Chapter 19 – Anatomy and surgical approaches




Abstract




It is important to spend time learning surgical approaches and anatomy. At least two questions in the exam will be drawn from these areas in either the trauma and/or basic science vivas. Anatomy is fairly straightforward for the FRCS(Tr & Orth), either it’s learnt and known well for the exam, allowing candidates to score easy marks, or it hasn’t been learnt and the viva quickly unfolds, losing scoring opportunities for the candidate. The skill is anticipating which questions are more likely to appear in the exam than others and adjusting your revision time accordingly to take this into account.





Chapter 19 Anatomy and surgical approaches


Tom Symes and Kiran Singisetti



Introduction




It is important to spend time learning surgical approaches and anatomy. At least two questions in the exam will be drawn from these areas in either the trauma and/or basic science vivas. Anatomy is fairly straightforward for the FRCS(Tr & Orth), either it’s learnt and known well for the exam, allowing candidates to score easy marks, or it hasn’t been learnt and the viva quickly unfolds, losing scoring opportunities for the candidate. The skill is anticipating which questions are more likely to appear in the exam than others and adjusting your revision time accordingly to take this into account.

If candidates are not expecting to be questioned in any great detail on basic anatomy, then it will become quite difficult as anatomy for most purposes just needs to be known.



The WHO Safer Surgery checklist has to be known. This has become important for patient safety and the prevention of system failure.


Structured oral examination question 1



Approach to hip for total hip arthroplasty


The candidate is shown a radiograph of THA (Figure 19.1a).





Figure 19.1a Anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiograph demonstrating cemented right Exeter THA.



EXAMINER: What approach do you use for THA?



CANDIDATE: The posterior approach to the hip joint.



COMMENT: This is probably the most common approach you will be asked to describe. You could mention any of the hip approaches, but the most common approaches used in the UK are the posterior and the anterolateral (Hardinge).


Talk about the approach that you know and use routinely. If you try to describe something that you have only read in a book, you will probably struggle to explain the details, including any technical tips or how to enlarge the approach. Read up on your favoured approach beforehand, especially the neurovascular intervals and structures at risk.



EXAMINER: What approach would you use for a THA operation done for fracture neck of femur?



CANDIDATE: The posterior approach. I am aware that many surgeons use an anterolateral approach for this indication to reduce the risk of dislocation. The NICE guidance for hemiarthroplasty prefers an anterolateral over a posterior approach, but no such differentiation is suggested with THA. I would use a posterior approach in this situation, as this is the approach I am more familiar with using in THA.



COMMENT: Candidates should be able to describe some rationale in using their preferred approach for the procedure.



EXAMINER: Describe the approach from skin, fat, fascia, bursa, and muscular interval if relevant to the joint.



CANDIDATE:


Posterior




Position: Lateral decubitus. Supports placed anteriorly over ASIS, and posteriorly over the sacrum.


Landmarks: Greater trochanter.


Incision: The skin incision is 15–20 cm centred over the posterior aspect of the greater trochanter, curving posteriorly.


Superficial dissection: Incise fat and deep fascia in line with the skin incision. Insert Charnley retractors under the fascia/tensor muscle to allow visualization of the posterior aspect of the hip and trochanter.


Deep dissection: Sweep fat of the short external rotators (ER) at the posterior aspect of the hip joint. Identify and tag the piriformis tendon, which can be difficult to identify if flimsy. Divide the piriformis, gemelli obturator tendons and quadratus femoris muscle off the trochanter from just below the trochanteric ridge. Release of the gluteus maximus insertion distally into the linea aspera may be necessary when greater mobilization of the femur is required, such as complex primary, resurfacing and revision. Consider partial release in unfavourable primary THA situations such as large BMI, inexperienced scrub assistant or during the surgery learning curve. Divide the capsule, dislocate the femoral head posteriorly. Excise the femoral head using a saw. Place a large retractor at the anterior edge of acetabulum at 2–3 o’clock rim, releasing incision inferior capsule, place Charnley spike or Judd pin posterior to the acetabular wall and an additional retractor inferiorly (Hohmann) just below the transverse acetabular ligament to overall give a 360° view/exposure of the acetabulum.


EXAMINER: Some surgeons do not routinely detach the piriformis.



CANDIDATE: I generally do so unless I am particularly worried about instability – but I would go anterolaterally if this was the case.



COMMENT: Candidates may be asked origins/insertions and nerve supply of the short external rotator muscles hip.





Figure 19.1b Skin incision for posterior approach hip. Landmarks: greater trochanter. Incision: a curvilinear incision starting 10 cm distal to the PSIS extended distal and laterally parallel to the fibres of the gluteus maximus to the posterior margin of the greater trochanter and then direct the incision 10 cm distally parallel to the femoral shaft. The sciatic nerve enters the lower limb in the gluteal region and passes inferiorly midway between two major palpable bony landmarks: the greater trochanter and the ischial tuberosity.



Lateral (Hardinge)



Position: Lateral decubitus position with supports.


Landmarks: ASIS, GT and femoral shaft.


Incision: Longitudinal midlateral incision centred over the GT tip and distally in line with the femoral shaft.


Internervous plane: No true plane.


Superficial dissection: Incise fat and fascia in line with the skin. The greater trochanter should come into view. The tensor fascia lata is retracted anteriorly and the gluteus maximus posteriorly (Figure 19.1c).


Deep dissection: The gluteus medius is incised, extending from the uppermost end of the ridge of vastus lateralis, curving around the greater trochanter in an omega-shaped incision, until it reaches the apex of the greater trochanter, where it is extended proximally between the fibres of the gluteus medius. Distally the incision is extended into the vastus lateralis in line with its fibres, elevating the anterior third in continuity with the medius tendon.


Avoid taking the dissection too far proximally (injury to the superior gluteal nerve). Perform an H- or inverted T-shaped capsulotomy and then dislocate the femoral head.




Figure 19.1c Skin incision for a lateral approach to the hip (Hardinge). Landmarks: greater trochanter and anterior superior iliac spine. Incision: longitudinal incision centred over the tip of the greater trochanter in the line of the femoral shaft.





Figure 19.1d Omega incision into the gluteus medius tendon. Modified Hardinge approach maintaining two-thirds of the medius and releasing towards the lesser trochanter and not vertically downwards, maintains the medius–lateralis tension band as well as exposes the acetabulum and the femoral shaft necessary for standard THA.



Anterolateral (Watson-Jones approach)


This approach avoids the need to cut the gluteus medius muscle, but involves considerable pulling (traction) on the gluteus medius and TFL muscles and potentially on the superior gluteal nerve. If used for THA it often requires additional division of the gluteus medius and minimus which lie over the anterior capsule for adequate exposure, which may lead to a Trendelenburg gait. This approach is not often used in the UK for primary THA, although a minimally invasive anterolateral approach hip (modified Watson-Jones) using special retractors, patient positioning devices, and offset reamers has gained some popularity recently.



Position: Supine position with a sandbag under the buttock and the buttock hanging slightly over the edge of the table.


Landmarks: ASIS and greater trochanter.


Incision: Incision is started 2 cm posterior and distal to the ASIS. It curves distally and posteriorly to the apex of the greater trochanter to extend longitudinally down about 6 cm distally along the shaft of the femur.


Internervous plane: No true internervous plane as tensor fascia lata and gluteus medius share the same nerve supply (superior gluteal nerve).


Superficial dissection: Subcutaneous tissue and fascia lata are incised in the same line as the skin. The interval between the gluteus medius and the tensor fascia lata is often difficult to delineate. However, it can be found more easily by beginning the separation midway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the greater trochanter before the tensor fascia lata blends with its fascial insertion. The incision is continued proximally along the posterior border of tensor fascia lata and the inferior branch of the superior gluteal nerve innervating the TFL is often seen.


Deep dissection: The tensor fascia with tensor fascia lata is retracted anteriorly and the gluteus medius posteriorly, exposing the fatty tissue covering the anterosuperior aspect of the hip capsule. The vastus lateralis is sometimes needed to be reflected from the proximal femur distal to the greater trochanter.


Structures at risk: Superior gluteal nerve.


Extension of approach: The fibres of the vastus lateralis may be split longitudinally to expose the upper part of the femoral shaft.


EXAMINER: What nerve is at risk in each approach and when?



CANDIDATE: Posterior: sciatic nerve during approach. Femoral nerve during retraction/exposure of the anterior acetabulum. Obturator nerve: during inferior acetabulum retraction.


Lateral: Superior gluteal nerve (3–5 cm above the upper border of the greater trochanter) during the approach through the abductors, femoral nerve, artery and vein (retractors); transverse branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery (as vastus lateralis is mobilized).



EXAMINER: What is the consequence of damage in terms of sensory loss, weakness?



CANDIDATE: Sciatic – most commonly affects peroneal branch; therefore, foot drop and sensory loss dorsum of the foot.


Femoral – weak knee extension and loss of sensation over the medial border of the leg and foot.


Superior gluteal nerve – abductor weakness, Trendelenburg gait.



COMMENT: You must know your peripheral nerve lesions and sensory dermatomes for many different topics, e.g. spinal injuries, ATLS assessment, brachial plexus.



EXAMINER: Which approach is more extensile for revision hip surgery?



CANDIDATE: The posterior.



COMMENT: It is acceptable to mention another approach if you can justify it.



EXAMINER: What manoeuvres can be performed to improve exposure of the acetabulum?



CANDIDATE: Release piriformis, anterior capsule, reflected head of rectus femoris, psoas tendon.



EXAMINER: What manoeuvres can be performed to facilitate removal of cement and/or a femoral stem which are difficult to remove?



CANDIDATE: Extended trochanteric osteotomy.


Trochanteric osteotomy/slide.


Window in femur.



EXAMINER: Describe how you would perform an ETO.



CANDIDATE: Ideally preoperative planning in which the osteotomy length is determined from the tip of the greater trochanter.


I would expose the lateral femur by elevating the vastus lateralis off the linea aspera with due care to identify the perforating vessels. Then mark out the osteotomy line using cautery planning for a posterior to anterior longitudinal cut and a short distal transverse cut. Then two or three osteotomes are used to elevate the osteotomy fragment with a muscular hinge anteriorly. I use a prophylactic cerclage cable distal to the osteotomy site.



EXAMINER: What are your indications for ETO?



CANDIDATE:



  1. 1. Improved exposure during approach.



  2. 2. Removal of femoral cement (especially infection).



  3. 3. Removal of well-fixed uncemented femoral prosthesis.



  4. 4. Removal of cement plug, poor bone stock, high risk of perforation (varus malformation).



  5. 5. Abnormalities of the proximal femur.



Structured oral examination question 2



Approach to the hip for drainage


A radiograph of a child’s hip is shown (Figure 19.2).



EXAMINER: A 5-year-old boy presents to A&E with a 2-day history of fevers, off legs, c/o painful hip and knee. This is his X-ray. After taking a history and examination, what tests would you perform (likelihood of hip sepsis)?



CANDIDATE: FBC, CRP, ESR, USS, MRI.



COMMENT: Hip sepsis in children is a common question at several points in the exam and needs to be known well. There are studies that have produced prediction of the likelihood of septic arthritis depending on blood markers and clinical features. If the viva station is progressing well it should be relatively easy to throw in Kocher’s criteria for a child with a painful hip:




  • Raised CRP.



  • Raised white cell count.



  • Inability to bear weight.



  • Pyrexia.



Four of the criteria are 99% sensitive for septic arthritis; three are 93% sensitive; two are 40% sensitive; and one is 3% sensitive.




Figure 19.2 Radiograph of child’s hip.



Reference

Kocher MS, Zurakowski D, Kasser JR. Differentiating between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children: an evidence-based clinical prediction algorithm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(12):16621670.




EXAMINER: The candidate is presented with test results (increased WBC, CRP, ESR, effusion on X-rays and USS). What is the management?



CANDIDATE: Open washout and drainage.



COMMENT: Some surgeons may argue that you should perform a USS-guided drainage to identify pus or a positive culture but the examiners in this situation want you to describe the approach, so will make it a barn door case.



EXAMINER: Which approach is recommended to perform open drainage and washout of a child’s septic hip and why?



CANDIDATE: Anterior (Smith Peterson) because the main blood supply to the femoral head is posterior.



COMMENT: You must know this approach for the basic science and also the paeds viva.



EXAMINER: Describe the layers and nerve supply.



CANDIDATE: Supine position.


Incision (use part of this) following anterior half of iliac crest to ASIS then curved down vertically 4–5 cm towards lateral side of patella.


Externally rotate the leg, identify the gap between the sartorius (femoral nerve) and the tensor fascia lata (superior gluteal nerve) about 5 cm below the ASIS, avoid the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve which pierces the deep fascia near the interval, incise the fascia medial to the TFL and retract it downwards and laterally, retract the sartorius upward and medially.


Ligate the ascending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery (which crosses the gap between the sartorius and tensor fascia lata), then develop the plane between the rectus femoris (femoral nerve) and the gluteus medius (superior gluteal nerve). Detach the two origins of the rectus femoris (AIIS and superior lip of acetabulum), retract the rectus femoris and the iliopsoas medially and the gluteus medius laterally to expose the hip capsule, capsulotomy (longitudinal or T-shaped) and then wash out the hip joint.



COMMENT: This is a pass–fail question and must be known.



Structured oral examination question 3



Henry’s/anterior approach to arm




EXAMINER: Describe this radiograph (Figure 19.3).



CANDIDATE: It is an X-ray of the right forearm of an adult. There are transverse fractures of the mid shaft of both radius and ulna. They are completely displaced.



COMMENT: You must be able to quickly and concisely describe a fracture as if you were talking to your consultant on the end of a phone and so he can easily imagine the fracture pattern.



EXAMINER: How would you describe the displacement concisely?



CANDIDATE: They are off-ended.



EXAMINER: What is the generally accepted surgical treatment for this injury?



CANDIDATE: Plating of both bones with dynamic compression plates.



EXAMINER: If you were to approach the fractured radius anteriorly, how would you do it?



COMMENT: The anterior approach to the radius was first described by Henry and his name is usually associated with it. Henry’s approach can be divided into a proximal internervous plane between the brachioradialis muscle (radial nerve) and the pronator teres (median nerve) or a distal approach between brachioradialis (radial nerve) and the flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR) (median nerve). The internervous planes are the same throughout the forearm, but the muscles encountered are different proximally and distally.


The deep surgical dissection is divided into thirds (proximal, middle and distal third).



CANDIDATE: Landmarks: Biceps tendon, brachioradialis (part of the mobile wad), lateral epicondyle of humerus and styloid process of radius.


Incision: Incise the skin over the FCR aiming towards the biceps insertion. Develop the plane between the brachioradialis (radial nerve) and the FCR (median nerve) distally and retract the FPL.


I would approach the distal radius through the bed of the FCR. The sheath of FCR is incised and the tendon freed and retracted in an ulnar direction to protect the median nerve. Next, the floor of the FCR sheath is incised. Directly beneath the sheath is the belly of the flexor pollicis longus (FPL). The muscle is bluntly swept to the side to expose the deep fibres of the pronator quadratus. The radial portion of the pronator quadratus is incised and dissected off the distal radius using a combination of sharp dissection and a periosteal elevator with an L-type incision. A small cuff of tissue is left for later repair. Often there is partial disruption by the fracture fragments in high-energy injuries.



COMMENT: The candidate for whatever reason has described the anterior volar approach to the distal radius. The radiograph demonstrates a mid-third radius fracture and as such the examiner should have guided the candidate back onto the mid-third radius approach.


The superficial muscular dissection is similar for all three parts of Henry’s anterior approach: the interval between the brachioradialis (mobile wad) and the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle. The radial artery lies deep to the brachioradialis in the middle part of the forearm and between the tendons of the brachioradialis and the FCR distally. It is identified by its two venae comitantes that run alongside it.


The middle third of the radial shaft is covered by the pronator teres (PT) and the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle. The arm is pronated to expose the insertion of the PT onto the lateral radial shaft. The insertion is detached, and the muscle stripped off in an ulnar direction, which also detaches the origin of the FDS.



EXAMINER: How would you position the patient?



CANDIDATE: I would position the patient supine with an arm board and upper arm tourniquet. I would elevate the arm but not exsanguinate it so as to keep the veins engorged. This helps with identification of the venae comitantes of the radial artery. I would perform a surgical time-out before inflating the tourniquet, undertaking skin preparation and draping.



COMMENT: Go through a set standard routine for each approach. This question is about how you set the patient up for surgery. Ideally, the candidate should have initially mentioned this.



EXAMINER: What do you mean by a surgical time-out?



CANDIDATE: This is the final step before the start of the surgical procedure where the patient, surgical procedure and side/site are reviewed by the surgical team.



COMMENT: This is a classic approach and anecdotally candidates have been failed for not knowing it! Some approaches have quirks or peculiarities, and this is one of them – the need to change the position of the limb depending on the fracture location.


Try to have a mental picture of the origins and insertions on the radius from proximal to distal when describing this approach.



EXAMINER: How would you extend the exposure proximally?



CANDIDATE: This approach can be extended across the elbow into an anterolateral approach to the humerus, but this is rarely required.



EXAMINER: How would you extend the exposure distally?



CANDIDATE: The approach can be extended distally into the wrist with a carpal tunnel-type incision.



EXAMINER: What are the structures at risk (SAR)?



CANDIDATE: PIN: this travels through the body of supinator and can be damaged when exposing the proximal third of the radial shaft. Fully supinate the forearm when dissecting the supinator muscle off the radius as this moves the PIN away from the operative field. A subperiosteal dissection stripping the muscle from bone rather than splitting the muscle thereby leaving the PIN in the substance of the muscle. Ensure full supination and avoid using a retractor on the posterior radial neck to avoid potential injury.


Superficial radial nerve (SRN): this runs down the forearm underneath the brachioradialis muscle. It is vulnerable when the mobile wad of three is mobilized and retracted laterally. The nerve can be damaged with vigorous retraction. The SRN is notorious in developing a painful neuroma second to innocuous injury.


Radial artery: runs down the middle of the forearm under brachioradialis. A leash of vessels from the radial artery supply the brachioradialis and they need to be ligated in order to mobilize the brachioradialis. The radial artery is vulnerable during mobilization of the brachioradialis and is often retracted medially to expose the deeper muscular layers.





Figure 19.3a Forearm fracture.





Figure 19.3b Anterior approach to the radius. Landmarks: biceps tendon, brachioradialis, lateral epicondyle humerus and styloid process of radius. Incision: a longitudinal incision from the elbow flexor crease lateral to the biceps tendon down to the radial styloid.





Figure 19.3c Anterior approach to the radius. How to enlarge the approach proximally and distally.



For score 7/8



EXAMINER: What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of a volar compared to a dorsal approach to the radius?



CANDIDATE: While a volar approach is the standard and preferred method for a fracture of the distal half of the radius, the approach for its proximal half is controversial.


Henry’s anterior approach to the radius is an extensile approach and offers full exposure of the radial shaft if required. As mentioned, the structures at risk in this approach include the PIN, radial artery, superficial radial nerve, lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm and recurrent leash of Henry.


In the dorsal approach, access to the bone is easier and the posterior or tension surface of the bone is in full view. The plate is applied to the tension dorsal side of the radius, which is biomechanically more favourable. The PIN is more vulnerable to injury in this approach, but injury to the nerve can occur whatever approach is used, and great care is needed during surgical dissection of the supinator muscle.


Plating on the anterior surface may cause impingement on the bicipital tuberosity and the biceps tendon.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 7, 2020 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Chapter 19 – Anatomy and surgical approaches

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access