Closed Reduction and External Fixation of Femoral Shaft Fractures



Closed Reduction and External Fixation of Femoral Shaft Fractures


Afamefuna M. Nduaguba

John M. Flynn





ANATOMY



  • Muscular deforming forces, if severe, increase the need for surgical fixation. In proximal and midshaft femoral shaft fractures, the proximal fragment tends to be forced into abduction and external rotation. This is more significant in proximal fractures than in midshaft fractures.


  • Fractures of the distal third of the femoral shaft tend not to deform greatly, whereas supracondylar femoral fractures are often forced into apex posterior angulation.


PATHOGENESIS



  • In toddlers, these injuries tend to be low energy and occur during normal activity. In adolescents, they tend to be higher energy injuries that may result from motor vehicle, biking, or high-speed sporting accidents.


  • Abuse should be considered in the infant or toddler with a femur fracture, especially if the child is nonambulatory.


PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL FINDINGS



  • In an unconscious patient or a patient with an insensate lower extremity, deformity, erythema, crepitance, and swelling might indicate the presence of a femoral fracture.


  • If child abuse is suspected, a skeletal survey should be obtained and Child Protective Services should be notified. Infants are more likely than toddlers to be the victims of child abuse in the setting of a femoral fracture.


IMAGING AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES



  • Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of pelvis and femur are obtained. The hip and knee should be visualized as well to evaluate for possible associated injuries (FIG 1).


  • Radiographs should be evaluated for fracture pattern, location, displacement, angulation, and shortening.


SURGICAL MANAGEMENT



  • Operative management of femoral shaft fractures should be considered in any femur fracture in a child older than 5 years of age. In younger children, polytrauma, head injury, high-energy trauma, open fracture, severe comminution, or body habitus incompatible with spica cast care are relative indications for operative management.


  • Surgical options include flexible nailing, plating, rigid intramedullary nailing, and external fixation.


  • Indications specifically for external fixation include polytrauma, concomitant head injury, open fracture with severe soft tissue damage or contamination, severe comminution, and very proximal subtrochanteric or distal fractures at the diaphyseal-metaphyseal junction.


  • Midshaft transverse fractures are at a higher risk of refracture when treated with external fixation compared to other methods of stabilization.


PREOPERATIVE PLANNING



  • The surgeon should determine where pins will be placed before surgery.


  • In each fragment, there must be at least 2 cm of intervening bone between the physis and the outermost pin and at least 2 cm between the fracture and the innermost pin.


  • The appropriate pin size varies according to the device. The AO/Synthes device guide recommends 4.0-mm Schanz screws be used, whereas the EBI device guide recommends screws not larger than one-third of the bone diameter.


Positioning



  • The patient should be placed on either a radiolucent operating table or a fracture table. The latter is useful if preoperative reduction is desired.






FIG 1 • Preoperative radiograph of a 12-year-old boy who sustained a distal femoral shaft fracture.



Jul 22, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Closed Reduction and External Fixation of Femoral Shaft Fractures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access