Assessment of Neuromuscular Conditions Using Ultrasound




Upper extremity pain in persons with spinal cord injury is a common cause of morbidity. Ultrasound of nerve, muscle, and tendon has the potential to become a valuable modality in assessing this population, and has the advantage of reduced health care costs, portability, and use in populations that cannot tolerate MRI. It has the potential to detect issues before the onset of significant morbidity, and preserve patient independence. Upper extremity ultrasound already has many studies showing its utility in diagnosis, and newer techniques have the potential to enhance its use in the diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal conditions.


Key points








  • Pain is commonly reported in persons with spinal cord injury.



  • Ultrasound is inexpensive, portable, and accessible.



  • Ultrasound has been shown to be a useful imaging modality for nerve, muscle, and tendons in the able-bodied population.



  • Ultrasound has been used to assess for changes in the spinal cord–injured population before and after exercise so that early changes can be found and intervention can be preventative.



  • Newer measures, including elastography, have the potential to facilitate diagnosis and allow earlier detection of pathology.






Introduction


No two spinal cord injuries are exactly the same. Not only are there significant differences in those with cervical, thoracic, and lumbar injuries, and complete and incomplete injuries, but there are many individual differences in patients with the same type of injury. Persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI) have reported various musculoskeletal pains that can occur early on or more remotely from the injury. The frequency and risk of certain types of musculoskeletal pain are increased in certain injury levels; up to 73% of persons with an SCI may suffer some form of musculoskeletal pain during their lifetime. Most of the musculoskeletal injuries suffered are nontraumatic in origin, and a result of poor posture and overuse. Therefore, most of these injuries and pain syndromes can be treated medically through rehabilitation, and may even be prevented through education on proper body mechanics, posture, and simple balancing exercises. Here, we outline the scope of the problem, and discuss how, with improvements in technology, ultrasound (US) is changing the way we assess these complaints. We also will address some of the newer data on differences in musculoskeletal structures that can be seen in anatomic structures in the SCI population when compared with the able-bodied population.




Introduction


No two spinal cord injuries are exactly the same. Not only are there significant differences in those with cervical, thoracic, and lumbar injuries, and complete and incomplete injuries, but there are many individual differences in patients with the same type of injury. Persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI) have reported various musculoskeletal pains that can occur early on or more remotely from the injury. The frequency and risk of certain types of musculoskeletal pain are increased in certain injury levels; up to 73% of persons with an SCI may suffer some form of musculoskeletal pain during their lifetime. Most of the musculoskeletal injuries suffered are nontraumatic in origin, and a result of poor posture and overuse. Therefore, most of these injuries and pain syndromes can be treated medically through rehabilitation, and may even be prevented through education on proper body mechanics, posture, and simple balancing exercises. Here, we outline the scope of the problem, and discuss how, with improvements in technology, ultrasound (US) is changing the way we assess these complaints. We also will address some of the newer data on differences in musculoskeletal structures that can be seen in anatomic structures in the SCI population when compared with the able-bodied population.




Nature of the problem


After SCI, the upper extremities (UEs) are often called on to become weight-bearing limbs. This is seen in those who now need to use their arms for transfers, positioning, pressure reliefs, and locomotion. The increased use of the UEs in wheelchair propulsion, transfers, and activities of daily living is believed to increase the incidence of injury to the shoulders, elbows, and wrists. The structures involved include tendons/ligaments, nerves, and joints. Although some of these issues may be acute and short lived, many often progress to chronic problems. In patients with SCI, 69% to 76% report pain in the UEs, most often the shoulders. The incidence of pain in the UE has been well characterized and shows the following:




  • Shoulder pain ranges between 30% and 73%



  • Elbow pain is approximately 32%



  • Wrist and hand pain ranges between 30% and 64%



This is most likely the result of the inability of the person with SCI to rest the affected structure because he or she is now more dependent on the UEs. Chronic injuries can be a significant source of increased disability in this population. Treatments may require time and even surgery. These chronic injuries can interfere with mobility and transfers. As a result, it is important to address these issues as soon as possible.




Possible affected structures


Muscles/Tendons and Joints


Overuse of tendons and ligaments is one of the major issues when the UE becomes a weight-bearing structure. The sheer and effects of gravity can affect multiple structures. These in turn can affect the bones and joints. These overuse musculoskeletal injuries carry a significant morbidity in this population. Any structure in the UE has the potential of being injured with the new demands of transfers, wheelchair propulsion, and pressure releases. These structures may be only mildly injured, as in tendinitis or strains, or more seriously damaged, as in a tear. Although many of these injuries may be self-limited in able-bodied persons, this is less likely the case, as it is more difficult to rest the injured area in the SCI population and an acute tendinitis can develop into a chronic tendinosis. A list of the muscles and tendons commonly affected is seen in Box 1 .



Box 1





  • Shoulder:




    • Rotator cuff tendons



    • Biceps tendon



    • Glenohumeral joint



    • Acromioclavicular joint



    • Subacromial bursa



    • Glenohumeral labrum




  • Elbow:




    • Lateral epicondyle



    • Medial epicondyle



    • Olecranon bursa




  • Wrist/Hand:




    • Wrist flexors



    • Wrist extensors



    • Carpal metacarpal joint



    • Extensor/Abductor pollicis




Structures susceptible to overuse injuries


Nerves


Although we see a significant number of musculoskeletal injuries as mentioned previously, neurologic injuries also play a role in contributing to pain in persons with SCI. These injuries may be difficult to diagnose as a result of their symptoms. Many persons with SCI have residual numbness and tingling, which is a common symptom of early peripheral nerve disease and may, therefore, mask the development of peripheral nerve problems. For instance, persons with C6 or C7 tetraplegia may have hand numbness and tingling at the level of injury, which may mask the early symptoms of either carpal tunnel syndrome or ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Not only are entrapments possible, but, with the increase in diabetes in the population in general, the SCI population is also at risk for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Sites and nerves that may be entrapped or injured in the distal upper extremities include the following:




  • Median nerve




    • Carpal tunnel syndrome



    • Pronator syndrome




  • Ulnar nerve




    • Entrapment at the Guyon canal



    • Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow




  • Radial nerve



  • Other peripheral nerves





Ultrasound


Why Use Ultrasound?


One of the issues in the past in assessing pain in SCI is the ability to assess the structure and find the cause of the pain. Although bones may be easily assessed with radiographs, soft tissue injuries require a different modality. Oftentimes, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography scans are used. These come with significant costs and need to be scheduled. Over the past decade, with the advent of improved technology, US has started to make the move from the radiology suite to the clinic setting in the form of portable US machines. This modality now allows instant assessment of the structures in question and can help guide treatments. Higher-frequency transducers have allowed for better characterization of tendons and nerves, especially in the more shallow structures as seen in the shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Table 1 illustrates the relative cost and advantages of the major imaging modalities.



Table 1

The relationship of cost, accessibility, structures assessed, and advantages of the major imaging modalities


































Diagnostic Modality Structures Visualized Cost Accessibility Advantage/Disadvantage
MRI All structures $$$ Within a week usually


  • Cannot use with pacemaker/defibrillator



  • Often cannot use with loose metal fragments



  • Hard to use in claustrophobia

CT scan Bones and some soft tissues $$ Within a week usually


  • Can use with pacemaker/defibrillators



  • Poor soft tissue visualization

US Tendons, ligaments and nerves $ In the clinic


  • Can use with pacemaker/defibrillators



  • Portable

Radiograph Bone and joints $ Day of clinic visit


  • Does not show soft tissue


Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; US, ultrasound; $, inexpensive; $$, moderately expensive; $$$, expensive.




Studies evaluating structures using US in the SCI population


To date, the studies evaluating tendons and nerves in the SCI population have been few. Some of the studies have been undertaken solely to characterize the tendon structure and develop a quantitative measurement for these structures. The questions that remain to be answered are the following:




  • Are there differences in the nerves and tendons of SCI and able-bodied persons?



  • How are tendons and nerves affected by use?



  • Is there a difference in the response to use between SCI and able-bodied persons?



  • Can we identify those at risk and intervene before there is significant morbidity?



We discuss what has been done in this population and then discuss where the health care industry might be able to maximize the potential of US in this population. There are several studies on US assessment of tendons and nerves in the upper extremities. These studies have focused on the changes that are associated with use in this population.


Study of the Nerves in the SCI Population


In a study comparing sedentary versus wheelchair racers in SCI, the authors found that the racers had fewer nerve injuries overall compared with sedentary wheelchair users; these subjects were assessed with electrodiagnostic testing and not US and suggested that the overall incidence of injuries was low: 3.2% in racers, and 13.6% in sedentary SCI. This is in contrast to the lifetime incidence mentioned earlier in this article. A more recent article found that asymptomatic median neuropathy may even be as high as 25.5% in the paraplegic population. Still, many other studies have found the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome to be between 49% and 73%, and that the prevalence increases with the time elapsed from initial injury.


With this information, researchers have begun to evaluate the median nerve’s reaction to exercise. In one study by Altinok and colleagues, there was an increase in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve at the level of the pisiform, but not at the distal radius in those patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) than in those without, at baseline, before activities. The study also found that differences between the groups were magnified and showed up in other parameters after provocative exercises imitating work-related stresses. Massy-Westropp and colleagues evaluated normal median nerves with exercise and found an increase in CSA after exercise that returned to baseline in 10 minutes. In 2009, Impink and colleagues evaluated the median nerve of paraplegic patients and the response to exercise and found that the nerve responded differently to exercise in those who had symptoms of CTS compared with those who did not have any symptoms. It is therefore likely that these nerves are different at baseline and with short bouts of exercise, but it is not clear what chronic use changes may be seen in this population.


This information may suggest that researchers should start to evaluate the changes in nerves as a result of exercise, not only in those with symptoms, but also to compare those who use manual wheel chairs with able-bodied controls to see if the nerves respond differently over time in a longitudinal study. This might lead to the ability to identify those at risk for future development of nerve injuries after SCI. It also may be important, once the problems are characterized, to develop an intervention that may prevent or reverse the anatomic changes seen on US.


Tendons in the SCI Population


Tendons may change after SCI and the resultant demands placed on them. To understand these changes, it is helpful to understand what adaptations the tendon makes after an SCI. One study in 2006 evaluated tendons below the level of injury in paraplegic patients and able-bodied controls. The findings suggested a decrease in the tendon CSA of the patellar tendon compared with controls. In this study, the tendons of the paraplegic subject underwent electrical stimulation, whereas the able-bodied controls continued their regular recreational activity levels.


There have been several studies attempting to quantitate tendons after exercise. In a study by van Drongelen and colleagues, the biceps tendon CSA and echogenicity were measured before and after a sporting event. They found the echogenicity of the tendon decreased and the size increased. They also found this was directly related to playing time. In one study assessing reliability, they found that the use of one operator was fairly good, but interrater reliability was lacking. They also found that US did not demonstrate changes in tendons, only muscles, after electrical stimulation of lower extremity muscles. Brushoj and colleagues noted that although the CSA may be fairly consistent, the tendon thickness and the thickness measurements were not as reliable.


Another group found the presence of edema in persons with tetraplegia and paraplegia when compared with the able-bodied population. In an attempt to help standardize assessment of tendons in the SCI population, Brose and colleagues developed the US Pathology Rating Scale (USPRS) to quantitate shoulder pathology, and found the changes in the USPRS were related to age, duration of SCI, and weight. Some researchers have advocated a more quantitative set of measures for assessing tendons, but again, the interrater reliability was less than desirable.


The potential future of US in the SCI population


US in the person with SCI has the potential to catch issues early, and allow for adjustment of biomechanics to prevent increased disability. The fact that US machines are becoming more powerful as well as more portable, will allow this tool to be used often and with ease. A patient admitted to the hospital with a new SCI, once stabilized, may then have complaints of shoulder pain, and bedside US may be able to identify a rotator cuff tear or subacromial bursitis, which may interfere with the rehabilitation. This will be a huge advantage, once adopted as standard, to decrease the cost of care in several ways. First, there will be the cost of obtaining an MRI; second, the loss of time to diagnosis (as MRIs may take several days to be performed); and third, treatment on the injury may start earlier, potentially leading to an earlier discharge. At this point in time, the advantages of US in the SCI population have not become common in practice because of several factors. Some of these include that until recently the radiologists have been the only ones able to perform these diagnostic procedures. There are multiple specialty societies who are now offering training for their physicians that in turn will increase the number of those who can perform the procedure. The next step is for standardization of training among different specialties and for the insurance industry to start covering the cost of this when performed by someone other than a radiologist. In addition, the cost of the US machine can still be considerable, and, in the era of cost containment, it may take a while to increase the availability of the US machine in the clinic.




Diagnostic ultrasound


Although the incidence of injury may be higher in the SCI population, the soft tissue evaluation with US is the same as for able-bodied persons. Consensus statements conclude that musculoskeletal US is for detecting joint synovitis, effusions, fluid collections, and evaluating tendon, muscle, and ligament, but is poor at detecting loose bodies. Jamadar and colleagues found that protocols detected nearly all symptomatic abnormalities in the extremities. Only 2.2% of findings from focal examinations were missed by a protocol-based approach. However, focal examination was more likely to detect abnormalities only in distal joints. They recommended combining protocol and focal examinations. Protocols have been developed for consistent evaluation of the UEs, with published descriptions of these evaluations.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 17, 2017 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Assessment of Neuromuscular Conditions Using Ultrasound

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access