Biologics for Intervertebral Disk Regeneration and Repair




Chapter Preview















  • Chapter Synopsis




  • Neck and low back pain is common, and intervertebral disk degeneration is thought to be one of the primary sources for pain generation. Although therapeutic techniques including surgical and non-surgical modalities have been applied, current therapies for disk degeneration may address symptoms but do not restore structure and function. In this chapter, we will review the advancement of biologic therapeutic options for disk degeneration.




  • Important Points




  • Animal models used for disk degeneration can be placed into three major groups: mechanical compression model, annular injury model, and environmental model.



  • Treatment strategies differ in different stages of degeneration.



  • Growth factors, cells, and scaffolds are the major elements in disk tissue engineering and regeneration.



  • Whole disk replacement is a promising approach for biologic disk replacement.



  • Despite the advancement in preclinical settings, there is still a long way to clinical application.



Low back and neck pain is ubiquitous and is a prevalent disabler of persons of working age. In fact, more than 100 million work days are lost for this reason every year in the United States, second only behind the common cold. Current treatment for axial pain and intervertebral disk (IVD) degeneration is dominated by symptomatic care such as activity modification, physical therapy, and oral medications. When symptoms are recalcitrant to conservative measures, surgery may be considered. At this time nearly all surgical treatment for predominantly diskogenic axial pain involves removal of the diseased disk, followed by either fusion or metallic disk replacement. No clinically available medical, biologic, or cellular-based treatment is available to slow, halt, or reverse disk degeneration.


IVD degeneration is characterized by a progressive alteration in the mechanical properties, cellular numbers and composition, nutrition, and metabolic profile. Currently, most biologic strategies for treatment of IVD degeneration are centered on one or more of these aspects of the degenerative cascade. Techniques studied have included augmenting trophic factors either by introduction of growth factors or gene-based therapy to transfect native cells to upregulate growth factor production. This chapter reviews the animal models and advances made in the biologic therapeutic options for disk degeneration.




Animal Models


The study of any intervention for a human disease often requires the development and validation of an animal model equivalent. Several models currently exist, although most can be placed into three major groups: mechanical compression model, annular injury model, and environmental model.


Mechanical Compression Model


Repetitive supraphysiologic mechanical stress has been suggested as a promoter of IVD degeneration. Studies of truck drivers suggested an increased rate of IVD degeneration. Lotz and colleagues devised an animal model of IVD degeneration by placing a static compressive load across a mobile tail segment in a mouse and demonstrated “number of harmful responses in a dose-dependent way: disorganization of the an[n]ulus fibrosus; an increase in apoptosis and associated loss of cellularity; and down regulation of collagen II and aggrecan gene expression.” Another group used a custom-made external loading device to compress rabbit IVD to yield histologic and radiographic evidence of degeneration. This degeneration was not reversible when the compression was removed for 28 days.


Annular Injury Model


Annular injury that initiates the degenerative cascade is a well-known clinical entity. Research has even suggested that a misplaced needle for anterior cervical level confirmation can lead to iatrogenic degeneration. One of the most widely used animal models for disk degeneration is an annular stab model. Sobajima and associates characterized a rabbit model using a 16-gauge needle puncture of the annulus fibrosus (AF) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plain radiographs, histology, and molecular composition. This technique has been adapted to use a percutaneous, minimally invasive stab model with computed tomography (CT) guidance, thus eliminating a formal surgical approach. A more recent study used a similar approach but with the annular injury provided by diode laser. A similar rate of degeneration was seen compared with needle puncture. Despite their widespread use in basic science and translational research, the annular injury model has been criticized as perhaps not truly reflecting age-related IVD degeneration, and it may more accurately represent posttraumatic disk degeneration.


Environmental Model


Many studies have linked smoking to accelerated rates of IVD degeneration. One study demonstrated that mice exposed to long-term cigarette smoke demonstrate IVD degeneration. This may be a useful model to better understand the pathways linking smoking to IVD degeneration.




Different Treatment Strategies for Different Stages of Disk Degeneration


Different stages of disk degeneration will likely require different treatment strategies. In the early stages of disk degeneration, cells in the nucleus pulposus (NP) area are still abundant. Therefore, a non–cell-based treatment option, such as in vivo gene transfer or growth factor injection targeted at NP regeneration using minimally invasive techniques, may be the most suitable strategy for targeting early disk degeneration.


However, for moderate disk degeneration, most functional NP cells, the target of gene therapy, have already disappeared, so only gene delivery or growth factor injection is insufficient. Thus, ex vivo gene approach or NP tissue engineering will be better for the intermediate stages of disk degeneration.


In the end stages of degeneration, the disk may be virtually nonexistent and replaced with a thin mass of fibrous tissue. Therefore, a tissue-engineered AF, or whole disk, or artificial disk will be needed ( Fig. 47-1 ).




FIGURE 47-1


Three major areas for possible therapeutic intervention in intervertebral disk tissue regeneration and repair. AF, Annulus fibrosus; NP, nucleus pulposus.


Interventions


The IVD regeneration and repair technology has been developed in three major areas: appliance of growth factors, characterization and use of stem cells, and the development of novel, degradable biomaterials.


Growth Factors


One of the hallmarks of disk generation is the imbalance of the catabolic and anabolic metabolism of extracellular matrix. Thus, scientists are targeting the production of extracellular matrix of disk cells and decreasing the degradation of matrix with growth factors and inhibitors of matrix degrading enzymes. Numerous studies have demonstrated that various growth factors promote disk cell proliferation and glycosaminoglycan synthesis, such as growth differentiation factor-5 (GDF5, also named BMP-14), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) ( Table 47-1 ).



Table 47-1

Growth Factors Used for Disk Repair




























































Molecular Method Outcome
BMP-2 Gene and protein therapy Increase proteoglycan and collagen production, delay degeneration process
BMP-7 Gene and protein therapy Increase cell proliferation and proteoglycan synthesis; Restore disk structure and biomechanical function
GDF5 Gene and protein therapy Increase proteoglycan and collagen synthesis, restore disk height and delay degeneration process
IGF-1 Protein and gene therapy Enhance proteoglycan synthesis, increase cell proliferation and anti-apoptotic effects; preserve degenerated disk
PDGF Protein therapy Increase cell proliferation
TGF-β1 Gene and protein therapy Increase cell proliferation and proteoglycan production in vitro and in vivo
bFGF Protein therapy Increase cell proliferation
Proteinase inhibitor TIMP-1 Gene therapy Increase proteoglycan synthesis of human degenerated disk cells; delay degeneration changes in rabbits
Sox 9 Gene therapy Increase collagen in human degenerated disk cells; main rabbit disk cell chondrocyte phenotype and architecture of the NP
Lim mineralization protein-1 Gene therapy Increases proteoglycan, BMP2, and BMP7 in cultured cells and disk of rabbit with intradiskal injection
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) Protein Increase cell proliferation and matrix production; increase disk height and maintain disk structure
TNF inhibitor Protein Decrease MMPs level
Interleukin-1α receptor Gene and protein therapy Decrease MMP3 and ADAMTS-4 expression

bFGF, Basic fibroblast growth factor; BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; GDF, growth differentiation factor; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; TGF, transforming growth factor; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.


These growth factors can be given by intradiskal injection or delivered with cells or scaffolds. For example, in the cultured disk cells, GDF5 has been shown to promote NP cell proliferation and increase GAG production. Similarly, in a rabbit disk degeneration model, injection of recombinant GDF5 alleviated degenerative progression and restored disk height. Adenovirus GDF5 injection to mice disks increased extracellular protein production and restored disk height and T2-weighted signal in an MRI study ( Fig. 47-2 ).




FIGURE 47-2


Magnetic resonance imaging T2-weighted signal images of the same animal at different time points. The upper arrow points to the location where the disk was injected with Ad-Luc (adenovirus–Luciferase vector), whereas the lower arrow points to the disk injected with Ad-GDF5 (adenovirus–growth differentiation factor-5). When compared with the adjacent intact disks, both the disks lost the bright T2-weighted signal at the second week after injection. However, the signal of the disk injected with Ad-GDF5 began to reappear at 6 weeks and had become clearer at 8 weeks. In contrast, no signs of recovery of the signal were seen in the disk injected with Ad-Luc.

(From Liang H, Ma SY, Feng G, et al.: Therapeutic effects of adenovirus-mediated growth and differentiation factor-5 in a mice disc degeneration model induced by annulus needle puncture, Spine J 10:32-41, 2010.)


BMP-7 has also been shown to have a similar function. Indeed, GDF5 and BMP-7 have been approved for a phase I clinical trial of intra-disk injection. The combination of several growth factors can synergistically stimulate matrix synthesis in the disk. In a pilot clinical study, a “cocktail solution” comprising a mixture of agents known to induce the synthesis of proteoglycan was injected into the lumbar disks of 30 patients with chronic low back pain. The evidence clearly showed that growth factors alter the degenerative process in the disk. The response of NP and AF cells may differ in response to growth factors; therefore, optimized combinations of growth factors may be needed for individual patients, depending on cells or metabolic pathways. However, some of these growth factors not only stimulate chondrogenic response but also induce osteogenesis. For example, BMP-2, BMP-7, GDF5, and TGF-β have been shown to have osteogenic properties.


Other proteins such as inhibitors of matrix degrading enzyme or inflammatory cytokines have also been investigated for the disk degeneration. The injection of recombinant interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist reversed disk degeneration and restored disk height by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and antibody have shown promising results as well. The N terminal peptide of Link protein was shown to halt and reverse some of the degeneration in a rabbit disk injury model. Gene therapy methods have also been used to deliver growth factors or inhibitors to the disk space for constant endogenous production and release of the molecules.


Cells


The use of proteins or gene transfer approaches is based on the assumption that enough viable disk cells are available; thus, the protein treatments are not suitable for the moderate stage of disk degeneration, in which the numbers of disk cells that can respond to growth factor and produce matrix are greatly diminished. Three major cell sources have been investigated: autologous disk cells, articular chondrocytes, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) ( Table 47-2 ). Autologous disk cell transplantation demonstrated promising results in rabbit, sand rat, and canine models. In a randomized, multicenter clinical trial, the EuroDisc study, interim 2-year analysis showed safe application and a decreased sum score and disability index in 14 patients who received disk chondrocyte transplantation. However, obtaining the “healthy” disk cells is a challenge, and the survivability of disk cells in the disk tissue is questionable.


Jul 9, 2019 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Biologics for Intervertebral Disk Regeneration and Repair

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access