Ageing, musculoskeletal health and work




Abstract


Changing demographics mean that many patients with soft tissue rheumatism, osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, large joint prostheses and age-related co-morbidities are seeking to work beyond the traditional retirement age. In this chapter, we review the evidence on musculoskeletal health and work at older ages. We conclude that musculoskeletal problems are common in older workers and have a substantial impact on their work capacity. Factors that influence their job retention are described, together with approaches that may extend working life. Many gaps in evidence were found, notably on the health risks and benefits of continued work in affected patients and on which interventions work best. The roles of physicians and managers are also considered.


Introduction


In Europe, the proportion of people aged >65 years is expected by 2050 to represent 30% of the population; worldwide, the support ratio (of adults of working age to those aged >65 and <15 years) is projected to be only one-third of that in 1950 . Therefore, in most countries, an economic imperative exists to encourage people to remain in productive work to older ages. Governments have responded by developing policies to encourage labour force participation in later life by, for example, delaying the age at which people can draw state pension benefits, abolishing the ‘default’ retirement age, and legislating against workplace age and disability discrimination.


The delayed availability of pension benefits as well as improved population health has led to many older individuals recognising the financial need and opportunity to remain in the workforce longer. A steady rise in those working beyond traditional retirement age has been observed .


This changing age profile in employment brings with it potential pros and cons. It is feasible that work at older ages can benefit health ; on the other hand, it may be challenging for those with serious health limitations. In this chapter, we consider the relation between work and health at older ages, focussing particularly on musculoskeletal health, and a number of associated questions:




  • How feasible is work, for those with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)?



  • Is work beneficial for people with chronic MSDs?



  • How limited in employment are affected patients? How often does poor musculoskeletal health prevent their working?



  • What interventions can increase work productivity in people with chronic MSDs?



  • What are the predictors of work disability due to MSDs?



  • Where affected individuals wish to work for longer, or feel they need to, what can be done to support them?



  • What role can health-care professionals and managers play in extending gainful employment?



We first review the pattern of musculoskeletal complaints in later middle age; then consider what is known about their impact on employment; finally, we review potential interventions, including what clinicians can do to support older workers with MSDs. Gaps in research are highlighted.


To inform the review, searches were performed in Medline and Google Scholar, as well as a hand search of recent volumes of two journals of occupational medicine and three journals of rheumatology (details available on request).




The relation of musculoskeletal symptoms and pathology to age


Regional pain


Musculoskeletal symptoms are common in older middle life. In a survey of adults aged ≥50 years from North Staffordshire , back pain in the previous 4 weeks affected about one in three people aged 50–59 years. Similar proportions reported knee or shoulder pain, while a fifth to a quarter reported pains in the hip, neck, distal upper limbs or feet. Almost two-thirds of those affected experienced moderate to extreme interference with their work and household duties.


Age is a major risk factor for prevalent regional pain. Thus, in a random sample of the Dutch population , pain affecting the elbow, hip or foot was about 1.5 times more common in people aged 45–64 years than in those aged 25–44; in the Quebec Health Survey , odds of upper extremity pain causing frequent disturbance in work activity were raised by 1.7–3.4-fold in those aged ≥50 versus 18–24 years; in a survey of over 4000 adults from 16 British general practices , pain lasting for ≥3 months and ‘highly disabling or severely limiting’ affected 10% of 55–64-year-olds but was rare in young adults; and in a sample drawn from 40 British general practices, sciatica was five to eight times more common in people aged 55–65 than in those aged 16–24 years .


For uncomplicated low back pain (LBP), the trend with age is somewhat flatter and less consistent. Many studies have found a moderate age-related rise, peaking and flattening off in the second half of working life; but some have found little relation. In a review of 22 such investigations , <50% had reported a positive association. However, even in LBP, there is a general, if moderate, tendency for disabling effects to become commoner at older ages. In the Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability (CUPID) study , comprising >12,000 workers across 47 occupational groups from 18 countries, disabling LBP was 55% more prevalent at 50–59 than at 20–29 years; and in a British population survey , the 12-month prevalence of troublesome LBP was roughly doubled in a similar age comparison.


The prevalence of disabling pain varies markedly by country and setting, even among workers doing jobs with similar physical exposures. Fig. 1 illustrates the variation, for example, in 1-month prevalence of disabling LBP and wrist/hand pain among 40–59-year-olds from the occupations and countries of the CUPID study . Such variation indicates that report of disability depends importantly on factors other than the work environment (see also Chapter 3).




Fig. 1


The 1-month prevalence of disabling low back and wrist/hand pain by occupational group and country in workers aged 40–59 years from the CUPID study (adapted from Ref. ).


Women are more likely than men to report pain, which they attribute to work, for reasons that have been much debated . The impact of this on work capacity may be growing, as more women work nowadays and most of this growth has been seen in women >50 years of age.


Osteoarthritis


Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) affects ∼2.5–7% of adults aged 45–59 years and ∼7–15% of 60–69-year-olds worldwide . In the UK, the prevalence of knee pain in the over-40s is ∼20–28% , and half of cases have radiographic OA. Cartilage injury, a strong risk factor for knee OA, is fairly common at a population level , while asymptomatic defects in knee cartilage are highly prevalent in middle age .


In a probability sample of the US population, radiographic hip OA was confirmed in 2% of adults aged 55–59, 2.7% of those aged 60–64, and 3.4% of those aged 65–69 . Doctor-diagnosed OA was ∼20 times higher in 55–64-year-olds than in those aged 25–34 years .


Large joint OA is a major cause of disability, a growing proportion of which is borne by people who regard themselves still of working age. Thus, during 2010–2011, 92,000 primary knee joint replacements and 5800 revisions were performed in England and Wales (up over 4 years by 41% and 77%): one-third of replacements occurred in patients aged <65 years ; in Finland, 45% of implants are received by patients <65 years ; and in Denmark, 51% of hip replacements in 2010 took place before age 70 .


Rheumatoid arthritis


Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is far less common than OA, but its prevalence rises steeply with age. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I), doctor-diagnosed disease was 11 times higher in 55–64-year-olds than in 25–34-year-olds , while the incidence in the British Norfolk Arthritis Register was six times higher in this age group than in 15–24-year-olds .


Ankylosing spondylitis


Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is usually thought of as a young person’s disease, but diagnosis is often delayed and symptoms tend to persist into later life. Thus, with suboptimal disease control, vocational handicap becomes more common with age.


Osteoporosis


This disease has rarely been studied in the occupational setting, in token of which our search for this review found no relevant hits on risks of osteoporotic fracture in older workers from manual occupations. Nonetheless, the overall 10-year risk of fracture from age 50 is in the order of 7–10%, reflecting the growing propensity to low-trauma osteoporotic fractures at older ages .




The relation of musculoskeletal symptoms and pathology to age


Regional pain


Musculoskeletal symptoms are common in older middle life. In a survey of adults aged ≥50 years from North Staffordshire , back pain in the previous 4 weeks affected about one in three people aged 50–59 years. Similar proportions reported knee or shoulder pain, while a fifth to a quarter reported pains in the hip, neck, distal upper limbs or feet. Almost two-thirds of those affected experienced moderate to extreme interference with their work and household duties.


Age is a major risk factor for prevalent regional pain. Thus, in a random sample of the Dutch population , pain affecting the elbow, hip or foot was about 1.5 times more common in people aged 45–64 years than in those aged 25–44; in the Quebec Health Survey , odds of upper extremity pain causing frequent disturbance in work activity were raised by 1.7–3.4-fold in those aged ≥50 versus 18–24 years; in a survey of over 4000 adults from 16 British general practices , pain lasting for ≥3 months and ‘highly disabling or severely limiting’ affected 10% of 55–64-year-olds but was rare in young adults; and in a sample drawn from 40 British general practices, sciatica was five to eight times more common in people aged 55–65 than in those aged 16–24 years .


For uncomplicated low back pain (LBP), the trend with age is somewhat flatter and less consistent. Many studies have found a moderate age-related rise, peaking and flattening off in the second half of working life; but some have found little relation. In a review of 22 such investigations , <50% had reported a positive association. However, even in LBP, there is a general, if moderate, tendency for disabling effects to become commoner at older ages. In the Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability (CUPID) study , comprising >12,000 workers across 47 occupational groups from 18 countries, disabling LBP was 55% more prevalent at 50–59 than at 20–29 years; and in a British population survey , the 12-month prevalence of troublesome LBP was roughly doubled in a similar age comparison.


The prevalence of disabling pain varies markedly by country and setting, even among workers doing jobs with similar physical exposures. Fig. 1 illustrates the variation, for example, in 1-month prevalence of disabling LBP and wrist/hand pain among 40–59-year-olds from the occupations and countries of the CUPID study . Such variation indicates that report of disability depends importantly on factors other than the work environment (see also Chapter 3).




Fig. 1


The 1-month prevalence of disabling low back and wrist/hand pain by occupational group and country in workers aged 40–59 years from the CUPID study (adapted from Ref. ).


Women are more likely than men to report pain, which they attribute to work, for reasons that have been much debated . The impact of this on work capacity may be growing, as more women work nowadays and most of this growth has been seen in women >50 years of age.


Osteoarthritis


Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) affects ∼2.5–7% of adults aged 45–59 years and ∼7–15% of 60–69-year-olds worldwide . In the UK, the prevalence of knee pain in the over-40s is ∼20–28% , and half of cases have radiographic OA. Cartilage injury, a strong risk factor for knee OA, is fairly common at a population level , while asymptomatic defects in knee cartilage are highly prevalent in middle age .


In a probability sample of the US population, radiographic hip OA was confirmed in 2% of adults aged 55–59, 2.7% of those aged 60–64, and 3.4% of those aged 65–69 . Doctor-diagnosed OA was ∼20 times higher in 55–64-year-olds than in those aged 25–34 years .


Large joint OA is a major cause of disability, a growing proportion of which is borne by people who regard themselves still of working age. Thus, during 2010–2011, 92,000 primary knee joint replacements and 5800 revisions were performed in England and Wales (up over 4 years by 41% and 77%): one-third of replacements occurred in patients aged <65 years ; in Finland, 45% of implants are received by patients <65 years ; and in Denmark, 51% of hip replacements in 2010 took place before age 70 .


Rheumatoid arthritis


Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is far less common than OA, but its prevalence rises steeply with age. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I), doctor-diagnosed disease was 11 times higher in 55–64-year-olds than in 25–34-year-olds , while the incidence in the British Norfolk Arthritis Register was six times higher in this age group than in 15–24-year-olds .


Ankylosing spondylitis


Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is usually thought of as a young person’s disease, but diagnosis is often delayed and symptoms tend to persist into later life. Thus, with suboptimal disease control, vocational handicap becomes more common with age.


Osteoporosis


This disease has rarely been studied in the occupational setting, in token of which our search for this review found no relevant hits on risks of osteoporotic fracture in older workers from manual occupations. Nonetheless, the overall 10-year risk of fracture from age 50 is in the order of 7–10%, reflecting the growing propensity to low-trauma osteoporotic fractures at older ages .




The impact of MSDs on work participation at older ages


In this review, health-related ‘work participation’ encompasses various employment-related outcomes, ranging from usual paid work at one extreme to health-related job loss at the other. This last event may take the form of early retirement on health grounds or, in some countries, entitlement to a state-funded disability pension; in between the extremes, patients may remain at work with amended or restricted duties, or diminished productivity (sometimes called ‘presenteeism’); or they may be employed but on sick leave; or they may have lost a job and be unemployed but not yet retired.


Rates of these outcomes fluctuate considerably by time and place. Thus, during 1971–2005, rates of new disability pensioning for MSDs increased >12-fold in similarly aged Swedish women . Across 10 European countries, a large variation exists in the proportion of 50–64-year-olds in paid employment ; among those with self-perceived poor health, odds of health-related retirement were elevated everywhere, but by greater than fourfold in Sweden and Denmark and far less in France and the Netherlands. In the National Health Service, rates of ill-health retirement have varied >10-fold between employing organisations .


Non-medical factors contribute to this variation. Local employment conditions, rules of entitlement and support systems, individuals’ behaviour and preferences all play a role. Thus, higher rates of disability pensioning exist among women living alone, or socially isolated or with limited savings ; ill-health retirement rates peak at times that coincide with enhanced pension entitlements .


Consistently across a large literature, however, age and musculoskeletal health are significant determinants.


As might be expected, long-term work disability strongly relates to age. Thus, for example, all-cause incidence of work disability in Norway rose 4.6-fold over follow-up in those aged 60–62 versus 20–22 years at baseline ; in a Danish national registry, risk of transition from work to disability pension was 2.5 times higher at 50–59 than at 20–29 years ; and in a Dutch cohort, disability pensioning after a decade was approximately eightfold higher in 55–64-year-olds than in those initially aged 18–34 years .


Soft tissue rheumatism and OA


Musculoskeletal complaints commonly underlie reduced work participation. In one systematic review , 25 studies were found on MSDs and disability pensioning, encompassing 58,000 workers. The pooled relative risk (RR) for disability pensioning was elevated two- to threefold in those with MSDs. Among included studies, risks of pensioning were more than doubled in nursing aids with inflammatory disease or frequent LBP , increased 2–3-fold in Danish municipal workers affected by MSDs of hips and knees , and approximately three times more likely in Finnish civil servants with musculoskeletal symptoms relative to other workers. When 24,000 twins from Finland were followed over three decades, disability pensioning due to any MSD occurred in 7.6% of the sample, a third of this ascribed to OA . In Greek nurses, absenteeism attributed to knee pain was ∼12 times more common after ≥45 than at ≤30 years .


Associations with job loss appear to be general to impaired musculoskeletal health, rather than specific to anatomical site or pathology. Thus, disability pensioning has been linked with pain in the low back, hips and knees, as described above , but also after other patterns of regional pain and with arthritis. In 3318 Danish employees followed over 2 years, long-term sick leave, disability retirement, and early retirement pensioning were related to neck or shoulder pain at baseline (RRs ∼1.6–1.9) ; in the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study, odds of disability retirement were increased for those at baseline with a back problem, OA, RA or a history of serious previous injury ( Table 1 ). In the British North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project (NorStOP) study, 25% of employed patients consulting a family doctor with OA had left the workplace 3 years later ; in the five European countries National Health and Wellness Survey, among a sample of mainly middle-aged interviewees, OA was frequently linked with unemployment, absenteeism and presenteeism ; while in the Australian ‘45 and Up’ study, treatment for OA in the previous month carried a twofold higher risk of ill-health retirement .



Table 1

Age-adjusted associations of prevalent disease with incidence of disability retirement in the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study (adapted from Krause et al. ).
























Variable Odds Ratio 95% CI
Serious injury in the past 2.73 1.45–5.15
Osteoarthritis 2.19 1.24–3.86
Rheumatoid arthritis 1.51 0.56–4.03
Back problems 1.60 0.97–2.67


Associations have also been found with a physician’s diagnosis of MSD and with frequently taken analgesia. Thus, in the Finnish twins study, those taking analgesic drugs on >10 days/year were twice as likely to receive an MSD-ascribed disability pension during the subsequent three decades .


Sick leave is a strong predictor of future disability pensioning. In a French cohort of 20,434 utility workers, sick leave of >7 days for an MSD in 1990–92 carried a >3–4.6-fold higher risk of disability pensioning over a 13-year follow-up ; in a population sample of 176,600 Swedes, those with sick leave of >7 days for an MSD in 1985 were 5.7 times more likely than those without to take an MSD-related disability pension in 1991–96 .


Whilst the association between musculoskeletal ill-health and job loss is rather non-specific, more severe or extensive symptoms appear consistently to carry a higher risk of poor employment outcome. For example, in a Norwegian study, the odds of disability pensioning over 14 years rose monotonically with number of painful anatomical sites in the year before baseline, being approximately fourfold higher in those with nine or 10 painful sites ; in another population survey from Norway, long-term disability was 3.5 times more likely in those with generalised pain in the week before baseline than in those with localised LBP ; and among Finnish workers attending occupational health services with upper limb pain, >50% reported reduced productivity at work , the main risk factors among older employees being high pain intensity and pain-related sleep disturbance (odds ratio (OR) 6.0 in the top tertile), rather than diagnosis.


Inflammatory arthritis


In general, RA is a more disabling condition than OA or soft tissue rheumatism, and has a more profound impact on employment. Disability begins early, rises linearly with time and, within 10 years of disease onset, >50% of patients fail to maintain a full-time job . In a large cohort with RA, only 10% remained in employment 30 years after disease onset . Job retention rates were lower in occupations with high physical demands than when work was flexible and self-paced. Similarly, when economically active patients with RA from the Norfolk Arthritis Register were followed for ∼8.6 years, one-third had stopped work for health reasons at a rate 32 times greater than a matched control group .


In outpatients with AS, psoriatic arthropathy and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), enrolled into a national German database, those aged 50–70 years had disability pension rates of 28%, 32% and 61%, respectively, versus 37% for patients with RA . The costs ascribed by the human capital approach to lost work productivity were estimated at 82%, 87% and 145% of those for similarly aged outpatients with RA. Although comparison between diseases of differing age at onset is not straightforward, these findings suggest that inflammatory arthropathies of various kinds can have a substantial career-limiting impact on patients’ ability to work. Further evidence on this comes from Dutch employment data on patients with AS ( Fig. 2 ) . Among those initially in work, the age-, sex-adjusted withdrawal rate over follow-up was three times that in the general population, notably in men with a manual job (elevated 5.2-fold), although still doubled in white-collar occupations .




Fig. 2


Proportion (%) of men in the Dutch population in full-time employment, by age and health status: men with ankylosing spondylitis versus all men (adapted from Boonen et al. ).


Co-morbidities


Workers with MSDs may cope less well if they have concurrent medical problems which otherwise might be compatible with working. In evidence of this, one report found that among patients with arthritis, those who were also clinically depressed were significantly more likely to become work-disabled . Treatment of depression in people with OA lessens their pain intensity and the interference with daily activities of their arthritis , and so perhaps benefits their work participation.




The modifying effect of work activity


Manual employment is clearly associated with risk of disability pension from an MSD. Thus, among 3674 people in the nationally representative Health Survey 2000 in Finland, disability retirement attributed to MSDs was approximately three to six times higher in manual as compared with non-manual occupations . Adjustment for physical working conditions attenuated the socio-economic gradient by almost two-thirds, indicating that these drive much of the relationship.


The authors further explored social differences using longitudinal data on a 10% sample of the Finnish workforce, followed during 1997–2010. Among 55–64-year-olds, disability retirement rates for back disorders were elevated 4.4–6.5-fold in manual versus upper class non-manual workers, 5.0–6.6-fold for arthrosis and 4.8–6.7-fold for all MSDs combined. MSDs accounted for 54–76% of the excess in disability retirement by work status .


Other studies have reached similar conclusions. In one investigation of socioeconomic inequalities in middle-aged men from Malmo, incidence of disability pensioning from MSDs was 3.5-fold higher in blue-collar than in ‘higher-level’ white-collar workers . In a study of 16,000 Finnish twins, work mainly involving lifting and carrying, or described as physically heavy, doubled the long-term risk of an MSD-related disability pension ; in the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study, odds of disability retirement were elevated by a high level of back, neck or overall musculoskeletal strain in employment at baseline, and with very heavy or repetitive work, and work involving a lot of crouching or postural discomfort ( Table 2 ) ; MSD-related disability pensioning was approximately three to four times more common where work involved frequent lifting, regular loading of muscles, working in an uncomfortable position or a heavy physical workload.


Nov 10, 2017 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Ageing, musculoskeletal health and work

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access