal to the osteotomy and three screws inserted into the talus to stabilize the plate. Note the osteotomy site (arrow) and the arthrodesis site (arrowhead).
2.4
Postoperative management
The patient’s leg was immobilized using a nonweightbearing short cast for 4 weeks postoperatively. Subsequently, they initiated progressively increased weightbearing in a fracture boot for another 2 weeks. Full-weight double-crutch walking was frequently permitted as tolerated after 6 weeks. The fracture boot was removed and stair exercises with a small cane were prescribed after 15 weeks. The patients resumed normal activities with regular shoes approximately 4 months postoperatively.
2.5
Statistical analysis
Nonparametric statistics were used because of the small number of patients and skewed distribution of most variables. Statistical analysis of the descriptive data was conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with a p-value of < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Statcel5 package (OMS Publishing Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used for raw data analysis.
3
Results
Of the 14 patients, 13 (14 ankles) achieved uneventful bone union. Further, all patients (15 ankles) experienced pain relief and walking ability improvement after SMO/AA. The mean osteotomy wedge height was 7.0 (5–9) mm. The mean time to full weightbearing and bone union was 8.4 (6–12) weeks and 11.7 (7–27) weeks, respectively. The mean preoperative plantar and dorsiflexion range of motion were 49.6° (30–65°) and 13.9° (− 10° to 35°) and, at the most recent follow-up, were 28.5° (15–40°) and 4.6° (0–10°), respectively. Leg-foot range of motion was decreased in all 15 ankles.
The mean VAS and JSSF scores were 7.3 (5.9–9.5) and 51.9 (29–67) preoperatively and improved to 1.4 (0–3.6) and 82.2 (70–94) postoperatively, respectively, (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The mean SAFE-Q scores for pain and pain-related, physical functioning and daily living, social functioning, shoe-related, and general health and wellbeing subscales were 37.0 (11.5–59.8), 40.7 (13.6–65.9), 32.0 (0–58.3), 36.2 (0–66.6), and 23.2 (0–75) preoperatively and improved to 84.3 (67.7–100), 73.5 (45.4–90.9), 80.2 (45.8–100), 83.3 (58.3–100), and 75.4 (35–100) postoperatively, respectively (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) ( Table 1 ).
Table 1
Clinical outcome variables (n = 15 ankles in 14 patients).
| Preoperative (Mean±SD) | Follow-up (Mean±SD) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAS score | 7.3 ± 0.9 | 1.4 ± 1.1 | < 0.001 |
| JSSF ankle/hindfoot scale score | 51.9 ± 9.5 | 82.2 ± 7.8 | < 0.001 |
| SAFE-Q subscale scores | |||
| Pain and pain-related | 37.0 ± 16.0 | 84.3 ± 11.3 | < 0.001 |
| Physical functioning and daily living | 40.7 ± 18.2 | 73.5 ± 15.1 | < 0.001 |
| Social functioning | 32.0 ± 21.6 | 80.2 ± 18.5 | < 0.001 |
| Shoe-related | 36.2 ± 24.8 | 83.3 ± 15.3 | < 0.001 |
| General health and well-being | 23.2 ± 23.9 | 75.4 ± 21.0 | < 0.001 |
Abbreviations: SD: standard deviation; VAS: visual analog scale; JSSF: Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot; SAFE-Q: Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree





