Anterolateral Psoas-Sparing Approach to Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
Tony Tannoury
Chadi Tannoury
Spine surgery for degenerative scoliosis is challenging due to the technical difficulties and commonly associated complications. Surgical morbidities are primarily related to the extensive nature of the surgery and the patients’ associated medical and age-related comorbidities. Many authors reported an overall 35% rate of major and minor complications. Similarly, the Scoliosis Research Society data of 5,980 patients found a 10.5% rate of major complications.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Alternative less invasive surgical treatment options such as direct lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (MIS LLIF) is gaining popularity. Early reports were encouraging with a quick learning curve.7, 8, 9, 10 Transpsoas techniques, however, proved to have their own set of complications. These include lumbar plexus injuries (36%), femoral nerve injuries, bowel perforations, kidney laceration, vascular injuries, etc.8,11,12 Additionally with MIS LLIF there is a ceiling effect for deformity correction, and inability to safely reach the L5-S1, and at times L4-L5 levels.13,14 Although accessing the lumbosacral junction is a well-known limitation of transpsoas surgery, appropriately addressing the frequently overlooked L4-S1 pathologies is crucial for successful deformity correction, arthrodesis, and with less risk of hardware failure.15,16 As the transpsoas approach is becoming frequently adopted, it is worrisome to see that L5-S1 (and at times L4-L5) anterior fusions being omitted simply because of the technique’s surgical limitation. From the open literature, the L5-S1 is reportedly involved in about 70% of degenerative conditions; however, it is well underreported in the MIS transpsoas (20%) literature.8 Furthermore, the limited capability of the MIS LLIF to successfully correct moderate to severe adult lumbar deformities has been well reported.13,17
INDICATIONS
Lumbar fusion is indicated in patients with degenerative scoliosis who have failed lengthy conservative treatments. Patients with intractable back pain, radicular or neurogenic claudicatory symptoms, and patients with global sagittal imbalance are offered surgery. Risks and benefits should be clearly stated and discussed with the consenting patients. The open traditional corrective posterior and posterolateral fusion is associated with significant morbidities.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
We firmly believe that any alternative to the standard open technique has to be safe, effective, and reproducible. The senior author has developed a minimally invasive anterolateral technique, anterior to and sparing the psoas muscle. This technique has been implemented in the authors’ practice for at least 10 years and it allows the surgeon to:
Preserve the psoas muscle, and therefore reduce thigh pain and weakness commonly seen following transpsoas fusions.
Avoid lumbar plexus injury.
Directly visualize the segmental and major vessels, and protect them.
Directly visualize the anterior longitudinal ligament and perform a safe anterior column release, necessary for sagittal and coronal deformity correction.
Directly decompress the spinal canal and the foramina.
Safely place interbody cages with careful endplate protection and preparation, with less risk of subsidence.
Safely access the whole lumbar spine between T12-S1 through the same incision.
Contraindications of this technique depend on the surgeons’ learning curve, comfort level, and their familiarity with the retroperitoneal space anatomy. Similar to the standard anterior lumbar fusion, patients with morbid obesity, history of peritonitis, presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm, prior retroperitoneal radiation therapy, and other major retroperitoneal procedures may warrant the consideration of an alternative surgical technique.18,19
POSITIONING
Appropriate positioning is essential for this minimally invasive retroperitoneal approach. The lumbar spine can be approached from either left or right depending on the concavity of the deformity and the levels involved. The patient is placed in a decubitus lateral position with the pelvis and chest perpendicular to the operating table supported by hip positioners (Fig. 30.1). One hip positioner is placed posterior to the pelvis and another anterior to the chest at the sternum-xiphoid level. Additionally, simple taping assures proper and stable patient position.
THE AUTHORS’ RECOMMENDED SURGICAL TECHNIQUE